Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. " Well stated ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can. But sex without connection is only a little bit more exiting than a lady wank ![]() ![]() Ha ha totally sums up why I keep getting fatter!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can. But sex without connection is only a little bit more exiting than a lady wank ![]() ![]() Now that food has replaced sex in my life, I cant even get in my own knickers!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can,depends on the circs. I think I've always thought about sex more like a "man" , than a "woman"." Interesting.. do you think it's largely a gender thing?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Well stated ![]() This for me also ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. " Do you think being happily married helps you seperate the two? Would you be as strong with the desperation if you were single? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, it’s the only sex that I want. I don’t want any other kind of connection. Even guys just trying to get to know me makes me run for the hills." Same here! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, it’s the only sex that I want. I don’t want any other kind of connection. Even guys just trying to get to know me makes me run for the hills." Interesting.. have you always been like that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes and no if were talking random people and 1 night stands i have in the past but it does now have to be a bit more than i like your tits now i have to like them and see them as more than a sexy hole to put my pecker in or in my case now love them as i do now if you were unaware i love scousesubsally ![]() ![]() (Looks for the ‘bore off’ emoji) ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can ... but, there's always a 'but' right The ease with which it is achieved depends how much I am into them Some meets are harder to shake off than others" Yeah I think I'd always have a but.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can. But sex without connection is only a little bit more exiting than a lady wank ![]() ![]() Ha ha snap! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can,depends on the circs. I think I've always thought about sex more like a "man" , than a "woman". Interesting.. do you think it's largely a gender thing?? " Not a gender thing but a learned thing. Traditionally it's been acceptable for men to fuck and go, but "good girls" were expected to be emotionally invested before they had sex. That's changed slightly, but I think that belief is still there unfortunately. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes and no if were talking random people and 1 night stands i have in the past but it does now have to be a bit more than i like your tits now i have to like them and see them as more than a sexy hole to put my pecker in or in my case now love them as i do now if you were unaware i love scousesubsally ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ha ha ha ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. " ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I need a connection for sex, it doesn’t have to be a normal emotional one, more a meeting of minds, similar desires. " How do you find that line? Does it get crossed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I need a connection for sex, it doesn’t have to be a normal emotional one, more a meeting of minds, similar desires. " Totally agree. If there’s a connection it definitely helps. I’ve a few people who have become Fab friends that I play with and we tick each other’s boxes, push boundaries and trust each other. Wouldn’t work without a connection. I can’t do sex with a total random. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes and no if were talking random people and 1 night stands i have in the past but it does now have to be a bit more than i like your tits now i have to like them and see them as more than a sexy hole to put my pecker in or in my case now love them as i do now if you were unaware i love scousesubsally ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes and no if were talking random people and 1 night stands i have in the past but it does now have to be a bit more than i like your tits now i have to like them and see them as more than a sexy hole to put my pecker in or in my case now love them as i do now if you were unaware i love scousesubsally ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. " Same here. Lusty partners are just that, no love lost at all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Do you think being happily married helps you seperate the two? Would you be as strong with the desperation if you were single?" I can't answer that really. I suspect though it's easier to separate the two when you already have a partner. For me sex with others just brings a little extra pleasure to both of us so I don't need anything else when I meet. Being single I think I'd probably be looking for whatever was missing in my life. And if that was emotional connection with somebody then I expect I would look for that in my encounters. If that makes sense? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Without some kind of positive emotional I don't enjoy sex. I don't want to feel like I'm just offering my holes to be filled. I'm lazy and can't be arsed to get ready, for hole filling sex. I'm not talking about feelings of love or attachment; I can feel detached from them and still feel an emotional connection. " Do you find it easy to keep that detachment or has it ever been blurred? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Do you think being happily married helps you seperate the two? Would you be as strong with the desperation if you were single? I can't answer that really. I suspect though it's easier to separate the two when you already have a partner. For me sex with others just brings a little extra pleasure to both of us so I don't need anything else when I meet. Being single I think I'd probably be looking for whatever was missing in my life. And if that was emotional connection with somebody then I expect I would look for that in my encounters. If that makes sense?" Totally yes.. I think this sums up what I think as a singleton and I wonder if it's more common than those that can successfully have detached sex... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can,depends on the circs. I think I've always thought about sex more like a "man" , than a "woman". Interesting.. do you think it's largely a gender thing?? Not a gender thing but a learned thing. Traditionally it's been acceptable for men to fuck and go, but "good girls" were expected to be emotionally invested before they had sex. That's changed slightly, but I think that belief is still there unfortunately." Very much so.. my thought is that maybe many singletons find this harder as they don't have the emotional intimacy with a partner that couples already have.. so singles who crave some emotion would find it harder to disconnect than those that don't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes I believe you can separate the two. You can have a connection and attraction of sorts without having emotions getting in the way. " Do you think this is linked to how content you are with real life? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have done in the past, but I'm finding it much harder to do these days.. Especially because I'm single... If I really feel a connection then it makes me miss what I don't have on a regular basis..I want that can't get enough of each other raw passion. Random sex just doesn't do it for me. The best sex I've ever had was when deep feelings were involved.. Hence why I don't have many meets at the moment. So im horny and fustrated most of the time at the moment grrrr haha and as melia puts it a "lady wank" just doesn't satisfy me... But rather that then just a fuck. " Yeah totally get that! The mindset of what you're missing in life must affect the way you see sex and relationships.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes I believe you can separate the two. You can have a connection and attraction of sorts without having emotions getting in the way. Do you think this is linked to how content you are with real life? " Yes it possibly is a factor. If you’re looking for more then there’s more chance of you finding it. I’m not looking for that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes it’s possible to separate the two, otherwise I’m not sure swingers / nsa sex would exist.. ![]() Do you think it's easier for happy couples than singles to maintain this? I wonder how easy it is to find the line as a single if you miss an emotional connection in real life.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"All you people who contemplating on this problem, you're the ones worth looking for! ![]() I definately think strong couples can achieve this easier than most singles.. I think singles who truly achieve this are in a minority. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can but I don't want to. Being a female on here I get plenty of offers and could have meaningless sex with a different person every day but I just wouldn't feel satisfied. I need that connection and to enjoy a person for who they are not just what we do physically. " Yeah too much choice is definately not always a good thing! Do you know where your lines are between connection and emotion? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Depends how good the sex is. If the sex is shit hot i get dickmatised. Also, if they leave me alone between meets and don’t woo me with words of passion etc., then yes, i find it easier. I also find it easier as i get older as i realise some men (not al!!!!) are just shitheads and you tend to learn from experience." 'Dickmatised' ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I also think the circumstances make a difference too.. If I met another single guy who was hot and sexy and I saw as someone I would like to "date" on a meet, that makes it harder to keep it separate. However it Would be completly dynamics and my feelings would be different if I was meeting a couple (haven't done so far) but within that you know it is sex and yes you would find each other attractive and sexy but there wouldn't be the "other" feelings involved. But hopefully the sex would still be great!? " This is very much my thoughts.. how many people are actually trying before they buy rather than choosing to keep emotion completely seperate.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. I can’t. I can’t do meaningless sex. Rather not bother. " Snap.. genuinely would rather have a brew. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. I can’t. I can’t do meaningless sex. Rather not bother. Snap.. genuinely would rather have a brew. " It’s a manc thing. A brew always makes things better ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can but I don't want to. Being a female on here I get plenty of offers and could have meaningless sex with a different person every day but I just wouldn't feel satisfied. I need that connection and to enjoy a person for who they are not just what we do physically. Yeah too much choice is definately not always a good thing! Do you know where your lines are between connection and emotion?" I like to think I do. I'm quite shy when it comes to emotions though, I don't really let people in easily and even then it tends to be once I'm sure the other person feels emotions too. I guess there's less risk for me that way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? " Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes we can separate emotions from sex but if you are seeing people regularly there needs to be some kind of relationship in a friends based way , a real connection " Do you think it would be as easy if you weren't in a couple already? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. " Yep, this exactly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. I can’t. I can’t do meaningless sex. Rather not bother. Snap.. genuinely would rather have a brew. It’s a manc thing. A brew always makes things better ![]() Ha ha doesn't it just!! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly." Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can but I don't want to. Being a female on here I get plenty of offers and could have meaningless sex with a different person every day but I just wouldn't feel satisfied. I need that connection and to enjoy a person for who they are not just what we do physically. Yeah too much choice is definately not always a good thing! Do you know where your lines are between connection and emotion? I like to think I do. I'm quite shy when it comes to emotions though, I don't really let people in easily and even then it tends to be once I'm sure the other person feels emotions too. I guess there's less risk for me that way. " Kind of reminds me a little of poker.. it's hard to keep a line when you have no idea where others lines are.. I'm naturally very defensive so very few get close. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes it’s possible to separate the two, otherwise I’m not sure swingers / nsa sex would exist.. ![]() I guess it depends on how you meet, I know of people who say they won’t meet more than once as they don’t want any chance of an attachment happening. The line can be easily blurred regardless of whether you’re single or not. Although if you’re in a strong, happy open relationship this is less likely to happen. Although it’s not beyond the realms of possibility to meet someone you fall for even when you’re not necessarily looking, if that makes sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can but I don't want to. Being a female on here I get plenty of offers and could have meaningless sex with a different person every day but I just wouldn't feel satisfied. I need that connection and to enjoy a person for who they are not just what we do physically. Yeah too much choice is definately not always a good thing! Do you know where your lines are between connection and emotion? I like to think I do. I'm quite shy when it comes to emotions though, I don't really let people in easily and even then it tends to be once I'm sure the other person feels emotions too. I guess there's less risk for me that way. Kind of reminds me a little of poker.. it's hard to keep a line when you have no idea where others lines are.. I'm naturally very defensive so very few get close." Absolutely this ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain!" Not sure I've ever been described as eloquent before, thank you. I dodged the key question though, Sex without emotion, like life without emotions what's the point. It just makes everything feel a little grey bland lifeless and empty. I'm an idiot. I want it all, stomach churning excitement, fireworks in the sky, fire in the eyes, a burning in the soul that another shares with me, the fun, laughs, that foolish vibrancy that makes life shiney,....without all that why should I ever come our of the cave..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes it’s possible to separate the two, otherwise I’m not sure swingers / nsa sex would exist.. ![]() Some ppl are a fuck load more loveable/dangerous than others I think, some couples seem to struggle to work that one out when choosing, so if there's the slightest crack in the relationship it's like a bomb hit.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes it’s possible to separate the two, otherwise I’m not sure swingers / nsa sex would exist.. ![]() Yes I definately think the strong relationship is key to this.. this place will expose flaws if there are any.. it's totally possible to fall for someone as long as both are open about it.. the scary bit is allowing yourself to get that close without knowing the other persons intentions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain! Not sure I've ever been described as eloquent before, thank you. I dodged the key question though, Sex without emotion, like life without emotions what's the point. It just makes everything feel a little grey bland lifeless and empty. I'm an idiot. I want it all, stomach churning excitement, fireworks in the sky, fire in the eyes, a burning in the soul that another shares with me, the fun, laughs, that foolish vibrancy that makes life shiney,....without all that why should I ever come our of the cave..... " Guess I’m an idiot too then ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can, yes, but it's utterly pointless for me and I agree with you on the cuppa. I'd rather have a coffee and talk shit with my lover than random sex with Angelina..... I wank better than I have random sex, it needs connection and or build up for me..... For me it's all about knowing that you're both doing it for each others minds too and tickling each other internally. There's nothing better than resting my forehead on my girls and "touching minds" after a long old knowing stare, and a brew... ![]() ![]() I concur.. obvs. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain! Not sure I've ever been described as eloquent before, thank you. I dodged the key question though, Sex without emotion, like life without emotions what's the point. It just makes everything feel a little grey bland lifeless and empty. I'm an idiot. I want it all, stomach churning excitement, fireworks in the sky, fire in the eyes, a burning in the soul that another shares with me, the fun, laughs, that foolish vibrancy that makes life shiney,....without all that why should I ever come our of the cave..... Guess I’m an idiot too then ![]() Probably a Manc thing ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? " Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain! Not sure I've ever been described as eloquent before, thank you. I dodged the key question though, Sex without emotion, like life without emotions what's the point. It just makes everything feel a little grey bland lifeless and empty. I'm an idiot. I want it all, stomach churning excitement, fireworks in the sky, fire in the eyes, a burning in the soul that another shares with me, the fun, laughs, that foolish vibrancy that makes life shiney,....without all that why should I ever come our of the cave..... Guess I’m an idiot too then ![]() ![]() Probably. Salt of the earth ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many threads, how many on the forum, of both sexes, say that they will never meet or have sex without "that connection" whatever the connection may be. Isnt that just another way of saying there needs to be some level of emotional involvement before people meet, and have sex? Yes OP I think they can be separated at an intellectual level, but sex often isn't about intellect, it's often about a visceral need to get inside anothers body and mind. That alone is a deep emotional response, isn't it? Body and mind they always work together, so how do we ever switch off that part of us, mind body emotions thoughts are all interlinked, and where we cannot function as a person without all those elements of us being present in everything we do? Maybe we can have sex without emotions, or maybe it depends on which emotions we are trying to subvert when we think of sex as just NSA. Every part of our life comes with strings in some form, why would sex be any different? Brilliantly put as usual..far more eloquent than I could explain! Not sure I've ever been described as eloquent before, thank you. I dodged the key question though, Sex without emotion, like life without emotions what's the point. It just makes everything feel a little grey bland lifeless and empty. I'm an idiot. I want it all, stomach churning excitement, fireworks in the sky, fire in the eyes, a burning in the soul that another shares with me, the fun, laughs, that foolish vibrancy that makes life shiney,....without all that why should I ever come our of the cave..... " Ah that's lovely!! I think most people would struggle to say that this isn't their dream.. the couples here hopefully have this already which allows them to explore together.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like." I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes it’s possible to separate the two, otherwise I’m not sure swingers / nsa sex would exist.. ![]() Totally!!! Only a rock solid relationship can truly do this without it causing some kind of emotional instability. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn’t have to be meaningless sex if you’re not emotionally invested though. I wouldn’t have sex with just anyone, there does need to be something about it but that doesn’t mean I’m emotionally invested. " ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is lust an emotion if it is then I can’t separate the two. I can have sex without developing feelings for the other person but a lustful attraction with some mental connection works best for me. However I’ve not been in a situation where it was purely sexual for many years so I don’t know if I can do it or can’t. That said I am looking to have sex with people I consider friends or would develop a friendship with as well these days so perhaps that answers it." Are you confident in knowing where your lines are in these relationships or are you playing it by ear? I think it's tough when you're a passionate person to differentiate in the moment... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.." I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"o/p interesting question. Over the years, since I was a teenager, I've become attracted to a few women in what I'd call a 'spritual' way. The physical side did not even come into it." Can you keep that seperate if you find someone you connect with and have sex with? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can. But sex without connection is only a little bit more exiting than a lady wank ![]() ![]() Oh my - couldn't have put it better myself! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it." I wonder whether it's because most singles crave a strong connection with someone before they can think in a less connected way... couples have their emotion already whereas singles don't.. some crave it.. others don't and that affects how they communicate and meet people.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes we can separate emotions from sex but if you are seeing people regularly there needs to be some kind of relationship in a friends based way , a real connection " Do you think you could do this as a single or does the strength of your relationship affect how you seperate emotion? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn’t have to be meaningless sex if you’re not emotionally invested though. I wouldn’t have sex with just anyone, there does need to be something about it but that doesn’t mean I’m emotionally invested. ![]() I agree with this too. Emotional connection is somewhat subjective after all. I have what I call a good emotional connection with a guy I met off here. We’re both in similar situations, we understand each other and neither of us are looking for anything more, it works well when we meet up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it." I agree with this ... I've always thought that sometimes people are looking for emotional connections that are missing in their lives. And there also is a discrepancy between men and women, men seem totally capable of just sex, with no connection of any sort for fulfilment, whereas women prefer sex with a connection of some sort for fulfilment. Of course I'm generalising and only talking about my experience on fab ...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is a space in between the two I find. I love my Wife and nothing would change that, we both swing, but I wouldn't engage sexually with someone who I didn't have a connection too. Our swing partners all have a connection for us which just dosent stimulate the body but also the mind, biggest sexual organ we all have. So we make love without being in love. It's closer than just sex but not a relationship. We care about them when we are with them but dont morn them when they have gone. If that makes sense Male ![]() Totally.. I think virtually everyone needs a connection on some level. I wonder if singles are as good at seperating the emotion... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn’t have to be meaningless sex if you’re not emotionally invested though. I wouldn’t have sex with just anyone, there does need to be something about it but that doesn’t mean I’m emotionally invested. ![]() It's totally subjective yes.. I think the emotional part is dependent on if you have a missing part in your real life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? " I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I agree with this ... I've always thought that sometimes people are looking for emotional connections that are missing in their lives. And there also is a discrepancy between men and women, men seem totally capable of just sex, with no connection of any sort for fulfilment, whereas women prefer sex with a connection of some sort for fulfilment. Of course I'm generalising and only talking about my experience on fab ...... " Totally.. my experience is that if I'm craving affection then I struggle to meet casually because the gap is not just sexual. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I wonder whether it's because most singles crave a strong connection with someone before they can think in a less connected way... couples have their emotion already whereas singles don't.. some crave it.. others don't and that affects how they communicate and meet people.. " I genuinely don't know. We were both promiscuous before we got together and didn't ask for or want a strong emotional connection with our lovers. We were discussing this last night actually as it seems to be a recurring theme in the fora currently. We came to the conclusion that people are just different and therefore have different requirements. However neither of us are quick to get involved emotionally with people, even on a platonic basis, maybe that's significant. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I have done in the past, but I'm finding it much harder to do these days.. Especially because I'm single... If I really feel a connection then it makes me miss what I don't have on a regular basis..I want that can't get enough of each other raw passion. Random sex just doesn't do it for me. The best sex I've ever had was when deep feelings were involved.. Hence why I don't have many meets at the moment. So im horny and fustrated most of the time at the moment grrrr haha and as melia puts it a "lady wank" just doesn't satisfy me... But rather that then just a fuck. " I agree, The best sex is always with a deep emotional attachment with someone you truly adore, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I agree with this ... I've always thought that sometimes people are looking for emotional connections that are missing in their lives. And there also is a discrepancy between men and women, men seem totally capable of just sex, with no connection of any sort for fulfilment, whereas women prefer sex with a connection of some sort for fulfilment. Of course I'm generalising and only talking about my experience on fab ...... " I think that for *some* women the need for emotional connection is a result of society's attitudes towards women and sex. After all nice women don't enjoy sex just for its own sake...do they? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! " Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I wonder whether it's because most singles crave a strong connection with someone before they can think in a less connected way... couples have their emotion already whereas singles don't.. some crave it.. others don't and that affects how they communicate and meet people.. I genuinely don't know. We were both promiscuous before we got together and didn't ask for or want a strong emotional connection with our lovers. We were discussing this last night actually as it seems to be a recurring theme in the fora currently. We came to the conclusion that people are just different and therefore have different requirements. However neither of us are quick to get involved emotionally with people, even on a platonic basis, maybe that's significant." It's knowing what suits your needs I think and being open about what works for you. More often than not I think grey areas cause drama when lines aren't clear on both sides. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have done in the past, but I'm finding it much harder to do these days.. Especially because I'm single... If I really feel a connection then it makes me miss what I don't have on a regular basis..I want that can't get enough of each other raw passion. Random sex just doesn't do it for me. The best sex I've ever had was when deep feelings were involved.. Hence why I don't have many meets at the moment. So im horny and fustrated most of the time at the moment grrrr haha and as melia puts it a "lady wank" just doesn't satisfy me... But rather that then just a fuck. I agree, The best sex is always with a deep emotional attachment with someone you truly adore, " With respect where does that leave the people you meet? Second best? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. " Or they’re too scared to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. " The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I wonder whether it's because most singles crave a strong connection with someone before they can think in a less connected way... couples have their emotion already whereas singles don't.. some crave it.. others don't and that affects how they communicate and meet people.. I genuinely don't know. We were both promiscuous before we got together and didn't ask for or want a strong emotional connection with our lovers. We were discussing this last night actually as it seems to be a recurring theme in the fora currently. We came to the conclusion that people are just different and therefore have different requirements. However neither of us are quick to get involved emotionally with people, even on a platonic basis, maybe that's significant. It's knowing what suits your needs I think and being open about what works for you. More often than not I think grey areas cause drama when lines aren't clear on both sides. " Yes I agree. We're both very clear with people on here and in real life. It helps but leads to unpopularity ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Or they’re too scared to. " Totally.. it's difficult to put yourself out there sometimes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. " Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes we can separate emotions from sex but if you are seeing people regularly there needs to be some kind of relationship in a friends based way , a real connection Do you think it would be as easy if you weren't in a couple already?" Probably not for me as my heart rules my head , D would definitely find it easier as he’s more cautious x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course. That's how I manage to have sex with others while being married. It wouldn't work if I was becoming emotionally involved with everyone. That's not to say my encounters are devoid of emotional feeling, just that I know how to separate lusty sex from lovey sex. Two completely different things. Yep, this exactly. Do you think this is because you're in a strong relationship? Possibly. It does seem that it's mostly people who are here singly who need an emotional connection. We meet people socially first to see if we get on but establishing an emotional connection that's anything but superficial compared to the connection we have with each other isn't possible. We're sexually promiscuous rather than emotionally promiscuous if you like. I think couples and singles on here are a world apart in how they view, handle and use the site.. with the odd exception.. I think you're right although the single men we meet have no interest in emotional connections. The following is a discussion point. I'm not offended or implying anyone is wrong for feeling the way they do. I sense a slight distaste towards disconnected sex running through this thread and others on similar subjects from some of the language used. I wonder if that's as a result of needing emotional connection or part of the motive for it. I wonder whether it's because most singles crave a strong connection with someone before they can think in a less connected way... couples have their emotion already whereas singles don't.. some crave it.. others don't and that affects how they communicate and meet people.. I genuinely don't know. We were both promiscuous before we got together and didn't ask for or want a strong emotional connection with our lovers. We were discussing this last night actually as it seems to be a recurring theme in the fora currently. We came to the conclusion that people are just different and therefore have different requirements. However neither of us are quick to get involved emotionally with people, even on a platonic basis, maybe that's significant. It's knowing what suits your needs I think and being open about what works for you. More often than not I think grey areas cause drama when lines aren't clear on both sides. Yes I agree. We're both very clear with people on here and in real life. It helps but leads to unpopularity ![]() I think you have it spot on! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. " Yes, I've only had it happen a couple of times, those times have developed. I don't have an issue with keeping myself in check though and it only developed because the feelings were reciprocated. I've always worked on the basis of not connecting emotionally with others as it does and will lead to negative behaviours. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() Agree, honesty is vital for me, both ways. I’m too old for mind games and players. I cannot be doing with all that shit. If me laying it out as it is and being honest fucks it up then so be it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. " Life is always that way isn't it? Is that why we try to sublimate our emotions so often, as a means of self protection? Out of fear of being vulnerable hurt or something not being reciprocated? There's a girl. The moment I saw her I knew that I wanted to be in her life, and have her in mine. She didnt want the same, if she had.... But to live our lives by sublimatiing our emotions, isn't that ultimately far more painful, more disconnected from life, than allowing for the fact that emotions exist, and that all emotions positive and negative are part of who we are. If we try to ignore dismiss or constrain them at what point do we diminish our humanity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() Do you think that your ability to seperate emotion from great sex can affect how you think about people though? Do you stop yourself from falling for a partner or do you think you've just not met him yet? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find that if I'm in the right frame of mind I can have a "fab" meet have great sex and take it for what it is.. End of... No head fuck I also find there's a differing varience on the emotional attachment.. I can fancy someone and are be attracted to them and think are sexy as fuck, have a meet no problems but then there's the very few people (for me) who come along and you feel that instant grrrrr I want you now.. Not Just on a physical level but on all levels.. And for me now if I experience that gut instinct and they only want NSA then I won't meet them.. Even if I think they are incredibly sexy. I've learnt the hard way not too. And being honest if I'm feeling more vulnerable then that's when I now avoid fab meets as well because that's when "the feels" can be worse.. So im learning to do what suits me and when I can or cannot meet someone. " I want you (to make me feel better) vs I want you (to make you feel better) innit. But if you're already on top of the world then...... What's to want....? ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() Absolutely! I call them head fuckers! There are a few on every site and in every walk of life I guess! They fuck people up big time - certainly did with me - but it was a hell of a good learning curve! ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. Yes, I've only had it happen a couple of times, those times have developed. I don't have an issue with keeping myself in check though and it only developed because the feelings were reciprocated. I've always worked on the basis of not connecting emotionally with others as it does and will lead to negative behaviours. " Do you think meeting tealady helped you reaffirm your lines and helps you detach much easier? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it comes down to how you define "emotional connection" - for me, and from what I have seen from others to, it's multi-faceted and as such an emotional connection doesn't have to mean hearts and flowers and deep seated love - it can simply be a meeting of minds, an attraction and "getting on" without the need for a longstanding monogomous relationship. I actually find the term "no strings attached" slightly odd - for some there won't be any at all, but for me personally that would be a very cold and clinical experience - there will always be strings of some sort, whether they be simply consideration and respect for the person you're meeting or something deeper. How to separate things though is the key, and this is where my oft rolled out "bubble theory" comes into play, I've not mentioned it for a while, but apologies for rolling it out again to anyone I've bored with it before ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find that if I'm in the right frame of mind I can have a "fab" meet have great sex and take it for what it is.. End of... No head fuck I also find there's a differing varience on the emotional attachment.. I can fancy someone and are be attracted to them and think are sexy as fuck, have a meet no problems but then there's the very few people (for me) who come along and you feel that instant grrrrr I want you now.. Not Just on a physical level but on all levels.. And for me now if I experience that gut instinct and they only want NSA then I won't meet them.. Even if I think they are incredibly sexy. I've learnt the hard way not too. And being honest if I'm feeling more vulnerable then that's when I now avoid fab meets as well because that's when "the feels" can be worse.. So im learning to do what suits me and when I can or cannot meet someone. " Totally.. it's very much about self awareness and protecting yourself. Can be tough when others aren't as clear on what they're open to. I think many meet people they fancy hoping that something develops, even though the other person just wants NSA.. it's an accident waiting to happen!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find that if I'm in the right frame of mind I can have a "fab" meet have great sex and take it for what it is.. End of... No head fuck I also find there's a differing varience on the emotional attachment.. I can fancy someone and are be attracted to them and think are sexy as fuck, have a meet no problems but then there's the very few people (for me) who come along and you feel that instant grrrrr I want you now.. Not Just on a physical level but on all levels.. And for me now if I experience that gut instinct and they only want NSA then I won't meet them.. Even if I think they are incredibly sexy. I've learnt the hard way not too. And being honest if I'm feeling more vulnerable then that's when I now avoid fab meets as well because that's when "the feels" can be worse.. So im learning to do what suits me and when I can or cannot meet someone. I want you (to make me feel better) vs I want you (to make you feel better) innit. But if you're already on top of the world then...... What's to want....? ![]() ![]() This is just me but I think the use of the word "random" to describe a person one is having casual sex with implies that they're somehow less because of it. Everyone we meet is important and significant to us in the moment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it comes down to how you define "emotional connection" - for me, and from what I have seen from others to, it's multi-faceted and as such an emotional connection doesn't have to mean hearts and flowers and deep seated love - it can simply be a meeting of minds, an attraction and "getting on" without the need for a longstanding monogomous relationship. I actually find the term "no strings attached" slightly odd - for some there won't be any at all, but for me personally that would be a very cold and clinical experience - there will always be strings of some sort, whether they be simply consideration and respect for the person you're meeting or something deeper. How to separate things though is the key, and this is where my oft rolled out "bubble theory" comes into play, I've not mentioned it for a while, but apologies for rolling it out again to anyone I've bored with it before ![]() Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() ![]() ![]() Totally!! Half the battle is finding someone on the same page.. otherwise it's a disaster with 2 people trying to change each other.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Gemini described it perfectly. In that moment with that person you are in your own bubble and the emotion that fuel that can arise. However, afterwards you return to normal life with a beautiful memory until (and including if) it happens again " Yep. Love the bubble analogy. That’s how I see it too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We are always honest with any prospective meet, that it’s nsa and nothing more, it then gives them the opportunity to choose. For pickle it’s never a problem as most blokes are happy just for a shag. Cheese however isn’t as lucky as most (not all) women seem to want more." I think that's the hard bit.. when you guys clearly communicate what you want and others go into it without the same mindset! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find that if I'm in the right frame of mind I can have a "fab" meet have great sex and take it for what it is.. End of... No head fuck I also find there's a differing varience on the emotional attachment.. I can fancy someone and are be attracted to them and think are sexy as fuck, have a meet no problems but then there's the very few people (for me) who come along and you feel that instant grrrrr I want you now.. Not Just on a physical level but on all levels.. And for me now if I experience that gut instinct and they only want NSA then I won't meet them.. Even if I think they are incredibly sexy. I've learnt the hard way not too. And being honest if I'm feeling more vulnerable then that's when I now avoid fab meets as well because that's when "the feels" can be worse.. So im learning to do what suits me and when I can or cannot meet someone. I want you (to make me feel better) vs I want you (to make you feel better) innit. But if you're already on top of the world then...... What's to want....? ![]() ![]() I agree, I have esteem for every human being on the planet, even those who I disagree with, just simply because they're a human, filled with potential and also I have no idea about 99.999999 % of what they might think or know. Humans are ace! I see some ppl on here do treat ppl like "randoms" or meat though and it makes me sad.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() The latter my lovely! ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Oooh!!! Exciting! Fingers crossed for you ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Awwww cool ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks lovely! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? I can - yes - absolutely! But then I realised since joining fab that I’ve always had a very ‘bloke’ mentality when it comes to sex in that I can enjoy great sex with virtual strangers for what it is! Of course I need to be physically and emotionally attracted to them - but attracted - not attached! The attachments I’ve made on Fab are friendship attachments - some of those people I have sex with - many I don’t! You’re right though op - many ARE in capable of the two - and whilst that can result in the formation of some lovely, loving fab couples - more often than not (on a site like this) it causes no end of shit as one person is in strictly nsa mode and the other develops ‘the feels’ in an incredibly short time! Then all hell breaks loose and often others get caught in the crossfire! That’s been my observation of it so far anyway! Very much so.. reminds me of a thread I did a while ago about how clear people are on what they truly want. I can't do NSA and have been very clear on this yet still had people attempt to get close that were clearly not on the same page. That's just a recipe for disaster and not worth the stress. My observation has been that a large proportion of singletons would like to meet their emotional equivalent and that grey area of allowing themselves to emotionally connect is a really tricky balancing act. Absolutely - and I think on a site like this honesty is vital! The only times I’ve been hurt on here are when people have deceived me! Lies hurt - honesty from the outset rarely does! Don’t get me wrong - I don’t particularly want to be single for the rest of my life and I’d like to meet a special, amazing someone! I know, however, that I want that special someone to be able to separate love and great sex just as successfully as I can - so that we can both swing but be each other’s undisputed number 1 - like many of the long term, successful couples on here! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I’ll let you know how it goes! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else?" I certainly think the bubble theory can be applied regardless of single/attached status - but I guess it would come down to individual needs and desires and what you are looking for at any given time - if someone was happily single and not looking for "a relationship" then it would be very easy to apply it - looking for a relationship then I think it could still be applied just your need to be inside the bubble more often becomes stronger until at some point it envelops you completely and, if desired, other satellite bubbles appear ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. Yes, I've only had it happen a couple of times, those times have developed. I don't have an issue with keeping myself in check though and it only developed because the feelings were reciprocated. I've always worked on the basis of not connecting emotionally with others as it does and will lead to negative behaviours. Do you think meeting tealady helped you reaffirm your lines and helps you detach much easier?" No, I was always able to do it fairly easily and recognise the difference between 'romantic sex' and 'physical sex'. I do think that me having a partner helps others to detach though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can do and have done in the past, I've had random encounters in clubs where it was just about the 'here and now', the purely physical attraction and I've had meets where it was literally just about having fun with someone that I connected with intellectually. I can separate emotional connection and sex, on occasions the line has become blurred though, that's when it's become more. The blurring of the lines is the danger zone.. either something develops or someone gets hurt.. Yes, I've only had it happen a couple of times, those times have developed. I don't have an issue with keeping myself in check though and it only developed because the feelings were reciprocated. I've always worked on the basis of not connecting emotionally with others as it does and will lead to negative behaviours. Do you think meeting tealady helped you reaffirm your lines and helps you detach much easier? No, I was always able to do it fairly easily and recognise the difference between 'romantic sex' and 'physical sex'. I do think that me having a partner helps others to detach though. " Ah ok.. think I've always been crap at that.. which is why I've met so little over the last 3 years! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else? I certainly think the bubble theory can be applied regardless of single/attached status - but I guess it would come down to individual needs and desires and what you are looking for at any given time - if someone was happily single and not looking for "a relationship" then it would be very easy to apply it - looking for a relationship then I think it could still be applied just your need to be inside the bubble more often becomes stronger until at some point it envelops you completely and, if desired, other satellite bubbles appear ![]() Ha ha god there's more bubbles!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With a judo chop its possible" Back to your lamppost ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes I believe you can separate the two. You can have a connection and attraction of sorts without having emotions getting in the way. " This ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Gemini described it perfectly. In that moment with that person you are in your own bubble and the emotion that fuel that can arise. However, afterwards you return to normal life with a beautiful memory until (and including if) it happens again Yep. Love the bubble analogy. That’s how I see it too. " It definitely works for me ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would also add, communication is important, an open honest conversation between the two " It's where so many go wrong.. when people meet others with whole different mindsets! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would also add, communication is important, an open honest conversation between the two It's where so many go wrong.. when people meet others with whole different mindsets!" It’s an early part of the conversation for me and way before any meet | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else? I certainly think the bubble theory can be applied regardless of single/attached status - but I guess it would come down to individual needs and desires and what you are looking for at any given time - if someone was happily single and not looking for "a relationship" then it would be very easy to apply it - looking for a relationship then I think it could still be applied just your need to be inside the bubble more often becomes stronger until at some point it envelops you completely and, if desired, other satellite bubbles appear ![]() This will be the one and only time ever I sing "I'm Forever Blowing Bubbles" ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional connection from physical connection? Are you able to truly have one without the other? Im not sure I ever have, and it seems to be getting worse as I get older.. I'd genuinely rather have a cup of tea than sex without an emotional link. Can you do it? Does it take effort? Are some people just incapable of seperating the two? " I’ve never been able to if I’m attracted and have chemistry but if I’m not overly attracted or little chemistry then yes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else? I certainly think the bubble theory can be applied regardless of single/attached status - but I guess it would come down to individual needs and desires and what you are looking for at any given time - if someone was happily single and not looking for "a relationship" then it would be very easy to apply it - looking for a relationship then I think it could still be applied just your need to be inside the bubble more often becomes stronger until at some point it envelops you completely and, if desired, other satellite bubbles appear ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ha ha ha are you skipping too? You're in rather a chipper mood! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Ha ha I love the bubble!! Do you think you would be as able to step in and out if you didn't have a partner to put above all else? I certainly think the bubble theory can be applied regardless of single/attached status - but I guess it would come down to individual needs and desires and what you are looking for at any given time - if someone was happily single and not looking for "a relationship" then it would be very easy to apply it - looking for a relationship then I think it could still be applied just your need to be inside the bubble more often becomes stronger until at some point it envelops you completely and, if desired, other satellite bubbles appear ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You sing that and I’ll give you some soap to make those bubbles flow as you wash your mouth haha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Yes. I just don't want to." Like pretty much everything in life its just personal choice as per usual innit.... ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes i can. But then someone comes along that takes your breath away and you want to see how far down the rabbit hole you can both go together ![]() Never thought of it as a rabbit hole before...... ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() That would imply an emotional connection still right? Just not a romantic one, social chemistry and mental attraction emotions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() A little I guess. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I need a spark, chemistry with a person for it to be satisfying. Emotionally I'm not sure if I do need that anymore. In the past I absolutely used sex as a way to fill part of that void in my life. Affection. Now though I fear getting hurt too much to allow my emotions to get too involved. I need to feel wanted and desired and I need to want and desire the other person. I need lust but will never again confuse it with or seek more from it than just that. " I think a lot of ppl use sex to fill a hole.... ....no pun intended.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. I just don't want to. Like pretty much everything in life its just personal choice as per usual innit.... ![]() ![]() You make it sound so romantic... ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I need a spark, chemistry with a person for it to be satisfying. Emotionally I'm not sure if I do need that anymore. In the past I absolutely used sex as a way to fill part of that void in my life. Affection. Now though I fear getting hurt too much to allow my emotions to get too involved. I need to feel wanted and desired and I need to want and desire the other person. I need lust but will never again confuse it with or seek more from it than just that. " That's a definite decision to hold that line.. maybe that'll change in time when the hurt isn't as raw... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes i can. But then someone comes along that takes your breath away and you want to see how far down the rabbit hole you can both go together ![]() ![]() ![]() It's a bit like Alice in Wonderland. An unknown void whereby you meet someone that you want to take the leap with and risk not knowing what will happen, but you have that connection where you need to risk yourself just to try ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can. But sex without connection is only a little bit more exiting than a lady wank ![]() ![]() Exactly this ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() I think maybe some people assume that not being emotionally involved means you'll find just fuck anybody. Is that why the word "randoms" is used so often? I just had a lightbulb moment ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wouldn't you need an emotional connection of some sort to want to have that physical connection" On a very superficial level yes but physical attraction is much more important to me for casual sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() ![]() Possibly! I don’t have any objections to those on here (though I find it curious bearing in mind the nature of the site!) who apparently can’t shag without an intense physical, emotional and seemingly almost spiritual connection - ie virtually being in love - but I roll my eyes a little when some (not the op as I think it’s genuinely just an open question) seem to feel a sense of superiority or higher morality to those of us who can fuck people for the pleasure, excitement and fondness of that moment - whether repeated with that person or not! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() ![]() Me too ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm quite good at separating the two. That said I can't/won't have sex just for the sake of it. I need to actually like/feel attracted to someone otherwise I might as well sit on my vibrator ![]() ![]() Quite. I vet quite hard on Fab, but that's mostly about respect and safety (and not having my time wasted). When I know I'm safe, my limitations are a whole lot less. A shared social activity, mutual pleasure, kink, what have you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |