Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When searching profiles id like to see where you can enter a word relating to what your after . This could be in statuses wording " Eg...ABFABS or Rimming | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Advantage search “interested in”" Advanced Search excuse Autocarrot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't be lazy...." Always one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When searching profiles id like to see where you can enter a word relating to what your after . This could be in statuses wording This is a very disapointing websight and I have made surgestions to change and modernise the entire format and layout. They don't change anything." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When searching profiles id like to see where you can enter a word relating to what your after . This could be in statuses wording Eg...ABFABS or Rimming" Or Beetroot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For everyone on here to take it seriously. It’s not a joke you know. " God bet your a bundle of fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd love the owners to publish a list of improvements they're planning or thinking of implementing, so that users could A. give their prioritised feedback ranking and B. have more of a clue about what's coming. The downside for fab - it would alert competitors. As they are so poor, they probably don't stand any chance of ever being approaching a 1/10 as good as fab, even if they were to know that fab was going to introduce, for example, search by body type, or words of interest etc." They did a couple of questionnaires last year but I didn't see any results published. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |