FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

catch 22ish

Jump to newest
 

By *good-being-bad OP   Man
over a year ago

mis-types and auto corrects leads cock leeds

If you were given a choice..

You could be irresistable to any other person you desired... but to get that power you had to do the thing that you've always vowed to never do..

Or

You would have no appeal to anyone you ever fancied(bit like being a single guy on here) but the ability to make others do the things they'd vowed to never do.

What would you choose .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury


"If you were given a choice..

You could be irresistable to any other person you desired... but to get that power you had to do the thing that you've always vowed to never do..

Or

You would have no appeal to anyone you ever fancied(bit like being a single guy on here) but the ability to make others do the things they'd vowed to never do.

What would you choose ."

With the first option would I have to do the thing I dont want to do more than once?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

The latter, but I'd skip the power.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not really a catch 22 situation is it...

Probably the first one, I'd take no pleasure in making others do things they don't want to.

Tea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury


"Not really a catch 22 situation is it...

Probably the first one, I'd take no pleasure in making others do things they don't want to.

Tea"

Same as me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What's the point in bring able to make anyone do anything ?especially if they aren't attracted to you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Liverpool

The former.

Because the latter is rather... Abusive really. You are forcing people to do things they don't want to do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

The first, because I could never force anyone to do something they didn't want to do - at least with the first I would be choosing to do it for myself and not forcing my will on others - I could forego the irresistability though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London

The second but only on condition that I’m the thing they never wanted to do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip

That's easy. The first option. I don't have any desire to make people do anything they don't want to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

My answer amounts to, in the grand scheme abstinence can be lived with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wow please repeat the question don't understand

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eliWoman
over a year ago

.

Neither for me - both remove free will. The first I'd be questioning if they would have actually found me irresistible if it wasn't for the power and then my overthinking would kick in and that would dry up any wetness of desire I had for them.

The second is a bit cuntish and not my thing. Surprisingly really. Maybe I could use it for good? But what if my good isn't actually good and what's best for them.

Neither.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Neither for me - both remove free will. The first I'd be questioning if they would have actually found me irresistible if it wasn't for the power and then my overthinking would kick in and that would dry up any wetness of desire I had for them.

The second is a bit cuntish and not my thing. Surprisingly really. Maybe I could use it for good? But what if my good isn't actually good and what's best for them.

Neither. "

Or this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *JohnMan
over a year ago

Newcastle upon Tyne

Can I go with neither?

There's no one specific thing that I've vowed never to do, but there are many that never needed a vow. I don't want to do any of them. And just to trick someone into wanting me? I'll do it the traditional way, and continue being irresistible in my own right.

As for the second - I couldn't do that to anyone. A life of loneliness is far too high a price for a power I could never use.

Sorry, no deal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think I'll just stay how I am thanks. The best bit about attraction is the fact that it's natural. Knowing someone likes you just because you're you is part of what makes it feel so good. I'd lose that if I accepted either option.

Dotty x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoenixAdAstraWoman
over a year ago

Hiding in the shadows

I'd never want to make anyone do anything they didn't want to do, against their will.

And the one thing I vowed I'd never do is get married again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Neither.

Having that sort of power over another, or indeed that control over all the possible alternative futures that may exist scares the life out of me.

If another can't see our value without being that directly controlled or manipulated by some similar external force then how we would ever know if that other was being "genuine" in their reactions to us.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top