Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law" Wow - that got dark quickly! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law Wow - that got dark quickly! " But at least you know where you would stand with me as supreme ruler | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't be arsed. " Just like the last few prime ministers  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law" You have got my vote where do you stand on the licra brigade | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law You have got my vote where do you stand on the licra brigade" Straight to the chair, no trial, no judge, dead! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law You have got my vote where do you stand on the licra brigade Straight to the chair, no trial, no judge, dead!" piece of cake for PM! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law You have got my vote where do you stand on the licra brigade Straight to the chair, no trial, no judge, dead! piece of cake for PM! "I will also reinstate Jus primae noctis | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday. Middle lane hoggers would be shot on site Death penalty reinstated for anyone who breaks the law You have got my vote where do you stand on the licra brigade Straight to the chair, no trial, no judge, dead! piece of cake for PM!
I will also reinstate Jus primae noctis"No election needed just give him the keys to number 10 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jaffa cakes free on the National health." Now you’re talking | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d bring back a fully working representative democracy. Direct democracy (referendums) don’t work that well. A representative democracy (parliament) with the brightest and best in has to be the best way. To get the brightest and best, I’d double or even treble MPs pay. When a head teacher can earn as much or more, what’s the incentive? I’d make any outgoing government explain why they didn’t achieve their manifesto. Lastly, I’d ban cats. Just because. Sly gits. " you've got the votes of all those in Barking | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd fine heavily anyone wearing a tracksuit and bring back conscription into the army for chavy theiving scum." What are people supposed to wear to train in? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tougher penalties for tax evading organisations." I'll drink a Starbucks coffee to that... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd fine heavily anyone wearing a tracksuit and bring back conscription into the army for chavy theiving scum. What are people supposed to wear to train in?" In Ilford I guess you must see many a tracksuit... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd fine heavily anyone wearing a tracksuit and bring back conscription into the army for chavy theiving scum. What are people supposed to wear to train in? In Ilford I guess you must see many a tracksuit..." Yes, but not everyone wearing one is a cunt though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" What new law/s would you pass" I'd abolish the planning law that requires permission for an erection over 8 feet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI " Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well." Seems reasonable... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable..." I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. " Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg." Quite possibly but I still don’t agree with it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg." ...and the point you're making is? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well." That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. " Finally, somebody speaking some sense... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. " How would that work in practice? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. ...and the point you're making is?" People think this is discrimination against overweight people but it’s really much cleverer than that. As I said, on the trial flight I was on where this was tested there were a lot of tall people who had to pay the surcharge. Much screaming and losing of tempers, Ryanair wisely did not introduce it. Btw. On another trial flight they gave out free drinks at the airport and then charged €20 to use the onboard toilet. Wasn’t popular either... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? " Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. " There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. " Seen this being done on some smaller aircrafts in the US. Makes perfect sense but do feel sorry for those being fat shamed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too..." That's a given. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. Seen this being done on some smaller aircrafts in the US. Makes perfect sense but do feel sorry for those being fat shamed." Id feel more sorry for anyone squished up next to them for hours to be honest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. " I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too..." You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? " Easier to move away from them on a train, just like you would an angry d*unk, or someone with terrible B O. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. " In that case that should probably declare their weight before arrival. Just as wheelchair user would. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. In that case that should probably declare their weight before arrival. Just as wheelchair user would. " Weight doesn’t necessarily equate to size. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? Easier to move away from them on a train, just like you would an angry d*unk, or someone with terrible B O." Ok. So on a packed tube? The smell, it’s offensive to their neighbours. Who is going to move them? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? Easier to move away from them on a train, just like you would an angry d*unk, or someone with terrible B O. Ok. So on a packed tube? The smell, it’s offensive to their neighbours. Who is going to move them? " boris johnson | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. In that case that should probably declare their weight before arrival. Just as wheelchair user would. Weight doesn’t necessarily equate to size. " In the same way that the airports have luggage measurement systems (those metal things to assess acceptable sizing / dimensions), we could have similar for passengers? - something all would need to fit through first before boarding... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. In that case that should probably declare their weight before arrival. Just as wheelchair user would. Weight doesn’t necessarily equate to size. In the same way that the airports have luggage measurement systems (those metal things to assess acceptable sizing / dimensions), we could have similar for passengers? - something all would need to fit through first before boarding..." Ahh would this be humour? I’m afraid it’s lost on me really. The only thing I need to happen at airports is safety and hopefully not to get sat next to someone who is a right royal pain in the article | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? Easier to move away from them on a train, just like you would an angry d*unk, or someone with terrible B O. Ok. So on a packed tube? The smell, it’s offensive to their neighbours. Who is going to move them? " Will you be next to them for 12 hours? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. I appreciate that but public humiliation is not the way forward. In that case that should probably declare their weight before arrival. Just as wheelchair user would. Weight doesn’t necessarily equate to size. " You're correct. Dimensions it is | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too... You can get that anywhere. The train for instance, not limited for space but the odour is bad. Who is going to ask them to leave? Easier to move away from them on a train, just like you would an angry d*unk, or someone with terrible B O. Ok. So on a packed tube? The smell, it’s offensive to their neighbours. Who is going to move them? Will you be next to them for 12 hours?" There is absolutely no way on this Earth I would take the tube that has panic attack written all over it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to." The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. " Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to." What is your constant need to lead the vanguard against the fat? Every thread possible. It’s the stuff of a psychologist’s wet dream. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. " And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. " Obviously isn’t if the things aren’t already enforced at this level. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. " But they do restrict it's size... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. That's ridiculous! It should be done on how wide you are. If your spare tyre gets squeezed onto your next door seat for instance you should pay more for a wider, safer seat. How would that work in practice? Ask people to move to the wider seat if they are obviously struggling to fit into a standard seat. If they refuse, or the seats are already taken then they can catch another flight. The airline is quite at liberty to refuse service to anyone they like. Plus you and i are entitled to enjoy our own space when travelling by plane, without sharing it with the excess body parts of our neighbours. There's the potential unpleasant odour factor too..." Are you suggesing that all fat people smell?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. But they do restrict it's size..." Yes but you’re talking about weight distribution and they don’t ever check that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. But they do restrict it's size... Yes but you’re talking about weight distribution and they don’t ever check that. " You realise that the weight distribution of a modern jet is changing continuously from engine start to shut down? However, as fuel load comes down so does the ability to control the Centre of Gravity. If waist lines continue to expand, you can expect to see controls over where people sit. The smaller the plane the more affect weight distribution has. If you started a flight with too much weight forward of the wing, usually the point of CofG, then you'd never take off. Are we saying that it's ok for people to spill over onto their neighbours seats for hours on end as long as they don't feel shamed about the state that their bodies are in? If you burned to death in an accident because your neighbour was so big you couldn't get passed them to an emergency exit, would you feel comforted that their feelings remained unharmed? I see no difference in the lack of manners of somebody spilling onto my seat than if they lit up a cigarette, or got offensively d*unk. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"St George's day would a be a bank holiday." But only in England. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg." I'd be fucked at 112kg | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. I'd be fucked at 112kg "Makes a change from free pretzels i guess. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. But they do restrict it's size... Yes but you’re talking about weight distribution and they don’t ever check that. You realise that the weight distribution of a modern jet is changing continuously from engine start to shut down? However, as fuel load comes down so does the ability to control the Centre of Gravity. If waist lines continue to expand, you can expect to see controls over where people sit. The smaller the plane the more affect weight distribution has. If you started a flight with too much weight forward of the wing, usually the point of CofG, then you'd never take off. Are we saying that it's ok for people to spill over onto their neighbours seats for hours on end as long as they don't feel shamed about the state that their bodies are in? If you burned to death in an accident because your neighbour was so big you couldn't get passed them to an emergency exit, would you feel comforted that their feelings remained unharmed? I see no difference in the lack of manners of somebody spilling onto my seat than if they lit up a cigarette, or got offensively d*unk. " I don’t understand anything about plans or weight distribution on them. I’m sure google would tell me though. On planes I see hand luggage that can barely be lifted up, bags of duty free not weighed. I see all shapes and sizes of people. I don’t believe in shaming people for whatever reason because it’s cruel and I’m not a cruel person. You are talking extremes now. Size will not matter in an emergency because people will trample on anyone to get out, irrespective of size or weight. You view of bad manners and mine are very different Clem. All I will say is thank goodness you’re not Prime Minister | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. But they do restrict it's size... Yes but you’re talking about weight distribution and they don’t ever check that. You realise that the weight distribution of a modern jet is changing continuously from engine start to shut down? However, as fuel load comes down so does the ability to control the Centre of Gravity. If waist lines continue to expand, you can expect to see controls over where people sit. The smaller the plane the more affect weight distribution has. If you started a flight with too much weight forward of the wing, usually the point of CofG, then you'd never take off. Are we saying that it's ok for people to spill over onto their neighbours seats for hours on end as long as they don't feel shamed about the state that their bodies are in? If you burned to death in an accident because your neighbour was so big you couldn't get passed them to an emergency exit, would you feel comforted that their feelings remained unharmed? I see no difference in the lack of manners of somebody spilling onto my seat than if they lit up a cigarette, or got offensively d*unk. I don’t understand anything about plans or weight distribution on them. I’m sure google would tell me though. On planes I see hand luggage that can barely be lifted up, bags of duty free not weighed. I see all shapes and sizes of people. I don’t believe in shaming people for whatever reason because it’s cruel and I’m not a cruel person. You are talking extremes now. Size will not matter in an emergency because people will trample on anyone to get out, irrespective of size or weight. You view of bad manners and mine are very different Clem. All I will say is thank goodness you’re not Prime Minister "Baggage has a maximum weight. Each bag is weighed. They know how many bags they have, and they know where they are distributed. I do think it's bad manners for a stranger's flab to encroach my personal space. If it happened i would complain to them, and to the cabin staff. I won't apologise for that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not sure if we should put concerns over fat shaming before passengers comfort and safety. But it's a shame soo many people these days have let themselves get soo fat. Maybe the answer is to increase the size of the seats by 50%, obviously the price of tickets would have to increase to. The seats and spaces are not adequate for most people. You hear enough moaning about it so I say yes, increase the size and let us have a space that is reasonable. Nothing to do with size or weight. Well weight and it's positioning on an aircraft is always a consideration im afraid. And yet they don’t check weight of hand luggage. But they do restrict it's size... Yes but you’re talking about weight distribution and they don’t ever check that. You realise that the weight distribution of a modern jet is changing continuously from engine start to shut down? However, as fuel load comes down so does the ability to control the Centre of Gravity. If waist lines continue to expand, you can expect to see controls over where people sit. The smaller the plane the more affect weight distribution has. If you started a flight with too much weight forward of the wing, usually the point of CofG, then you'd never take off. Are we saying that it's ok for people to spill over onto their neighbours seats for hours on end as long as they don't feel shamed about the state that their bodies are in? If you burned to death in an accident because your neighbour was so big you couldn't get passed them to an emergency exit, would you feel comforted that their feelings remained unharmed? I see no difference in the lack of manners of somebody spilling onto my seat than if they lit up a cigarette, or got offensively d*unk. I don’t understand anything about plans or weight distribution on them. I’m sure google would tell me though. On planes I see hand luggage that can barely be lifted up, bags of duty free not weighed. I see all shapes and sizes of people. I don’t believe in shaming people for whatever reason because it’s cruel and I’m not a cruel person. You are talking extremes now. Size will not matter in an emergency because people will trample on anyone to get out, irrespective of size or weight. You view of bad manners and mine are very different Clem. All I will say is thank goodness you’re not Prime Minister
Baggage has a maximum weight. Each bag is weighed. They know how many bags they have, and they know where they are distributed. I do think it's bad manners for a stranger's flab to encroach my personal space. If it happened i would complain to them, and to the cabin staff. I won't apologise for that. "They don’t weight hand luggage or duty free. I don’t want you to apologise. It’s nothing to do with me how you conduct yourself. I’m responsible for me that’s all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. I'd be fucked at 112kg "Perfect example then for why weight alone can’t work as after looking at your pics, you’ve got hunk written all over you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tougher penalties for tax evading organisations." This! ...and better investment in monitoring and stopping tax evasion and avoidance. We'd have £350m for the NHS before you know it!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. I'd be fucked at 112kg
Perfect example then for why weight alone can’t work as after looking at your pics, you’ve got hunk written all over you "Well it could, there's no reason why fat people alone should be penalised for excessive weight. Then it also takes away the "Is it cos im fat?" argument. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tougher penalties for tax evading organisations. This! ...and better investment in monitoring and stopping tax evasion and avoidance. We'd have £350m for the NHS before you know it! "But then nando's would be really expensive!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Insist upon ailines removing luggage / baggage weight restrictions, and scrap hold luggage fees - instead, charge passengers for their seats based on their body weight / BMI Was on a Ryanair flight where they tried doing this. If you weighed more than 90 kg you had to pay an extra amount of money. It didn’t go down too well. Seems reasonable... I don’t think it’s reasonable. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary. Many tall, well built guys weigh more than 90kg. I'd be fucked at 112kg
Perfect example then for why weight alone can’t work as after looking at your pics, you’ve got hunk written all over you
Well it could, there's no reason why fat people alone should be penalised for excessive weight. Then it also takes away the "Is it cos im fat?" argument."Breath and let it go man. Do you want to pm me your bad experiences? I’ve always got an open... ear | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Education would be the ticket I would base my manifesto on. Bring back the cane, blackboard erasers, detention, lines and finally school uniforms. However, teachers would also have to smarten themselves up too and obey a code of uniform too. Any parents who think their little darlings are harshly treated will receive a sympathetic ear, asked why their offspring should be treated differently and facile arguments will be summarily dismissed. Of course this will lead to short term disruption but the sight of those dissenting families being put on coaches to the newly opened borstals and training establishments will soon have the rectifying effect. Proper vocational training for those who are gifted in that area, to bring the country back to a respected industrial nation would also be on the agenda, whilst the students who still want to do “niche” degrees in dog grooming, media studies ( reading papers & watching tv), nail bar technology etc can of course still avail themselves of such delights, but will be subject to an extra 20% income tax levy to help pay for their accommodation costs, meals, tuition etc that are incurred during such studies. I could include a couple of other things but wouldn’t want to appear radical. " Ooh you will have the Fab PC police after you! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Education would be the ticket I would base my manifesto on. Bring back the cane, blackboard erasers, detention, lines and finally school uniforms. However, teachers would also have to smarten themselves up too and obey a code of uniform too. Any parents who think their little darlings are harshly treated will receive a sympathetic ear, asked why their offspring should be treated differently and facile arguments will be summarily dismissed. Of course this will lead to short term disruption but the sight of those dissenting families being put on coaches to the newly opened borstals and training establishments will soon have the rectifying effect. Proper vocational training for those who are gifted in that area, to bring the country back to a respected industrial nation would also be on the agenda, whilst the students who still want to do “niche” degrees in dog grooming, media studies ( reading papers & watching tv), nail bar technology etc can of course still avail themselves of such delights, but will be subject to an extra 20% income tax levy to help pay for their accommodation costs, meals, tuition etc that are incurred during such studies. I could include a couple of other things but wouldn’t want to appear radical. Ooh you will have the Fab PC police after you!" An I wonder just what gives that impression. Do you think I might have upset someone??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Education would be the ticket I would base my manifesto on. Bring back the cane, blackboard erasers, detention, lines and finally school uniforms. However, teachers would also have to smarten themselves up too and obey a code of uniform too. Any parents who think their little darlings are harshly treated will receive a sympathetic ear, asked why their offspring should be treated differently and facile arguments will be summarily dismissed. Of course this will lead to short term disruption but the sight of those dissenting families being put on coaches to the newly opened borstals and training establishments will soon have the rectifying effect. Proper vocational training for those who are gifted in that area, to bring the country back to a respected industrial nation would also be on the agenda, whilst the students who still want to do “niche” degrees in dog grooming, media studies ( reading papers & watching tv), nail bar technology etc can of course still avail themselves of such delights, but will be subject to an extra 20% income tax levy to help pay for their accommodation costs, meals, tuition etc that are incurred during such studies. I could include a couple of other things but wouldn’t want to appear radical. Ooh you will have the Fab PC police after you! An I wonder just what gives that impression. Do you think I might have upset someone???" I can't speak for anyone else, but you haven't upset me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tougher penalties for tax evading organisations. This! ...and better investment in monitoring and stopping tax evasion and avoidance. We'd have £350m for the NHS before you know it!
But then nando's would be really expensive!!"Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
Plus, I know better places for Portuguese cuisine.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like it to be compulsory that everyone would do a funded year of volunteering for a charity, before the age of 24 - with a programme of those above the age getting it done within the next five years - salary matched - as a wash-up. " That's a good idea. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tougher penalties for tax evading organisations. This! ...and better investment in monitoring and stopping tax evasion and avoidance. We'd have £350m for the NHS before you know it!
But then nando's would be really expensive!!
Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
Plus, I know better places for Portuguese cuisine. ". Where then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Education would be the ticket I would base my manifesto on. Bring back the cane, blackboard erasers, detention, lines and finally school uniforms. However, teachers would also have to smarten themselves up too and obey a code of uniform too. Any parents who think their little darlings are harshly treated will receive a sympathetic ear, asked why their offspring should be treated differently and facile arguments will be summarily dismissed. Of course this will lead to short term disruption but the sight of those dissenting families being put on coaches to the newly opened borstals and training establishments will soon have the rectifying effect. Proper vocational training for those who are gifted in that area, to bring the country back to a respected industrial nation would also be on the agenda, whilst the students who still want to do “niche” degrees in dog grooming, media studies ( reading papers & watching tv), nail bar technology etc can of course still avail themselves of such delights, but will be subject to an extra 20% income tax levy to help pay for their accommodation costs, meals, tuition etc that are incurred during such studies. I could include a couple of other things but wouldn’t want to appear radical. Ooh you will have the Fab PC police after you!" I would fine anyone who mentioned “Fab PC police”  or is it a dare that you say it at least once in every thread  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Education would be the ticket I would base my manifesto on. Bring back the cane, blackboard erasers, detention, lines and finally school uniforms. However, teachers would also have to smarten themselves up too and obey a code of uniform too. Any parents who think their little darlings are harshly treated will receive a sympathetic ear, asked why their offspring should be treated differently and facile arguments will be summarily dismissed. Of course this will lead to short term disruption but the sight of those dissenting families being put on coaches to the newly opened borstals and training establishments will soon have the rectifying effect. Proper vocational training for those who are gifted in that area, to bring the country back to a respected industrial nation would also be on the agenda, whilst the students who still want to do “niche” degrees in dog grooming, media studies ( reading papers & watching tv), nail bar technology etc can of course still avail themselves of such delights, but will be subject to an extra 20% income tax levy to help pay for their accommodation costs, meals, tuition etc that are incurred during such studies. I could include a couple of other things but wouldn’t want to appear radical. Ooh you will have the Fab PC police after you! I would fine anyone who mentioned “Fab PC police” or is it a dare that you say it at least once in every thread "Not a dare. Just that I got jumped on in a recent thread and I was accused of saying things I didn't say. Re your query at the end of the thread "Where has all the good looking women gone ?", the "Giro" I was referring to was in the thread "Shout out to the jobless ones" where I think the OP was trying to be provocative. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All tory and ukip politicians would be thrown in jail for life. That would be a good start. "Spoken like a tolerant liberal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All tory and ukip politicians would be thrown in jail for life. That would be a good start.
Spoken like a tolerant liberal " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All tory and ukip politicians would be thrown in jail for life. That would be a good start.
Spoken like a tolerant liberal
"Absolutely, I think we have all put up with their nonsense for long enough | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles." Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem?" I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again." But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! " So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? " I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... " Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. " Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. " I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? " All civilised people. Wouldn't you say? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? " Public stocks sound perfect for these crimes. Public humiliation for tax avoidance and bent politicians??! Yes please! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? " It depends on circumstances, the severity of the crime and previous offences. "Seduced", you haven't answered the question "So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment?". You are entitled to an opinion - may we hear it please? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? It depends on circumstances, the severity of the crime and previous offences. "Seduced", you haven't answered the question "So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment?". You are entitled to an opinion - may we hear it please?" There’s consequences (punishment) that don’t publicly shame and humiliate people or encourage others to exact retribution and shame others and purports this to be entertaining. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. " Well if you thought about it for a second more you might think that at present, if found guilty of this crime, they have a pretty bad time in prison and are not exactly invited to everyone's house party afterwards and everyone agree's its vile. So im not sure the consequences of crime factor too highly in their thinking. In fact there is very little evidence that higher levels of punishment really affect criminal behaviour. Especially around something like sex crimes against children. I think in terms of re-offending you might be talking about castration and removing the desire? As otherwise once you have been sterilised there is nothing really to stop you carrying on as before. There is some evidence that some people who have desires towards children would be open to being chemically castrated as they know what they want is wrong but have a desire that they struggle to manage. Is that what you mean? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? It depends on circumstances, the severity of the crime and previous offences. "Seduced", you haven't answered the question "So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment?". You are entitled to an opinion - may we hear it please?" I believe that every action has consequences. Including yours!?! In my head, I believe that everyone has the right to be heard. In my heart... ...I don't think there is a right or wrong answer. Not one I can win anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? It depends on circumstances, the severity of the crime and previous offences. "Seduced", you haven't answered the question "So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment?". You are entitled to an opinion - may we hear it please? I believe that every action has consequences. Including yours!?! In my head, I believe that everyone has the right to be heard. In my heart... ...I don't think there is a right or wrong answer. Not one I can win anyway. " No one wins is what I'm trying to say... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. Well if you thought about it for a second more you might think that at present, if found guilty of this crime, they have a pretty bad time in prison and are not exactly invited to everyone's house party afterwards and everyone agree's its vile. So im not sure the consequences of crime factor too highly in their thinking. In fact there is very little evidence that higher levels of punishment really affect criminal behaviour. Especially around something like sex crimes against children. I think in terms of re-offending you might be talking about castration and removing the desire? As otherwise once you have been sterilised there is nothing really to stop you carrying on as before. There is some evidence that some people who have desires towards children would be open to being chemically castrated as they know what they want is wrong but have a desire that they struggle to manage. Is that what you mean?" Yeah if you like. Id rather cut their arms and legs off, keep them in boxes, and feed then through a tube as they live a long long life. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again." Stop that.Stop it,will you stop that.Now look,no one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle. *Even*...and I want to make this absolutely clear...*even* if they *do* say "Jehovah. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. " Sterilisation doesn't normally change a sex drive | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Baggage has a maximum weight. Each bag is weighed. They know how many bags they have, and they know where they are distributed. I do think it's bad manners for a stranger's flab to encroach my personal space. If it happened i would complain to them, and to the cabin staff. I won't apologise for that. " I appreciate that your wife may not have encroached her flab in anothers personal space when she was bigger, but when she was bigger and decided she didn't want to be so lost weight , did you speak like this then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. Well if you thought about it for a second more you might think that at present, if found guilty of this crime, they have a pretty bad time in prison and are not exactly invited to everyone's house party afterwards and everyone agree's its vile. So im not sure the consequences of crime factor too highly in their thinking. In fact there is very little evidence that higher levels of punishment really affect criminal behaviour. Especially around something like sex crimes against children. I think in terms of re-offending you might be talking about castration and removing the desire? As otherwise once you have been sterilised there is nothing really to stop you carrying on as before. There is some evidence that some people who have desires towards children would be open to being chemically castrated as they know what they want is wrong but have a desire that they struggle to manage. Is that what you mean? Yeah if you like. Id rather cut their arms and legs off, keep them in boxes, and feed then through a tube as they live a long long life. "So you have gone from stopping them re-offending to torturing people for no good reason other than revenge. good one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sterilization for paedophiles. Im not sure you really understand what you are talking about. How would this solve the problem? I was thinking it might stop then offending, and certainly reoffending. Well if you thought about it for a second more you might think that at present, if found guilty of this crime, they have a pretty bad time in prison and are not exactly invited to everyone's house party afterwards and everyone agree's its vile. So im not sure the consequences of crime factor too highly in their thinking. In fact there is very little evidence that higher levels of punishment really affect criminal behaviour. Especially around something like sex crimes against children. I think in terms of re-offending you might be talking about castration and removing the desire? As otherwise once you have been sterilised there is nothing really to stop you carrying on as before. There is some evidence that some people who have desires towards children would be open to being chemically castrated as they know what they want is wrong but have a desire that they struggle to manage. Is that what you mean? Yeah if you like. Id rather cut their arms and legs off, keep them in boxes, and feed then through a tube as they live a long long life.
So you have gone from stopping them re-offending to torturing people for no good reason other than revenge.
good one.
"I know right?! Wot am i lyike?!
Id happily take horrible revenge on a paedophile. I know alot of you want to understand them, rehabilitate them, and make friends with them. But to be honest. Im not interested in that at all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Baggage has a maximum weight. Each bag is weighed. They know how many bags they have, and they know where they are distributed. I do think it's bad manners for a stranger's flab to encroach my personal space. If it happened i would complain to them, and to the cabin staff. I won't apologise for that. I appreciate that your wife may not have encroached her flab in anothers personal space when she was bigger, but when she was bigger and decided she didn't want to be so lost weight , did you speak like this then?" No no, i told her she was beautiful just the way she was, and in fact i really found larger women even MORE attractive... you know, because i still wanted to fuck her. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd annexe France and make patisseries available on the national health " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! " Theift is theift. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd bring back the stocks and public humiliation. It's just what the scum bags of today deserve. Fruit n' Veg seller's will make a killing selling off the old stock and for many it would be a good day out. Chucking rotten tomatoes at theiving scum will bring everyone together again. But what if they stole so they could feed their family because their giro didn't come in time for the bank holiday?! So if a guy smashes his way into your home, steals any jewellery and cash that he can, but does it to feed his family, you believe their should be no punishment? I belive people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or tomatoes... Everyone has an excuse to be a criminal. It's just that civilised people resist the urge. Do they? So, MP's don't fiddle their expenses? People who have money don't avoid their taxes? All crimes. I could go on... Some people speed!? Some people take drugs?! Some people decide they aren't paying their train fare... So what punishment do they deserve? " That's up to the courts to decide. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread shows why the country is as fucked as it is. It’s like looking at he UKIP manifesto. " Except a bit more sexy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread shows why the country is as fucked as it is. People want to hug a hoody, and make pals with paedophiles " Couldn't agree more | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread shows why the country is as fucked as it is. It’s like looking at he UKIP manifesto. " It’s pretty vile reading in parts. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd annexe France and make patisseries available on the national health " Best suggestion in the thread  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
