Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's a junction near me and it amazes me how many motorists simply do not get what their damn indicators are for. They get so annoyed and upset if you start to cross, they pull out having not indicated, nearly now you down and you start shouting at them I had some stupid bint the other week tell me she "didnt realise" but I don't see what realising has to do with it. Indicators. Goddamn use them. Too stupid to get it, get off the damn road before you kill someone" “stupid bint” haven’t heard that in years | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code." middle lane drivers are the worst, i was on the M6 a while back and the inside lane was empty as far as the eye could see but the middle lane was pretty busy | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too....." Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too..... Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha" How did you guess? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too..... Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha How did you guess?" Audi drivers have special privileges, the highway code doesn’t apply to them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too..... Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha How did you guess? Audi drivers have special privileges, the highway code doesn’t apply to them " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me!" i saw one driver exceeding the speed limit by about 30mph in the heavy rain last week, they must think they’re immortal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code." It's not actually illegal to undertake. The highway codes advises against it, but it is allowed and it's also classed as acceptable in certain situations You will only be penelised if it's deemed reckless | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code." If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, WHATS THE WORST CASE OF IDIOTIC DRIVING YOU"VE WITNESSED?" A driver who overtook on the wrong side of a single carriageway rd at approx 50mph (Approach speed approx 100mph and hit my car head on! Im extremely lucky to be alive!! Before this Id never broken a bone and left me having to be cut out of my car and 5 wks in hospital a number of broken bones and 2 years off work. He walked into A&E and walked out 3 hrs later | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, what’s the worst case of idiotic driving you’ve witnessed?" Im drive for a living so i see most of this routinely . Never ceases to amaze me peoples blatant disregard for self-preservation. I always hope that when natural selection takes its course no one else is hurt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, WHATS THE WORST CASE OF IDIOTIC DRIVING YOU"VE WITNESSED? A driver who overtook on the wrong side of a single carriageway rd at approx 50mph (Approach speed approx 100mph and hit my car head on! Im extremely lucky to be alive!! Before this Id never broken a bone and left me having to be cut out of my car and 5 wks in hospital a number of broken bones and 2 years off work. He walked into A&E and walked out 3 hrs later " Omg sounds horrendous. Hope you're ok now. Always seems to be the innocent party who always comes off the worst in these cases. Was the other driver charged by the police? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code." As so many drivers refuse to use the inside lane, I think that the government show make all motorways into dual carriage ways and cut motorway maintenance costs by a third. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, WHATS THE WORST CASE OF IDIOTIC DRIVING YOU"VE WITNESSED? A driver who overtook on the wrong side of a single carriageway rd at approx 50mph (Approach speed approx 100mph and hit my car head on! Im extremely lucky to be alive!! Before this Id never broken a bone and left me having to be cut out of my car and 5 wks in hospital a number of broken bones and 2 years off work. He walked into A&E and walked out 3 hrs later Omg sounds horrendous. Hope you're ok now. Always seems to be the innocent party who always comes off the worst in these cases. Was the other driver charged by the police? " I am now thanks mate, well as good as you can get with a load of additional metalwork holding me together haha. Yes it went to court and he was found guilty of a relatively new driving offence of causing serious injury by dangerous driving. He was given the max non custodial sentence which is 240 hrs community service, and banded for driving for 3 years. I did a hell of a lot more than 240 hours in hydro and physiotherapy as part of my recovery! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, what’s the worst case of idiotic driving you’ve witnessed?" i saw three acts the other morning on way to work the first car in right hand lane on roundabout missed left turn realised it and cut across traffic to make turn, next a lorry overtaking a tractor going up a hill on a country road | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's people not knowing what they're doing at roundabouts... Wrong lanes, drifting across lanes and no indicators ... " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking " Yes I do read the highway code, it used to be my job to. Yes in certain circumstances a driver may pass on the inside but overtaking on the inside, which is what I was referring to, is not allowed. A fellow caravanner got stopped and cautioned for doing just that. The drivers who blindly stick in the middle lane are now being prosecuted thankfully. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code." Older drivers ? You can tell from the back ? You have time to check ages ? Yep i'm age sensitive and with good reason. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. Older drivers ? You can tell from the back ? You have time to check ages ? Yep i'm age sensitive and with good reason. " There was a time that this was the way it was taught hence the older drivers comment I would think There are also still times when it is acceptable, when the straight on junction is past the 12 o clock of the roundabout. You should always obey the signage however, not how you were taught | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. Older drivers ? You can tell from the back ? You have time to check ages ? Yep i'm age sensitive and with good reason. There was a time that this was the way it was taught hence the older drivers comment I would think There are also still times when it is acceptable, when the straight on junction is past the 12 o clock of the roundabout. You should always obey the signage however, not how you were taught" No. Straight ahead has never been taught as a right indication. I'm sensitive to age comments cos im in the older bracket. Just as im sensitive to 'fucking women drivers' comments. A bad driver is a bad driver. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"some prat on a 125cc I overtook last week. Stupid cunt sped up and had the nerve to call work about my dangerous driving. Trying to say I'm to blame and threatening me with police action. " similar to how i got sacked other week that im glad i was sacked if my own bosses dont have the back bone to believe staff over total strangers i dont wanna earn them money | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, what’s the worst case of idiotic driving you’ve witnessed?" Yes I agree, the risks people are taking these days seem, to me anyway, dangerous and unnecessary. It annoys me because I feel like it's the sensible drivers overcompensating and avoiding collisions and accidents just for the idiots and in the process keeping their bloody insurance from raising. I had a man completely ignore a give way sign, and road markings. If I'd not braked as hard as I did I've have hit him, he just gestured to me and shouted "alright, alright" out of his window. I have a dashcam, front and back on my car and some of the things I catch on there. More recently I've noticed that when I have an obstruction in front of me, parked cars usually, the driver behind me doesn't appear to check it's clear for them to pull out after me. I always make sure I've somewhere to pull over should I need to as I don't have right of way, but the person behind me seems to think it's OK just to automatically follow me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"misuse of highway code is an everyday thing surely " Yes I believe it is for some people. But is it better or worse for the drivers who purposely misuse it as opposed to those who have no idea what they are doing in the first place? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages." This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking " To clarify: ON MOTORWAYS Rule 268 of the Highway Code states – do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake. Perhaps YOU should re read the Highway Code | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking Yes I do read the highway code, it used to be my job to. Yes in certain circumstances a driver may pass on the inside but overtaking on the inside, which is what I was referring to, is not allowed. A fellow caravanner got stopped and cautioned for doing just that. The drivers who blindly stick in the middle lane are now being prosecuted thankfully." Your job was reading the Highway Code? As per message, you can undertake anytime you want, and as I said in message, I spend alot of time in that lane whilst driving a truck, and yes I undertake alot. It's not illegal to undertake if in traffic and the outer lanes are going slower. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking Yes I do read the highway code, it used to be my job to. Yes in certain circumstances a driver may pass on the inside but overtaking on the inside, which is what I was referring to, is not allowed. A fellow caravanner got stopped and cautioned for doing just that. The drivers who blindly stick in the middle lane are now being prosecuted thankfully. Your job was reading the Highway Code? As per message, you can undertake anytime you want, and as I said in message, I spend alot of time in that lane whilst driving a truck, and yes I undertake alot. It's not illegal to undertake if in traffic and the outer lanes are going slower. " Yes it was my job to read the Highway Code, we were tested on it regularly, no need for your comment. ON MOTORWAYS Rule 268 of the Highway Code states – do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking Yes I do read the highway code, it used to be my job to. Yes in certain circumstances a driver may pass on the inside but overtaking on the inside, which is what I was referring to, is not allowed. A fellow caravanner got stopped and cautioned for doing just that. The drivers who blindly stick in the middle lane are now being prosecuted thankfully. Your job was reading the Highway Code? As per message, you can undertake anytime you want, and as I said in message, I spend alot of time in that lane whilst driving a truck, and yes I undertake alot. It's not illegal to undertake if in traffic and the outer lanes are going slower. Yes it was my job to read the Highway Code, we were tested on it regularly, no need for your comment. ON MOTORWAYS Rule 268 of the Highway Code states – do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake." So your agreeing with me. You can undertake anytime you want, see above. I can spend maybe 20 mins (3 junctions on the m6) undertaking and guess what, none of it is illegal! So if middle lane (which is an overtaking lane) is moving at 50mph and the inside lane (the only actual lane on a motorway) is moving at 56mph due to traffic, that means every vehicle in that lane is undertaking legally, it's when you move from the middle lane to the inner lane to perform an undertake, that is illegal. But thanks for keeping agreeing with me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"some prat on a 125cc I overtook last week. Stupid cunt sped up and had the nerve to call work about my dangerous driving. Trying to say I'm to blame and threatening me with police action. similar to how i got sacked other week that im glad i was sacked if my own bosses dont have the back bone to believe staff over total strangers i dont wanna earn them money" Fortunately for me, my boss is a bit of a dude. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've recently bought myself a dash cam.....lol you really don't realise how bad people drive untill you play some of the video back..." All of our works vehicles have these fitted, it's nice when you get people ring up and complain. They play back the video, and never had a chat with HR about it yet I will say they are very good for the most part, as long as you don't become a DCW, but remember, it can also be used against you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me! " ... And of course the opposite. People who don't seem to be able to turn off their fog lights. I've the beginnings of a cataract, and the glare really affects me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. If you read the highway code you would know your allowed to undertake. I do it all the time in the truck. 55mph and sail past! What your not allowed to do is undertake and then straight away move back into a lane thus completing an overtake. But yes, if they are going slower than you, stick in the inside lane, go past and then after 30 seconds I think it is, overtake the truck Remember, there is only one lane on a motorway, the others are just for overtaking Yes I do read the highway code, it used to be my job to. Yes in certain circumstances a driver may pass on the inside but overtaking on the inside, which is what I was referring to, is not allowed. A fellow caravanner got stopped and cautioned for doing just that. The drivers who blindly stick in the middle lane are now being prosecuted thankfully. Your job was reading the Highway Code? As per message, you can undertake anytime you want, and as I said in message, I spend alot of time in that lane whilst driving a truck, and yes I undertake alot. It's not illegal to undertake if in traffic and the outer lanes are going slower. Yes it was my job to read the Highway Code, we were tested on it regularly, no need for your comment. ON MOTORWAYS Rule 268 of the Highway Code states – do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake. So your agreeing with me. You can undertake anytime you want, see above. I can spend maybe 20 mins (3 junctions on the m6) undertaking and guess what, none of it is illegal! So if middle lane (which is an overtaking lane) is moving at 50mph and the inside lane (the only actual lane on a motorway) is moving at 56mph due to traffic, that means every vehicle in that lane is undertaking legally, it's when you move from the middle lane to the inner lane to perform an undertake, that is illegal. But thanks for keeping agreeing with me " It doesn't say anytime you want. But in congested conditions. If traffic is flowing at 55mph,I wouldn't interpret that as congested. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me how some think that using indicators gives them the right of way. . An indicator is a signal of intention. . . You must still give way and not just barge into the next lane. " yeah i see that a lot on the city roads, they just indicate and switch lane without even looking if there’s room. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me how some think that using indicators gives them the right of way. . An indicator is a signal of intention. . . You must still give way and not just barge into the next lane. " Motorways are the worst is indicate and pull out no though to if there is room or making someone sharply brake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me! ... And of course the opposite. People who don't seem to be able to turn off their fog lights. I've the beginnings of a cataract, and the glare really affects me." Fog lights? I thought all cars had 4 headlights!! And no I do not have fog lights! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im sure I read that if you smash some one up the bum it's always your fault , but is this the case if they reverse on to you ??? " If you can prove they brake checked you, it is their fault. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me! ... And of course the opposite. People who don't seem to be able to turn off their fog lights. I've the beginnings of a cataract, and the glare really affects me. Fog lights? I thought all cars had 4 headlights!! And no I do not have fog lights!" Rear ones are a legal requirement, and those are the ones people tend to leave on... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me! i saw one driver exceeding the speed limit by about 30mph in the heavy rain last week, they must think they’re immortal " We use two sets of tyres over here in Europe. I had to adjust from all weather to having summer and winter tyres. When driving with winter tyres on the M25 I realised how much more grip I had in the wet conditions than many other cars. I stuck to 70mph/120kph and was overtaking everyone who were staying in the other lanes. Even with these tyres still see the same reduction in standards. Drivers in expensive cars holding phones. These cars have bluetooth built in!! Not indicating, pulling out forcing you to slow down, German autobahns fighting for space in the fast lane due central lane joggers- don't forget 50% German autobahn have no speed limits!! Yes we have better cars but we are not driving them with due care and attention. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I keep seeing people hogging the middle lane on the motorway/dual carriageway. When I'm towing the caravan I can't pass them (no towing vehicles allowed in lane three) undertaking is also prohibited. Pratts! Also, older drivers always seem to signal right on approach to a roundabout only to go straight ahead. All these drivers need a hard slap with a copy of the highway code. It's not actually illegal to undertake. The highway codes advises against it, but it is allowed and it's also classed as acceptable in certain situations You will only be penelised if it's deemed reckless " Undertaking I hardly saw (ok the weaving driver on the empty Brussels ring road you barge past right when he goes left) however now it is a common sight. Middle lane hoggers are mainly to blame. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was in a standing line of traffic a week ago, car in front brake lights on, so I got out and signaled her to open the window, I simply said "are you sitting with your foot on the brake?" She replied yes I'm sorry, so I said well you're blinding me. Use the bloody hand brake people!!! " Have that all the time in Europe. Standard practice. Plus the fog lights on in the evening!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was in a standing line of traffic a week ago, car in front brake lights on, so I got out and signaled her to open the window, I simply said "are you sitting with your foot on the brake?" She replied yes I'm sorry, so I said well you're blinding me. Use the bloody hand brake people!!! Have that all the time in Europe. Standard practice. Plus the fog lights on in the evening!!" It's the complete lack of consideration for people sitting behind that gets me. In a line of say 10 cars, at least 8 will be sat on the brake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"misuse of highway code is an everyday thing surely Yes I believe it is for some people. But is it better or worse for the drivers who purposely misuse it as opposed to those who have no idea what they are doing in the first place?" lol true but it seems they got through the test somehow | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Slightly off topic, drivers who drive with full beam on when catching you up, or driving on the motorway at night but not dipping their lights when in view. People badly fitting their own bulbs (some bulbs can be fitted upside down). Some headlights are badly aligned after damage. Lights pointing too high when the boot space is overloaded (some lights have a range adjustment). But, the biggest gripe is when you have a bulb out on some cars it makes the other lamps too bright, but lots of cars have a bulb failure warning light, so they are being ignored. VW based cars seem to be set too high as standard? " I used to hate coming up behind cars on my R6, as the headlamp is perfectly positioned to shine in your rear view mirror. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also have a dash cam... Will say I have made the odd mistake driving but nowt major.. Taxi drivers as well grr Will say it's easily done not too have lights on at night in car if u have running day lights as the dash is always ilumanated. In older card dash only illuminated when lights where on. So around town with plenty street lights it's easily done" Stupid design. The old dash design was better. Also some cars have dash lights too bright. Out in the country with full beam on but the dash lights are so bright you're blinded by them and can't see the full beam on the road ahead. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the things that annoys me most is especially relevant in the heavy rains we've just had - drivers not turning their lights on. Most modern cars nowadays have LED all-day running lights on at the front and I think people think they can be seen in all weather conditions with them on, but obviously don't know that their rear lights only turn on when you put your headlights on. Last week I was driving along the motorway in torrential rain doing no more than 50mph when I almost rear-ended one of these clowns as he had no rear lights on. He was in a silver car and almost invisible, but when I got past, his front driving lights were blazing away merrily. Apart from him, 100s of others also had no lights on. Idiots. Why manufacturers can't wire them so that the rear lights are on all the time beats me!" And this!! Really bad at this time of year. People start driving in daylight but don't turn their lights on as it gets to dusk. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. " They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. " The only way it would cause an accident is if the 'frustrated' car driver,let their frustration over one common sense,and did something stupid,unless your driving an emergency services vehicle your journey is no more/less important than any one else's,so calm down and understand you share,not own the road | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. The only way it would cause an accident is if the 'frustrated' car driver,let their frustration over one common sense,and did something stupid,unless your driving an emergency services vehicle your journey is no more/less important than any one else's,so calm down and understand you share,not own the road " Totally agree, all road users should respect the other road users. I was pointing out that frustration caused by inconsiderate use of the road can lead to people doing something they otherwise not do, I am not excusing that, just stating that it happens. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. " Cycle lanes on rural roads? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. Cycle lanes on rural roads?" Yes there are some rural villages and towns exist too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. " Highway code 203 to 225, covers what you need to do when coming up against vulnerable road users. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, what’s the worst case of idiotic driving you’ve witnessed?" I see so much we’d be here till Christmas, absolutely shocking here in the UK | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pretty sure this is nationwide, but there’s a growing trend of drivers taking higher risks when driving, jumping lights when they’ve just changed to red, undertaking, switching lanes without warning, pulling out into oncoming traffic, what’s the worst case of idiotic driving you’ve witnessed?" if people didn't drive in thr outside lanes at inappropriate speeds.. people wouldn't undertake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too..... Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha" You missed out BMW, Mercedes, 4X4, van and taxi drivers, they seem to think the rules don't apply to them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cyclists not using cycle lane and holding up traffic for ages. This had nothing to do with 'misuse of the highway code'. There is absolutely no obligation for a cyclist to use a cycle lane. They should use it if provided out of courtesy to the miles long queue of cars that cannot pass on rural roads, respect for other road users is a two way street, frustrating car drivers who can't pass for ages at 10 mph causes accidents too. The only way it would cause an accident is if the 'frustrated' car driver,let their frustration over one common sense,and did something stupid,unless your driving an emergency services vehicle your journey is no more/less important than any one else's,so calm down and understand you share,not own the road Totally agree, all road users should respect the other road users. I was pointing out that frustration caused by inconsiderate use of the road can lead to people doing something they otherwise not do, I am not excusing that, just stating that it happens." Personally I will not use a cycle lane, as they are not fit for purpose. Too many are littered with broken glass or other debris. It would be nice if cars drivers were more considerate when passing cyclists, seeing as it is law now to give them at least 3 foot of space was overtaking them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've recently bought myself a dash cam.....lol you really don't realise how bad people drive untill you play some of the video back... All of our works vehicles have these fitted, it's nice when you get people ring up and complain. They play back the video, and never had a chat with HR about it yet I will say they are very good for the most part, as long as you don't become a DCW, but remember, it can also be used against you. " What does DCW mean?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've recently bought myself a dash cam.....lol you really don't realise how bad people drive untill you play some of the video back... All of our works vehicles have these fitted, it's nice when you get people ring up and complain. They play back the video, and never had a chat with HR about it yet I will say they are very good for the most part, as long as you don't become a DCW, but remember, it can also be used against you. What does DCW mean??" Dash cam wanker? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've recently bought myself a dash cam.....lol you really don't realise how bad people drive untill you play some of the video back... All of our works vehicles have these fitted, it's nice when you get people ring up and complain. They play back the video, and never had a chat with HR about it yet I will say they are very good for the most part, as long as you don't become a DCW, but remember, it can also be used against you. What does DCW mean?? Dash cam wanker?" No .. warrior.... yes warrior | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are more cars than ever on the road so a decline in driving standards goes hand in hand with that. I drive 25,000 business miles a year and I see examples of poor driving every day. Near where I live there’s a set of traffic lights at a junction. After the junction it goes from two lanes down to one and I really don’t understand why other drivers feel the need to gain a few yards by being in the outside lane immediately before switching lanes. The junction is only busy at peak times so I get why there are two lanes of traffic then. But when there’s hardly another car on the road why? It usually the drivers of particular makes of car too..... Wouldn't be Audi drivers by any chance haha You missed out BMW, Mercedes, 4X4, van and taxi drivers, they seem to think the rules don't apply to them." And weekend grannies usually in an old micra... 17 miles an hour, no indicators ever... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I totally hate it when pedestrians walk into the road at zebra crossings without waiting.... " They don't have to. They have right of way, if they are on a crossing you must stop. They don't need your permission. Obviously in the real world its worth checking to see the idiot car driver has noticed... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I totally hate it when pedestrians walk into the road at zebra crossings without waiting.... They don't have to. They have right of way, if they are on a crossing you must stop. They don't need your permission. Obviously in the real world its worth checking to see the idiot car driver has noticed... " Exactly this. You don't have to wait at a Zebra crossing, but you do have to at a Pelican and a Toucan crossing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |