Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not." Any particular reason why u dont ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Not. Any particular reason why u dont ? " Yes because all of the evidence points to them being a human construct And zero credible data to suggest any of the human invented ghost myths are even plausible let alone real | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. If it helps you deal with loss to believe in them then great though. However, there is a special rung in hell for those twisted sociopaths who claim they can chat to your dead relatives and charge you for the privilege. Or, psychic mediums as they're called. " There is alot of fakes out there with the aim to con people out of money but thats not what this is about to be honest im not asking about psychics or mediums but i totally agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"No. If it helps you deal with loss to believe in them then great though. However, there is a special rung in hell for those twisted sociopaths who claim they can chat to your dead relatives and charge you for the privilege. Or, psychic mediums as they're called. " I think the decision is to deep to slightly touch and discuss here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not. Any particular reason why u dont ? Yes because all of the evidence points to them being a human construct And zero credible data to suggest any of the human invented ghost myths are even plausible let alone real " Ooo- I said that without even opening my mouth! Only more eloquently! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you believe OP? Heard of the stone tape theory? " Yes i do believe and no not heard of that one, i recently last year got into doing paranormal investigations with a couple of friends and i love doing it x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don’t believe in them. But I think we are all haunted houses. " So deep Vine. So deep. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you believe OP? Heard of the stone tape theory? Yes i do believe and no not heard of that one, i recently last year got into doing paranormal investigations with a couple of friends and i love doing it x" The fun is in doing the investigation. There has yet to be an investigation that proves the existence of ghosts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not. Any particular reason why u dont ? Yes because all of the evidence points to them being a human construct And zero credible data to suggest any of the human invented ghost myths are even plausible let alone real Ooo- I said that without even opening my mouth! Only more eloquently!" Thats fair enough i respect ur opinion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you believe OP? Heard of the stone tape theory? Yes i do believe and no not heard of that one, i recently last year got into doing paranormal investigations with a couple of friends and i love doing it x" Ghosts as into figures or are we talking energy here? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? " Not here, there is not the slightest bit of evidence for ghosts, gods or anything else of a similar nature. The great Carl Sagan put things better than I can! "A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" Suppose I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity! "Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but no dragon. "Where's the dragon?" you ask. "Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon." You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints. "Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air." Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire. "Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless." You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible. "Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work. Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. The only thing you've really learned from my insistence that there's a dragon in my garage is that something funny is going on inside my head. You'd wonder, if no physical tests apply, what convinced me. The possibility that it was a dream or a hallucination would certainly enter your mind. But then, why am I taking it so seriously? Maybe I need help. At the least, maybe I've seriously underestimated human fallibility. Imagine that, despite none of the tests being successful, you wish to be scrupulously open-minded. So you don't outright reject the notion that there's a fire-breathing dragon in my garage. You merely put it on hold. Present evidence is strongly against it, but if a new body of data emerge you're prepared to examine it and see if it convinces you. Surely it's unfair of me to be offended at not being believed; or to criticize you for being stodgy and unimaginative -- merely because you rendered the Scottish verdict of "not proved." Imagine that things had gone otherwise. The dragon is invisible, all right, but footprints are being made in the flour as you watch. Your infrared detector reads off-scale. The spray paint reveals a jagged crest bobbing in the air before you. No matter how skeptical you might have been about the existence of dragons -- to say nothing about invisible ones -- you must now acknowledge that there's something here, and that in a preliminary way it's consistent with an invisible, fire-breathing dragon. Now another scenario: Suppose it's not just me. Suppose that several people of your acquaintance, including people who you're pretty sure don't know each other, all tell you that they have dragons in their garages -- but in every case the evidence is maddeningly elusive. All of us admit we're disturbed at being gripped by so odd a conviction so ill-supported by the physical evidence. None of us is a lunatic. We speculate about what it would mean if invisible dragons were really hiding out in garages all over the world, with us humans just catching on. I'd rather it not be true, I tell you. But maybe all those ancient European and Chinese myths about dragons weren't myths at all. Gratifyingly, some dragon-size footprints in the flour are now reported. But they're never made when a skeptic is looking. An alternative explanation presents itself. On close examination it seems clear that the footprints could have been faked. Another dragon enthusiast shows up with a burnt finger and attributes it to a rare physical manifestation of the dragon's fiery breath. But again, other possibilities exist. We understand that there are other ways to burn fingers besides the breath of invisible dragons. Such "evidence" -- no matter how important the dragon advocates consider it -- is far from compelling. Once again, the only sensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis, to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the cause might be that so many apparently sane and sober people share the same strange delusion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you believe OP? Heard of the stone tape theory? Yes i do believe and no not heard of that one, i recently last year got into doing paranormal investigations with a couple of friends and i love doing it x The fun is in doing the investigation. There has yet to be an investigation that proves the existence of ghosts. " Thats fine if thats ur opinion i just love the whole subject and think its so interesting with all the different theories and the science behind them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? Not here, there is not the slightest bit of evidence for ghosts, gods or anything else of a similar nature. The great Carl Sagan put things better than I can! "A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" Suppose I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity! "Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but no dragon. "Where's the dragon?" you ask. "Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon." You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints. "Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air." Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire. "Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless." You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible. "Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work. Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. The only thing you've really learned from my insistence that there's a dragon in my garage is that something funny is going on inside my head. You'd wonder, if no physical tests apply, what convinced me. The possibility that it was a dream or a hallucination would certainly enter your mind. But then, why am I taking it so seriously? Maybe I need help. At the least, maybe I've seriously underestimated human fallibility. Imagine that, despite none of the tests being successful, you wish to be scrupulously open-minded. So you don't outright reject the notion that there's a fire-breathing dragon in my garage. You merely put it on hold. Present evidence is strongly against it, but if a new body of data emerge you're prepared to examine it and see if it convinces you. Surely it's unfair of me to be offended at not being believed; or to criticize you for being stodgy and unimaginative -- merely because you rendered the Scottish verdict of "not proved." Imagine that things had gone otherwise. The dragon is invisible, all right, but footprints are being made in the flour as you watch. Your infrared detector reads off-scale. The spray paint reveals a jagged crest bobbing in the air before you. No matter how skeptical you might have been about the existence of dragons -- to say nothing about invisible ones -- you must now acknowledge that there's something here, and that in a preliminary way it's consistent with an invisible, fire-breathing dragon. Now another scenario: Suppose it's not just me. Suppose that several people of your acquaintance, including people who you're pretty sure don't know each other, all tell you that they have dragons in their garages -- but in every case the evidence is maddeningly elusive. All of us admit we're disturbed at being gripped by so odd a conviction so ill-supported by the physical evidence. None of us is a lunatic. We speculate about what it would mean if invisible dragons were really hiding out in garages all over the world, with us humans just catching on. I'd rather it not be true, I tell you. But maybe all those ancient European and Chinese myths about dragons weren't myths at all. Gratifyingly, some dragon-size footprints in the flour are now reported. But they're never made when a skeptic is looking. An alternative explanation presents itself. On close examination it seems clear that the footprints could have been faked. Another dragon enthusiast shows up with a burnt finger and attributes it to a rare physical manifestation of the dragon's fiery breath. But again, other possibilities exist. We understand that there are other ways to burn fingers besides the breath of invisible dragons. Such "evidence" -- no matter how important the dragon advocates consider it -- is far from compelling. Once again, the only sensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis, to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the cause might be that so many apparently sane and sober people share the same strange delusion. " The definition of a paranormal experience is an experience that no one can explain so its a personal thing to that person, so in my opinion i would never says it true or a lie if that person believes it then thats their personal choice | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"had the willies put up me a few times" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you believe OP? Heard of the stone tape theory? Yes i do believe and no not heard of that one, i recently last year got into doing paranormal investigations with a couple of friends and i love doing it x Ghosts as into figures or are we talking energy here? " Me personally i tend to go towards it being residual energy x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? Not here, there is not the slightest bit of evidence for ghosts, gods or anything else of a similar nature. The great Carl Sagan put things better than I can! "A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" Suppose I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity! "Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but no dragon. "Where's the dragon?" you ask. "Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon." You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints. "Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air." Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire. "Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless." You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible. "Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work. Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. The only thing you've really learned from my insistence that there's a dragon in my garage is that something funny is going on inside my head. You'd wonder, if no physical tests apply, what convinced me. The possibility that it was a dream or a hallucination would certainly enter your mind. But then, why am I taking it so seriously? Maybe I need help. At the least, maybe I've seriously underestimated human fallibility. Imagine that, despite none of the tests being successful, you wish to be scrupulously open-minded. So you don't outright reject the notion that there's a fire-breathing dragon in my garage. You merely put it on hold. Present evidence is strongly against it, but if a new body of data emerge you're prepared to examine it and see if it convinces you. Surely it's unfair of me to be offended at not being believed; or to criticize you for being stodgy and unimaginative -- merely because you rendered the Scottish verdict of "not proved." Imagine that things had gone otherwise. The dragon is invisible, all right, but footprints are being made in the flour as you watch. Your infrared detector reads off-scale. The spray paint reveals a jagged crest bobbing in the air before you. No matter how skeptical you might have been about the existence of dragons -- to say nothing about invisible ones -- you must now acknowledge that there's something here, and that in a preliminary way it's consistent with an invisible, fire-breathing dragon. Now another scenario: Suppose it's not just me. Suppose that several people of your acquaintance, including people who you're pretty sure don't know each other, all tell you that they have dragons in their garages -- but in every case the evidence is maddeningly elusive. All of us admit we're disturbed at being gripped by so odd a conviction so ill-supported by the physical evidence. None of us is a lunatic. We speculate about what it would mean if invisible dragons were really hiding out in garages all over the world, with us humans just catching on. I'd rather it not be true, I tell you. But maybe all those ancient European and Chinese myths about dragons weren't myths at all. Gratifyingly, some dragon-size footprints in the flour are now reported. But they're never made when a skeptic is looking. An alternative explanation presents itself. On close examination it seems clear that the footprints could have been faked. Another dragon enthusiast shows up with a burnt finger and attributes it to a rare physical manifestation of the dragon's fiery breath. But again, other possibilities exist. We understand that there are other ways to burn fingers besides the breath of invisible dragons. Such "evidence" -- no matter how important the dragon advocates consider it -- is far from compelling. Once again, the only sensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis, to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the cause might be that so many apparently sane and sober people share the same strange delusion. The definition of a paranormal experience is an experience that no one can explain so its a personal thing to that person, so in my opinion i would never says it true or a lie if that person believes it then thats their personal choice " Simply believing something doesn't make it true. That was the basic thought behind the Sagan post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No judgements here do u believe in ghosts or have had an a paranormal experience ? Or just interested in the subject ? " Interested but sceptical. My opinion is that ghosts don't exist objectively, but that people can still have experiences. Perhaps low frequency vibration causing stimulation to the brain, which is perceived as ghosts etc? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No judgements here do u believe in ghosts or have had an a paranormal experience ? Or just interested in the subject ? Interested but sceptical. My opinion is that ghosts don't exist objectively, but that people can still have experiences. Perhaps low frequency vibration causing stimulation to the brain, which is perceived as ghosts etc? " Thats definetly a good theory, i believe most of the time its a thing called residual energy its like a sort of echo if u like | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn't matter to me if they are real or not. If they are real, then it means my ancestors live on. I live where my ancestors lived so what can they do to me? " Your ancestors are the planets and stars my friend. We are all protons neutrons electrons | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn't matter to me if they are real or not. If they are real, then it means my ancestors live on. I live where my ancestors lived so what can they do to me? " Thats a very good point of view and a nice way to look at it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? " I believe and yes, several | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? I believe and yes, several" Feel free to inbox me them if u dont want to put them on here would love to hear about them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don’t want to see a ghost It’s a sight that I fear most" Fair enough lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So any of u believers had any paranormal experiences ? " Massive YES from me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don’t want to see a ghost It’s a sight that I fear most" Can't believe noone suggested toast. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love ghost stories and the like and definitely have felt spooked out in places with a few bumps in the night. There is an awful lot of rubbish surrounding it though such as that awful tv programme with the Blue Peter woman " Most Haunted was a good programme when it first started but they never moved on with times and the technology thats available now but thats only my opinion x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love ghost stories and the like and definitely have felt spooked out in places with a few bumps in the night. There is an awful lot of rubbish surrounding it though such as that awful tv programme with the Blue Peter woman " The power of your own mind. The more creative your imagination, the more it can lead you astray.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love ghost stories and the like and definitely have felt spooked out in places with a few bumps in the night. There is an awful lot of rubbish surrounding it though such as that awful tv programme with the Blue Peter woman Most Haunted was a good programme when it first started but they never moved on with times and the technology thats available now but thats only my opinion x " Im not so keen on all the technology stuff, takes away from it somehow. Ghosts and spirits aren't about the science but something else (imagination for the cynic in me ) I like the story and then to just build myself up into a terrified panic | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love ghost stories and the like and definitely have felt spooked out in places with a few bumps in the night. There is an awful lot of rubbish surrounding it though such as that awful tv programme with the Blue Peter woman The power of your own mind. The more creative your imagination, the more it can lead you astray.." Absolutely. And once it starts running away with you the ghosts have got you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious " Each to their own I guess, I’m not telling you what to believe or not. But as I mentioned for those who have seen or experienced this phenomenon they are very real. That includes my own experience | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious " Glad you got the 'usually' in there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love ghost stories and the like and definitely have felt spooked out in places with a few bumps in the night. There is an awful lot of rubbish surrounding it though such as that awful tv programme with the Blue Peter woman The power of your own mind. The more creative your imagination, the more it can lead you astray.. Absolutely. And once it starts running away with you the ghosts have got you. " And the ghoulies too? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious Each to their own I guess, I’m not telling you what to believe or not. But as I mentioned for those who have seen or experienced this phenomenon they are very real. That includes my own experience" Science doesn't take into account what people "believe" Science only uses facts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious " Science can limit us as much as it can advance us. We aren't as clever as we like to think. After life and ghosts aren't the same thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious Science can limit us as much as it can advance us. We aren't as clever as we like to think. After life and ghosts aren't the same thing." Obviously not if you think ghosts are floating around | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too?" Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel " If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes I’ve seen a couple and one lives with me and has followed me when I move the cheeky bugger haha!! I seen poltergeist at primary school and a lot of people seen it too! That was coming down a corridor chucking bags and coats everywhere! " Awesome story | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters " We do measure it they give off electric fields that can be measured and by drops in temperature | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters We do measure it they give off electric fields that can be measured and by drops in temperature " I doubt you'll ever convince someone who isn't interested or doesn't believe, or doesn't want too... it's like Brexit.. haha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I once asked a vicar about the existence of the paranormal and he said to me that he prays to the Holy Ghost each day so how can he say they don’t exist. He also added that he was a qualified exorcist and had real reason to believe. I concur that it is probably residue energy. I have seen a few what I believe to be ghosts but one time I was sharing a room with my step brother. I thought he was asleep until he told me not to look at the ghost, he could see it to!! " Nice one thanks for ur story | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I base my "belief" on what I've seen for myself A couple in my home - intelligent haunting A man in mum's house Mrs Lovely Whatever the fuck it was at Fountains Abbey Abbeydale picture house " Nice one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no evidence of ghosts They are 100 percent people's imagination. Science can explain and measure things. There is no plausible explanation It's like religion and god. After life believers are usually religious Each to their own I guess, I’m not telling you what to believe or not. But as I mentioned for those who have seen or experienced this phenomenon they are very real. That includes my own experience Science doesn't take into account what people "believe" Science only uses facts " Does it? So no scientific advances and disvoveries have been made on what someone believed? Only on facts? If only Galileo, Darwin, Wegener as well as a whole host of other scientists and pioneers knew that..... I’d assume a fact would become so, only after someone had the belief to pursue the discovery? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been interested since I was a kid. There was a program on TV in the 90's called Ghostwatch which was made to look like a documentary. It had Sarah Green and Michael Parkinson on it. I watched that and scared the sh1t out myself for Months. More recently I've been on a couple of ghost hunts near to where I live. Never seen or heard anything, but I remain open minded and really interested in it all. " Iv been lucky that northamptonshire and leicestershire areas have so many sightings and stories and iv seen and heard quite alot of stuff during investigations keep going with ur interest mate | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters " So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been interested since I was a kid. There was a program on TV in the 90's called Ghostwatch which was made to look like a documentary. It had Sarah Green and Michael Parkinson on it. I watched that and scared the sh1t out myself for Months. More recently I've been on a couple of ghost hunts near to where I live. Never seen or heard anything, but I remain open minded and really interested in it all. Iv been lucky that northamptonshire and leicestershire areas have so many sightings and stories and iv seen and heard quite alot of stuff during investigations keep going with ur interest mate " There are some really good sites in Lincs too. Lots of old RAF bases from WW2 and the areas around the cathedral are really interesting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been interested since I was a kid. There was a program on TV in the 90's called Ghostwatch which was made to look like a documentary. It had Sarah Green and Michael Parkinson on it. I watched that and scared the sh1t out myself for Months. More recently I've been on a couple of ghost hunts near to where I live. Never seen or heard anything, but I remain open minded and really interested in it all. Iv been lucky that northamptonshire and leicestershire areas have so many sightings and stories and iv seen and heard quite alot of stuff during investigations keep going with ur interest mate There are some really good sites in Lincs too. Lots of old RAF bases from WW2 and the areas around the cathedral are really interesting. " Yeah we have been investigating round our own county to start with be are starting to travel further out now so no doubt we will be heading out that way at somepoint | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered." That's not an argument for evidence of ghosts The laws of science are there and unlike laws of the land,these cannot be broken. The op says they have meters to measure ghosts. So how come this isn't a well known science? I will tell you why, it's b.s There is a bloke called James randi with 1 million dollars for someone who can prove this type of thing. His prize has been there for years. No surprise then that no one has evidence of supernatural paranormal happenings. As much as such and such saying 'I saw one in a house' may sound good but it's not or never will be proof. Someone show me undeniable proof and I will believe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered. That's not an argument for evidence of ghosts The laws of science are there and unlike laws of the land,these cannot be broken. The op says they have meters to measure ghosts. So how come this isn't a well known science? I will tell you why, it's b.s There is a bloke called James randi with 1 million dollars for someone who can prove this type of thing. His prize has been there for years. No surprise then that no one has evidence of supernatural paranormal happenings. As much as such and such saying 'I saw one in a house' may sound good but it's not or never will be proof. Someone show me undeniable proof and I will believe. " The Roman Inquisition thought the same of Galileo. He believed the earth revolves around the sun. Darwin was condemned by several prominent religious groups and scientific leaders. He believed in evolution. Wegener was rejected and ridiculed for years by prominent scientific leaders. He believed that earths continents moved relatively to each other. Semmelweis was ridiculed my leading medical and health practitioners. He believed that if surgeons washed their hands before performing surgery the patience chances of survival increased. Just because something isn’t scientifically proven right now, doesn’t make it not real. Those people above believed in something that at the time couldn’t be proven and didn’t listen to the unimaginative and close mind masses. I believe that those who are brave enough to stand up for something they believe in may well achieve something - and ghost hunters may be the pioneers akin to some of the greatest discoveries of mankind one day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered. That's not an argument for evidence of ghosts The laws of science are there and unlike laws of the land,these cannot be broken. The op says they have meters to measure ghosts. So how come this isn't a well known science? I will tell you why, it's b.s There is a bloke called James randi with 1 million dollars for someone who can prove this type of thing. His prize has been there for years. No surprise then that no one has evidence of supernatural paranormal happenings. As much as such and such saying 'I saw one in a house' may sound good but it's not or never will be proof. Someone show me undeniable proof and I will believe. " Im sorry but who the hell do u think u are to say my beliefs are bs grow up ur clearly not as educated and clever as u think u are ! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in a haunted house have seen sum strange things but was always taught ignore it it wont hurt u " I think in the majority of cases this is very true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Stuff happened when I was a child that was unexplainable otherwise. Knowing where a grandparents grave was that my parents couldn't find and telling my dad off for disturbing me talking to my dead nan who I had never met. " Wow thats awesome and it does seem to be the case that children and animals are more sensitive to the paranormal x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends what you think ghosts are. I've experienced things I can't explain but I'm reluctant to describe them as the spirits of dead people." Thats fair enough | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends what you think ghosts are. I've experienced things I can't explain but I'm reluctant to describe them as the spirits of dead people. Thats fair enough " What's your opinion on what ghosts are? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends what you think ghosts are. I've experienced things I can't explain but I'm reluctant to describe them as the spirits of dead people. Thats fair enough What's your opinion on what ghosts are? " Honestly i dont know i think alot of the time its residual energy so like an echo or recording replaying but u wont get intelligent responses from them, then u get other side im far from intelligent enough to say what that others are x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if all time and past and future plays out at the same time. Like a radio. Maybe ghosts aren't dead. Just people living their lives in their time. I wonder if they see us " Very interesting theory | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if all time and past and future plays out at the same time. Like a radio. Maybe ghosts aren't dead. Just people living their lives in their time. I wonder if they see us " I do wonder this. I've mentioned this before so I'll give a brief version. I regularly said good morning to an early morning cleaner at work. He was missing for a few weeks but one morning I saw him again said good morning and he nodded in acknowledgement. That evening I saw him cycling away from work as was normal. I mentioned to a colleague that it was nice to see him back and she told me he'd died several weeks previously. I wonder if briefly I'd tuned in to the radio frequency he was broadcasting on so to speak. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered. That's not an argument for evidence of ghosts The laws of science are there and unlike laws of the land,these cannot be broken. The op says they have meters to measure ghosts. So how come this isn't a well known science? I will tell you why, it's b.s There is a bloke called James randi with 1 million dollars for someone who can prove this type of thing. His prize has been there for years. No surprise then that no one has evidence of supernatural paranormal happenings. As much as such and such saying 'I saw one in a house' may sound good but it's not or never will be proof. Someone show me undeniable proof and I will believe. Im sorry but who the hell do u think u are to say my beliefs are bs grow up ur clearly not as educated and clever as u think u are ! " Statistically many beliefs by pure logic must be bull ! So suggesting an substantiated claim as most likely wrong is not offensive or rude simply an honest objective stand point For example you keep referring to your wild made up guess regarding residual energy But its obviously a construct of imagination not based upon any data What is energy? The irony is one moment residual energy is mentioned and then in the same guess , cold spots are mentioned Cold spots by measurement and definition are lack of energy interesting contradictions x Apparitions are either Matter reflecting light source Matter emitting light Or something that cause the neural network of the brain to produce images Residual energy is a meaningless buzz phrase that answers nothing , when I fart I leave residual energy and the laws of thermodynamics illustrate what will happen to that energy x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel If it's an energy it can be measured This is real life not ghostbusters So do you think we have discovered every science and technology that can possibly be discovered, and there is nothing else waiting to be discovered. That's not an argument for evidence of ghosts The laws of science are there and unlike laws of the land,these cannot be broken. The op says they have meters to measure ghosts. So how come this isn't a well known science? I will tell you why, it's b.s There is a bloke called James randi with 1 million dollars for someone who can prove this type of thing. His prize has been there for years. No surprise then that no one has evidence of supernatural paranormal happenings. As much as such and such saying 'I saw one in a house' may sound good but it's not or never will be proof. Someone show me undeniable proof and I will believe. Im sorry but who the hell do u think u are to say my beliefs are bs grow up ur clearly not as educated and clever as u think u are ! Statistically many beliefs by pure logic must be bull ! So suggesting an substantiated claim as most likely wrong is not offensive or rude simply an honest objective stand point For example you keep referring to your wild made up guess regarding residual energy But its obviously a construct of imagination not based upon any data What is energy? The irony is one moment residual energy is mentioned and then in the same guess , cold spots are mentioned Cold spots by measurement and definition are lack of energy interesting contradictions x Apparitions are either Matter reflecting light source Matter emitting light Or something that cause the neural network of the brain to produce images Residual energy is a meaningless buzz phrase that answers nothing , when I fart I leave residual energy and the laws of thermodynamics illustrate what will happen to that energy x " Indeed. It does my head in when people get all offended when you tell them that their ill informed beliefs are, in fact, ill informed. There's is zero robust evidence for the existence of ghosts so I don't believe they exist. If robust evidence came along I'd believe in them. It's that simple. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope I don't believe in them. I love a good ghost story but think they are complete fiction. It's easy to let your imagination run wild when you're in a creepy place and start thinking that every noise or flash in the corner of your eye is something supernatural, or other things like lack of sleep, stress, mental illness or any other weird thing that the human brain can throw up randomly. My dad always claimed he saw something in the woods when he was a teenager that scared the crap out of him, like a figure with no features made up of fog. I don't doubt he saw something but I very much doubt it's what he thought it was." I was at work when I saw someone who had been dead for several weeks in a well lit reception area. I'm not saying it was the dead person come back to haunt the building but there must be an explanation of some sort. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel " Right, I googled "residual energy" and read a few pages on it - I can find nothing about it that is backed up by reliable, proven science that falls within the boundaries of the laws of physics. Are you able to point me in the direction of any solid scientific research that's able to prove this theory? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel Right, I googled "residual energy" and read a few pages on it - I can find nothing about it that is backed up by reliable, proven science that falls within the boundaries of the laws of physics. Are you able to point me in the direction of any solid scientific research that's able to prove this theory?" Quantum mechanics is what you want to read | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel Right, I googled "residual energy" and read a few pages on it - I can find nothing about it that is backed up by reliable, proven science that falls within the boundaries of the laws of physics. Are you able to point me in the direction of any solid scientific research that's able to prove this theory? Quantum mechanics is what you want to read " I'm fairly well-read in Quantum Mechanics - again, there's no proven correlation between QM and ghosts, just the usual wacky theories that don't fall into the realms of any proven laws of physics. I don't know how much money has ever been spent on trying to prove ghosts exist, but there are real problems that will have answers and need money for research - world hunger, cancer etc. If ghosts are proved to be real, of what use is that knowledge to humanity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel Right, I googled "residual energy" and read a few pages on it - I can find nothing about it that is backed up by reliable, proven science that falls within the boundaries of the laws of physics. Are you able to point me in the direction of any solid scientific research that's able to prove this theory? Quantum mechanics is what you want to read I'm fairly well-read in Quantum Mechanics - again, there's no proven correlation between QM and ghosts, just the usual wacky theories that don't fall into the realms of any proven laws of physics. I don't know how much money has ever been spent on trying to prove ghosts exist, but there are real problems that will have answers and need money for research - world hunger, cancer etc. If ghosts are proved to be real, of what use is that knowledge to humanity?" Isn’t it ironic that Funnily enough Planck was regarded as talking a bit of nonsence, disbelieved, and his early theories and experiments failed to prove his theories, yet despite this he pursued his beliefs. If he hadn’t have done, perhaps you wouldn’t be so well read in quantum mechanics? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in ghosts is believing that human beings are more than just flesh and bone, which I don't. We're made of organic matter, nothing more. A question for believers - do you think there are animal ghosts too? Im sorry but thats quite a closed off view of what people think ghosts are there is so many theories of what ghosts actually are, myself i believe that most ghosts that are seen are a thing called residual energy its a type of echo that u see and feel Right, I googled "residual energy" and read a few pages on it - I can find nothing about it that is backed up by reliable, proven science that falls within the boundaries of the laws of physics. Are you able to point me in the direction of any solid scientific research that's able to prove this theory? Quantum mechanics is what you want to read I'm fairly well-read in Quantum Mechanics - again, there's no proven correlation between QM and ghosts, just the usual wacky theories that don't fall into the realms of any proven laws of physics. I don't know how much money has ever been spent on trying to prove ghosts exist, but there are real problems that will have answers and need money for research - world hunger, cancer etc. If ghosts are proved to be real, of what use is that knowledge to humanity? Isn’t it ironic that Funnily enough Planck was regarded as talking a bit of nonsence, disbelieved, and his early theories and experiments failed to prove his theories, yet despite this he pursued his beliefs. If he hadn’t have done, perhaps you wouldn’t be so well read in quantum mechanics? " How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundaries of the laws of physics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How ironic is it that people are coping the exact same message as someone else! Spooky! " ??? You mean quoting a post? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari" Yes quite. But point missed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed " Please explain your point more clearly then. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then." I’m not sure I could make it more so | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How ironic is it that people are coping the exact same message as someone else! Spooky! ??? You mean quoting a post?" Erm.... Yea. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so " Ok | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah we have plenty of spirits amongst us.... In the beer store.... N the pubs! " I suspect that those kinds of spirits are the more likely reason for most people thinking they've experienced the other kind | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah we have plenty of spirits amongst us.... In the beer store.... N the pubs! I suspect that those kinds of spirits are the more likely reason for most people thinking they've experienced the other kind " Lol haha haha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok " This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope I don't believe in them. I love a good ghost story but think they are complete fiction. It's easy to let your imagination run wild when you're in a creepy place and start thinking that every noise or flash in the corner of your eye is something supernatural, or other things like lack of sleep, stress, mental illness or any other weird thing that the human brain can throw up randomly. My dad always claimed he saw something in the woods when he was a teenager that scared the crap out of him, like a figure with no features made up of fog. I don't doubt he saw something but I very much doubt it's what he thought it was. I was at work when I saw someone who had been dead for several weeks in a well lit reception area. I'm not saying it was the dead person come back to haunt the building but there must be an explanation of some sort. " I've worked in offices like that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg " Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg." Lol - yep a barn door and a Gatling gun wouldn’t help you now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Guys this wasnt meant to end up in arguing one way or the other its a fun and interesting subject that i believe in i dont want anybody getting upset so if u dont believe thats all fair and well but please dont try and make people that do believe feel like they are stupid or in the wrong ! And vise versa arguing with someone that doesnt believe will never work ! I meant for the post to be abit of fun and see what people believe and dont believe " I’m not arguing - I’ve also stated that I’m not sure whether I believe or not - what I’m trying to state is that simply not having the scientific fact or proof to prove something doesn’t disprove it - much like every major scientific discovery in our entire history before someone had the belief and bravery to try and prove it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg." Here m8 u free? Fancy a fone wank? U into standardised paper sizes too? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. Lol - yep a barn door and a Gatling gun wouldn’t help you now " Indeed, neither of those items would help me prove or disprove the existence of ghosts However, I could threaten people into believing by using the Gatling gun, in much the same way religion has always convinced people of its veracity - by threat of violence. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Guys this wasnt meant to end up in arguing one way or the other its a fun and interesting subject that i believe in i dont want anybody getting upset so if u dont believe thats all fair and well but please dont try and make people that do believe feel like they are stupid or in the wrong ! And vise versa arguing with someone that doesnt believe will never work ! I meant for the post to be abit of fun and see what people believe and dont believe " People will always argue over this. I don't think ridicule is ok from either side though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. Here m8 u free? Fancy a fone wank? U into standardised paper sizes too?" A5 gets me hot, but I'm not keen on the slutty A4 - it's too much of an easy lay. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. Lol - yep a barn door and a Gatling gun wouldn’t help you now Indeed, neither of those items would help me prove or disprove the existence of ghosts However, I could threaten people into believing by using the Gatling gun, in much the same way religion has always convinced people of its veracity - by threat of violence." Neither were supposed to, as that’s far from the point I’m trying to highlight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. Here m8 u free? Fancy a fone wank? U into standardised paper sizes too? A5 gets me hot, but I'm not keen on the slutty A4 - it's too much of an easy lay." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Guys this wasnt meant to end up in arguing one way or the other its a fun and interesting subject that i believe in i dont want anybody getting upset so if u dont believe thats all fair and well but please dont try and make people that do believe feel like they are stupid or in the wrong ! And vise versa arguing with someone that doesnt believe will never work ! I meant for the post to be abit of fun and see what people believe and dont believe People will always argue over this. I don't think ridicule is ok from either side though." Wished i hadnt started the thread now just wanted it to be abit of fun maybe hear some cool stories of other peoples experiences | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""How is it ironic? Planck worked well within the accepted boundari Yes quite. But point missed Please explain your point more clearly then. I’m not sure I could make it more so Ok This might help you with the point you missed. “It is strange that only extraordinary men make the discoveries, which later appear so easy and simple.” - Georg C. Lichtenberg Hmm, ok - Lichtenberg was a self-promoting buffoon whose greatest contribution to the world was standardising paper sizes. In comparison, Planck was a planet to the speck of dust that was Lichtenberg. Lol - yep a barn door and a Gatling gun wouldn’t help you now Indeed, neither of those items would help me prove or disprove the existence of ghosts However, I could threaten people into believing by using the Gatling gun, in much the same way religion has always convinced people of its veracity - by threat of violence." Neither were supposed to, as that’s far from the point I’m trying to highlight. " Splendid | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |