Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi guys, is it worth sending more than one message to someone if I haven't received a reply, I appreciate it looks a bit desperate but at the same time I know women on here get inundated with messages and there is always the chance that a message gets overlooked or bulk deleted. What are your thoughts on this? " Don't do it I say on my profile if i haven't responded to your first message don't send a 2nd one asking whether i got the first one.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi guys, is it worth sending more than one message to someone if I haven't received a reply, I appreciate it looks a bit desperate but at the same time I know women on here get inundated with messages and there is always the chance that a message gets overlooked or bulk deleted. What are your thoughts on this? " I check all my messages even though I bulk delete once a week, and I don’t like it when men keep messaging | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! " Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer." not on this site there wasnt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer.not on this site there wasnt" I wasn't 'worried' about unanswered messages, it was the 'office manager' in me that thought there has to be a more efficient way to handle all the extraneous bits of 'digital paper' left hanging about - although I appreciate they fall away into oblivion after a while anyway! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer.not on this site there wasnt I wasn't 'worried' about unanswered messages, it was the 'office manager' in me that thought there has to be a more efficient way to handle all the extraneous bits of 'digital paper' left hanging about - although I appreciate they fall away into oblivion after a while anyway!" How do undeleted messages clog up my inbox? They don't. The people who I chat to regularly pop back up to the top as unread when I get a new message from them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer.not on this site there wasnt I wasn't 'worried' about unanswered messages, it was the 'office manager' in me that thought there has to be a more efficient way to handle all the extraneous bits of 'digital paper' left hanging about - although I appreciate they fall away into oblivion after a while anyway! How do undeleted messages clog up my inbox? They don't. The people who I chat to regularly pop back up to the top as unread when I get a new message from them." ...if you are chatting that is fine and how it works so you have a conversation thread - that is useful. This is about messages that are read and left/abandoned, they have no on going value to either party and could be deleted! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Clearly nobody wants to be hassled by unwelcome repeat messages but why are so many messages opened but just abandoned, that is, neither replied to nor deleted? I appreciate most 'single' women and many couples are inundated with messages so wouldn't it be better to have a, 'thanks but no thanks' button which thanks for the contact whilst automatically deleting the senders message? Leaving a message 'opened but unanswered' (one way or the other) surely clogs up your inbox and I suppose the server?! Apparently there used to be a "thanks but no thanks" button (although I've also heard that it was on a different site). Unfortunately people complained it was too impersonal. Why worry about messages not deleted? Not getting a response must surely be your answer.not on this site there wasnt I wasn't 'worried' about unanswered messages, it was the 'office manager' in me that thought there has to be a more efficient way to handle all the extraneous bits of 'digital paper' left hanging about - although I appreciate they fall away into oblivion after a while anyway! How do undeleted messages clog up my inbox? They don't. The people who I chat to regularly pop back up to the top as unread when I get a new message from them. ...if you are chatting that is fine and how it works so you have a conversation thread - that is useful. This is about messages that are read and left/abandoned, they have no on going value to either party and could be deleted!" I do understand what you're getting at. I'm just saying there is no actual point in deleting messages. It doesn't clutter up your inbox like you think it does. I'm sure the site would prefer it if we deleted messages (from the sent items too), but they can't really enforce you to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |