FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

What knickers do you wear

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Ireland r*pe trial. Defence lawyer holds up girl's lace thong in court to use as evidence that she was 'up for it'.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/11/14/irish-protests-cry-underwear-not-consent-teenagers-thong-used/

Whatever next?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aven RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool

Thats disgraceful and boils my blood that anyone has that attitude. Shame on them x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’ve been so vocal on social media about this, received a lot of hate but I don’t care. It’s disgusting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely disgusting and that's from,a man.wesr what you want means nothing unless concentual.

Personnaly would never go with a woman who is to d*unk is a sober or no goer rule for me, ex doorman and stepped in a few times to put a woman in a taxi who I was concerned was to d*unk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Vile.

If r*oe was all about what underwear a women wears, or how up for it she is, children & virgins wouldn’t be r*ped either.

I feel for the poor girl.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Does it explain how he knew what knickers she had on before he r*ped her?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lawyer is a total cunt shocker!

Next they’ll be saying well she has breasts and a vag, what did she expect! Archaic and I hope that the jury dismissed the “evidence” with the contempt it deserved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some things are indefensible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousVoyeurMan
over a year ago

Northside

[Removed by poster at 17/11/18 14:11:12]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousVoyeurMan
over a year ago

Northside

The defence lawyer should hang her head in shame for that! Yes..you read that correctly, the defence lawyer was a woman!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

[Removed by poster at 17/11/18 14:28:24]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham


"The defence lawyer should hang her head in shame for that! Yes..you read that correctly, the defence lawyer was a woman!!"

The girl was 17 years old, maybe the lawyer was jealous that a 17 year old had better lingerie than her.

In all seriousness. I thought what a woman chooses to wear, defines wether or not 'she is up for it' Went out with the ark.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Does it explain how he knew what knickers she had on before he r*ped her?"

Good point!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pider-WomanWoman
over a year ago

Exeter, Bristol, Plymouth, Truro

None so he wouldn't have a lot to hold up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingin CatMan
over a year ago

London

Has echoes of this really tragic case from quite a few years ago:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/02/gender.uk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ryst In IsoldeWoman
over a year ago

your imagination

I know... Neanderthal attitudes like this make me ashamed to be Irish at times. The old Catholic notions that 'good girls' should wear sensible white cotton knickers.

Sadly I suspect its also the reason why many assaults, etc., go unreported.... because despite what the law may state, the onus is not to prove the perpetrators' guilt, but to prove the victims' innocence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Religious nut countrys eh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about. "

Perhaps we were wrong. Perhaps that fashion really meant they wanted their arses plundered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pider-WomanWoman
over a year ago

Exeter, Bristol, Plymouth, Truro


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about. "

Ass cracks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aimeSmithTV/TS
over a year ago

Cliss

Pink and black full back satin are my favourite xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about. "

Actually that's exactly what it means.

It's a "statement" of availability that started in American prisons.

If these idiots knew what it meant I'm sure they'd pull their trousers up pretty damn quick.

In relation to the "evidence" being used in the case, it's despicable.

I wonder what drawers the lawyer was wearing when she held up the evidence?

How many thongs are in her knicker drawer......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about.

Perhaps we were wrong. Perhaps that fashion really meant they wanted their arses plundered. "

It actually does......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about.

Perhaps we were wrong. Perhaps that fashion really meant they wanted their arses plundered.

It actually does...... "

Perhaps they know that.

Considering the amount of Fab straight men, must be the same percentages of 'straight' men outside Fab.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ryst In IsoldeWoman
over a year ago

your imagination


"When it was the fashion for men to wear their jeans etc half way down their arse with boxers on show, that wasn’t meaning they were up for it. Neither Is wearing a thong or even no underwear. Consent is what it’s about.

Actually that's exactly what it means.

It's a "statement" of availability that started in American prisons.

If these idiots knew what it meant I'm sure they'd pull their trousers up pretty damn quick "

Correct... The practice is called 'Jailing', and did (and still does) signify sexual availability in prisons where scrubs are used as uniforms rather than jumpsuits.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top