Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"She did the crime, she pays the fine " Is it really a crime? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Litter is litter. Add that fag butt to every day she smokes there, it builds up." £150 is steep though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"She did the crime, she pays the fine Is it really a crime? " Littering is, which is technically what she's done. I'd feel hard done by if it was me but I can see both sides of this one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah I got one but it’s one of the things like the car park ones. I didn’t pay it and nothing happened. Don’t think they have much authority tbh " No that's my understanding too. Is civil and not criminal. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"She did the crime, she pays the fine Is it really a crime? Littering is, which is technically what she's done. I'd feel hard done by if it was me but I can see both sides of this one. " The reason I thought it was unfair is because she apologised and picked it up to try and find a bin but he still fined her. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Litter is litter. Add that fag butt to every day she smokes there, it builds up. £150 is steep though. " It is a strong deterrent, she probably will think twice about doing it again. Litter in your home area is said to reduce the value of your home around 11%. Litter gets under my skin personally, I was taught never to drop litter, that standard stuck with me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " I wonder how many other smokes she's discarded on the floor in her time? Seems harsh given what else goes on but aah, tuff luck. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit." She was smoking a roll up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not." But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not. But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. " She only picked it up at the threat of a fine. The fine will teach her not to do it again. Fag butts stink. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not. But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. She only picked it up at the threat of a fine. The fine will teach her not to do it again. Fag butts stink." So do car fumes so let's ban them too! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. " What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not. But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. " But I bet everybody who gets caught does that. So if they let everyone off with a warning, that's no deterrent at all and no fines would be issued,ever,unless they follow people about hoping they'll reoffend. I do get why you think it's harsh though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not. But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. She only picked it up at the threat of a fine. The fine will teach her not to do it again. Fag butts stink. So do car fumes so let's ban them too! " They are trying, hence electric cars | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does it matter if it's in a flower bed or on the pavement it's still litter. And some people say it's only a fag butt but it's the same as a sweet wrapper or crisp packed if you saw someone dropping those would you see it as socially acceptable as a fag probably not. But she picked it up and was still fined. I just think it was harsh. " The fact that she then made an effort to pick it up after the bad action was pointed out to her just shows that she could have chosen to do that in the first place. A high price to pay, yes, but zero sympathy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again" I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. " So you think what she done was ok? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. " I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. " I think that says more about how the judicial system and arguably society at large view speeding more than anything else | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? " I didn't say that! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter" But it is still an issue, and should be dealt with accordingly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument." But you could have killed someone! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. " For a speeding fine you get to pay a £100 only once in three years, otherwise the penalty is way higher. How many times has this woman dropped a fag end at her convenience for somebody else to clear up when she should have done it herself? I'd put money on it being way more that once in three years. Smokers do not have a god-given right to drop litter. They should bloody well learn that, even if it's the hard way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! " So you think what she done was wrong? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! So you think what she done was wrong? " I didn't say that either! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. For a speeding fine you get to pay a £100 only once in three years, otherwise the penalty is way higher. How many times has this woman dropped a fag end at her convenience for somebody else to clear up when she should have done it herself? I'd put money on it being way more that once in three years. Smokers do not have a god-given right to drop litter. They should bloody well learn that, even if it's the hard way." May I point out it's not just smokers that litter! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter" That's what they call what-about-ism. There may be more pressing matters in the world but it's still an issue and one the smokers themselves can easily fix. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter But it is still an issue, and should be dealt with accordingly." jobsworths all of em like ticket muppets | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Littering is an offence. Councils enforce it though there are no specific regs as to the levels of fines - this is down to individual councils. Police in certain circumstances enforce it too. £150 seems a bit steep as most councils I've seen impose fines of around £50. But fag butts are as much a nuisance as chewing gum, paper, crisp packets, discarded food containers & wrapping (with or without food in them) and so on. Littering is laziness; authorities supply bins, but people are too bone idle to activate their brain cells and think!" That's my point I think the fine is too steep not that it shouldn't be enforced. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! " I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! So you think what she done was wrong? I didn't say that either! " Well if you can’t see that she done wrong there’s no point me going any further... I’m guessing it won’t be long till you get a similar fine.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. " The thing is, the fine could be £1000000000 and I'd be fine with that. Why? Because it is a deterrent. If she had not been caught (I'm not a fan of the predatory behaviour of the enforcement officers though) she would not have been sorry and gone on about her day. Likely to litter again with things other that a butt. Its a tricky thing to balance. Too low and people don't give a shit. Too high and people bitch about excessive. Excessive? Just don't drop litter anywhere but in a bin. Nobody forced you to drop litter, therfore you can avoid getting a fine easily. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter But it is still an issue, and should be dealt with accordingly.jobsworths all of em like ticket muppets" You wouldn't be saying that if you couldn't park your car, or got blocked in by people being able to park with no consequences, or people tossing litter on your doorstop. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. " Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. " If it had a filter.. then he has her. Filters are a nightmare to wildlife and an eye sore till they're physically removed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. " And I disagree, repeatedly it seems | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! So you think what she done was wrong? I didn't say that either! Well if you can’t see that she done wrong there’s no point me going any further... I’m guessing it won’t be long till you get a similar fine.. " What a ridiculous thing to say, what are you talking about? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems " Don't you roll your eyes at me lady. You sought opinions, mine is valid, other people agree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter But it is still an issue, and should be dealt with accordingly.jobsworths all of em like ticket muppets You wouldn't be saying that if you couldn't park your car, or got blocked in by people being able to park with no consequences, or people tossing litter on your doorstop." as for rubbish spent years on an estate with smack rats and bog rats dropping there crisps in my yard just picked it up and put it in a bin then put the bin in the front yard got less litter as for parking been on many hospital trips unable to park shit happens | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. For a speeding fine you get to pay a £100 only once in three years, otherwise the penalty is way higher. How many times has this woman dropped a fag end at her convenience for somebody else to clear up when she should have done it herself? I'd put money on it being way more that once in three years. Smokers do not have a god-given right to drop litter. They should bloody well learn that, even if it's the hard way. May I point out it's not just smokers that litter! " Very true, and I'm an equal-opportunities anti-litterer. Fine the whole bloody lot of them, I say. It's completely avoidable in most circumstances. It's just that as far as I can see smokers are incredibly prolific with their littering because they think it is perfectly acceptable. It's a cultural thing. I don't regularly see people who eat crisps or drink from cans thinking they can just chuck their rubbish on the ground. Some do, certainly, and if that was a regular thing with I'd be just as angry at them. The culture of smokers littering should be stamped out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems Don't you roll your eyes at me lady. You sought opinions, mine is valid, other people agree." As is mine and I chose to roll my eyes. Don't be so condescending! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It only becomes litter of it is dropped on the floor and you walk away from it " That was my understanding too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! So you think what she done was wrong? I didn't say that either! Well if you can’t see that she done wrong there’s no point me going any further... I’m guessing it won’t be long till you get a similar fine.. What a ridiculous thing to say, what are you talking about? " I reread and it all makes sense to someone who dislikes littering.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " I don't think it's right to drop ciggarett butts. But "environment enforcement officers" are dubious and I personally might be incline not to stop when they talk to me. If I jogged away before they handed me paper I don't think they could actually fine me or start a hot persute. It's not like the parking pricks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Much bigger issues on the streets than litter But it is still an issue, and should be dealt with accordingly.jobsworths all of em like ticket muppets" Bit unfair that. Everyone has a role in life. You may not like it, but these people are doing a job, but not necessarily being on dole, taking hangouts etc. I did a few months as as a Traffic Warden a few years ago. I liked to think I was fair, eg, allowing delivery drivers a few extra minutes here and there to allow them to keep to schedule. But it was the abuse I had to endure, both physical and mental that forced me out. It's a lack of respect regardless of any role in society. Calling someone a Jobsworth Muppet is an extension of disrespect just for doing their job. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " It’s a filthy habit, if it helps her to quit then good on him | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced!" I agree and I haven't once said the fine was wrong just the amount. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems Don't you roll your eyes at me lady. You sought opinions, mine is valid, other people agree. As is mine and I chose to roll my eyes. Don't be so condescending! " Rolling your eyes at a comment is being condescending. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced!" By who? They aren't the police. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. So you think what she done was ok? I didn't say that! So you think what she done was wrong? I didn't say that either! Well if you can’t see that she done wrong there’s no point me going any further... I’m guessing it won’t be long till you get a similar fine.. What a ridiculous thing to say, what are you talking about? I reread and it all makes sense to someone who dislikes littering.. " I dislike littering and you suggesting I'm likely to fine is ridiculous. At no point did I say what she did was OK, I said I thought the fine was too steep. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ?" Rolling paper and tobacco disintegrate and degrade very quickly. Cigarettes use different papers, and all have filters that dont degrade and it's that what you're all mainly seeing on streets as litter. Rollups with filters are same problem. I dont use them.. my "littering" if I were to do it.. would disappear by itself in a days time. Why should I be slammed for that..? If someone who spilt fizzy pop all over the street isn't fined for littering? Or dropping a burger on the floor? Are people fined for spitting in street? Throwing up after a heavy night out on way back home? It may sound pretty to you and others. I'm all for a bit of proportionate justice though and I'm argumentative | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems Don't you roll your eyes at me lady. You sought opinions, mine is valid, other people agree. As is mine and I chose to roll my eyes. Don't be so condescending! Rolling your eyes at a comment is being condescending." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ? Rolling paper and tobacco disintegrate and degrade very quickly. Cigarettes use different papers, and all have filters that dont degrade and it's that what you're all mainly seeing on streets as litter. Rollups with filters are same problem. I dont use them.. my "littering" if I were to do it.. would disappear by itself in a days time. Why should I be slammed for that..? If someone who spilt fizzy pop all over the street isn't fined for littering? Or dropping a burger on the floor? Are people fined for spitting in street? Throwing up after a heavy night out on way back home? It may sound pretty to you and others. I'm all for a bit of proportionate justice though and I'm argumentative " chewing gum is the worst | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced! I agree and I haven't once said the fine was wrong just the amount. " I'll partially agree with you there. If there were three times the amount of fines dished out, therefore teaching more people, I would be happy if it were £50. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no excuse for littering. Was the five too much? I dunno but I bet it will put her off doing it again I really feel it was especially when you get fined less for speeding and have the option to go an education course. I didn't get the option of a speed awareness course, so paid the fine and the increased insurance premiums for years. I was speeding, I was in the wrong, no argument. But you could have killed someone! I know, but I was responding to your comment comparing speeding to a fag being dropped. I broke the law, I didn't try and wriggle out of it, nor would I have done if I had been caught littering the environment. Yes but my point was its not even comparable but the fines are similar. I think the fine was far too steep not unjustified. And I disagree, repeatedly it seems Don't you roll your eyes at me lady. You sought opinions, mine is valid, other people agree. As is mine and I chose to roll my eyes. Don't be so condescending! Rolling your eyes at a comment is being condescending. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? It’s a filthy habit, if it helps her to quit then good on him " There are loads of filthy habits out there though that don't receive the same level of scrutiny and judgement. It's an addiction. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yup, it's unsightly and not good for the environment. Behave responsibly and there's no problem and no fine. " I agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i find it perfectly acceptable to fine her, I put my rubbish in a bin so why couldn’t she? You can bet she won’t do it again though, so job done " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced! I agree and I haven't once said the fine was wrong just the amount. " But that's the thing, as I said somewhere above. If it's too low people don't care anyway. If you don't want a fine, don't take the risk and drop litter - regardless of it being actual litter or not. It's a simple task of finding a bin. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? It’s a filthy habit, if it helps her to quit then good on him There are loads of filthy habits out there though that don't receive the same level of scrutiny and judgement. It's an addiction. " proportion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced! I agree and I haven't once said the fine was wrong just the amount. I'll partially agree with you there. If there were three times the amount of fines dished out, therefore teaching more people, I would be happy if it were £50." Yes and I wouldnt mind if the money gained in fines was used to have more litter bins, street cleaners ect but I doubt it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fine is maybe a bit steep in comparison to more serious crimes. But honestly, it's nice to here it being enforced! I agree and I haven't once said the fine was wrong just the amount. But that's the thing, as I said somewhere above. If it's too low people don't care anyway. If you don't want a fine, don't take the risk and drop litter - regardless of it being actual litter or not. It's a simple task of finding a bin. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ? Rolling paper and tobacco disintegrate and degrade very quickly. Cigarettes use different papers, and all have filters that dont degrade and it's that what you're all mainly seeing on streets as litter. Rollups with filters are same problem. I dont use them.. my "littering" if I were to do it.. would disappear by itself in a days time. Why should I be slammed for that..? If someone who spilt fizzy pop all over the street isn't fined for littering? Or dropping a burger on the floor? Are people fined for spitting in street? Throwing up after a heavy night out on way back home? It may sound pretty to you and others. I'm all for a bit of proportionate justice though and I'm argumentative " Not you specifically but the genpop won't see it that way, they won't make the distinction between what is harmful or not. So they will just throw whatever, if one is acceptable most people will then condition there mind to slow believe what is comfortable and just drop litter regardless. Im starting to ramble there, when what I should just say is that it's just good practice to correctly dispose of all rubbish and trash to avoid any uncertainty. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ? Rolling paper and tobacco disintegrate and degrade very quickly. Cigarettes use different papers, and all have filters that dont degrade and it's that what you're all mainly seeing on streets as litter. Rollups with filters are same problem. I dont use them.. my "littering" if I were to do it.. would disappear by itself in a days time. Why should I be slammed for that..? If someone who spilt fizzy pop all over the street isn't fined for littering? Or dropping a burger on the floor? Are people fined for spitting in street? Throwing up after a heavy night out on way back home? It may sound pretty to you and others. I'm all for a bit of proportionate justice though and I'm argumentative Not you specifically but the genpop won't see it that way, they won't make the distinction between what is harmful or not. So they will just throw whatever, if one is acceptable most people will then condition there mind to slow believe what is comfortable and just drop litter regardless. Im starting to ramble there, when what I should just say is that it's just good practice to correctly dispose of all rubbish and trash to avoid any uncertainty. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"it's because the filters in straight cigarettes dont biodegrade very well. I smoke rollups without a filter, so would seriously argue the toss. Litter is litter.. if it degrades quickly in a drop of rain.. no.. a £150 fine is grossly excessive.. If it's got non-biodegradable parts to it.. plastic.. gum.. etc. Then yes.. slap em with it. I dont want to see birds choking on filters or crisp packets and drinks bottles cluttering up the place. If I got a £150 fine for dropping a fikterless rollup on the floor.. I'd be livid. As it happens, I flick them down a drain or put the butts in the bin usually. Out of habit. She was smoking a roll up. What's the difference it's still litter that someone has to clean up or it stays there and builds up Would you leave a fab butt or roll up ? Rolling paper and tobacco disintegrate and degrade very quickly. Cigarettes use different papers, and all have filters that dont degrade and it's that what you're all mainly seeing on streets as litter. Rollups with filters are same problem. I dont use them.. my "littering" if I were to do it.. would disappear by itself in a days time. Why should I be slammed for that..? If someone who spilt fizzy pop all over the street isn't fined for littering? Or dropping a burger on the floor? Are people fined for spitting in street? Throwing up after a heavy night out on way back home? It may sound pretty to you and others. I'm all for a bit of proportionate justice though and I'm argumentative Not you specifically but the genpop won't see it that way, they won't make the distinction between what is harmful or not. So they will just throw whatever, if one is acceptable most people will then condition there mind to slow believe what is comfortable and just drop litter regardless. Im starting to ramble there, when what I should just say is that it's just good practice to correctly dispose of all rubbish and trash to avoid any uncertainty. " Which I do.. habit of non littering in general carrys through to smoking. I'm just paying devils advocate to the absolutists | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also I thought it was £70 if paid in a certain time limit? They must have upped it!!" People have PM'd and told me about their fines and they all seem to be between £50 and £85. That is what I would have expected and deemed reasonably but £150! But it was London! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also I thought it was £70 if paid in a certain time limit? They must have upped it!! People have PM'd and told me about their fines and they all seem to be between £50 and £85. That is what I would have expected and deemed reasonably but £150! But it was London! " Everything's more expensive in London. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " where was this ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I must congratulate you, OP, on starting such an emotive thread! You'll probably reach the magic 175 within two hours of posting!" I really didn't think people would get so emotional about. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also I thought it was £70 if paid in a certain time limit? They must have upped it!! People have PM'd and told me about their fines and they all seem to be between £50 and £85. That is what I would have expected and deemed reasonably but £150! But it was London! Everything's more expensive in London." Tell me about it! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? where was this ?" London. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also I thought it was £70 if paid in a certain time limit? They must have upped it!! People have PM'd and told me about their fines and they all seem to be between £50 and £85. That is what I would have expected and deemed reasonably but £150! But it was London! " it must differ between councils. £150 straight away is very steep. They should signpost it more really! That would stop some people doing it too. But, as someone has said it's nice to hear that it's being enforced anyway! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " I don't like the use of fines to enforce, it's an Americanism but I'm sick of litter bugs so if fining works I'm all for it adults are just as bad as kids but are they dealing with the Macdonald food litter culture? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also I thought it was £70 if paid in a certain time limit? They must have upped it!! People have PM'd and told me about their fines and they all seem to be between £50 and £85. That is what I would have expected and deemed reasonably but £150! But it was London! it must differ between councils. £150 straight away is very steep. They should signpost it more really! That would stop some people doing it too. But, as someone has said it's nice to hear that it's being enforced anyway!" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"£150 is not nearly enough . Didn’t Singapore go from one of the dirtiest cities to one of the cleanest in the world due to people being fined for littering ? We need a similar approach in the uk. Our local town is a disgrace due to this. " I have heard it's illegal to take gum into Singapore. Like yourself, I'm in Warwick, working Nights. Council personnel are round the town centre as early as 6am, sweeping the streets. We used to have a cigarette butt bin outside our premises, but oddly, we had to remove it as it could deemed a danger to partially sighted people. You can't win! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? I don't like the use of fines to enforce, it's an Americanism but I'm sick of litter bugs so if fining works I'm all for it adults are just as bad as kids but are they dealing with the Macdonald food litter culture? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? " Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"They have to make it a £150 fine, because stocks are now illegal. Think she should also get her picture on billboards as a littering." Ooooo, I like the idea of stocks. Can’t think why. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth." This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. " The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Didn’t Singapore go from one of the dirtiest cities to one of the cleanest in the world due to people being fined for littering ? Indeed it was I have heard it's illegal to take gum into Singapore " Correct! Gum and chewing gum is banned in Singapore | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.." No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.." I am not against smokers, but I do consider fag butts as litter, so does the law. The law says drop litter and you get fined. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. I am not against smokers, but I do consider fag butts as litter, so does the law. The law says drop litter and you get fined." At no point have I said its not litter. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. I am not against smokers, but I do consider fag butts as litter, so does the law. The law says drop litter and you get fined. At no point have I said its not litter. " I never said you you did. Your opening thread was that you felt it was unreasonable as it was only a roll up fag butt. I, and many disagreed that the fine should stand for a fag butt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! " At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Didn’t Singapore go from one of the dirtiest cities to one of the cleanest in the world due to people being fined for littering ? Indeed it was I have heard it's illegal to take gum into Singapore Correct! Gum and chewing gum is banned in Singapore " especially if you stick it on the bottom of your shoes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. " Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. " Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. " If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" £150 seems excessive but I bet she never does it again. " I bet she does, but makes sure no one's watching. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! " When I asked “So do you think what she did was wrong?” You replied.. “I didn’t say that” It’s a good thing that you’re now saying what she did was wrong.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! When I asked “So do you think what she did was wrong?” You replied.. “I didn’t say that” It’s a good thing that you’re now saying what she did was wrong.. " I didn't say it was right or wrong, I was asking about the fine. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! When I asked “So do you think what she did was wrong?” You replied.. “I didn’t say that” It’s a good thing that you’re now saying what she did was wrong.. I didn't say it was right or wrong, I was asking about the fine. " Surely now you see it as wrong? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! When I asked “So do you think what she did was wrong?” You replied.. “I didn’t say that” It’s a good thing that you’re now saying what she did was wrong.. I didn't say it was right or wrong, I was asking about the fine. Surely now you see it as wrong? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So today myself and Ash where stood at a bus stop and saw a lady being fined by a street environment enforcement officer. The fag but had bearly been discarded when he pounced and gave her an on the spot £150 fine! She didn't drop it on the floor but extinguished it on the wall and flicked it on to a mud verge of a flower bed. Personally I feel this fine was excessive, what do you think? Oh eck. You pressed a button there. Off I go.... Fag butts are litter. Bloody things everywhere. Smoking is so antisocial, polluting, a health hazard to others and a litter menace. It’s rare to see someone actually get fined for it. I’d charge double. Hate smoking. Rant endeth. This is my point its because it was a fag butt, if I'd said it was a sandwich wrapper people wouldn't have used the thread to have a dig at smokers. I don't disagree that it's litter, I don't think it shouldn't be enforced, I do think £150 is to steep. The thread is about a cigarette butt.. moral of the thread, don’t litter your cigarette butts.. No the thread is about a £150 fine! And actually the moral of the story is don't litter! At last, we are basically agreeing on the same thing.. Yes but I was able to do it without casting aspersions. Not quite, you couldn’t say what she done was wrong for a bit until you saw sense.. If you read the whole thread you will see you are very wrong! When I asked “So do you think what she did was wrong?” You replied.. “I didn’t say that” It’s a good thing that you’re now saying what she did was wrong.. I didn't say it was right or wrong, I was asking about the fine. Surely now you see it as wrong? " Hopefully with time you will.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"She did the crime, she pays the fine Is it really a crime? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ?" No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. " You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost." Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. " Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. " Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me." I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me. I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. " Thinking about it I didn't see him ask her for any ID so she could have easily given false details. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. " Your argument is as valid as me going to a store and when arriving at the checkout saying, well the prices for these groceries are outrageous, they should be 66% off. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. Your argument is as valid as me going to a store and when arriving at the checkout saying, well the prices for these groceries are outrageous, they should be 66% off." No that really isn't the same thing! That doesn't even make sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. Your argument is as valid as me going to a store and when arriving at the checkout saying, well the prices for these groceries are outrageous, they should be 66% off. No that really isn't the same thing! That doesn't even make sense. " And arguing the fine does? Why? Because depsite you're in the wrong you don't want to deal with the consequences? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. Your argument is as valid as me going to a store and when arriving at the checkout saying, well the prices for these groceries are outrageous, they should be 66% off. No that really isn't the same thing! That doesn't even make sense. And arguing the fine does? Why? Because depsite you're in the wrong you don't want to deal with the consequences?" Yes she should have picked it up but I don't feel the "crime" fits the punishment. £50 would make most people think twice despite what you think £150 could but some people is really hardship. I'm allowed an opinion and disagree with things, I disagree with it and that's my progative. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm struggling to see any smart reason from the opposition side, you would rather live in a dump tripping over trash as you walk around ? No one is opposing the fine, just the amount. You do realise the amount is doing the exact thing it was intended to do? The very reason you're arguing that it's too high means that it's doing the job it was meant to do. If it was any less people wouldn't think twice about it and surely chance it again. It literally worked perfectly considering how upset people are about the cost. Yes they would! Someone in this thread said they got fined £80 and never has or would do it again. Not sure about you but most people would think twice at £50 as that's a lot of money to loose for many. Never has or would do it again, that is literally a single persons opnion which also isn;t a fact btw. And where is the research to support your statement of "most people would think twice at $50"? I would 100% argue that's not the case and that most people would just assume they'll never get caught again. Not to mention if you're already wasting so much money on smoking what's another $50 for you. Well I wish £50 was not much but you live in a different world to me then. I really don't understand why people don't so upset that others dare to have a different opinion. Your argument is as valid as me going to a store and when arriving at the checkout saying, well the prices for these groceries are outrageous, they should be 66% off. No that really isn't the same thing! That doesn't even make sense. And arguing the fine does? Why? Because depsite you're in the wrong you don't want to deal with the consequences? Yes she should have picked it up but I don't feel the "crime" fits the punishment. £50 would make most people think twice despite what you think £150 could but some people is really hardship. I'm allowed an opinion and disagree with things, I disagree with it and that's my progative. " Plus I wasn't in the wrong so no consequences to deal with! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me. I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. " you get 14days to pay then it doubles they check your details on the electrol role | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well I'm glad the offenders are not the ones who get to choose their own punishment then. I'm pretty sure the $150 wasn't just the first thought that came to their mind when deciding on it. "Previously, fines have ranged from £50 to £80, with a default level of £75 of the council does not set its own amount. However, it has been announced that maximum fines for litter louts are set to double to £150. The default fine will go up to £100, with the minimum penalty increasing to £65" To me this indicates that people weren't deterred enough at smaller fines hence the increase. " Or councils are skinkt and its a money making exercise. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me. I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. you get 14days to pay then it doubles they check your details on the electrol role" OK but what stops someone giving false details in the first place. He didn't appear to look at a tablet/phone or call anyone to check her identity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well I'm glad the offenders are not the ones who get to choose their own punishment then. I'm pretty sure the $150 wasn't just the first thought that came to their mind when deciding on it. "Previously, fines have ranged from £50 to £80, with a default level of £75 of the council does not set its own amount. However, it has been announced that maximum fines for litter louts are set to double to £150. The default fine will go up to £100, with the minimum penalty increasing to £65" To me this indicates that people weren't deterred enough at smaller fines hence the increase. Or councils are skinkt and its a money making exercise. " Burglars should have reduced sentences since the times are tough too. And if they put back all the things stolen, they should really just get off with a warning. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me. I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. you get 14days to pay then it doubles they check your details on the electrol role" . So it could go up to £300! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well I'm glad the offenders are not the ones who get to choose their own punishment then. I'm pretty sure the $150 wasn't just the first thought that came to their mind when deciding on it. "Previously, fines have ranged from £50 to £80, with a default level of £75 of the council does not set its own amount. However, it has been announced that maximum fines for litter louts are set to double to £150. The default fine will go up to £100, with the minimum penalty increasing to £65" To me this indicates that people weren't deterred enough at smaller fines hence the increase. Or councils are skinkt and its a money making exercise. Burglars should have reduced sentences since the times are tough too. And if they put back all the things stolen, they should really just get off with a warning." You are just being ridiculous now! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do they actually extract the money from you? How do they manage to stop you in your tracks and force you to give them your details? Genuine question, because they wouldn't be getting anything from me. I'm not sure to be honest. The lady today gave her details, name address ect. I'm not sure what would happen if she refused. you get 14days to pay then it doubles they check your details on the electrol role" But they wouldn't have my details. I wouldn't speak to them. I wouldn't even stop walking. They cannot detain you. They can follow you, but an hour long walk through a city centre going through every packed out shop might well deter them. They don't have to target that many a day to meet their quota. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're labouring your point of the fine being too steep. They should make the fine even bigger. The point of a steep fine is to deter, is it not? She was not deterred by the potential fine and chose to litter anyway. Perhaps if she knew she could get a £300 fine, she'd find the bin." that logic of course doesn't work...... Example....... Speeding, speed cameras and fines | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're labouring your point of the fine being too steep. They should make the fine even bigger. The point of a steep fine is to deter, is it not? She was not deterred by the potential fine and chose to litter anyway. Perhaps if she knew she could get a £300 fine, she'd find the bin.that logic of course doesn't work...... Example....... Speeding, speed cameras and fines " Of course it does. I can't afford the fine for speeding, so I don't speed. It's pretty straightforward really. The same as I can't afford £150 for dropping my crap on the floor, so I bin it or take it home with me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're labouring your point of the fine being too steep. They should make the fine even bigger. The point of a steep fine is to deter, is it not? She was not deterred by the potential fine and chose to litter anyway. Perhaps if she knew she could get a £300 fine, she'd find the bin.that logic of course doesn't work...... Example....... Speeding, speed cameras and fines Of course it does. I can't afford the fine for speeding, so I don't speed. It's pretty straightforward really. The same as I can't afford £150 for dropping my crap on the floor, so I bin it or take it home with me. " ahhhh but most people aren't deterred they carry on speeding lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I got done for this five or six years ago. Was in business in Liverpool and flicked a ciggy out the window. Turns out the police were behind me and sent me a letter in the post. I didn’t even know it was littering at the time " didn't know chucking stuff out of your car was littering lol! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're labouring your point of the fine being too steep. They should make the fine even bigger. The point of a steep fine is to deter, is it not? She was not deterred by the potential fine and chose to litter anyway. Perhaps if she knew she could get a £300 fine, she'd find the bin.that logic of course doesn't work...... Example....... Speeding, speed cameras and fines Of course it does. I can't afford the fine for speeding, so I don't speed. It's pretty straightforward really. The same as I can't afford £150 for dropping my crap on the floor, so I bin it or take it home with me. ahhhh but most people aren't deterred they carry on speeding lol " the fines exist to pay for the police traffic officers and the litter pickers hopefully it will stop people but for some it's a mentality a bad habit that's becoming engrained, they see the bin and still drop it on floor, Macdonalds a prime example get their food eat it leave leftovers everywhere, drive through eat in car wind window down drop it out, the beaches littered with drinks bottles / drink cans tissues, no respect for the place they live in, sad really it's an epidemic | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |