Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So you should be glad they published their verifications then, no? " Ain't it! What he's saying is women are not replying and he thinks he's better than who they've been with. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do not get the advantage of publishing your own verifications. I understand it shows you are reasonably endorsed and possibly not a weirdo. I have been mutually messaging with a few people, and noticed they had been politely (in relations) with 5 different people in the last 7 days. When I looked at the profiles of the people who where verifying them, some of them were (Yuk). I realised instantly that I would not want to be going where they had just been. Is the verification thing just a way of showing off about how easy you give it away?" This kind of highlights one of my issues with verifications. People put so much stock in them and looking back over who others have met. You're essentially taking any element of choice away from those that you're looking at. People like others for many different reasons, what is important to you might not be for them, also they may have a badly written profile or bad pictures but could be great in person. If you like the person's profile then go ahead, you don't get to see a potential partners exs in real life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"God yes, but that is an advantage for me. I questioned about the advantage for them." The advantage for them is they dont end up meeting judgemental people. Im sure you will be of no loss to them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""So you should be glad they published their verifications then, no? " Ain't it! What he's saying is women are not replying and he thinks he's better than who they've been with. No, its MEN actually. I haven't experienced anyone not replying yet! Thanks for your input Einstein " Can't you see how insulting you're being? You're judging people on who they've been with. You won't go there because who they've been with is 'yuk'. Your fucking mental. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've never understood why people say things like " I've seen the people they've been with and yuck ". You don't have to fancy all the people they've been with just them surely!" No wonder no one meets if we have to fancy everyones past meets too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""The advantage for them is they dont end up meeting judgemental people. Im sure you will be of no loss to them" Sounds like your judging me a little bit there! Ha the whole point of this site is to make judgements about people usually binary YES/NO. " In that case I think I'm doing this site all wrong! I just have sex with the people that I like and let the others get on with their own business. Oops looks like I'm on the wrong site then! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do not get the advantage of publishing your own verifications. I understand it shows you are reasonably endorsed and possibly not a weirdo. I have been mutually messaging with a few people, and noticed they had been politely (in relations) with 5 different people in the last 7 days. When I looked at the profiles of the people who where verifying them, some of them were (Yuk). I realised instantly that I would not want to be going where they had just been. Is the verification thing just a way of showing off about how easy you give it away?" That's one way of looking at it. Same as your post is just a way of showing how judgemental you are. "Easy" isn't a word I'd expect to see used on a swinging site. People can choose to show their veries of hide them. It would be naive to assume someone with no veries showing was somehow "better" than someone with many. If you're that squeamish about the thought that people you want to meet might have "shock horror" met other people who maybe don't meet your high standards then maybe this isn't the site for you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""So you should be glad they published their verifications then, no? " Ain't it! What he's saying is women are not replying and he thinks he's better than who they've been with. No, its MEN actually. I haven't experienced anyone not replying yet! Thanks for your input Einstein Can't you see how insulting you're being? You're judging people on who they've been with. You won't go there because who they've been with is 'yuk'. Your fucking mental. " It’s not mental and I’m sure most people do the same with verifications. If they met someone who looked quite unclean it would make you question that persons standards. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""So you should be glad they published their verifications then, no? " Ain't it! What he's saying is women are not replying and he thinks he's better than who they've been with. No, its MEN actually. I haven't experienced anyone not replying yet! Thanks for your input Einstein Can't you see how insulting you're being? You're judging people on who they've been with. You won't go there because who they've been with is 'yuk'. Your fucking mental. It’s not mental and I’m sure most people do the same with verifications. If they met someone who looked quite unclean it would make you question that persons standards. " I don't think anyone would publish a veri' from someone who looks so unclean that it'd put you off meeting them. Even if it's just a social. People on here have been with other people outside of Fab so you really can't say who's been with who and to what 'standard' they were. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So if peoples input and opinions are irrelevant why start a forum thread about it? " And there clearly is a question mark at the end of your post... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s when people verify you saying they saw you on the self serve in Asda, that’s annoying. Happened on one of my old profiles. I’ve got a veri that I don’t display off a guy I met a couple months back who o has such a deep conversation with I started crying into my cuppa tea! Why the hell he verified me I don’t know but he did. " I love your tales. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi Thanks to the people who helped to answer the original question. What is the advantage of publishing your own verifications. The people who picked up on the "YUK" word or "Easy" you missed the point. This is my own personal opinion (not a question) and your input or opinion is irrelevant and not required. (I really like the person who assumed I was getting knocked back by woman and I was all bitter and twisted) As I said earlier. I only get involved with Men/TV/TS And to date have received replies from everybody I have been in contact with. Jeez, people who use this site and say they are non judgemental, when they look at somebody's profile/verifications. Well I think I will just leave it there...... Thanks again " you do realize you asked a question on a forum | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s when people verify you saying they saw you on the self serve in Asda, that’s annoying. Happened on one of my old profiles. I’ve got a veri that I don’t display off a guy I met a couple months back who o has such a deep conversation with I started crying into my cuppa tea! Why the hell he verified me I don’t know but he did. I love your tales. " Haha yeah loads of shit happens to me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you could of worded your OP a little better!! " And used brackets correctly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...As I said earlier. I only get involved with Men/TV/TS ... " If I might digress. Your profile says your bi-curious. I'd say you more than likely gay. This would be a reason not to meet your good self. Not because your gay, but because you hide it. Unlike those who choose not to hide some of their swinging escapades. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do not get the advantage of publishing your own verifications. I understand it shows you are reasonably endorsed and possibly not a weirdo. I have been mutually messaging with a few people, and noticed they had been politely (in relations) with 5 different people in the last 7 days. When I looked at the profiles of the people who where verifying them, some of them were (Yuk). I realised instantly that I would not want to be going where they had just been. Is the verification thing just a way of showing off about how easy you give it away?" Actually disagree on this one. If this was Match dot com I might agree. It's a swingers site where people are generally looking for NSA sex. And clearly said individual was excercising right to do just that. I don't get what the problem is. Actually we quite like to see a good number of veris. For example experience tells us a meet with a couple with numerous veris is much less likely to end with a drama than with newbies. They've usually ironed out their do's and don'ts and can usually express them before meeting. Equally with single guys a string of veris from petite single ladies all under the age of 28 suggests they probably aren't going to be interested in meeting a middled aged couple where the lady is a little larger (us!!). Generalisations maybe. But ...we certainly are not going to judge anyone or be critical of anyone because of their veris. Just makes it easier for us to narrow down those we feel we might want to approach. Probably makes sense to hide veris from way back when, but if people hide too many veris, rightly or wrongly it implies to us that maybe there is something that people don't want you to know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Final Update regarding Ayeman from Audio2 ---------------------------- NSAchick Woman The 3rd post in this thread Look at her profile She is absolutely gorgeous. But according to you I don't really believe that. ooooh! YES I do. " If I didn't know better I'd think you were trying to tempt me into contacting you privately by keep bumping my nom de plume on your thread. What you just said there holds no weight at all. Your desire for sexual liaisons with men and TV's tells all. Enjoy them. Oh, do you want me to contact you privately? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Blimey! This whole thread is a mystery. Why didn't anyone mention to the OP how to relate his replies to particular posters He is new to the forums and been doing things the long way... Audio2 welcome to the forums. Interesting thread. I think you got enough info there. Under every message there is an option to "reply+quote" click on that when you want to respond to particular comments. It will save your time and be less confusing to people reading. All the best." He’d lost me with the odd transcripts too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do not get the advantage of publishing your own verifications. I understand it shows you are reasonably endorsed and possibly not a weirdo. I have been mutually messaging with a few people, and noticed they had been politely (in relations) with 5 different people in the last 7 days. When I looked at the profiles of the people who where verifying them, some of them were (Yuk). I realised instantly that I would not want to be going where they had just been. Is the verification thing just a way of showing off about how easy you give it away?" I don't decide to meet based on the attractiveness of the people they've met. I meet based on whether the individual is attractive to me, and I am to them. That's about it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |