Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Emily Pankhurst would be so proud if she could see all the weak, under the thumb men now." lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() And accomodate x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() Haha yeah, in their huge, luxury pad overlooking a lake ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Kicking out all the horrible men who ruin it for everyone would be a start and would definitely even it up. Theres probably around the same number of polite, respectful men here as there is couples. Numbers will be more even, the site would be less hassle and everyone's happy " nobody ever ruined awt for me exept me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() Yacht moored up next to their private jet x ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In liverpool ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Girls can dream x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ever seen the footballers houses in Formby? Wow!! Stunning ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() you know John Travolta can I come with you next time you visit? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Perfect ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() as it happens yes i have lol not too long back | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So yes then, in Liverpool ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously? The one major change that would potentially level the playing field would be if a lot of men changed their attitude, approach and expectations of the site. Yes it would initially create more of an imbalance but may potentially attract more women in the longer term, and may even have the effect of changing the view of some of the women and couples that currently don't meet single men because of their bad attitude etc - you'd also lose those that simply can't change or don't get it which would again reduce the imbalance." I agree but how is that solved? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() Wish I lived local to u hun. Gorgeous is the word x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() cheeky bugger ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously? The one major change that would potentially level the playing field would be if a lot of men changed their attitude, approach and expectations of the site. Yes it would initially create more of an imbalance but may potentially attract more women in the longer term, and may even have the effect of changing the view of some of the women and couples that currently don't meet single men because of their bad attitude etc - you'd also lose those that simply can't change or don't get it which would again reduce the imbalance. I agree but how is that solved? " Wholesale? It won't be, but for those that do so on an individual basis their experience of the site will be so much better. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hi i am a Manchester United Season supporter holder" Oh god, I wouldn’t spread that around. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() Really? you've had zero meets from Fab in 7 months? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() I haven’t, I’ve met one guy (my Geri is hidden as it’s quite descriptive and I’ve seen 3 people I know on here so far!). Not really sure what your point is?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hi i am a Manchester United Season supporter holder Oh god, I wouldn’t spread that around." ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() No point, just saying what we saw ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() Ah right ok then. I’m yet to find someone that takes my fancy and is local, hence my original comment. I have to be really into someone to fuck them ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Haha, well if you ever fancy a couple give us a shout ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() How do you know how many meets anyone has had, all you know is how many veris they have if they display them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hi i am a Manchester United Season supporter holder" Random ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Will do, thanks ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously? The one major change that would potentially level the playing field would be if a lot of men changed their attitude, approach and expectations of the site. Yes it would initially create more of an imbalance but may potentially attract more women in the longer term, and may even have the effect of changing the view of some of the women and couples that currently don't meet single men because of their bad attitude etc - you'd also lose those that simply can't change or don't get it which would again reduce the imbalance. I agree but how is that solved? Wholesale? It won't be, but for those that do so on an individual basis their experience of the site will be so much better." the trouble is how do you educate the guys, they're thinking with the cock? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hi i am a Manchester United Season supporter holder" language ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. " ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. " yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? " Apart from dropping them from the site, there isn't much that could be done. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? " On another site, men aren’t allowed to message first. What about that? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? Apart from dropping them from the site, there isn't much that could be done." their is if the site was open to it eg restricting certain words in initial messages and not allowing pics to be sent unless face | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? On another site, men aren’t allowed to message first. What about that? " Sounds like a man meat market ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? On another site, men aren’t allowed to message first. What about that? Sounds like a man meat market ![]() Maybe, I think it works quite well but who knows. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? On another site, men aren’t allowed to message first. What about that? " that would work for me ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? Apart from dropping them from the site, there isn't much that could be done.their is if the site was open to it eg restricting certain words in initial messages and not allowing pics to be sent unless face " True | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Emily Pankhurst would be so proud if she could see all the weak, under the thumb men now." Its Emmeline Pankhurst, and you've missed the point of feminism entirely. (Sorry off topic but annoyed me) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously? The one major change that would potentially level the playing field would be if a lot of men changed their attitude, approach and expectations of the site. Yes it would initially create more of an imbalance but may potentially attract more women in the longer term, and may even have the effect of changing the view of some of the women and couples that currently don't meet single men because of their bad attitude etc - you'd also lose those that simply can't change or don't get it which would again reduce the imbalance. I agree but how is that solved? Wholesale? It won't be, but for those that do so on an individual basis their experience of the site will be so much better.the trouble is how do you educate the guys, they're thinking with the cock? " Exactly you can't ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They attractive creatures aren’t they. " exactly you can't fault em to their face lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They attractive creatures aren’t they. exactly you can't fault em to their face lol" You tried and paid the price then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They attractive creatures aren’t they. exactly you can't fault em to their face lol You tried and paid the price then?" I'm always a gent ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They attractive creatures aren’t they. exactly you can't fault em to their face lol You tried and paid the price then?" Hello stranger what you up to? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d like every man on here to resemble my ideal man and all live locally to me. That would be perfect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Well, if you'll settle for a town house overlooking a picturesque canal with a sports cruiser moored outside you're in luck. Also, I can fly pretty much any aeroplane or helicopter you might care to provide..... ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe have an entry test for men say a multiple choice questionnaire that you have to pass with a 92% success rate lol" ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many men seem to think just because it's a sex site women are desperate and will fuck anything. yes but what would you do to even out the playing field? On another site, men aren’t allowed to message first. What about that? " So it’s just based on a photo look and a basic profile ? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast" Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe have an entry test for men say a multiple choice questionnaire that you have to pass with a 92% success rate lol ![]() Noooooooo their wouldn't be any women here then lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe have an entry test for men say a multiple choice questionnaire that you have to pass with a 92% success rate lol ![]() ![]() Oooohhh.....I think you'll find that you'll have a lot more women than men....That may turn the tables for a while until an equilibrium is found. ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” " .. no but it stops them coming back once banned. As for trip advisor, yeah, same sorta stuff. The verification system is flawed. People will obviously only ever show good veris. Pointless. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” .. no but it stops them coming back once banned. As for trip advisor, yeah, same sorta stuff. The verification system is flawed. People will obviously only ever show good veris. Pointless. " As with verifications it’s our choice whether to show them or not. With your system, as now, anyone would be able to score/veri whether we have met them or not, but you want it automatically shown and the profile holder has no day in it. That isn’t going to work as would be wide open to abuse. It’s bad enough getting shitty abusive messages because we say no, but now they’d be able to leave an automatic rating ! Sorry but sh*t idea | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” .. no but it stops them coming back once banned. As for trip advisor, yeah, same sorta stuff. The verification system is flawed. People will obviously only ever show good veris. Pointless. As with verifications it’s our choice whether to show them or not. With your system, as now, anyone would be able to score/veri whether we have met them or not, but you want it automatically shown and the profile holder has no day in it. That isn’t going to work as would be wide open to abuse. It’s bad enough getting shitty abusive messages because we say no, but now they’d be able to leave an automatic rating ! Sorry but sh*t idea " Actually no. A real verification system would require both people to confirm they've met. Whether that's done before the Veri is shown to the other or not is whatever. The fact I could round and verify anyone I want right now and it would just sit as unpublished in their list is ridiculous. I shouldn't be able to do that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” .. no but it stops them coming back once banned. As for trip advisor, yeah, same sorta stuff. The verification system is flawed. People will obviously only ever show good veris. Pointless. As with verifications it’s our choice whether to show them or not. With your system, as now, anyone would be able to score/veri whether we have met them or not, but you want it automatically shown and the profile holder has no day in it. That isn’t going to work as would be wide open to abuse. It’s bad enough getting shitty abusive messages because we say no, but now they’d be able to leave an automatic rating ! Sorry but sh*t idea " exactly people could use it for revenge, I actually think a fairer way would be to have the multiple choice test for men and as a result restrict the amount of men that enter based on the results, this would even out the ratio of men to women, also make women and couples do a verification pic at point of entry, which would le out men starting couples profiles. The multiple choice test would be simple but based on answers given, which would have to vary to cut out cheating, clubs would be required to bring in line fairer entry fees so we all pay a similar fee but restrict the amount of men allowed entry which is probably what they do anyway ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone must be photo verified, inc. with photo ID. People who are banned. Are then banned properly. No multi accounts for people, no accounts being made for abuse. No more fakes. Verification system needs work. Needs expanding and updating. Also, as stupid as this sounds.. could have a score based on certain categories. So you can still hide the Veri, but your average score on things such as "cleanliness" "respectfulness" "punctuality" "enjoyment".. whatever they are chosen. So you can get a feel for someone. Beast Someone being photo veried and identified does not stop them being tw*ts ! The rest of it sounds like trip advisor and open to each individual’s interpretation. What’s good for some isn’t good for others Just got to ignore the tw*ts and not let it ruin your experience or as we say in our family “don’t tar everyone with the same brush” .. no but it stops them coming back once banned. As for trip advisor, yeah, same sorta stuff. The verification system is flawed. People will obviously only ever show good veris. Pointless. As with verifications it’s our choice whether to show them or not. With your system, as now, anyone would be able to score/veri whether we have met them or not, but you want it automatically shown and the profile holder has no day in it. That isn’t going to work as would be wide open to abuse. It’s bad enough getting shitty abusive messages because we say no, but now they’d be able to leave an automatic rating ! Sorry but sh*t idea exactly people could use it for revenge, I actually think a fairer way would be to have the multiple choice test for men and as a result restrict the amount of men that enter based on the results, this would even out the ratio of men to women, also make women and couples do a verification pic at point of entry, which would le out men starting couples profiles. The multiple choice test would be simple but based on answers given, which would have to vary to cut out cheating, clubs would be required to bring in line fairer entry fees so we all pay a similar fee but restrict the amount of men allowed entry which is probably what they do anyway ![]() I typed we#dle but it cut out the we#d God | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |