FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Proposed new bigbrother spy laws

Jump to newest
 

By *luespartan OP   Man
over a year ago

crawley

Will anyone on hear worry enough to stop visting this site?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lam rockerMan
over a year ago

Tain

just think of the size of computer they'll need!

It'll never happen!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 02/04/12 12:18:07]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Will anyone on hear worry enough to stop visting this site?"

Lets just say that the authorities monitor you for no reason(assuming you're not a terrorist,anarchist etc)

They find you're logging on to fabs,youporn and other similar legal websites.Assuming they they actually give a shit what could they do with the information?. Nothing,absolutely nothing. If people are worried that HM Government may find out they're here then maybe they shouldn't be here in the first place.

The authorities have bigger things to worry about and the interest they have in normal law abiding citizens who haven't been flagged up for some reason is non existent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlMarxMan
over a year ago

Nuneaton

I don't think they'll be able to do much with the information you're worried about. How many british members are there on here, how many log ins and messages are sent each day. So i'm guessing upwards of ten thousand separate pieces of information they'll gather. Who are they gonna pay to trawl through all of that, just to find out that you might be into fucking strangers, which isn't breaking any laws. I'd only worry if you're a paedophile or terrorist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will anyone on hear worry enough to stop visting this site?"

Not a bit. It would give me a warped sense of satisfaction if I discovered my cock was being discussed in the corridors of power.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

with the milllons of things going on here on net all over the world are thay going to be looking at us . lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For anyone who thinks this is a fuss over nothing, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion but may I quote the highly respected The Register tech website.....

.

"Quite apart from legal powers, it's expected that such an ambitious project will cost BILLIONS of pounds to implement, in part because of the large amount of kit that will need to be installed throughout the UK's communications infrastructure to allow GCHQ to copy "on demand" any internet traffic sent in the UK in "real time". It's still unclear how much of the burden will be borne by private-sector entities such as ISPs - who are already required to keep extensive records - AND HOW MUCH BY THE TAXPAYER."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luespartan OP   Man
over a year ago

crawley

So thats a no, Im much of the same opinion, x million million mesaages a day how could they check them all. I guess they will search key words phrases etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"For anyone who thinks this is a fuss over nothing, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion but may I quote the highly respected The Register tech website.....

.

"Quite apart from legal powers, it's expected that such an ambitious project will cost BILLIONS of pounds to implement, in part because of the large amount of kit that will need to be installed throughout the UK's communications infrastructure to allow GCHQ to copy "on demand" any internet traffic sent in the UK in "real time". It's still unclear how much of the burden will be borne by private-sector entities such as ISPs - who are already required to keep extensive records - AND HOW MUCH BY THE TAXPAYER.""

You don't honestly think the govt pay £3,000 for a hammer, or £6,000 for a toilet seat, do you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

..and let's be honest here, who of us wouldn't get a kick out of finding that Cameron and Osbourne were poring over photos of our wives and girlfriends saying, "You seen the norks on this one Dave!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will anyone on hear worry enough to stop visting this site?"

Nope, i have no worries at all, im doing nothing illegal, they would be pretty bored if they were watching me x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"..and let's be honest here, who of us wouldn't get a kick out of finding that Cameron and Osbourne were poring over photos of our wives and girlfriends saying, "You seen the norks on this one Dave!" "

if camormoron or his lapdog clegg ever joined this site they would be the biggest pair of tits on here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Worry?

Not in the slightest.... if they have nothing better to do than perv over us.... well you know!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"For anyone who thinks this is a fuss over nothing, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion but may I quote the highly respected The Register tech website.....

.

"Quite apart from legal powers, it's expected that such an ambitious project will cost BILLIONS of pounds to implement, in part because of the large amount of kit that will need to be installed throughout the UK's communications infrastructure to allow GCHQ to copy "on demand" any internet traffic sent in the UK in "real time". It's still unclear how much of the burden will be borne by private-sector entities such as ISPs - who are already required to keep extensive records - AND HOW MUCH BY THE TAXPAYER."

You don't honestly think the govt pay £3,000 for a hammer, or £6,000 for a toilet seat, do you? "

Lol love that film and quote

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"For anyone who thinks this is a fuss over nothing, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion but may I quote the highly respected The Register tech website.....

.

"Quite apart from legal powers, it's expected that such an ambitious project will cost BILLIONS of pounds to implement, in part because of the large amount of kit that will need to be installed throughout the UK's communications infrastructure to allow GCHQ to copy "on demand" any internet traffic sent in the UK in "real time". It's still unclear how much of the burden will be borne by private-sector entities such as ISPs - who are already required to keep extensive records - AND HOW MUCH BY THE TAXPAYER."

You don't honestly think the govt pay £3,000 for a hammer, or £6,000 for a toilet seat, do you?

Lol love that film and quote "

One of my fave's too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top