Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush" Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush" I banged some bush 2 hours ago it's still fresh in my mind... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. " I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Brutal and extended cold blast could shatter all records - whatever happened to global warming?" - POTUS He must have people writing these tweets "Trumpanzees love a bit of fake climate porn to wank off to. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. " Is this how conservatives justify their representatives? Well, yours President was shit some don't blame ours for being an idiot. I don't care which party the president aligns with as long as he does a good job. Yes I may be social liberal and disagree with you on most things. But let's not be silly and pretend global climate change isn't drastically speed up by our polution. If we go by President Trumps thinking then "I'm not hungry so world hunger doesn't exist" would be a valid statement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Brutal and extended cold blast could shatter all records - whatever happened to global warming?" - POTUS He must have people writing these tweets
Trumpanzees love a bit of fake climate porn to wank off to. "As long as they do it at home where it's not raining. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. " Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. " He is a bit of a Twit isn't he. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. " I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Is this how conservatives justify their representatives? Well, yours President was shit some don't blame ours for being an idiot. I don't care which party the president aligns with as long as he does a good job. Yes I may be social liberal and disagree with you on most things. But let's not be silly and pretend global climate change isn't drastically speed up by our polution. If we go by President Trumps thinking then "I'm not hungry so world hunger doesn't exist" would be a valid statement. " Trump was a democrat 2001 - 2009, he's hardly representative of a conservative. He's just better at playing identity politics with the right. He'll say whatever he thinks you want him to say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... " Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. " I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. " Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. " Sorry but you need to expand the analysis of trump that you've seen, if you can't recognise how he changes his message to whatever the audience will applaud. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. " Fair enough, I just personally don't give a shit about actors opinions on anything other than films or musicians opinions on anything other than music. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. Fair enough, I just personally don't give a shit about actors opinions on anything other than films or musicians opinions on anything other than music. " That's literally what I just said. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just because people don't agree does not make them stupid " True, I believe the correct word would be ignorant. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just because people don't agree does not make them stupid True, I believe the correct word would be ignorant." Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. Fair enough, I just personally don't give a shit about actors opinions on anything other than films or musicians opinions on anything other than music. That's literally what I just said." Twitter is likely to tell you what sandwich they ate for lunch or what they watched on TV last night. If you wanted to hear an actor or musician say something intelligent about their craft then you'd go to YouTube. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. Actually I think it's less about "outrage culture" and more about the immediacy of twitter which is Trump's prefered outlet. I agree but they are deeply intertwined. I hate Twitter with a passion, always thought it was a shit idea and don't personally know anyone that actually uses it and don't believe that anyone actually uses it for anything other than selling shit or narcissm. For some strange reason, some people with influence do seem to monitor Twitter though. I think Twitter is about as representative of society as daisys are of France, but most mainstream journalists seem to think it's newsworthy. If you have any theories on why then I'd be interested... Laziness. Why go out looking for a story, when you can sit at home, playing with your phone. I think that theory has legs. About 70% of what hits the front page of BBC news, isn't newsworthy in my opinion. Twitter is a platform for quick and short updates from people you find of interests. Journalism and news are only a branch of the tree. I mostly follow musicians and actors, not for their political views to make it clear. As for news, of course they're mostly bullshit because that's what sells. This doesn't change it's literally Trump himself posting these idiotic comments at 3am in the morning, and no he doesn't say what you want to hear, unless majority of the U.S. is stupid enough to share his views and ideologies. Fair enough, I just personally don't give a shit about actors opinions on anything other than films or musicians opinions on anything other than music. That's literally what I just said. Twitter is likely to tell you what sandwich they ate for lunch or what they watched on TV last night. If you wanted to hear an actor or musician say something intelligent about their craft then you'd go to YouTube. " You do realise musicians and comedians post tour dates, album releases etc on Twitter, not just thier breakfast selfies? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just because people don't agree does not make them stupid True, I believe the correct word would be ignorant. Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance." And you may not be right  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just because people don't agree does not make them stupid True, I believe the correct word would be ignorant. Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance. And you may not be right "About what?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. " So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid." That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. " You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago?" E.G. redirect attention from something important to something scandalous. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. " Might be much longer | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago?" The rights only agenda is play down everything trump says .Then of course there's the obligatory reference to Obama and Karl Marx if you disagree with trump and you must be the loony sandal wearing left if you don't agree with trump. It's all very obvious and shallow. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid." It's always convenient for the climate change loons to revert to weather when the outlook does not support their agenda | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. It's always convenient for the climate change loons to revert to weather when the outlook does not support their agenda" Stop ...your not doing yourself any favours.but I did like the use of "outlook" in the sentence.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. It's always convenient for the climate change loons to revert to weather when the outlook does not support their agenda" It's not a worry for you and the flat earth you live on, so why stress about it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago?" Yes, or "control the media agenda himself" as a spin doctor would put it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago? The rights only agenda is play down everything trump says .Then of course there's the obligatory reference to Obama and Karl Marx if you disagree with trump and you must be the loony sandal wearing left if you don't agree with trump. It's all very obvious and shallow. "You do like a little Marx here and there though. You're not an alcoholic, you just like to make your coffee a bit Irish. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's not a worry for you and the flat earth you live on, so why stress about it "And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate King Canute tried and failed So sleep well.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. You mean constantly trying to change the subject/object of drama so that people do not have the time to in depth analyze the situation he has been invovled with 2 'tweets' ago? The rights only agenda is play down everything trump says .Then of course there's the obligatory reference to Obama and Karl Marx if you disagree with trump and you must be the loony sandal wearing left if you don't agree with trump. It's all very obvious and shallow.
You do like a little Marx here and there though. You're not an alcoholic, you just like to make your coffee a bit Irish. "Not a Marx fan I like rum in coffee with a Cuban cigar so I guess that's more Fidel . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's not a worry for you and the flat earth you live on, so why stress about it
And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate
King Canute tried and failed
So sleep well.. "It really does deliver bliss... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You do like a little Marx here and there though. You're not an alcoholic, you just like to make your coffee a bit Irish. " An alcoholic is a person who drinks as much as you do that you don't like | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's not a worry for you and the flat earth you live on, so why stress about it
And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate
King Canute tried and failed
So sleep well.. "Mankind cannot live in space, so why explore it. Mankind can't outlive the planet so why keep reproducing. If I see a car coming my way, I can't control it so why step out of the way. You really shine like a bright star spreading wisdom left and right | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. " What? Who is having ‘a Trump induced heart attack’? Is it not even possible to calmly comment on something like this without it being completely exaggerated into something it isn’t, in a totally transparent attempt to make the criticism appear somehow irrational? If it’s not what you were saying, what did you mean by ‘outrage culture’, given that no-one actually appeared close to being outraged? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. What? Who is having ‘a Trump induced heart attack’? Is it not even possible to calmly comment on something like this without it being completely exaggerated into something it isn’t, in a totally transparent attempt to make the criticism appear somehow irrational? If it’s not what you were saying, what did you mean by ‘outrage culture’, given that no-one actually appeared close to being outraged?" You can keep trying to twist my words all you want. You don't seem to get that trump is the best media manipulator the world has even seen in the digital age. He wants you to comment /criticise/ get outraged or whatever you want to call it. If you're happy to play into that then carry on as you were. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. What? Who is having ‘a Trump induced heart attack’? Is it not even possible to calmly comment on something like this without it being completely exaggerated into something it isn’t, in a totally transparent attempt to make the criticism appear somehow irrational? If it’s not what you were saying, what did you mean by ‘outrage culture’, given that no-one actually appeared close to being outraged? You can keep trying to twist my words all you want. You don't seem to get that trump is the best media manipulator the world has even seen in the digital age. He wants you to comment /criticise/ get outraged or whatever you want to call it. If you're happy to play into that then carry on as you were. " I’m not twisting your words. You talked about people having ‘Trump induced heart attacks’. I just asked who was actually having anything of the sort. Seeing as no-one actually is, the only person twisting words here is you. Twisting some perfectly reasonable comment, expressed perfectly calmly, into some over sensationalised version of events, intent on belittling the original comment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love how the lefties have already forgotten about Bush Oh yes, I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me my years of 7-15, the president meant a lot to me back then. I'm just saying that hysteria about Republican Presidents is not a new thing. Bush said far worse things than Trump, it's just that outrage culture hadn't set in. We all thought it was kind of funny. So criticism of the nonsense that Trump comes out with is somehow invalid, because there has been criticism of previous Republican Presidents? And it that criticism can somehow be belittled by attributing it to something called ‘outrage culture’? It seems that criticism of the US President for not to knowing the difference between ‘weather’ and ‘climate’ is entirely valid. That's obviously not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that you lefties might be less likely to have a trump induced heart attack if you just recognise what he's doing for what it is and remind yourself that he'll be gone in 2 years. What? Who is having ‘a Trump induced heart attack’? Is it not even possible to calmly comment on something like this without it being completely exaggerated into something it isn’t, in a totally transparent attempt to make the criticism appear somehow irrational? If it’s not what you were saying, what did you mean by ‘outrage culture’, given that no-one actually appeared close to being outraged? You can keep trying to twist my words all you want. You don't seem to get that trump is the best media manipulator the world has even seen in the digital age. He wants you to comment /criticise/ get outraged or whatever you want to call it. If you're happy to play into that then carry on as you were. " Let me just clarify You are saying the president of the United States With all the power and influence that holds and all the tools and facilities at his disposal Is ? A manipulator Very good I would indeed agree I would prefer an agile diplomat But no we indeed have a manipulator Please in any response articulate when the word manipulator or manipulative has been used as a positive atribute ? Yup the USA president is manipulative , very . Often one has noticed the world manipulative and liar are used in conjunction ? Also deceptive , contrived , devious ? SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx " Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize" Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump!" China doesn't give two shits about trade sanctions on north Korea. North Korea only exists because China wants it to, nobody can force north Korea to do anything other than China. America can incentivise but not force. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump!" Why knock him. If it works out then yes, I think it's down to him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! China doesn't give two shits about trade sanctions on north Korea. North Korea only exists because China wants it to, nobody can force north Korea to do anything other than China. America can incentivise but not force. " Who said America controls North korea? I think if anything I disagreed with the poster above. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. " Lol interesting non defence I think Clinton was manipulative ! Not as good as trump indeed trump is a fine manipulator Remember I was not asking if other people are manipulative Just confirming you think the president of the USA is and the bit you conveniently ignored that manipulative is not usually considered a positive attribute ? And indeed you illustrate the point , my view on trump is manipulated , by him very very well indeed .I'm manipulated exactly by the precision of his manipulation of me as he as you clearly state is a master manipulator , he has eloquently manipulated me to understand him as a Nazi xxx damm that manipulative Nazi . If only my mind was strong enough not to be manipulated by him x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's not a worry for you and the flat earth you live on, so why stress about it
And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate
King Canute tried and failed
So sleep well.. "King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. Lol interesting non defence I think Clinton was manipulative ! Not as good as trump indeed trump is a fine manipulator Remember I was not asking if other people are manipulative Just confirming you think the president of the USA is and the bit you conveniently ignored that manipulative is not usually considered a positive attribute ? And indeed you illustrate the point , my view on trump is manipulated , by him very very well indeed .I'm manipulated exactly by the precision of his manipulation of me as he as you clearly state is a master manipulator , he has eloquently manipulated me to understand him as a Nazi xxx damm that manipulative Nazi . If only my mind was strong enough not to be manipulated by him x" It's neither mine nor trumps fault if you don't have the first clue what a Nazi is! It's also amusing to me that you think I'm here to defend trump! As if somehow I approve of his gutter debates, very strange ideas about John McCain, policy made up on the fly and obsession with reinventing the wheel. I just think he is better than the alternative. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. Lol interesting non defence I think Clinton was manipulative ! Not as good as trump indeed trump is a fine manipulator Remember I was not asking if other people are manipulative Just confirming you think the president of the USA is and the bit you conveniently ignored that manipulative is not usually considered a positive attribute ? And indeed you illustrate the point , my view on trump is manipulated , by him very very well indeed .I'm manipulated exactly by the precision of his manipulation of me as he as you clearly state is a master manipulator , he has eloquently manipulated me to understand him as a Nazi xxx damm that manipulative Nazi . If only my mind was strong enough not to be manipulated by him x It's neither mine nor trumps fault if you don't have the first clue what a Nazi is! It's also amusing to me that you think I'm here to defend trump! As if somehow I approve of his gutter debates, very strange ideas about John McCain, policy made up on the fly and obsession with reinventing the wheel. I just think he is better than the alternative. " I think the term NAZI is getting used way too much. It’s a very specific political and ideological viewpoint. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. Lol interesting non defence I think Clinton was manipulative ! Not as good as trump indeed trump is a fine manipulator Remember I was not asking if other people are manipulative Just confirming you think the president of the USA is and the bit you conveniently ignored that manipulative is not usually considered a positive attribute ? And indeed you illustrate the point , my view on trump is manipulated , by him very very well indeed .I'm manipulated exactly by the precision of his manipulation of me as he as you clearly state is a master manipulator , he has eloquently manipulated me to understand him as a Nazi xxx damm that manipulative Nazi . If only my mind was strong enough not to be manipulated by him x It's neither mine nor trumps fault if you don't have the first clue what a Nazi is! It's also amusing to me that you think I'm here to defend trump! As if somehow I approve of his gutter debates, very strange ideas about John McCain, policy made up on the fly and obsession with reinventing the wheel. I just think he is better than the alternative. I think the term NAZI is getting used way too much. It’s a very specific political and ideological viewpoint. " Yes, one held by people are too stupid and or ignorant to do basic research into the economic policy of Nazi Germany. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" SO allow me to confirm you indeed think the vile Nazi trump is manipulative Xxx Yes he's manipulative. No more or less than Clinton, just much better at it. He's not a Nazi and you have to have a very immature world view to use that word as a descriptor of trump. Lol interesting non defence I think Clinton was manipulative ! Not as good as trump indeed trump is a fine manipulator Remember I was not asking if other people are manipulative Just confirming you think the president of the USA is and the bit you conveniently ignored that manipulative is not usually considered a positive attribute ? And indeed you illustrate the point , my view on trump is manipulated , by him very very well indeed .I'm manipulated exactly by the precision of his manipulation of me as he as you clearly state is a master manipulator , he has eloquently manipulated me to understand him as a Nazi xxx damm that manipulative Nazi . If only my mind was strong enough not to be manipulated by him x It's neither mine nor trumps fault if you don't have the first clue what a Nazi is! It's also amusing to me that you think I'm here to defend trump! As if somehow I approve of his gutter debates, very strange ideas about John McCain, policy made up on the fly and obsession with reinventing the wheel. I just think he is better than the alternative. I think the term NAZI is getting used way too much. It’s a very specific political and ideological viewpoint. " Yes it's a very manipulative word x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate." Everything to do with it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate. Everything to do with it " No, you are wrong. You said "And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate. King Canute tried and failed". King Canute did not say or try to prove he could control the climate. He set out to prove that God was supreme over all men, including kings. As proof of this he demostrated that he could not stem the tide as this was controlled by God. Proving whether you can stem the tide or not has nothing to do with climate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate. Everything to do with it No, you are wrong. You said "And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate. King Canute tried and failed". King Canute did not say or try to prove he could control the climate. He set out to prove that God was supreme over all men, including kings. As proof of this he demostrated that he could not stem the tide as this was controlled by God. Proving whether you can stem the tide or not has nothing to do with climate." You miss the point Man cannot overcome nature | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate. Everything to do with it No, you are wrong. You said "And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate. King Canute tried and failed". King Canute did not say or try to prove he could control the climate. He set out to prove that God was supreme over all men, including kings. As proof of this he demostrated that he could not stem the tide as this was controlled by God. Proving whether you can stem the tide or not has nothing to do with climate. You miss the point Man cannot overcome nature" If you are going to quote an example to back up your point make sure it is relevant and accurate. Canute was not trying to prove man cannot overcome nature (and you specifically said the climate) he was demonstrating man cannot overcome God. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! Why knock him. If it works out then yes, I think it's down to him " What is it you think he’s achieved with that so far? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" King Canute's objective was to prove that the will of God was supreme over the will of men. His experiment had nothing to do with control of the climate. Everything to do with it No, you are wrong. You said "And that's the point.. Mankind cannot control the climate. King Canute tried and failed". King Canute did not say or try to prove he could control the climate. He set out to prove that God was supreme over all men, including kings. As proof of this he demostrated that he could not stem the tide as this was controlled by God. Proving whether you can stem the tide or not has nothing to do with climate. You miss the point Man cannot overcome nature If you are going to quote an example to back up your point make sure it is relevant and accurate. Canute was not trying to prove man cannot overcome nature (and you specifically said the climate) he was demonstrating man cannot overcome God. " No ma can overcome God | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! Why knock him. If it works out then yes, I think it's down to him What is it you think he’s achieved with that so far?" Judge him after his term... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! Why knock him. If it works out then yes, I think it's down to him What is it you think he’s achieved with that so far? Judge him after his term..." He's a racist Ike his father before him and all who suckle at the trump titty are complicit in his racism .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Judge him after his term... He's a racist Ike his father before him and all who suckle at the trump titty are complicit in his racism .. "And half of America that vote for him ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he brings north korea nuke disamerment he should win the Nobel peace prize Yes it was totally him that has done it, not at all the trade sanctions imposed on the country which resulted in inevitable failure of their leadership... Thank god for Trump, viva la Trump! Why knock him. If it works out then yes, I think it's down to him What is it you think he’s achieved with that so far? Judge him after his term..." So nothing then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
