Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork?" Do bratwurst count as sausages? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine is assuredly correct. Alas, many fab-straight fellas seem to not believe me going by their messages." this i would like to keep my filters open to guys who need a straight wingman or are organising gangbangs etc but my utter 100% straighness does nothing to deter homosexual men from sending unwanted requests....so i have to keep the no single guys filter on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork? Do bratwurst count as sausages? " mmmmm brotwurst and Frankfurters..... Thanks now I'm hungry haha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I did used to have bi curious but got too many messages wanting me to join couples and some where quite persistent as if the curious bit wasn’t even considered. I changed it to straight and decided to keep any curiousness between me and people who I trust and like and who won’t pressure me into anything. " Ditto I feel exactly the same. However, more recently I’ve been fantasising more about the ladies | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I changed mine to straight as was sick of couples expecting me to play woth the woman whether i found her attractive or not" Mine says straight and I still get those messages. I tell them that I'm happy for her to go down on me as long as I find him attractive but I'm not interested in going down on either of them. They tend not to respond after that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options. I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am only bi on the 29th February" That's the day I get laid | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I am only bi on the 29th February That's the day I get laid" You are welcome dude | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah, mine’s about right. I keep flirting with pansexual but I’m pretty much just bi. Wait a sec...does that make me Fab bi? " Pansexual would be a good addition but most people won't know what it means. Some sites have explanations to help people pick the sexuality that they feel fits them best. Or more than 1 tick. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options. I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances." "Only in the right circumstances" - good point. I find that someone saying they are bi means people assume they will definitely play with everyone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options. I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances. "Only in the right circumstances" - good point. I find that someone saying they are bi means people assume they will definitely play with everyone. " Thisis what I find too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nosey cunt aren’t you " Is that a bad thing? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No im a lesbian" Same here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me." Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. " That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift." You're definitely not Straight so that should go out the window. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift." Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. " A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?" They didn’t recognise Jedi as a recognised sexuality | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. " But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. " I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My sexuality on here is 100% accurate as I perceive it and I'm actually the only one that can perceive it as such. Much is made of the need to label on here, and I'm actually in two minds as to whether it really matters - does the phenomenon of "Fab straight" bother me? Not really, as it doesn't impact me at all as I wouldn't meet anyone identifying as straight who contacted me, as personally I figure if they are lying about their sexuality what else are they lying about (their marital status? Their approach to sexual health?). Does lying about your sexuality as a guy bemuse me? Yes it does, but only because most of the time it's done to get round the filters of those that won't meet bisexual men, without realising that by doing so they're potentially closing the door on a large number that either actively seek bisexual men, or are not bothered by them either way (as evidence for this a survey carried out on here earlier in the week showed that over 80% of people replying were not bothered if a guy is bisexual, and over 30% would go out of their way to do so). Having said all that, I appreciate there are situations like my good friend Genghis above, where there currently isn't a specific "cap that fits" but am not sure exactly what the answer to that one is, other than perhaps "labels are for tombstones baby" (copyright Yaphet Koto in Live & Let Die) in some instances. " There is an exception to every rule | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. " Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? " I think he has it on right now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. " You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? I think he has it on right now. " Just choking on my tea | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? " I went a gay bar once after a club with my friend a bisexual DJ. He said there'd be loads of nice women. Trying to pull a lesbian was like getting blood out of a stone. One said to me "Aren't you butch". I said " Nah, I'm just Straight mate". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My sexuality on here is 100% accurate as I perceive it and I'm actually the only one that can perceive it as such. Much is made of the need to label on here, and I'm actually in two minds as to whether it really matters - does the phenomenon of "Fab straight" bother me? Not really, as it doesn't impact me at all as I wouldn't meet anyone identifying as straight who contacted me, as personally I figure if they are lying about their sexuality what else are they lying about (their marital status? Their approach to sexual health?). Does lying about your sexuality as a guy bemuse me? Yes it does, but only because most of the time it's done to get round the filters of those that won't meet bisexual men, without realising that by doing so they're potentially closing the door on a large number that either actively seek bisexual men, or are not bothered by them either way (as evidence for this a survey carried out on here earlier in the week showed that over 80% of people replying were not bothered if a guy is bisexual, and over 30% would go out of their way to do so). Having said all that, I appreciate there are situations like my good friend Genghis above, where there currently isn't a specific "cap that fits" but am not sure exactly what the answer to that one is, other than perhaps "labels are for tombstones baby" (copyright Yaphet Koto in Live & Let Die) in some instances. There is an exception to every rule " Bloody big ones sometimes It does seem to be a Fab specific thing though - you don't go through day to day life advising people of your sexuality - even in a situation where you're likely to get sexual. For instance if I were to go to a club on a non-bi night, it's unlikely I'd be asked my sexuality, or feel the need to express it - people would have no way of knowing. I express mine on here as I am open to meeting other guys one to one for sex, now I haven't done so to date, but if the right guy were to happen along and all the usual things of connection and chemistry were there, then I'd be open to it, so by identifying as bisexual here, it gives that potential meet a chance to find me, or me them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. " It may sound odd, but I'd still like them to like me, see me as honest and non deceitful. If I'm commenting on something clearly in the realms of bisexualdom I'm going to constantly called 'Fabstraight' Which if Tame made a joke at me about, given he knows my real nature now. Would be recieved as a joke between 'Friends'. From someone who didn't, it'd just provoke another boring discussion about the dynamics of sexuality. Defending what I am and how I see myself. "Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right. Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" "Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right. Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. " Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. It may sound odd, but I'd still like them to like me, see me as honest and non deceitful. If I'm commenting on something clearly in the realms of bisexualdom I'm going to constantly called 'Fabstraight' Which if Tame made a joke at me about, given he knows my real nature now. Would be recieved as a joke between 'Friends'. From someone who didn't, it'd just provoke another boring discussion about the dynamics of sexuality. Defending what I am and how I see myself. "Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right. Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. " Ha ha it's only for you to decide Christ yes make up your own definition and enjoy it. There will always be some bugger trying to get a rise so grab it and own it!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" "Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right. Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! " Ha ha ha trust you!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" "Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right. Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! " Both | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. " OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen "I may be gone for some time..." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Most of my profiles are mostly accurate. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well theres no option for NECROPHILIAC,,oooh and if there was would ya be a straight necro or a gay necro,,fab necro???? " . Isnt that just dead boring | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen "I may be gone for some time..."" My poor aching brain | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen "I may be gone for some time..."" War and Peace was a quick read compared to that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. " Wow... couldn't resist a peak but didn't have the staying power to read through it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options. I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances." This is me also - Fi | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. " I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. " Amen, I want what I want when I want it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. " Is this profile available on kindle | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar. Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders. I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality. One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter". 99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes. I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested. A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi. once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing. I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box. Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with. Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label. If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. Nobody gets to label you. It is what it is. Whatever that may be. That's how I feel. "I am what I am" Popeye People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. " I like that idea a lot. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot." That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. " Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d prefer mine to say ‘bi-friendly’ or ‘bi-playful ‘ - but that’s not an option! I’ll never be fully bi - I’d never have a relationship (in that sense) with a woman and it’s very rare I play with a woman without a man present (I like cock far too much) To me, men are the cake, and a hot woman is the icing on top of it - particularly when her ‘cake’ is fucking me from behind whilst I give her attention! I thoroughly enjoy having cake at clubs and parties! " I've changed my mind on this a bit. As you say, you wouldn't have a relationship with a woman but you'd play with one. So I feel the sexuality 'label' on profiles is misleading and unnecessary. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d prefer mine to say ‘bi-friendly’ or ‘bi-playful ‘ - but that’s not an option! I’ll never be fully bi - I’d never have a relationship (in that sense) with a woman and it’s very rare I play with a woman without a man present (I like cock far too much) To me, men are the cake, and a hot woman is the icing on top of it - particularly when her ‘cake’ is fucking me from behind whilst I give her attention! I thoroughly enjoy having cake at clubs and parties! I've changed my mind on this a bit. As you say, you wouldn't have a relationship with a woman but you'd play with one. So I feel the sexuality 'label' on profiles is misleading and unnecessary. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. " They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. " It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink." Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years." I love how open and honest you 2 are. P | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years." So that's where I'm going wrong!! I get the occasional message from other guys but that's it - so I need to go Fab straight you think? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. So that's where I'm going wrong!! I get the occasional message from other guys but that's it - so I need to go Fab straight you think? " Most definately.. Only they tend to be sub bottoms that send you the messages. Wanting instant gratification. Not sure if that's what you're seeking my friend | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years." thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo " You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?" No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi Ms Icebreaker | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club " Can we still be mates though? If not I'll stay bi thanks | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight " I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose? No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi Ms Icebreaker " How would you describe queer? I love that word. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork? Do bratwurst count as sausages? mmmmm brotwurst and Frankfurters..... Thanks now I'm hungry haha " What about square sausage | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. " Sexuality Fluidity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. Sexuality Fluidity?" That's probably a thing, yes. Different time in life, different friends, different desires. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club " Oh I’ll make an exception for you Bro. Brace | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. I like that idea a lot. That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently. Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless. It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches. Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion. It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest. Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club Oh I’ll make an exception for you Bro. Brace " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose? No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi Ms Icebreaker How would you describe queer? I love that word. " I can't speak for Ms Icebreaker but for me my queerness is defined by the fact that I not only am fluid in my tastes (with regard to gender and sexual orientation) but I accept that that fluidity is an unexceptional state of being. I grew up with a host of sources around me in terms of speculative fiction, fabulous music and great people who made the idea of two genders or fixed categories of sexual orientation irrelevant. SO, like Ms Icebreaker I'm gleefuly queer... Mr Icebreaker | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably 70 percent of men’s are incorrect, or there isn’t a “fab straight” box to tick " How did you arrive at this conclusion and where are the facts to back up your findings ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose? No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi Ms Icebreaker How would you describe queer? I love that word. I can't speak for Ms Icebreaker but for me my queerness is defined by the fact that I not only am fluid in my tastes (with regard to gender and sexual orientation) but I accept that that fluidity is an unexceptional state of being. I grew up with a host of sources around me in terms of speculative fiction, fabulous music and great people who made the idea of two genders or fixed categories of sexual orientation irrelevant. SO, like Ms Icebreaker I'm gleefuly queer... Mr Icebreaker" I love that!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not? Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?" mine is as close as I can get it with the limited choices. If just no playful or situational if I could or hetro flexible As while I enjoy playing with ladies in group situations I've never chased or felt inclined to meet a lady on her own x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I guess I'm lucky in the fact that one of the few available choices on here applies to me. I've never been bi-curious and I've known since I first became a sexual being that I was attracted to and could fall in love with both men and women. Though saying that, I'm still not sure where I am on gender fluidity." You could be Pansexual. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
back to top |