FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Sri Lanka's face covering ban .

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A necessary security step or alienating a whole religion?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A necessary security step or alienating a whole religion?"

It's no different from women covering their tits. Can we ban that too please?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I look at it as a security measure. Fully respect people's right to believe and Wear what they like but to be fair, if all you can see of someone is their eyes, they could be anyone!

If people have to take their motorcycle helmets off for security purposes, why should some women not have to show their face?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

An overreaction to a heinous crime. It’s group punishment for the acts of a few individuals.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Makes no sense and will just create more resentment. These attacks were carried out openly by men dressed as tourists in hotels. Do we ban all tourists or close down all hotels? 0f course not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its going to annoy some but it does stop people hiding behind it and the situation is serious over there so make people show their faces or do more children have to die so people can cover up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London


"An overreaction to a heinous crime. It’s group punishment for the acts of a few individuals.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oupleforfun31Couple
over a year ago

Bradford


"A necessary security step or alienating a whole religion?

It's no different from women covering their tits. Can we ban that too please?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edmark07Man
over a year ago

liverpool

The attacks were carried out by men in shorts n tees. This won't help either the situation worse security services

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

As has been said the suicide bombers that they have CCTV footage of made no attempt to hide their faces. Banning back packs might be more logical

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just walk into a shop where a woman serving is wearing a full face veil while wearing a balaclava and see what they say then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation."

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know. "

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *c1989Woman
over a year ago

Manchester


"As has been said the suicide bombers that they have CCTV footage of made no attempt to hide their faces. Banning back packs might be more logical"

I don't think its the bombers they are trying to detect.

Anyone involved can go about undetected by donning a burkha.

There was that incident a while back involving a man disguising himself in a burkha trying to flee a murder conviction so I can certainly see the logic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance "

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Why are women being punished for the actions of men?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why are women being punished for the actions of men?

"

It's not just women. Male cross dressers in Sri Lanka are also being banned from wearing burkhas. There are many.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference. "

It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What about Muslim women who identify as men?... do they get a pass on the head/face covering thing? Genuine question because i really don't know...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance "

Any yours do? Interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.

It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time? "
do a bit of both. Simples

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.

It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time? "

Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.

It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time?

Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know. "

Ah, good cop out. Me, a man brought up in a muslim household knows less about a muslim female's upbringing than you, a privileged white western woman? Yeah, you're the expert sweety

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stellaWoman
over a year ago

London


"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.

And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.

And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance

And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.

It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time?

Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know.

Ah, good cop out. Me, a man brought up in a muslim household knows less about a muslim female's upbringing than you, a privileged white western woman? Yeah, you're the expert sweety "

Please, keep telling me how much you know about me. Do add in some more terms of endearment like “sweety” to add weight to your point. It’s fabulous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone planning on visiting the island anytime soon?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top