Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I personally think it’s disgusting. They weren’t advertising porn (ok they were sponsored by a softcore channel, but that’s different), they were using their initials and not a full name and the whole reason for their existence is to raise money for charity. Why should they be discriminated against because of their legal professions? " Agreed! But....i do now follow them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I personally think it’s disgusting. They weren’t advertising porn (ok they were sponsored by a softcore channel, but that’s different), they were using their initials and not a full name and the whole reason for their existence is to raise money for charity. Why should they be discriminated against because of their legal professions? Agreed! But....i do now follow them. " Neither do I, I just read about it in the Daily Mail earlier today. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The very little bit I know about cycling includes the fact that the sport is trying to promote a "clean" image after certain controversies. In my mind promoting sexual health charities is a good thing to be doing but porn pedallers is an ambiguous name that has certain connotations, I would just have asked them to change it and keep up the good work. " True. I'd still like to see their gear. Arf arf | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |