FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The science of sexual fantasy

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

My poolside reading and podcast listening is Dr Justin Lehmiller. Some of his latest work is centred around sexual fantasy.

His survey of. 4100 Americans revealed that while we all fantasise for different reasons and in different ways he found that men and women show different levels of detail.

Women seem more particular about the setting and location of the fantasy rather than the person or people. Where as he found men were more particular about the people.

This intrigued me because on here to me women are often more particular about the people than men are.

So my question is when it comes to fantasy what is the key for you. The people/person or the setting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My poolside reading and podcast listening is Dr Justin Lehmiller. Some of his latest work is centred around sexual fantasy.

His survey of. 4100 Americans revealed that while we all fantasise for different reasons and in different ways he found that men and women show different levels of detail.

Women seem more particular about the setting and location of the fantasy rather than the person or people. Where as he found men were more particular about the people.

This intrigued me because on here to me women are often more particular about the people than men are.

So my question is when it comes to fantasy what is the key for you. The people/person or the setting "

So basicsly women are shallow materialists while men are about the person and connection?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My poolside reading and podcast listening is Dr Justin Lehmiller. Some of his latest work is centred around sexual fantasy.

His survey of. 4100 Americans revealed that while we all fantasise for different reasons and in different ways he found that men and women show different levels of detail.

Women seem more particular about the setting and location of the fantasy rather than the person or people. Where as he found men were more particular about the people.

This intrigued me because on here to me women are often more particular about the people than men are.

So my question is when it comes to fantasy what is the key for you. The people/person or the setting "
person for me couldnt care a jolt where as long as i got her

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orthyorkypairCouple
over a year ago

North Yorkshire

person for both of us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

Location and setting down to the minutest detail. The people are shadowy figures.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't tend to fantasize unless I have someone in mind so I guess it's the most important part.

I tend to focus more on how things would feel or their scent or noises they'd make than the mechanics of it all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The person always x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entileschiWoman
over a year ago

Norwich


"Location and setting down to the minutest detail. The people are shadowy figures. "

This

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Location and setting down to the minutest detail. The people are shadowy figures.

This"

Why though? What is it about the location and setting tjat gets you going more than a person?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Person. Definitely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The person, for me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The fantasy would always be around someone I knew, rather than a fictional character or someone I'd not met. So yes more attention would be to detail of place and circumstance as that would be the fantasy part, rather than the person.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Person everytime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"

So basicsly women are shallow materialists while men are about the person and connection?

"

It IS about fantasy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *_Yeah19Couple
over a year ago

Lincoln

I must be a bloke then as mine usually involve SSS and a selection of sexy ladies , couldn’t say about the actual scenario!

TB

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Location and setting down to the minutest detail. The people are shadowy figures. "

This for me too, it's more about my senses and sensations than anything else.

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago

Manchester (he/him)

I think it would be interesting to know the social status of these people involved in the study. If they were all married then the person would be a given for most of those ladies involved, whereas for the guys it might point to fantasising about other people other than their partner.

The personal circumstances here will make a massive difference to the relevance of the results.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top