Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those who seek power in Afghanistan, seek to exploit their own people. We should not hate all Afghans because of this. We should support positive action to support everyday people to live safe and healthy lives. Especially the children." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i walked to school every day in safety before we were there. there was no bloke in pyjamas and a turban threatening to blow me up on the way to school. our troops are there because g.w bush wanted to make a name for himself and blair didn't have the balls to tell him to fuck himself. tell me how some uneducated hick from afghanistan is more of a threat to my safety and liberty then some tracksiut wearing chav with designs on my phone ?? who terrorises who ?? " Home grown criminals should not be confused with international terrorists who will kill you, given the chance, for nothing more than being British. He doesn't even want your phone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i walked to school every day in safety before we were there. there was no bloke in pyjamas and a turban threatening to blow me up on the way to school. our troops are there because g.w bush wanted to make a name for himself and blair didn't have the balls to tell him to fuck himself. tell me how some uneducated hick from afghanistan is more of a threat to my safety and liberty then some tracksiut wearing chav with designs on my phone ?? who terrorises who ?? Home grown criminals should not be confused with international terrorists who will kill you, given the chance, for nothing more than being British. He doesn't even want your phone." the french ressitance would be called insurgents and terrorist if germany had won the war once again are you that dim ??? obviously you are i hope you enjoyed reading the sun on sunday | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have to say I wasn't meaning to go down the whole terrorist route but more towards letting you know that as British soldiers and servicemen and women, compared to the Americans and the rest of the coalition forces there our professionalism is second to none. However, you'd be widely mistaken to think that the job that's happening out there isn't having a positive effect to this countries security and ultimately out safety. It's safe to say that terrorism in all its forms, and there's more to it than just blowing things up, is completely different to the "Chav" eyeing up someone's phone. " then why aren't we sending drones and bombs to northern ireland ? as far as i remember they are a bigger threat to us than anyone else | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have to say I wasn't meaning to go down the whole terrorist route but more towards letting you know that as British soldiers and servicemen and women, compared to the Americans and the rest of the coalition forces there our professionalism is second to none. However, you'd be widely mistaken to think that the job that's happening out there isn't having a positive effect to this countries security and ultimately out safety. It's safe to say that terrorism in all its forms, and there's more to it than just blowing things up, is completely different to the "Chav" eyeing up someone's phone. " My brother-i-l has served in both Iraq and Afghanistan and what you say is quite true. I remember having a chat with him some time ago when the big news of the day was how ill-equipped our forces are and he chuckled at what was being printed in the popular press. He went on to say that the British Army doesn't need - or want - a mobile McDonalds and that our forces out there have every they need to get the job done. I tried to argue with him that armoured carriers were not offering enough protection and were being retrofitted etc and he said, "How much armour does a vehicle need to make it impregnable to any sort of roadside bomb yet still driveable in rough terrain?" He added that they didn't have much use for a lump of metal that nobody could damage with a bomb if they couldn't drive it anywhere. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There really is no need for this bickering...if you can't debate like adults then don't post." do i not have freedom of speach like the rest on here ??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There really is no need for this bickering...if you can't debate like adults then don't post. do i not have freedom of speach like the rest on here ???" Yes you do, but the freedom to insult...no! read the forum rules! kat | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There really is no need for this bickering...if you can't debate like adults then don't post. do i not have freedom of speach like the rest on here ??? Yes you do, but the freedom to insult...no! read the forum rules! kat " so it's fine to insult my intelligence ??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There really is no need for this bickering...if you can't debate like adults then don't post. do i not have freedom of speach like the rest on here ???" You just look like you are spoiling for a row. Read the rules, stick to them and you can carry on posting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"America was against the last Falklands war unlikely they would support us if there was a next time." Actually the US tried to mediate a peaceful resolution to the conflict, that included an immediate withdrawal from the islands by the Argentinians. When the Argentinians turned their back on this proposal the US Congress passed a resolution for the US to offer military support, in the form of logistics and arms for Britain. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"America was against the last Falklands war unlikely they would support us if there was a next time. Actually the US tried to mediate a peaceful resolution to the conflict, that included an immediate withdrawal from the islands by the Argentinians. When the Argentinians turned their back on this proposal the US Congress passed a resolution for the US to offer military support, in the form of logistics and arms for Britain." Because the relationship between the UK & the US (no, not the 'special' one) meant more to the US than any agreement they had with South American nations. America needs British support when the US commits US forces to campaigns in this part of the world. Brazil & Argentina will never send a flotilla of warships and a couple of hundred thousand troops in place of the British forces America relies upon. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |