FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Dr Evil

Jump to newest
 

By *rumph650 OP   Man
over a year ago

Cardiff

Even though I find it hard to understand why anyone would want to remove their nipple or split their tongue, surely it should be their choice. The tattooist who was given a 40 month sentence for carrying out the work I think was treated a bit harshly. The people he worked on were happy with what he's done so why ruin his life and tie up a prison cell, when money and resources might be better spent locking up actual criminals. What are your thoughts ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Totally agree, his customer wanted what they asked for he didn’t force anyone!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

I agree as well...as the procedures were done with the permission and at the behest of his clients

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilth500Man
over a year ago

Merseyside

he broke the law no??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

I think the guys who had his ear removed felt duped by him as to what he was getting into.

He operated outside the law literally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ibblingnewtWoman
over a year ago

by the sea

He wasn’t medically trained to do those modifications, The nipples have a lot of vascular parts, so a risk of bleeding infection etc, I think people have every right to have modified bodies but it needs to be done in clinical conditions by trained people for the more extreme ones a tattoo parlour isn’t the ideal place tbh, I feel for the guy and he shouldn’t have got that sentance

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilth500Man
over a year ago

Merseyside


"I think the guys who had his ear removed felt duped by him as to what he was getting into.

He operated outside the law literally. "

then he's not exempt then. hes a criminal same as bank robbers and violent offenders. simples

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilth500Man
over a year ago

Merseyside


"He wasn’t medically trained to do those modifications, The nipples have a lot of vascular parts, so a risk of bleeding infection etc, I think people have every right to have modified bodies but it needs to be done in clinical conditions by trained people for the more extreme ones a tattoo parlour isn’t the ideal place tbh, I feel for the guy and he shouldn’t have got that sentance "

he seriously broke the law .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London


"he broke the law no??"

Yes. Consent is not a defence to ABH (actual bodily harm) or above in criminal law unless as part of a regulated sport (boxing,mma etc).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top