FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

me & my 26 kids

Jump to newest
 

By *ast Rollo OP   Man
over a year ago

glasgow west

a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So that is why the Tories were taking all the money away from the sick and disabled. To give to her and her 26 kids.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought there was a limit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

I thought the limit for child benefit was 2

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do "

You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.

Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,

B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)

and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.

I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

It's already capped at 2 kids.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do

You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.

Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,

B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)

and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.

I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer

"

its already limited

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do

You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.

Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,

B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)

and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.

I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer

its already limited"

There's still financial positives for having more children though, as far as I recall. Eligibility for social housing, if you're unemployed you can apply for a higher amount of jobseekers allowance if you have dependants (or you could 5 years ago when I was last unemployed) and I think there's a few others.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do "

But they wouldn't think thst.

They would just keep having kids and let them suffer till the state stepped in as it cant just let kids suffer because thier parents arw retards.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .

Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do

You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.

Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,

B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)

and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.

I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer

its already limited"

Only for kids born after april 2017. So she will be getting it for all of them older than that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top