FabSwingers.com forum: Should schoolboys face police charges?

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

Personally I'm very uncomfortable with dragging the police into schools to sort out this kind of trivial shit. Yes, it is trivial shit, go watch the video. Weapons used - no? Punches thrown - no? Injuries sustained - no? Worth a criminal record - no, in my opinion. Feelings hurt - Yes. Is he a bully - Yes.

It's easy to be horrified by the video but look a little closer. The fact that the 16 year old allowed it to be filmed, the fact that he picked on someone with a broken wrist that he knew couldn't fight back and the fact that he didn't punch him, is all telling you something. This is a boy who was on a power trip. That is actually relatively easy behaviour to correct, but criminal records aren't about correcting future behaviour. I'm not saying he shouldn't be punished, but there has to be a period of time where children learn what is and isn't acceptable behaviour without the police involvement.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ichaelangelaCouple
over a year ago

notts

Yes

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He pinned him down and waterboarded him. You might think it's hurt feelings hurt, but it's assault. Not only that the poor boy has a bloody cast on. I think there should be a charge, but it should involve some kind of rehabilitation programme.

I went through years of bullying and this kind of crap is on another level. I was unlucky and I had my cheekbone fractured. The girl was charged and sent to rehab courses. The girl is now a care worker and has a child. Thankfully she completely changed her life around.

L xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inkyCouple1927Couple
over a year ago

Newcastle

Agree with the OP. The world has become far too “sensitive”. He should get a clip round the ear and be grounded for a good while with no console etc.

Of course if he persists in being a cock, then take things further as necessary.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

How do you know it was unprovoked?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong. "

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wpuldnt get a reccord referal order at the very worst

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

Assault is assault and a 16 year old should know better. The location the age and the degree of assault is no excuse.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"He pinned him down and waterboarded him. You might think it's hurt feelings hurt, but it's assault. Not only that the poor boy has a bloody cast on. I think there should be a charge, but it should involve some kind of rehabilitation programme.

L xx"

He didn't fucking waterboard him. Do you even know what that term means!?!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"Assault is assault and a 16 year old should know better. The location the age and the degree of assault is no excuse. "

Ok so age is no excuse. Let's give 2 year olds criminal records then?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too? "

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

How do you know it was unprovoked?"

Watching the video, the 15 year old is minding his own business. I'm saying that there's no way to claim this was self defence.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"Assault is assault and a 16 year old should know better. The location the age and the degree of assault is no excuse.

Ok so age is no excuse. Let's give 2 year olds criminal records then? "

Again... a two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility. And you said that seriously?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really. "

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too? "

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *itty9899Man
over a year ago

Craggy Island

Kids, and especially boys fight I know it wrong, but the teacher and parents should be able to sort it out first but if it gets any more violent then yes the police should be informed.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions. "

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But that's the problem of today when I was at school I would have got the Cain etc. Schools can't do anything now. I seen kids send home and then being send back. Because the school upset the kids.

Families can't punish the kids.so only thing that you can do is call the police. My dad would have went nuts if I did anything bad in school. Tesco selling kids clothes saying I break the rules.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

The bully got his mates to film it and has shared it on social media. If he hadn't sought out notoriety he wouldn't be getting nicked, it's his own fault the police are involved and I'm certainly not sorry that they are

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *nSeeNMan
over a year ago

Z'ha'dum

Shall we wait then till he did something more serious. Bet you wouldnt feel so sympathetic if he did that to your child.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too? "

That is the stupidest comparison I have ever read. A 16 year old knows right from wrong and 2 year old doesn't!! 16 years old and pinning someone down by their neck is assault. A 2 year old hitting thsir mum is their way of testing the boundaries, they soon learn that they cannot do this.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *woPlusMore69Couple
over a year ago

Birstall

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

He allegedly broke this boys wrist but not got reported by school a few weeks before and now this , yes he does deserve it ,what kind of adult is he going to make ? His sister has been attacked yesterday too by the bullies sister !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"Agree with the OP. The world has become far too “sensitive”. He should get a clip round the ear and be grounded for a good while with no console etc.

Of course if he persists in being a cock, then take things further as necessary."

Interesting... who should administer the clip around the ear? And who sets the limits on being a cock, when is too far too far?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can't give him a clip round the ear it's against his human rights.

Load of bollocks do the same to him humiliate him and post it on social media see what the brain dead little shit thinks about that.

When one of your children has been a victim of bullying you might feel differently

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The boy does have a broken wrist. If he did that then it's a serious injury and then yes, police action might be appropriate.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

How do you know it was unprovoked?

Watching the video, the 15 year old is minding his own business. I'm saying that there's no way to claim this was self defence."

But we don't know what happened before the start of the video.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?"

A playground fight is not bullying.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

I'm exploring the cut off point. So far everyone is dodging my question about 10 year olds...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inkyCouple1927Couple
over a year ago

Newcastle

"Agree with the OP. The world has become far too “sensitive”. He should get a clip round the ear and be grounded for a good while with no console etc.

Of course if he persists in being a cock, then take things further as necessary.

Interesting... who should administer the clip around the ear? And who sets the limits on being a cock, when is too far too far?"

Parents if they’re worth their salt

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?"

Utter bollucks, go watch the video

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At sixteen I had a full time job. I moved out into my own home at barely seventeen. I was in a committed relationship.

You KNOW better at sixteen. It’s illegal. And he should be charged. Comparing it to a two year old having a tantrum and hitting his mum is surreal.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Kids have commited suicide over bullying, so yes something needs to be done. At 16yrs old, he is old enough to know that what he did was wrong & should face the consequences.

We don't know that this was the first time, how many chances should a bully be given?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A person at 16 knows the difference between right and wrong so if they break an adult law they should get an adults punishment simple

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Isn't it a criminal offence to film an assault and post it on social media?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"At sixteen I had a full time job. I moved out into my own home at barely seventeen. I was in a committed relationship.

You KNOW better at sixteen. It’s illegal. And he should be charged. Comparing it to a two year old having a tantrum and hitting his mum is surreal. "

For the fourth time then, how about a 10 year old?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?"

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inkyCouple1927Couple
over a year ago

Newcastle

"At sixteen I had a full time job. I moved out into my own home at barely seventeen. I was in a committed relationship.

You KNOW better at sixteen. It’s illegal. And he should be charged. Comparing it to a two year old having a tantrum and hitting his mum is surreal. "

I was the same. But “we” knew better at 16. The world is different now and most kids can’t look after themselves at 16 cause they are brought up very differently...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask. "

Another non answer then

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context. "

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Would it be reasonable to suggest that your lack of empathy for the victim, is part of the reason that you seem to be feeling that the buly is somehow a victim due to the retribution he is now facing?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then? "

How old were Jamie Bulgers killers? Bullying is a step down the wrong path and if the bully can't be shown the error of their ways by other means then yes I'm okay with an eleven year old getting a record especially if it was one of my family being bullied!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

Another non answer then

Hardly. What didn’t you understand?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Dictionary definition of waterboarding:-

"an interrogation technique simulating the experience of drowning, in which a person is strapped head downwards on a sloping board or bench with the mouth and nose covered, while large quantities of water are poured over the face."

I'm not defending the attackers actions, but all I saw in the video was him pouring water on the face of the victim.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

Yes they should be liable to criminal prosecution, if they are "man" enough to commit such crimes, then should face up to the consequences. A clip round the ear is not gonna send out the right messages.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"Agree with the OP. The world has become far too “sensitive”. He should get a clip round the ear and be grounded for a good while with no console etc.

Of course if he persists in being a cock, then take things further as necessary.

Interesting... who should administer the clip around the ear? And who sets the limits on being a cock, when is too far too far?

Parents if they’re worth their salt"

And if they aren't?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him? "

Yep.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?"

A playground fight is very different to targeting one boy several times.

He sister has also been bullied aswell. This seems to have been an ongoing thing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Our society does not seem to punish knife crime...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

Another non answer then

Hardly. What didn’t you understand? "

Imagine everything about this case is the same except the bully is 10 not 16, should he be charged?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep. "

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him? "

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *c1989Woman
over a year ago

Manchester

It disgusts me when I see this kind of thing making the rounds on social media. Teenagers full on attacking each other.

It should be taken very seriously by authorities as it can lead to more serious fighting involving weapons. How the police and cps choose to deal with it is another matter. Suspended sentence. Conditional discharge even. There are plenty of ways to show that near adult the error of his ways. He may be schoolboy but he is far from being a child and certainly not in below the age of criminal responsibility.

That threshold was lowered to 10 in the early 90s. And for good reason too.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Of course the police should be involved, bullying is never okay in any circumstance. What a stupid thing to even post

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Go watch the video for yourself then. It's shameful you to trivialise torture in this way.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

Another non answer then

Hardly. What didn’t you understand?

Imagine everything about this case is the same except the bully is 10 not 16, should he be charged? "

I’d refer you to my question which you haven’t answered. Are they breaking the law? Do they have the mental capacity? It’s relatively easy to charge people but gaining a conviction is another kettle of fish.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It disgusts me when I see this kind of thing making the rounds on social media. Teenagers full on attacking each other.

That threshold was lowered to 10 in the early 90s. And for good reason too. "

You clearly didn't watch the video.

A "full on" attack would at least have a strike.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Go watch the video for yourself then. It's shameful you to trivialise torture in this way. "

It is far more shameful that you seem to think assault should go unpunished.

Nita

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Great point.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened? "

Because I'm interested in what peoples cut off point is. Clearly from all the non-answers and evisions, most people are uncomfortable with charging 10 year olds for this sort of thing, except the one person who did give a straight answer. So we know that it's not as simple as the age of criminal responsibility. So somewhere between 10 and 16, people have a cut off point and I'm interested where that is...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree. "

As you are entitled to do. But as you like hypothetical scenarios. Your child is bullied repeatedly by an eleven year old. The school have washed their hands of the bully and the parents don't give a toss. Your last recourse is the law, what do you do?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *woPlusMore69Couple
over a year ago

Birstall

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

Another non answer then

Hardly. What didn’t you understand?

Imagine everything about this case is the same except the bully is 10 not 16, should he be charged? "

At 10 they know right from wrong too , I have family who know this bullies family ,older brother in prison for assault and battery , mum a d*unk and violent ,younger sister violent towards the poor boy from this videos sister just yesterday! So yes he should be arrested and hopefully he will learn from this...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Go watch the video for yourself then. It's shameful you to trivialise torture in this way.

It is far more shameful that you seem to think assault should go unpunished.

Nita"

Try reading the whole of the original post where i explicitly said he should be punished

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"At sixteen I had a full time job. I moved out into my own home at barely seventeen. I was in a committed relationship.

You KNOW better at sixteen. It’s illegal. And he should be charged. Comparing it to a two year old having a tantrum and hitting his mum is surreal.

For the fourth time then, how about a 10 year old? "

Yes

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened?

I’m not uncomfortable with charging a 10 year old.

My niece is 12 years old so 2 years off 10, and if she had been the bully in the video I’d expect her to be arrested for it too.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

No, because the 2 year old is under the age of 10 when the law states that they become criminally liable for their actions.

Ok So are you ok with 10 year olds getting criminal records for playground 'fights'?

Haha, are they breaking the law? If so then they are, by law, criminally responsible if they have the mental capacity to understand their actions etc. That’s a better question to ask.

Another non answer then

Hardly. What didn’t you understand?

Imagine everything about this case is the same except the bully is 10 not 16, should he be charged?

We're not debating what the law is. We're debating opinions on what it should be.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"Assault is assault and a 16 year old should know better. The location the age and the degree of assault is no excuse.

Ok so age is no excuse. Let's give 2 year olds criminal records then? "

See now, in this country at least, you're old enough to legally have sex at 16, but you can't buy a porn mag, go to the off license and buy a beer for your loved one then go and vote for the Raving Monster Loony Party. You should be accountable for your actions.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Don’t forget to add that this boy had his wrist broken by bullied in October, was bullied continually for months.

His sister was also bullied as recent as the day before the attack if I recall from the comment. So much so, she attempted to commit suicide.

But hey, let’s give the kid a warning. He’s only 16.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Best left to the legal system ..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am an older guy. For two years every single night and day I had 4 boys from 8 to 9 plus a 13 year old . Break down my back gate.throw stones eggs anything at my windows damaged my car. Banged kicked my door and Windows. The family refuse to say that there kids did anything.

They even tried to tell the police I was a paedophile. Because it got so bad the police was here everyday. They would not stop. On till I put cameras outside. And 3 of them got criminal records.

So I don't care about any of the Wee suits where I live

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I am an older guy. For two years every single night and day I had 4 boys from 8 to 9 plus a 13 year old . Break down my back gate.throw stones eggs anything at my windows damaged my car. Banged kicked my door and Windows. The family refuse to say that there kids did anything.

They even tried to tell the police I was a paedophile. Because it got so bad the police was here everyday. They would not stop. On till I put cameras outside. And 3 of them got criminal records.

So I don't care about any of the Wee suits where I live"
shits

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Don’t forget to add that this boy had his wrist broken by bullied in October, was bullied continually for months.

His sister was also bullied as recent as the day before the attack if I recall from the comment. So much so, she attempted to commit suicide.

But hey, let’s give the kid a warning. He’s only 16. "

Nobody's saying "give him a warning". I would have said that an incident where he broke the boys wrist is sufficient grounds for exclusion. I wasn't aware of that back story, where did you find it? The video I saw was a trivial incident, breaking someone's wrist is not.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Agree with the OP. The world has become far too “sensitive”. He should get a clip round the ear and be grounded for a good while with no console etc.

Of course if he persists in being a cock, then take things further as necessary."

Maybe he’s had numerous warnings already and this is the further as necessary.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

Its frankly shameful of you to use the term waterboarding in this context.

Why is it? I';m merely repeationg how many media source has viewed the incident. Are you saying that all the reporting on this incident is shameful?

Go watch the video for yourself then. It's shameful you to trivialise torture in this way.

It is far more shameful that you seem to think assault should go unpunished.

Nita

Try reading the whole of the original post where i explicitly said he should be punished

OK, I should have clarified.

Please read as "arrested for assault". Given this is seemingly an on going thing, previous punishment has clearly been ineffective.

If it were my child...either of them...I would say the same.

If such things are not taken seriously, it is far more likely to escalate further.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist. "

Okay the bully is excluded from school the referral unit has been closed (it's happening look it up) the bullying takes place in the local park. A real world situation that happens every day. What do you do?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too? "

Well that doesn’t compare. A two year old is 8 years below the age of criminal responsibility for a start.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Sounds like a Crim. Lock him up!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist. "

The hypothetical exact same attack by an 11 year old doesn't exist, it doesn't seem to stop you discussing it though

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

Well that doesn’t compare. A two year old is 8 years below the age of criminal responsibility for a start."

Ooooh! That might be construed as a ‘non answer’!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

Utter bollucks, go watch the video"

I have watched the video, and the word is spelled "bollocks".

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *woPlusMore69Couple
over a year ago

Birstall

They even tried to tell the police I was a paedophile. Because it got so bad the police was here everyday. They would not stop. On till I put cameras outside. And 3 of them got criminal records.

So I don't care about any of the Wee suits where I live"

Parents too should be made accountable too, they let their kids out and not watching them

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

Yes in that circumstance, I'm comfortable with the criminal charges. I just think that school is a very artificial environment that breeds this kind of bullshit showing off, which is what he was doing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

Utter bollucks, go watch the video

I have watched the video, and the word is spelled "bollocks"."

Then you should be ashamed of yourself for trivialising torture in such a way. Its an insult to real victims of waterboarding to put this in the same category.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

The hypothetical exact same attack by an 11 year old doesn't exist, it doesn't seem to stop you discussing it though"

Incidents like this involving 11 year olds happen every day in the country. The school had not and could not "wash their hands with him".

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Don’t forget to add that this boy had his wrist broken by bullied in October, was bullied continually for months.

His sister was also bullied as recent as the day before the attack if I recall from the comment. So much so, she attempted to commit suicide.

But hey, let’s give the kid a warning. He’s only 16.

On Facebook posted by a friend of the family. It was shared on my page.

There’s is also an additional video being shared that shows his sister being bullied.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iffaWoman
over a year ago

wherever

Kid sounds like a prick. 16 is old enough to know better. If he gets away with it what’s the next thing he will do?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’. "

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

I'm exploring the cut off point. So far everyone is dodging my question about 10 year olds..."

I know of an 11 year old who took an iron bar to a little old lady in the course of a robbery. I'm fine with 10. It's not like convicted 10 year olds go to mainstream adult prison.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened? "

I agree with this the thug is 16 he knew full well what he was doing especially as his friends filmed it why keep asking what if he was 11.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

"
he shouldn’t have been let out in my not at all humble opinion.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

I'm exploring the cut off point. So far everyone is dodging my question about 10 year olds...

I know of an 11 year old who took an iron bar to a little old lady in the course of a robbery. I'm fine with 10. It's not like convicted 10 year olds go to mainstream adult prison."

No but the criminal record essential ensures they won't get a decent job in future and we know where that leads. In your example, some serious physical harm and a robbery was committed. In the video I've seen, there was nothing more than a bully humiliating a victim, which is wrong but incredibly common as kids learn how to act properly in society.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *owdyboy 890Man
over a year ago

Country West

Once they do the crime they should do the time xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened?

I agree with this the thug is 16 he knew full well what he was doing especially as his friends filmed it why keep asking what if he was 11. "

The title of the thread starts with "should". It's about opinions on whether this should go to the law, the law is very straight forward on this once the police are involved.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iker boy 69Man
over a year ago

midlands

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

It was this cunt that caused the lad to break his arm so yes, charges should be bought. People like you thatd let your kids bully and grow up to be minless thugs

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I'm sorry but that's twaddle. Excusing bullying as showing off is just namby pamby crap. The location has nothing to do with it bullying is bullying. To use your logic it's like saying its okay to sexually abuse a woman if she is dressed in a revealing outfit. There is never a justifiable excuse for violence from someone who knows better.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

It was this cunt that caused the lad to break his arm so yes, charges should be bought. People like you thatd let your kids bully and grow up to be minless thugs"

Idiotic response. I'd never let my child behave the way this bully did.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When my brother was eight, an eight year old and his 12 year old sister dragged him off his bike, and slammed bricks on his head. Why? Because my brother is autistic.

I’m completely fine with a ten year old being charged.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iker boy 69Man
over a year ago

midlands

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

It was this cunt that caused the lad to break his arm so yes, charges should be bought. People like you thatd let your kids bully and grow up to be minless thugs

Idiotic response. I'd never let my child behave the way this bully did. "

Well you class it as trivial shit, so how trivial would it be if your kid had his arm broke then continuous bullying.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

No that comparison makes no sense whatsoever. Bullying is bullying does not mean that bullying does not contain showing off. Why didnt he punch him if he really wanted to hurt him? What he obviously wanted was to look cool in front of his friends and he is going about it in totally the wrong way. If you aren't aware that neglected children will misbehave to get attention then i really wonder where you've been.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

The hypothetical exact same attack by an 11 year old doesn't exist, it doesn't seem to stop you discussing it though

Incidents like this involving 11 year olds happen every day in the country. The school had not and could not "wash their hands with him". "

Again I have to point out your mistake. Schools do exclude kids they can't handle and yes many of them are basically left for the parents to sort because there are not the specialist units for them to go to. So yes schools can and do wash their hands of them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

It was this cunt that caused the lad to break his arm so yes, charges should be bought. People like you thatd let your kids bully and grow up to be minless thugs

Idiotic response. I'd never let my child behave the way this bully did.

Well you class it as trivial shit, so how trivial would it be if your kid had his arm broke then continuous bullying. "

Breaking someone's arm is not trivial. Pouring water over then for 3 seconds is.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

The hypothetical exact same attack by an 11 year old doesn't exist, it doesn't seem to stop you discussing it though

Incidents like this involving 11 year olds happen every day in the country. The school had not and could not "wash their hands with him".

It's not my mistake, it's your interpretation. The boy should have been excluded if and when he broke the kids wrist.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There seems to be so many vile children around now.

There are many reasons for it - usually the parents and their peers.

Regardless - violence needs to be dealt with.

Especially at 16.

It's just another scum bag most probably due to circumstance that will end up in prison when he inevitably ends up really hurting someone as an adult

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iker boy 69Man
over a year ago

midlands

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

The hypothetical exact same attack by an 11 year old doesn't exist, it doesn't seem to stop you discussing it though

Incidents like this involving 11 year olds happen every day in the country. The school had not and could not "wash their hands with him".

It's not my mistake, it's your interpretation. The boy should have been excluded if and when he broke the kids wrist."

Yes, he should have been excluded, and walked out of school in handcuffs charged with gbh.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world. "

Yeah I'm a real bleeding heart liberal

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

I do love these 'what's your opinion? I don't care about your opinion' type threads

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

he shouldn’t have been let out in my not at all humble opinion. "

Exactly, that is where society is letting us down. I spent 10 years at boarding school, and any sort of bullying was quickly stamped out, usually without the teacher's intervention. It has to be instilled into modern youth that this kind of behaviour is just not acceptable.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely yes

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I do love these 'what's your opinion? I don't care about your opinion' type threads

Call it that if you like. I see it as "what's your opinion", "let's test that opinion". We got there eventually with about 6 people saying they support the decision and would even if the bully was a bit younger. I'm in the minority on this one.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *osweet69Couple
over a year ago

portsmouth

I'm with the op on this one.

The head master should have been allowed to addressed this matter and allowed to dish out the appropriate punishment to fit the crime.

This country has gone PC mad. The lunatic are now running the asylum.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

he shouldn’t have been let out in my not at all humble opinion.

Jamie Bulger and Jon Venables are totally fucked up beyond repair. I don't think this bully is... yet. I think he will be if he gets a criminal record. If he does then this won't be his last crime.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I'm with the op on this one.

The head master should have been allowed to addressed this matter and allowed to dish out the appropriate punishment to fit the crime.

This country has gone PC mad. The lunatic are now running the asylum.

Wahoo, it's about 3 on our side and about 7 declared against

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

he shouldn’t have been let out in my not at all humble opinion.

Jamie Bulger and Jon Venables are totally fucked up beyond repair. I don't think this bully is... yet. I think he will be if he gets a criminal record. If he does then this won't be his last crime. "

Thompson and Venables are fucked up. James Bulger was the baby they killed.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

Whether the bully was 10 or 16, he was a bully (which by definition means it was not an isolated incident) and he assaulted somebody, of course police should get involved and yes charges should be applied.

It's also quite sad to see that at 16 he is coming from a fairly dysfunctional home and, it's been reported, he actively follows Britain First, a far right group... Hopefully he will benefit from some rehabilitation and one to one education.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I don’t agree with the concept of ‘punishment’. I prefer ‘re-education and rehabilitation’.

In some cases this might be the best way of dealing with offenders, but look at the Jamie Bulger case, Jon Venables went on to commit further crime when given the opportunity to start a new life

he shouldn’t have been let out in my not at all humble opinion.

Jamie Bulger and Jon Venables are totally fucked up beyond repair. I don't think this bully is... yet. I think he will be if he gets a criminal record. If he does then this won't be his last crime.

Thompson and Venables are fucked up. James Bulger was the baby they killed. "

Ooops, it was a bit before my time. Apologies I meant Thompson and Venables

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"Whether the bully was 10 or 16, he was a bully (which by definition means it was not an isolated incident) and he assaulted somebody, of course police should get involved and yes charges should be applied.

Interesting development, where did you find that? That's deeply sad.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I blame the parent who supports a banned league. You cannot choose your parents but to change you have to have a strength and will to do it.

I think the future will be very interesting when these children grow up and face the real world.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I do love these 'what's your opinion? I don't care about your opinion' type threads

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I blame the parent who supports a banned league. You cannot choose your parents but to change you have to have a strength and will to do it.

I think the future will be very interesting when these children grow up and face the real world."

Sadly I don't think he ever will, he's on the fast track to a life in and out of prison. Sounds like he had a shit start in life and doesn't have the skills to get off that track.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world.

Yeah I'm a real bleeding heart liberal "

Yet oddly you seem to be when the victim is a 16 year old racist thug... You've even said a criminal sentence would be odd for him

Odd that only a few days ago moped muggers deserved all they got, same age, same dysfunctional background, although the sterotype would suggest a differing ethnicity

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

Interesting development, where did you find that? That's deeply sad. "

I'm not a Daily Mail reader by any stretch but this caught my eye

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6438149/Teenager-accused-water-board-attack-Britain-supporter.html

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world.

Yeah I'm a real bleeding heart liberal

Yet oddly you seem to be when the victim is a 16 year old racist thug... You've even said a criminal sentence would be odd for him

Odd that only a few days ago moped muggers deserved all they got, same age, same dysfunctional background, although the sterotype would suggest a differing ethnicity"

Exactly my thoughts.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm absolutely heartbroken, re the 15 year old refugee suffered an absolutely horrendous attack, ,,,in flipping Huddersfield! !!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world.

Yeah I'm a real bleeding heart liberal

Yet oddly you seem to be when the victim is a 16 year old racist thug... You've even said a criminal sentence would be odd for him

Odd that only a few days ago moped muggers deserved all they got, same age, same dysfunctional background, although the sterotype would suggest a differing ethnicity"

Odd for pouring a bottle of water over someone's head, not for breaking their wrist

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *oan of DArcCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

But the bully is 16? What is the point of a debate as to whether an 11 year old should be arrested if they did the same thing?

How is a hypothetical scenario relevant to what actually happened? "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too? "

That's silly, as when laws on accountability are decided then development milestones are considered. A toddler is deemed as not being able to regulate emotion as this part of the brain, and language development hasn't matured, moral judgement, understanding right from wrong and understanding cause and consequence should be understood by high school children, therefore deemed a developmentally appropriate age to be held accountable for their actions.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester

If it means future acts of racist bullying , or any bullying at all are filmed and shown on social media , then I hope they do charge him .

What a world we live in where things like this get shared .

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

kells

Most definitely yes, nip this scumbags racist attitude in the bud and let him know now that there’s consequences for his actions before he becomes a 20 yr old racist evolved into something a lot more dangerous

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Interesting development, where did you find that? That's deeply sad.

I'm not a Daily Mail reader by any stretch but this caught my eye

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6438149/Teenager-accused-water-board-attack-Britain-supporter.html"

Ok so his wrist was broken on October 7th, I really don't understand what it means by "A previous unconnected incident on 7 October, in which the victim suffered a wrist injury, was also fully investigated at the time." This happened on the 25th of October and the boy was finally excluded on the 20th of November.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It’s a disgusting act. So glad he’s going to be charged with assault!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"Ooops, it was a bit before my time. Apologies I meant Thompson and Venables

Yeah Thompson seems to have settled down and integrated into society as a mature adult, albeit under a new identity, and he has got to live with what he did for the rest of his life. Venables on the other hand, has been given the same opportunity through rehabilitation to turn his life around, but he just spurned it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

So getting my head around that, the bully would have been interviewed by police regarding the wrist incident before this happened. He then still thought it was a good idea to film himself bullying the kid. Damn.

Well when the facts change then my opinion changes, I can't defend that. Yes he should have known better by age 16. He deserves to be charged.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So getting my head around that, the bully would have been interviewed by police regarding the wrist incident before this happened. He then still thought it was a good idea to film himself bullying the kid. Damn.

Well when the facts change then my opinion changes, I can't defend that. Yes he should have known better by age 16. He deserves to be charged. "

If he'd been 11 when he broke the arm, would he deserve to be charged then?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

Utter bollucks, go watch the video

I have watched the video, and the word is spelled "bollocks".

Then you should be ashamed of yourself for trivialising torture in such a way. Its an insult to real victims of waterboarding to put this in the same category. "

I'm not trivialising anything. You, on the other hand, are trivialising an assault that emulated a torture technique, quite possibly on the basis of the victims' race and religion.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

So... Just watched itv news and now I have an opinion lol

Any unwanted hands on contact is an assault. Thars a fact. But bullying is not new. Children fighting in school is not new. Victims crying themselves to sleep at night is not new (I did it), victims not wanting to go to d hool isn't new schools doing next to nothing about it isn't new.

So why this story? Why are news agencies asking what the country is coming to based on one video of a kid being bullied?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Well when the facts change then my opinion changes, I can't defend that. Yes he should have known better by age 16. He deserves to be charged.

If he'd been 11 when he broke the arm, would he deserve to be charged then?"

It's right on the border for me. It's almost certain he's getting the inspiration for this at home. If that's the case, does an 11 year old really know what is objective moral behaviour in the face of their parents telling them the opposite? However, after being interviewed once by the police then that should have been a huge wake up call, even for an 11 year old.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

It’s shouldnt have happened, but let’s get things into perspective. It’s no different or worse to what went on when we were at school and will certainly not be any different to what’s going on at any other school up and down the country

Why is there such a focus on this incident I wonder?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

Utter bollucks, go watch the video

I have watched the video, and the word is spelled "bollocks".

Then you should be ashamed of yourself for trivialising torture in such a way. Its an insult to real victims of waterboarding to put this in the same category.

I'm not trivialising anything. You, on the other hand, are trivialising an assault that emulated a torture technique, quite possibly on the basis of the victims' race and religion."

No it didn't. To be waterboarded you must be strapped down, have your head lower than your legs, your face covered and a large quantity of water poured on you. None of those things happened. You Should be ashamed of making such a comparison.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *allSteveMan
over a year ago

Poole

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Why should that bully not be excluded and send to a pupil referal unit? The scenario you present does not exist.

I give up. You are too far down the 'ah poor little darlings' road to see sence. I wish you well in your pink fluffy world.

Yeah I'm a real bleeding heart liberal

Yet oddly you seem to be when the victim is a 16 year old racist thug... You've even said a criminal sentence would be odd for him

Odd that only a few days ago moped muggers deserved all they got, same age, same dysfunctional background, although the sterotype would suggest a differing ethnicity

Odd for pouring a bottle of water over someone's head, not for breaking their wrist

Simple answer from me. If my child is getting bullied and nothing was being done by either the authorities or the child's parent. I would take matters into my own hands. The bullies father would get beat to severely. May not be acceptable but nobody bullies my children and walks away

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"So... Just watched itv news and now I have an opinion lol

So why this story? Why are news agencies asking what the country is coming to based on one video of a kid being bullied? "

So the elephant in the room is the victims status as a refugee. But also this kind of event would have been impossible in the pre-smartphone era so it's shocking that kids are essentially uploading the evidence against them onto YouTube.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well when the facts change then my opinion changes, I can't defend that. Yes he should have known better by age 16. He deserves to be charged.

If he'd been 11 when he broke the arm, would he deserve to be charged then?

But at the start of the thread you felt that the 16 year old shouldn't have even been interviewed bu the police. You said it wasn't a police matter. But now the hypothetical 11 year old should have been interviewed and learnt from that?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All these people saying he should get a slap on the wrist. would be calling for the death penalty if it was their kids

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria

Yes but the motivation was wrong there 2/3 kids getting treated like this in every schools do nothing police on willing to get involved the fact that is migrant frustrates me that he gets better protection.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So there's a video of an unprovoked attack by a 16 year old boy on a 15 year old at school. The boy is being charged with assault.

The attackers copied a torture technique used by the CIA, (And probably the British security services), on a Syrian child refugee. If they did that to your child, would you be as dismissive?

Utter bollucks, go watch the video

I have watched the video, and the word is spelled "bollocks".

Then you should be ashamed of yourself for trivialising torture in such a way. Its an insult to real victims of waterboarding to put this in the same category.

I'm not trivialising anything. You, on the other hand, are trivialising an assault that emulated a torture technique, quite possibly on the basis of the victims' race and religion.

Do you know what the word "pedant" means?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Well when the facts change then my opinion changes, I can't defend that. Yes he should have known better by age 16. He deserves to be charged.

If he'd been 11 when he broke the arm, would he deserve to be charged then?

Please quote me correctly. Pouring water on a kids head or shoving them to the ground is not an event on its own that warrants police attention when done by a child. The kind of savagery needed to break someone's wrist is. Its critical that the wrist break happened before this video, which in isolation would have been trivial.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olliPineCouple
over a year ago

swingers clubs

Why wouldn't they? Being at school doesn't exempt you from the law.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"All these people saying he should get a slap on the wrist. would be calling for the death penalty if it was their kids "

Let's be honest if the Syrian kid had been the aggressor the calls for clemency wouldn't be happening either

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’ve seen the video on the news. It’s disgusting behaviour, at 16 he’s already learned what’s right and what’s wrong. Yes he should absolutely face criminal charges, his behaviour was after all criminal.

Had been my kid he was picking on jail would’ve been an easy way out.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *xtrafun4youMan
over a year ago

Dunstable

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong. "
no matter what the age.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle."

It is also being reported that the boy took part in an attack on a young girl who has since had to be home schooled due to fear of leaving her house

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So... Just watched itv news and now I have an opinion lol

So why this story? Why are news agencies asking what the country is coming to based on one video of a kid being bullied?

The elephant is a very large one. Perhaps the 80000.00+ donated to them will help with a nice move and all is forgotten. However the youth of today have no sense.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

It is also being reported that the boy took part in an attack on a young girl who has since had to be home schooled due to fear of leaving her house"

This was reported by Tommy Robinson in a video.

I’m sorry but unless there’s video evidence like there is for the refugee and his sister being bullied. I call bullshit.

I was reading the comments and there’s a good few amount of troll accounts making up stories to suit their agenda. Of course certain people will believe it and will be quick to share the “other side”.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The thing that this really drives home is that we have a massive problem with extremism in this country, and that far right extremism is being normalised. He's reportedly follows far right groups but let's be honest much of the right wing media and particularly the Mail and Sun have repeatedly attacked refugees and assylum seekers, dehumanised them and made it clear they aren't welcome.

This isn't the bullies fault, he's been radicalised. And this should scare the shit out of all of us.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is widely been reported that it was racially motivated. He attempted to waterboard him. That goes way beyond a playground scuffle.

It is also being reported that the boy took part in an attack on a young girl who has since had to be home schooled due to fear of leaving her house

This was reported by Tommy Robinson in a video.

I’m sorry but unless there’s video evidence like there is for the refugee and his sister being bullied. I call bullshit.

Well in the video, the sister is being attacked by two girls... But the bottom line is that if you were falsely accused of breaking someone's wrist and had a police interview. The last thing you'd do is film yourself bullying them!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The thing that this really drives home is that we have a massive problem with extremism in this country, and that far right extremism is being normalised. He's reportedly follows far right groups but let's be honest much of the right wing media and particularly the Mail and Sun have repeatedly attacked refugees and assylum seekers, dehumanised them and made it clear they aren't welcome.

This isn't the bullies fault, he's been radicalised. And this should scare the shit out of all of us."

Absolutely agree.

The Daily Fail & The Sun and their headlines are outrageous, far too many people are influenced by their articles.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would like to see the video.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

This isn't the bullies fault, he's been radicalised. And this should scare the shit out of all of us.

Absolutely agree.

The Daily Fail & The Sun and their headlines are outrageous, far too many people are influenced by their articles. "

Are they? I'd be willing to bet this kid has a shitty relationship with a shitty racist father and on some level he thinks this will gain approval from said father

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hatYorkLadMan
over a year ago

York

Yes they should get the police involved, the bullying piece of shit needs to learn that actions have consequences, some of which will stay with him for life. I've watched the video and he reminds me of some of the arseholes I had to put up with at school.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"I would like to see the video."

Put "Almondbury Community School" into YouTube

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

This isn't the bullies fault, he's been radicalised. And this should scare the shit out of all of us.

Absolutely agree.

The Daily Fail & The Sun and their headlines are outrageous, far too many people are influenced by their articles. "

The daily Mail's reporting was far better than the BBCs. If I'd read the daily Mail's version first then I wouldn't have started the thread. The BBC made it seem like the central issue was that a refugee got a bottle of fecking water poured over this head. The reality was that a kid had broken another kids wrist, been interviewed by police and carried on anyway. None of that was present in the BBC version.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"I would like to see the video."

I've just seen it on Facebook. He tells the hot he's going to drown him.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

*boy

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *havenrodMan
over a year ago

Reading

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree. "

Put it another way then. At what age should they be prosecuted?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The BBC video?

Pulls him to ground and pours his drink on him?

Naaaaahhhh

Fucking hell. Boys do that stuff all day long in schools.

There isn't enough background to this story.

I just see a bigger boy picking on a smaller boy in school.

And it's not a terribly violent crime.

It's borderline bullying but I've had worse.

Boys will be boys...They aren't adults.

He's hardly running around London on a moped with a machete.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

This isn't the bullies fault, he's been radicalised. And this should scare the shit out of all of us.

Absolutely agree.

The Daily Fail & The Sun and their headlines are outrageous, far too many people are influenced by their articles.

Well, it might have upset someone..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

"It is assault. It is illegal. It is wrong.

Good luck finding a child who has never assaulted anyone. How about a 2 year old that has a temper and hits their mum, should they get a criminal record too?

A two year old is below the age of criminal responsibility so a bit of a daft thing to say really.

Ok my bad. You're fine with 11 year olds getting criminal records then?

Take this case exactly how it is, but the boys age is 11 not 16, do you think it is right to charge him?

Yep.

Thank you for your straight answer. I totally disagree.

Put it another way then. At what age should they be prosecuted?

With what i now know about the case, certainly by 13 but I'm still uncomfortable with 11. He should have been excluded before this event even happened. His parents have a lot to answer for.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The BBC video?

Pulls him to ground and pours his drink on him?

Naaaaahhhh

Fucking hell. Boys do that stuff all day long in schools.

There isn't enough background to this story.

I just see a bigger boy picking on a smaller boy in school.

And it's not a terribly violent crime.

It's borderline bullying but I've had worse.

Boys will be boys...They aren't adults.

He's hardly running around London on a moped with a machete."

‘Boys will be boys’ terrifies me to be honest...hate that excuse. Heard it so many times, been told it so many times and basically blamed for the abuse/assult/bullying I received

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *y Favorite Pornstar OP Couple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Anyway, thanks for all who debated well, a lot of info came out that changed my opinion. Don't call this waterboarding though. Good thread

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"Anyway, thanks for all who debated well, a lot of info came out that changed my opinion. Don't call this waterboarding though. Good thread"

Yeah, It was quite provoking thread, maybe some people will be educated from reading it? I certainly hope so

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *oachman 9CoolMan
over a year ago

derby

"But that's the problem of today when I was at school I would have got the Cain etc. Schools can't do anything now. I seen kids send home and then being send back. Because the school upset the kids.

Families can't punish the kids.so only thing that you can do is call the police. My dad would have went nuts if I did anything bad in school. Tesco selling kids clothes saying I break the rules.

"
This ... This is the root of the problem there never was and never will be with some kids any other solution than a bloody good wallop from parent or deputy head teacher which is what happened in my day, because some teachers took it to far The do gooders stepped in and here we are some 35 years later with the spoils.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately