Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now there saying it might not have been a drone! So the pic on front of paper possibly fake?? " Could have been a photo of anyone's drone. The do have drones afterall. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very true. And the couple on front of the tabloids.... released without charge!" Poor guys, thrown under the bus for having a remote control helicopter, by their neighbours. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely there would have been reporters there with expensive cameras that zoom in etc Not one single picture of the drone close up .I find it hard to believe now " I'm thinking cover up. A plane inbound needed to be diverted somewhere else, maybe some kind of terrorist on board. So a legitimate reason for a diversion needed to be established. Just a thought. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely there would have been reporters there with expensive cameras that zoom in etc Not one single picture of the drone close up .I find it hard to believe now I'm thinking cover up. A plane inbound needed to be diverted somewhere else, maybe some kind of terrorist on board. So a legitimate reason for a diversion needed to be established. Just a thought. " Or someone made a mistake/ hoax call, and the authorities took the appropriate actions straight away. Imagine how much worse the papers would have been had a drone been sucked down an engine because the authorities thought "ah it's probably nothing". C | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely there would have been reporters there with expensive cameras that zoom in etc Not one single picture of the drone close up .I find it hard to believe now I'm thinking cover up. A plane inbound needed to be diverted somewhere else, maybe some kind of terrorist on board. So a legitimate reason for a diversion needed to be established. Just a thought. Or someone made a mistake/ hoax call, and the authorities took the appropriate actions straight away. Imagine how much worse the papers would have been had a drone been sucked down an engine because the authorities thought "ah it's probably nothing". C" Or ATC was hacked and they didn't want to panic the pubic, and admit the issue. Or maybe it was organised by the French to lower the price before Vinci bought it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |