Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk " Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent "Why was he in prison then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes he should be allowed to if it's in accordance with his licence But would any club want to sign a convicted paedophile who used his position to abuse a fan?" I read that no clubs, even foreign ones want him. Danish x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes he should be allowed to if it's in accordance with his licence But would any club want to sign a convicted paedophile who used his position to abuse a fan?" This. The club would loose many fans with a convenient paedophile playing, no parent would take their child to a game. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! " So it's okay to abuse a child and be fully aware of their age if they look older?? 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk " He is entitled to seek employment and he a trained professional, it just that he so high profile now no one going to hire him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! " He clearly is... you've just said she told him! And not accused either, found guilty. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Luke McCormack killed two kids whilst speeding and over the limit he got 4 years and he went back to his club Plymouth argyle " sex crimes are seen as worst not killing to children while speeding, don't blame me blame society. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! " Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then? "wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial "Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. " Didn’t have sex... nothing more than kiss and grope by all accounts, got what he deserved (Sunderland Fan) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it? "not guilty. is not guilty. do you look for excuses/mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it? "Family paid her former sexusl partners to discuss her sex life in court and somehow discussing the victims sexlife was deemed permissable evidence. And society seems to think that a woman who enjoys sex will consent to anything with anyone | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it?
Family paid her former sexusl partners to discuss her sex life in court and somehow discussing the victims sexlife was deemed permissable evidence. And society seems to think that a woman who enjoys sex will consent to anything with anyone"what total nonsense. she was proved to be a liar in court. she lied about several things DURING the 1st trial that come to be proved during the 2nd trial, new evidence came to light hence the courts ordering a retrial. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah he should be allowed to, but it's a free market, clubs are under no obligation to hire him. As for his offense... I don't know enough detail to be sure but from what I've read calling him a pedo is a huge reach. That being said I was given to understand it was a mistake regarding age, people in here seem to have the idea he knew her age for certain which if that's the case makes me far less sympathetic" So meeting a girl being fully aware of her age and for the sole reason of engaging in sexusl activities is a huge reach from beog a paedophile? By that logic I assume all those people caught on line by paedophile hunters are also innocent? Because that's what Johnson did. Only this tine it was a real school girl who turned up and was assaulted by him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah he should be allowed to, but it's a free market, clubs are under no obligation to hire him. As for his offense... I don't know enough detail to be sure but from what I've read calling him a pedo is a huge reach. That being said I was given to understand it was a mistake regarding age, people in here seem to have the idea he knew her age for certain which if that's the case makes me far less sympathetic So meeting a girl being fully aware of her age and for the sole reason of engaging in sexusl activities is a huge reach from beog a paedophile? By that logic I assume all those people caught on line by paedophile hunters are also innocent? Because that's what Johnson did. Only this tine it was a real school girl who turned up and was assaulted by him" can i ask your thoughts on the lady i lost my virginity too? i was under 16, she was over 18.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it?
not guilty. is not guilty. do you look for excuses/mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty? "lawyers often find mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty. It’s called ‘attempting to reduce the sentence’. Obviously there’s a moral difference between someone being found not guilty even when they did the crime simply on a technicality rather than not. Or doesn’t it matter? T matters to me. I have high moral standards. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah he should be allowed to, but it's a free market, clubs are under no obligation to hire him. As for his offense... I don't know enough detail to be sure but from what I've read calling him a pedo is a huge reach. That being said I was given to understand it was a mistake regarding age, people in here seem to have the idea he knew her age for certain which if that's the case makes me far less sympathetic So meeting a girl being fully aware of her age and for the sole reason of engaging in sexusl activities is a huge reach from beog a paedophile? By that logic I assume all those people caught on line by paedophile hunters are also innocent? Because that's what Johnson did. Only this tine it was a real school girl who turned up and was assaulted by him can i ask your thoughts on the lady i lost my virginity too? i was under 16, she was over 18.... " statutory r-pe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it?
not guilty. is not guilty. do you look for excuses/mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty? lawyers often find mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty. It’s called ‘attempting to reduce the sentence’. Obviously there’s a moral difference between someone being found not guilty even when they did the crime simply on a technicality rather than not. Or doesn’t it matter? T matters to me. I have high moral standards. "her family haven’t any moral standards it’s well known that they bragged about the money they have made from it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it?
not guilty. is not guilty. do you look for excuses/mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty? lawyers often find mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty. It’s called ‘attempting to reduce the sentence’. Obviously there’s a moral difference between someone being found not guilty even when they did the crime simply on a technicality rather than not. Or doesn’t it matter? T matters to me. I have high moral standards. "she was proven to be a liar. she got someone convicted on the basis of lies during the 1st trial. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah he should be allowed to, but it's a free market, clubs are under no obligation to hire him. As for his offense... I don't know enough detail to be sure but from what I've read calling him a pedo is a huge reach. That being said I was given to understand it was a mistake regarding age, people in here seem to have the idea he knew her age for certain which if that's the case makes me far less sympathetic So meeting a girl being fully aware of her age and for the sole reason of engaging in sexusl activities is a huge reach from beog a paedophile? By that logic I assume all those people caught on line by paedophile hunters are also innocent? Because that's what Johnson did. Only this tine it was a real school girl who turned up and was assaulted by him can i ask your thoughts on the lady i lost my virginity too? i was under 16, she was over 18.... statutory r-pe " but not paedo?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s served half his prison sentence and he’s out should he be allowed to play football again in the uk Yes why not. Even more so with chad Evans. He was proven innocent
Why was he in prison then?
wrongly convicted. not guilty after retrial
Not guilty for what reason? Technicality? Lack of evidence? He didn’t do it?
not guilty. is not guilty. do you look for excuses/mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty? lawyers often find mitigating circumstances when someone is found guilty. It’s called ‘attempting to reduce the sentence’. Obviously there’s a moral difference between someone being found not guilty even when they did the crime simply on a technicality rather than not. Or doesn’t it matter? T matters to me. I have high moral standards. her family haven’t any moral standards it’s well known that they bragged about the money they have made from it " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! " What world do you live in???? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? " i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ... "Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. " technically a paedophile wpuld mean she was p*epubescent so 12 ish? Ephebophilia is for late pubescent teenagers up to 19. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ... Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was. " you picking and choosing your replies now? haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ...
Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was. ".is that what happened or is thst a typo by the poster? Did she tell.him.she was o ver 16 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. technically a paedophile wpuld mean she was p*epubescent so 12 ish? Ephebophilia is for late pubescent teenagers up to 19. " legal age of consent is 16. Anyone younger, the law deems they are incapable of consent. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ... Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was. you picking and choosing your replies now? haha " No I'm just not interested in engaging with what was clearly a loaded question | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. technically a paedophile wpuld mean she was p*epubescent so 12 ish? Ephebophilia is for late pubescent teenagers up to 19. legal age of consent is 16. Anyone younger, the law deems they are incapable of consent. " paedophile has nothing to do with age of consent it means pr*pubescent. https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/world-news/adam-johnson-jailed-how-whatsapp-7620441 But hep he knew she was 15 (she does look about 20) but she told him so yep grooming is dead to rights | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ...
Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was.
.is that what happened or is thst a typo by the poster?
Did she tell.him.she was o ver 16"Johnson was fully aware of her age. It was well reported in his trial | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! What world do you live in???? i dont think he realised he actually knew her real age ...
Read the post again. He states she looked older than the age she told him he was.
.is that what happened or is thst a typo by the poster?
Did she tell.him.she was o ver 16
Johnson was fully aware of her age. It was well reported in his trial "Yeah jjst googled dont follow football so unfamiliar with the case. Seen the whatsapps he knew it and still went for it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Definitely! To class him as a peadophile is totally wrong! If anyone saw the girl on social media he was accused of meeting with, then you’d realise why he thought she was older than what she told him! Did he have sex with an under age girl? If he did, then to label him a paedofile is the correct and appropriate label. technically a paedophile wpuld mean she was p*epubescent so 12 ish? Ephebophilia is for late pubescent teenagers up to 19. legal age of consent is 16. Anyone younger, the law deems they are incapable of consent. paedophile has nothing to do with age of consent it means pr*pubescent. https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/world-news/adam-johnson-jailed-how-whatsapp-7620441 But hep he knew she was 15 (she does look about 20) but she told him so yep grooming is dead to rights" He doesn’t sound like a very nice chap. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
