Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"3 or 4..I'm struggling to see one. Glad to see Bachmann go tho. that woman is insane. Santorum wants to start bombing Iran within a fortnight, Romney dropped a bollock offering another candidate a 20 grand bet" I agree about Bachmann, albeit I sort of began feeling sorry for her in the end. Looked like a forlorn puppy. But not the kind of politics I want to see anywhere near the white house for sure. I think it's a throw up between Romney and Ron Paul in the end. Although Santorum was a surprise in Iowa, I don't think he can push his campaign along in the way Romney and Paul can. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anybody following them? Been quite interesting so far. Seems like there's only about 3 or 4 viable candidates now. I think Newt ruled himself out of the race with his mannerisms." as what you would describe as a "left leaning" democrat I am looking at it with interest.. and there is only one candidate... mitt romney... Bachmann is scary right (tea party right)... perry is too much like "dubya" cain was a nutter.... paul is a nutter... newts position always shifts and santorem is silently scary (if you know some of his positions he would scare you...) the only one i would have considered voting for is jon huntsman... but he is so far to the centre than republicans would never vote for him.... this is going to be an interesting fight because in the southern states they hate romney almost as much as obama..... the interest race isn't new hampshire... it is going to see what happens in south carolina... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anybody following them? Been quite interesting so far. Seems like there's only about 3 or 4 viable candidates now. I think Newt ruled himself out of the race with his mannerisms." love american politics, and married to a man with a degree in govt.. Think romney faces the kennedy problem ,many dont believe he will he put counrty before church newt has missed his chance So the good news is Barak for a second term | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anybody following them? Been quite interesting so far. Seems like there's only about 3 or 4 viable candidates now. I think Newt ruled himself out of the race with his mannerisms. as what you would describe as a "left leaning" democrat I am looking at it with interest.. and there is only one candidate... mitt romney... Bachmann is scary right (tea party right)... perry is too much like "dubya" cain was a nutter.... paul is a nutter... newts position always shifts and santorem is silently scary (if you know some of his positions he would scare you...) the only one i would have considered voting for is jon huntsman... but he is so far to the centre than republicans would never vote for him.... this is going to be an interesting fight because in the southern states they hate romney almost as much as obama..... the interest race isn't new hampshire... it is going to see what happens in south carolina..." Although you're correct that there are few centrist positions in the race, I think that extremes are necessary for change to occur. Of all the candidates, the one I'd prefer to get into most is Paul, he's actually the most socially liberal candidate the republicans have. Be nice to see libertarianism given a chance for once. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So the good news is Barak for a second term " I wouldn't count my chickens! It's possible, certainly, but a whole lot of Democrats aren't happy with Barak. Personally, from a right wing perspective and despite my reservations about stimulus spending aka Keynesian economics, I think he's basically done a decent job, but the left in America want much more aggressive policies, I don't think there's been a time in several decades where the divisions between the parties have been so deep. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"there may be a lot of democrats who are what we would say "disappointed" in obama (me too because in the two years the democrats had contol of both houses of government.. he pandered and didn't get thru half the stuff he could of) there is no way a democrat is going to run against obama, because he is still there best hope.... the people in the south again are going to have an interesting choice... a black man or a mormon... of which a lot of people in the "bible belt" are going to hate..... plus the healthcare bill that republicans hate is the same one that romney brought when he was govenor of mass..... and obama will remind everyone of that everyday until the election.... the problem for romney is that he flip flops.. isn't right wing enough for the south and isn't liberal enough for the west coast or the north east...... it will be closer but obama would fancy his chances..." Seems like it will be close. There's a thing called IOWA electronic markets (google this) They are a futures market, betting on political events. Like a stock market for politicians. It is much more accurate than voting polls etc, so you might be interested to look at the numbers as the primaries and voting continue. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |