FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Single male profiles

Jump to newest
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london

Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one"

I agree and I've wondered the same. On a previous profile I had some pics of me with one woman - but she knew she knew and consented. It was also there for the reason that we occasionally met together.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one"

What they don't obviously realise that if the females know they are on here and can be identifed,the person or persons who shared their pics are committing a criminal offence and if reported to the appropiate authorities,can be severely punished.

With maybe even jail time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

What they don't obviously realise that if the females know they are on here and can be identifed,the person or persons who shared their pics are committing a criminal offence and if reported to the appropiate authorities,can be severely punished.

With maybe even jail time. "

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Obviously so other women think they are capable of sex.

Maybe I need to put pics of my right hand in mine to show my compatability/ relationship status

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

I won't respond to men where the majority of a picture is female but just a hint of the man. I'm interested in meeting men not the women they have seen before.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’d like to meet a porn star sounds fun

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rontier PsychiatristMan
over a year ago

Coventry

No randoms on mine, just me and my Woman.

The key word as always is consent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkysexpotMan
over a year ago

leeds

I wouldn't put a pic of any female on my profile with or without their permission, the profile is about me and the women I may meet is between myself and her

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one"

"stars"

Is pushing it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't see it as a justification the the woman knows about it or well she's my woman so it's ok.

In my opinion if you have a singles profile nobody else should be in the photo.

I just don't understand what value it adds other than the fact it proves that you've got laid at some point in your life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed. "

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female."

Fab is not basically a porn site!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Pornstars? Where?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *s_macWoman
over a year ago

Traffic land

I avoid any single male profiles that feature females, I always wonder if the female has given permission for the picture to be used.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It’s not a crime to send intimate images or videos of yourself privately to another person if you're both consenting adults. It's a crime if they show them or send them to another person, upload them to a website, or threaten to do this, without your consent. This includes so called revenge porn. 

This criminal behaviour could be prosecuted under a number of different offences, such as breach of the peace or the specific criminal offence of sharing or threatening to share intimate images or videos without consent in Scotland. There's a similar offence in England and Wales."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female."

There is no 'revenge porn act'.

Section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 makes it an offence in England and Wales to disclose private sexual photographs and films without the consent of the individual depicted and with the intent to cause distress.

The issue of proof is a nightmare as it's the 'with intent to cause distress' that's the issue. The law isn't as simple as the papers make out unfortunately.

That said, I note you are in Scotland so I am not sure what the legislation is there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fab is not basically a porn site! "

Fab has thousands of pics of men and females engaging in sexual acts.

Live cam feeds of ppl having sex etc.

Your mobile phone providors class fabs as a porn site.

So what would you call it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

From 2014

"Revenge porn – the distribution of a private sexual image of someone without their consent and with the intention of causing them distress – will be made a specific offence in the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said:

The fact that there are individuals who are cruelly distributing intimate pictures of their former partners without their consent is almost beyond belief.

We want those who fall victim to this type of disgusting behaviour to know that we are on their side and will do everything we can to bring offenders to justice.

That is why we will change the law and make it absolutely clear to those who act in this way that they could face prison.

Minister for Women and Equalities Nicky Morgan said:

Circulating intimate photos of an individual without their consent is never acceptable. People are entitled to expect a reasonable level of respect and privacy.

It is right that those who do circulate these images are held to account, and that we educate young people to the hurt that can be caused by breaking this trust.

The change will cover the sharing of images both online and offline. It will mean that images posted to social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter will be caught by the offence, as well as those that are shared via text message. Images shared via email, on a website or the distribution of physical copies will also be caught. Those convicted will face a maximum sentence of 2 years in prison.

The offence will cover photographs or films which show people engaged in sexual activity or depicted in a sexual way or with their genitals exposed, where what is shown would not usually be seen in public. Victims and others will be able to report offences to the police to investigate. Officers will work with the Crown Prosecution Service to take forward cases for prosecution.

Those found to have committed a sexual offence can continue to be prosecuted under existing legislation, which can lead to sentences of up to 14 years in prison.

The change in the law will be made via an amendment to the Criminal Justice & Courts Bill, which includes a number of measures to toughen up sentencing."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I really don’t like seeing birds in single guys pictures, whether they’re sucking him off or he’s hanging out of one. I just don’t see the point of it.

It’s really off putting. Not once have I looked at one of those pictures and thought oh I want to meet him because there’s a woman sucking his dick in a picture.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"No randoms on mine, just me and my Woman.

The key word as always is consent. "

Why not a couples profile??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fab is not basically a porn site!

Fab has thousands of pics of men and females engaging in sexual acts.

Live cam feeds of ppl having sex etc.

Your mobile phone providors class fabs as a porn site.

So what would you call it?

"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female.

Fab is not basically a porn site! "

90% of it is I’m afraid

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago

Hillside desolate

It's worse when it's couples though. At least a single guy with a woman you know which one he is in the picture. With couples and multiple people in the picture you actually don't know which one is part of the couple or not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female.

Fab is not basically a porn site!

90% of it is I’m afraid"

In your opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I find it a real turn off and delete messages from men who have women in their photos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As I say woohoos. The legislation isn't as simple as the papers make out. The issue, as I have said is the 'with intention to cause distress'.

There has been very few convictions under the new legislation unfortunately.

In my opinion the law needs further tweaking to change it so it includes simply 'withough consent'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female.

Fab is not basically a porn site!

90% of it is I’m afraid

In your opinion. "

I’m afraid your a little blinkered

Biggest complaint on fab too many males. Second is fake profiles

But your right just my opinion

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The law is a little more specific than that... would have to be shared for specific purposes for the offence to be committed.

If the female objected to her face or any identifying marks been uploaded to a what is basically a porn site then it would be up to the police to decide what action to take, maybe under the revenge porn act if person who uploaded pics is well known to the female.

Fab is not basically a porn site!

90% of it is I’m afraid

In your opinion.

I’m afraid your a little blinkered

Biggest complaint on fab too many males. Second is fake profiles

But your right just my opinion"

Ok how is that blinkered? and what has too many males or fake profiles got to do with this being a porn site or not I don't think it's me that's blinkered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue. "

I fail to see how stating facts is an attitude or being agiated!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uciyassMan
over a year ago

sheffield

Single!!! Male!!! Is there such a thing ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue.

I fail to see how stating facts is an attitude or being agiated!"

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he girl with dreadlocksWoman
over a year ago

need to know basis in Wolverhampton


"I wouldn't put a pic of any female on my profile with or without their permission, the profile is about me and the women I may meet is between myself and her"

Spot on wish all the guys had this attitude.

Photos where all you see is a hand and her arse, like really why do you guys think thats the kind of stuff we want to see.

There needs to a new ruling on the kind of photos that are allowed on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As I say woohoos. The legislation isn't as simple as the papers make out. The issue, as I have said is the 'with intention to cause distress'.

There has been very few convictions under the new legislation unfortunately.

In my opinion the law needs further tweaking to change it so it includes simply 'withough consent'. "

A few convictions is still convictions though,maybe time the law clamped down harder.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he girl with dreadlocksWoman
over a year ago

need to know basis in Wolverhampton


"No randoms on mine, just me and my Woman.

The key word as always is consent. "

But want makes you think women want to see your woman? If your seeing people together then get a coupled profile, if its just you then photos shoukd be of just you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!"

So..

Im wrong with

There are thousands of pics of ppl having sex and also live cam feeds of the above?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issmorganWoman
over a year ago

Calderdale innit

Total turn off when a profile has more pics of other women ,than the actual bloke.

Even more so if its a woman in the avatar and no other pics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As I say woohoos. The legislation isn't as simple as the papers make out. The issue, as I have said is the 'with intention to cause distress'.

There has been very few convictions under the new legislation unfortunately.

In my opinion the law needs further tweaking to change it so it includes simply 'withough consent'.

A few convictions is still convictions though,maybe time the law clamped down harder."

Agree, needs to be changed still. Legislation looks good on paper. Approach CPS for a prosecution and it becomes clear it isn't that simple.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!

So..

Im wrong with

There are thousands of pics of ppl having sex and also live cam feeds of the above?

"

No you are very wrong that mobile phone providers consider this site porn site and also with the legislation and the law that exists but you are very clearly stated those as facts. Fab is very clear about the rules and it is not against the rules to have somebody else in your photo as long as their face is Blurred or they cannot be identified while I'm sure a few photos like this Creep in the majority I see abide by the rules and any that don't should be reported. I don't like seeing other people in singles profiles however it is not against the site rules if the face is Blurred so I don't understand why everyone is getting so uptight about it I just move along and get on with having my own fun.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It always smacks of insecurity to me.

Like they feel the need to prove they've had sex.

Sad

Very

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As I say woohoos. The legislation isn't as simple as the papers make out. The issue, as I have said is the 'with intention to cause distress'.

There has been very few convictions under the new legislation unfortunately.

In my opinion the law needs further tweaking to change it so it includes simply 'withough consent'.

A few convictions is still convictions though,maybe time the law clamped down harder.

Agree, needs to be changed still. Legislation looks good on paper. Approach CPS for a prosecution and it becomes clear it isn't that simple. "

As the above gentleman states there have been convictions under the legislation and as he also states "scottish law" is different.

I am aware that fabs do their best to stop unfiltered pics getting thro, fabs comes up as a porn site on a few public wifi connections.

The only thing i don't agree with is the "fake couples" whose wife or even husband have no idea their pics are on here.

Fabs does their best but like any site, it is open to abuse.

As you say lets move on and enjoy our adult hobby

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue.

I fail to see how stating facts is an attitude or being agiated!

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!"

Blinkered u r hon

No one other than fab CAN state facts but obvs they want

Don’t be that snowflake

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue.

I fail to see how stating facts is an attitude or being agiated!

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!

Blinkered u r hon

No one other than fab CAN state facts but obvs they want

Don’t be that snowflake"

Won’t I mean

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don’t know what the point od the thread is anymore

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No it doesn't!

Can you just turn down the attitude because it feels like you're coming across a little bit agitated about this issue.

I fail to see how stating facts is an attitude or being agiated!

Because it's the way you are saying it and also you are not giving facts you are giving opinion and passing them off as fact!

Blinkered u r hon

No one other than fab CAN state facts but obvs they want

Don’t be that snowflake"

What on earth are you on about!!!

it is exceptionally rude to call someone a snowflake simply because they disagree with you.

I suggest if you're going to start a thread be prepared that people are going to have different opinions and it is not pleasant to be rude to people that then comment on your thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wonder exactly the same thing OP. Unless they are a couple displaying action shots, these pics completely put me off chatting to someone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I must admit it does put me off being confronted by a woman's arsehole and pussy with a cock hanging out of it, when I look to see who I'm chatting to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I avoid any single male profiles that feature females, I always wonder if the female has given permission for the picture to be used."

This.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

Regardless of the law, the rules of the site are fairly clear:

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

https://m.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules

And in the site T's and C's:

10.5 In the case of those over 18 (or higher applicable age of consent), you must not publish or send any Content (including images) which enables those persons to be identified unless you have obtained their explicit written consent to the image / information being provided as well as to our privacy and cookies policy.

So if you have any doubts or come across pictures that go against those rules then report them so they can be investigated and if necessary removed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Regardless of the law, the rules of the site are fairly clear:

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

https://m.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules

And in the site T's and C's:

10.5 In the case of those over 18 (or higher applicable age of consent), you must not publish or send any Content (including images) which enables those persons to be identified unless you have obtained their explicit written consent to the image / information being provided as well as to our privacy and cookies policy.

So if you have any doubts or come across pictures that go against those rules then report them so they can be investigated and if necessary removed "

exactly this and that was my point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So..

If anyone sees a pornographic pic that they feel identifies a female or even a male who they think have not given their written permission to be used,they report it to fabs.

But if they feel upset enough they can also report it to the police to deal with,under the current legislation regarding images.

Is the outcome of this thread we think.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one"

I've often asked who the woman is in their pics.

Usually they reply "my ex". ...'No they hadn't asked her permission because they don't speak to her anymore and why am I being a prude'.

I just report their pic and message.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I do think if the upload screen made more of a mention of the so-called revenge porn act then it may deter people from uploading photos they haven't got consent for. Another issue that men don't seem to understand is that consent can be withdrawn retrospectively and they may be required to remove them when asked. Also something that should be part of the upload form.

For my part I have two photos; one of a previous sub who has more photos of our play on f-life than I do and a previous buddy who until recently was a fab user herself. Both of these photos only serve to demonstate forms of play involving restraints.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I try to avoid singles profiles with action shots. Simply put, anyone could say anything they want about consent, and I have no way to tell if you're telling the truth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who are the porn stars? The single males or the numerous random females?

Sorry OP, just thought I'd ask while I sit here melting in the heat of the rant collective that seems to have invaded Monday....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *good-being-badMan
over a year ago

mis-types and auto corrects leads cock leeds

Pretty sure the photo rules allow pictures to include others as long as the others identity is obscured.

Strange the consent issue is never mentioned about couples and single females that have others in their pictures

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham

[Removed by poster at 11/02/19 09:10:58]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham

So ....

Where does the tributing "girlfriends" or "wives" or "partners" fit in with this?

Or indeed any men if that is the poster's want ...

Do you think the person being tributed has given permission for such? Especially as this often involves pictures of said person's face ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham


"So ....

Where does the tributing "girlfriends" or "wives" or "partners" fit in with this?

Or indeed any men if that is the poster's want ...

Do you think the person being tributed has given permission for such? Especially as this often involves pictures of said person's face ... "

Although I agree what others have said ... this is straying away from the original thread ... sorry OP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uicyfruit3Man
over a year ago

portsmouth

I'm not fussed I have consent to use all the pictures that have me and another woman in them, I like the pictures (I won't go as far as saying that they are arty, but I wouldn't say they are vulgar)

If someone doesn't want to meet me based on that, it's their perogative. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *innie The MinxWoman
over a year ago

Under the Duvet


"I don't see it as a justification the the woman knows about it or well she's my woman so it's ok.

In my opinion if you have a singles profile nobody else should be in the photo.

I just don't understand what value it adds other than the fact it proves that you've got laid at some point in your life. "

Agree.

Major turn off for me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one"

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *innie The MinxWoman
over a year ago

Under the Duvet


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

"

The pix are generally a turn off for me

regardless, but I do see more of them on single men's threads than any others.

I don't want to see a dick buried in a possibly unsuspecting random.

(Unsuspecting about the pic,not the dick lol)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

My comments here are gender neutral, and also apply to third parties in couples profiles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

"

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest. "

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

"

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

"

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again "

That's the point I was trying to make but badly.

Let's be honest it is mainly male profiles that feature other people usually women, and I don't see how pointing that out it's man bashing. I wouldn't go near a woman though if she had bareback action shots on her profile and other people have suggested the same thing and it just seems ridiculous that somebody would even ask if it was a man bashing thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Likewise.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urse Gladys OP   Woman
over a year ago

london


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

"

‘‘Tis just a question

Not really worth reiterating

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I avoid single male profile that do this, but in my experience couples are just as guilty.

I've seen loads of couple profiles with pics of 3+ females arses, boobs etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I avoid single male profile that do this, but in my experience couples are just as guilty.

I've seen loads of couple profiles with pics of 3+ females arses, boobs etc. "

Yes I feel like there shouldn't be anyone else other than the people on the profile in the picture. If someone wants to do that then obviously it's their profile and their decision I just don't understand what it brings to the profile other than the fact they've obviously had sex at some point in their life.

I won't respond to a profile that has pictures such as this but I don't let it bother me I just move along.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again "

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Cheeky GirlsCouple (FF)
over a year ago

PDI GRAN CANARIA

I thought pictures had to be that of the person, not just appendages.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows."

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I didn't create the thread, and wouldn't have gendered it so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikeC81Man
over a year ago

harrow

For me there are three women on the photos that I have played with over a 10 year period. All three I have and got consent.

It’s not just men with women,I have seen women with men,women with couples and couples with random guys

For me as long as it is not bare back on a single profile then not so worried

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive. "

If I see it, yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"I didn't create the thread, and wouldn't have gendered it so. "

My point exactly.

As I may have said a few times.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I didn't create the thread, and wouldn't have gendered it so.

My point exactly.

As I may have said a few times. "

I think it's a broader point though. I made a comment on another thread yesterday where I specifically said not all men and women can be bad too, and was accused of man bashing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought pictures had to be that of the person, not just appendages."

Well, you would think so, so we can see who we're talking to.

There's also lots of couple's profiles with more than one man in the pics, or different men in the pics. How are you supposed to tell who the male of the profile is.

I don't often look at single female profiles, so I don't know how many have men in them.

I had one up with a buddy's cock in once, with me in it, playing with his cock. It was quite popular and it was his idea to put it on my profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I didn't create the thread, and wouldn't have gendered it so.

My point exactly.

As I may have said a few times. "

I don't understand why you shouldn't mention gender.

It was just your assumption but it was a man bashing thread but if you'd read it all you have realised it isn't.

I think assumption is the issue rather than the content.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive. "

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"For me there are three women on the photos that I have played with over a 10 year period. All three I have and got consent.

It’s not just men with women,I have seen women with men,women with couples and couples with random guys

For me as long as it is not bare back on a single profile then not so worried

"

You have plenty of pics of you too though. Some have very little of their own body, and lots of the women. Some people might enjoy looking at these pics, but as a single woman looking for a single man, I would prefer more of him-if he's going to have public pics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I was fortunate enough to be in a position to take pics with a lady present, I would go with an arty hand across my chest / arse, or spooning, probably in black and white with no genitals showing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

"

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I tell him I'll meet if his wife is coming to the meet too.

That's when they usually admit they haven't seen her in ages and she dumped them anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!"

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men. "

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Sometimes, problematic behaviour is perpetrated by one group more than another. Sometimes that's facts not bashing. We shouldn't have to walk on eggshells to avoid offending everyone of that demographic (there's no need to be deliberately offensive and bigotry is over the line, but I can't see how not liking photos mostly not of the person, and yes it is mostly guys that do it, is man bashing)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title. "

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance. "

But you know we're perfect Stingly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

But you know we're perfect Stingly "

FaF?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance. "

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

It does sometimes feel like "Oooh women do it too!"

Like on a cock shots thread. I and others will say "many women don't like that, try something else." and guys will come back "well put your smashed kebab away, then!"

Which amuses me enormously because one, guys often demand more nudity, so women play to their audience by uploading it, and two, I practice what I preach. I happen to be commando in one of my shots, but the most you can see is upper thigh. My "smashed kebab" is not on Fab at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sometimes, problematic behaviour is perpetrated by one group more than another. Sometimes that's facts not bashing. We shouldn't have to walk on eggshells to avoid offending everyone of that demographic (there's no need to be deliberately offensive and bigotry is over the line, but I can't see how not liking photos mostly not of the person, and yes it is mostly guys that do it, is man bashing) "

I disagree. I'd say it's fairly ubiquitous amongst all profile types.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Sometimes, problematic behaviour is perpetrated by one group more than another. Sometimes that's facts not bashing. We shouldn't have to walk on eggshells to avoid offending everyone of that demographic (there's no need to be deliberately offensive and bigotry is over the line, but I can't see how not liking photos mostly not of the person, and yes it is mostly guys that do it, is man bashing)

I disagree. I'd say it's fairly ubiquitous amongst all profile types. "

That's not my experience, but fair enough. But my point is: if a behaviour happens much more (seems to happen more) on male profiles than others, it's not man bashing to say so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r MoriartyMan
over a year ago

The Land that time forgot (Norfolk)

I'm available for starring in any ladies pics if required. I can't promise I'll help you get meets but I will bring sandwiches of you choice.

Oh and I will be bringing a friend, hope that's ok.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said"

Really? She didn't say only men?

That's exactly what she said. You've advised me to re-read the post. I'd advise you to do the same.

And yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. If you're going to make observational comments on profiles, have a think about whether the observation is gender specific or applies to everyone.

If it's truly gender specific, fine.

If it's not, don't single out specific genders or profiles for your thread title or opening comment.

And let's be honest, most observations negative or positive here aren't gender neutral.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm available for starring in any ladies pics if required. I can't promise I'll help you get meets but I will bring sandwiches of you choice.

Oh and I will be bringing a friend, hope that's ok."

Can she be a stand in for me? I'll have my big toe in all the pics.

Chicken and bacon sandwiches please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sometimes, problematic behaviour is perpetrated by one group more than another. Sometimes that's facts not bashing. We shouldn't have to walk on eggshells to avoid offending everyone of that demographic (there's no need to be deliberately offensive and bigotry is over the line, but I can't see how not liking photos mostly not of the person, and yes it is mostly guys that do it, is man bashing)

I disagree. I'd say it's fairly ubiquitous amongst all profile types.

That's not my experience, but fair enough. But my point is: if a behaviour happens much more (seems to happen more) on male profiles than others, it's not man bashing to say so. "

It seems it when the thread title only says men/male.

I have to admit to not looking at many single women's profiles to know whether it's the same with them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he girl with dreadlocksWoman
over a year ago

need to know basis in Wolverhampton


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said

Really? She didn't say only men?

That's exactly what she said. You've advised me to re-read the post. I'd advise you to do the same.

And yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. If you're going to make observational comments on profiles, have a think about whether the observation is gender specific or applies to everyone.

If it's truly gender specific, fine.

If it's not, don't single out specific genders or profiles for your thread title or opening comment.

And let's be honest, most observations negative or positive here aren't gender neutral. "

The op is a female who is looking for men how many couples/women's profile do you think she has looked at?. So her experience is gonna be single mens profile so yeah she put single men in the title.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *good-being-badMan
over a year ago

mis-types and auto corrects leads cock leeds

Jeez.. simple solution.

Don't like the profile you've clicked on for whatever reason. Move quickly to the next that might appeal and repeat.

If you think a picture contravenes the site rules report it.

Simples..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I avoid single male profile that do this, but in my experience couples are just as guilty.

I've seen loads of couple profiles with pics of 3+ females arses, boobs etc.

Yes I feel like there shouldn't be anyone else other than the people on the profile in the picture. If someone wants to do that then obviously it's their profile and their decision I just don't understand what it brings to the profile other than the fact they've obviously had sex at some point in their life.

I won't respond to a profile that has pictures such as this but I don't let it bother me I just move along. "

I guess for some it's just another way to prove that they do meet.

For others it's probably about bragging.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aekaeWoman
over a year ago

Between a cock and a soft place


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said"

How can you say the OP doesn't say it's only single men when the trhreads called single male profiles, the opening comment is Single male profiles are and there's no mention of any other sex?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aekaeWoman
over a year ago

Between a cock and a soft place


"Jeez.. simple solution.

Don't like the profile you've clicked on for whatever reason. Move quickly to the next that might appeal and repeat.

If you think a picture contravenes the site rules report it.

Simples.. "

Too easy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I get put off seeing a woman in a single mans profile. I want to think of him with me, not with a woman's head stuck on his cock.

The pics that feature only the woman are her pics, not his & if it's not a couples profile, then it shouldn't be there.

That's my 2p.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said

How can you say the OP doesn't say it's only single men when the trhreads called single male profiles, the opening comment is Single male profiles are and there's no mention of any other sex?

"

The word only is not used so I am absolutely right and that's why I can say it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I get put off seeing a woman in a single mans profile. I want to think of him with me, not with a woman's head stuck on his cock.

The pics that feature only the woman are her pics, not his & if it's not a couples profile, then it shouldn't be there.

That's my 2p."

I never did get the opportunity for a photo shoot in a Belfast hotel...

The elephant is still there the last time I went for coffee

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I get put off seeing a woman in a single mans profile. I want to think of him with me, not with a woman's head stuck on his cock.

The pics that feature only the woman are her pics, not his & if it's not a couples profile, then it shouldn't be there.

That's my 2p.

I never did get the opportunity for a photo shoot in a Belfast hotel...

The elephant is still there the last time I went for coffee "

Lol noted

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aekaeWoman
over a year ago

Between a cock and a soft place


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said

How can you say the OP doesn't say it's only single men when the trhreads called single male profiles, the opening comment is Single male profiles are and there's no mention of any other sex?

The word only is not used so I am absolutely right and that's why I can say it."

The OP doesn't reference single women or couples tbough, she ONLY refers to single males.

The inference, intent and implication is obvious.

I have also spent two valuable pence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Single male profiles are more and more featuring numerous random women.

I wonder how many of them know they are pornstars.

And before the snowflakes start I don’t mean every single one

For the sake of balance I've seen plenty of couples and single women's profiles which include other people.

This wasn't intended as yet another single man bashing thread was it...?

I didn't see it as a male bashing thread and actually I think too much store is set by people trying to pitch sexes off against each other, when actually often that isn't case.

It is perfectly acceptable to be annoyed about something somebody has done regardless of their sex and to say it is bashing men is a little bit unnecessary if I'm honest.

I agree.

I also agree with the sentiment of the thread. My picture gallery is of me, no one else. I think all profiles should be the same, pictures of the profile holders.

I didn't say that it was a man bashing thread, I said that I hoped it wasnt.

Some may see a thread titled "Single male profiles" as gender specific though.

Yes and I agree with the sentiment of the thread but when I didn't like was people going into legal implications because the site rules are very clear.

That's my point a lot of threads are gender specific and I would actually suggest there is more and negatively at women than the other way round.

But every time anything negative is mentioned about men, even highly caveated, even when everyone else cops it too, it's Oooh single men bashing again

Best not title the thread "single male profiles" and then have a dig at men then.

Personally I'd have phrased it differently. But then again I'm a single male and obviously I could have (havent) reacted differently.

In answer to the actual question posed, who knows.

Do you comment such things when you see title threads like " women on the make"

"Fat women who call themselves curvy" ect...

So my point is just because somebody mentions gender does not automatically make it a bashing thread and I think suggesting so is just divisive.

Actually I'm going to rephrase my answer here.

Agreed, phrasing a thread gender specific doesn't necessarily make it a gender bashing thread.

But when the opening post clearly bashes a gender, I'd say it does.

Actually I think you need to read it again because it doesn't do that!

It makes a fairly accurate statement that there has been recently an increase in male profiles that feature more of the woman than the man.

I still have no idea how you think this is bashing men in any way.

it is stating that she would rather not see other people in the profile and yes there is no denying it is more often than not men that do this. I just don't see how you've concluded but just because the word man is in the title it is man bashing!

I haven't concluded it from the thread title.

It could be concluded from the opening post though.

If it's not man bashing per se, why reference it in the opening comment or title the thread that way?

As I've said above once or twice now, I agree with the sentiment. I feel it should apply to all profiles, not just single men.

But why because she hasn't said anything that's inaccurate!

If it was a man that had started the thread using exactly the same wording would this still be an issue for you?

I just think it would be a sad world if we're not allowed to mention gender just in case somebody gets upset.

I agree there are plenty of men bashing threads and there are also plenty of women bashing threads.

I just think it would have been best to wait for one of those to make the point rather than just one that has man in the title.

Yet again, I agree, it's not an inaccurate observation.

My point is, it's not just male profiles who do this, so if it's really not man bashing, why not title it differently and make the opening comment non gender specific?

I'm off to start a "single female profiles" thread now for balance.

Then there is no balance you starting a thread like that is there.

Because she did not say it was only man and if she had said this you would be right but she didn't so you are wrong.

So what you were trying to say is in future what she should have written is, mostly men and sometimes couples and very occasionally women?

I just think you need to pick your battles because I don't agree with a lot of what was written on this thread and for you to pick out the word man and Men and suggest it is bashing. it's just divisive like I've already said

How can you say the OP doesn't say it's only single men when the trhreads called single male profiles, the opening comment is Single male profiles are and there's no mention of any other sex?

The word only is not used so I am absolutely right and that's why I can say it.

The OP doesn't reference single women or couples tbough, she ONLY refers to single males.

The inference, intent and implication is obvious.

I have also spent two valuable pence.

"

My point was and still is the statement in the original opening Post is not inaccurate.

It feels like you can't mention a specific gender without being accused of bashing or being a man hater and it's getting ridiculous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The OP is not bashing men over women & couples. She is looking for men, so it stands to reason that male profiles & photos would be the ones that she comments on.

It's getting a bit pedantic now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The OP is not bashing men over women & couples. She is looking for men, so it stands to reason that male profiles & photos would be the ones that she comments on.

It's getting a bit pedantic now."

I agree with you more all this because somebody didn't read the thread and just made an assumption but it was a man bashing thread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uicyfruit3Man
over a year ago

portsmouth


"Jeez.. simple solution.

Don't like the profile you've clicked on for whatever reason. Move quickly to the next that might appeal and repeat.

If you think a picture contravenes the site rules report it.

Simples.. "

Couldn't have said it better myself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'd like it stopped. There's no need really and it would be a good move for fab to improve the site.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top