Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just been thinking and I'm going to post my thoughts to see if anyone else feels the same. When I started on here and for many years after I had very rigid preferences, I called them requirements which were, must be over 6ft, must have a penis minimum 7" with decent girth, must have dark hair, big eyebrows and obscene facial attractiveness. Just thinking how many guys I've discounted right from the off, without even a consideration of meeting them. Just seems a waste of men and quite a pointless thing when I think how much I fancy someone from the real world, that isn't 6 foot, whose penis I have no idea of the size, the obscene facial attractiveness is there but just makes me think I could have felt like this about 100's of guys that I rejected instantly all because of my stupid preferences. Anyone else feel the same? " No as I don't have these types of restriction my best sex has been with people who aren't usually my type | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just been thinking and I'm going to post my thoughts to see if anyone else feels the same. When I started on here and for many years after I had very rigid preferences, I called them requirements which were, must be over 6ft, must have a penis minimum 7" with decent girth, must have dark hair, big eyebrows and obscene facial attractiveness. Just thinking how many guys I've discounted right from the off, without even a consideration of meeting them. Just seems a waste of men and quite a pointless thing when I think how much I fancy someone from the real world, that isn't 6 foot, whose penis I have no idea of the size, the obscene facial attractiveness is there but just makes me think I could have felt like this about 100's of guys that I rejected instantly all because of my stupid preferences. Anyone else feel the same? " You need to have a benchmark but some preferences can slip through the net. Perfection isn't obtainable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just been thinking and I'm going to post my thoughts to see if anyone else feels the same. When I started on here and for many years after I had very rigid preferences, I called them requirements which were, must be over 6ft, must have a penis minimum 7" with decent girth, must have dark hair, big eyebrows and obscene facial attractiveness. Just thinking how many guys I've discounted right from the off, without even a consideration of meeting them. Just seems a waste of men and quite a pointless thing when I think how much I fancy someone from the real world, that isn't 6 foot, whose penis I have no idea of the size, the obscene facial attractiveness is there but just makes me think I could have felt like this about 100's of guys that I rejected instantly all because of my stupid preferences. Anyone else feel the same? " My prefencence is just a fun confident TRUTHFUL open women with a cracking set of norks LOL | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have preferences looks wise as such, it's more personality that does it for me. The only ones I'm rigid about are that they are not cheating, live within a reasonable distance and are in my age range. I hope you find what you are looking for. " Thanks. It's stupid when I think about how I've been on here. Like I never even gave people a chance to even see what their personality was like, was just instant nope, not you, you're not what I want. They could've been all I wanted and more but never gave anyone a chance. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But even if in the past I've had a message off a guy with pictures attached and the guy has been very handsome with a nice willy, I've looked at his height on the profile and if it was under 6ft I'd say no thank you. Even if it was 5'10 or 5'11, it's stupid when I think about it, especially as I'm only 5'2 and a half and almost all men are taller than me anyway. " Would you really have been put off him though because of 1 or 2 inches in height, or do you think it was your mood at the time putting you off that person? Did you ever use your preferences to keep someone at bay simply because you weren't 'feeling it' that day? Did you let your despondency and disillusionment with the site close you off to people? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have preferences looks wise as such, it's more personality that does it for me. The only ones I'm rigid about are that they are not cheating, live within a reasonable distance and are in my age range. I hope you find what you are looking for. Thanks. It's stupid when I think about how I've been on here. Like I never even gave people a chance to even see what their personality was like, was just instant nope, not you, you're not what I want. They could've been all I wanted and more but never gave anyone a chance. " But by your own admission you wouldn't date a guy off here, and I think I get why. So no wonder you weren't interested in giving any of them a chance outside of being sex toys. I don't have a problem with that. That's just the way you, and many other women, used this site. You're still not interested in dating guys off here. So why should that change? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. " I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. " It's true though, some women are no longer commodities whether they believe it or not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I mainly just have girls i like or dont" I’m with you on this one, if I like someone then I do and previous partners don’t really have any physical attributes in common. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. It's true though, some women are no longer commodities whether they believe it or not." Elaborate please | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But even if in the past I've had a message off a guy with pictures attached and the guy has been very handsome with a nice willy, I've looked at his height on the profile and if it was under 6ft I'd say no thank you. Even if it was 5'10 or 5'11, it's stupid when I think about it, especially as I'm only 5'2 and a half and almost all men are taller than me anyway. Would you really have been put off him though because of 1 or 2 inches in height, or do you think it was your mood at the time putting you off that person? Did you ever use your preferences to keep someone at bay simply because you weren't 'feeling it' that day? Did you let your despondency and disillusionment with the site close you off to people? " I agree with this. OP if you were really bothered you would have met them anyway. There will be something else that put you off. I wouldn't think bad of the past. Those were your requirements then. For the future you could change them if you wanted to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. It's true though, some women are no longer commodities whether they believe it or not. Elaborate please" Well in a dating sense but not for NSA. When a woman gets to a certain age and has had children etc some men don't wanna take that on. They could find a younger lady who hasn't had children. Especially if these guys are so appealing it can be easily done. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. It's true though, some women are no longer commodities whether they believe it or not. Elaborate please Well in a dating sense but not for NSA. When a woman gets to a certain age and has had children etc some men don't wanna take that on. They could find a younger lady who hasn't had children. Especially if these guys are so appealing it can be easily done." That's not being a commodity, that's a preference on the part of men who want younger women or one's unburdened by children. There are other men who won't give a flying fuck about these things or will even prefer them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. It's true though, some women are no longer commodities whether they believe it or not. Elaborate please" I have messages from guys that say they are boob men or love big boobs I don't respond I wouldn't want to meet someone purely because what they like hasn't been found | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My preference is someone who's as chatty as me, no sorry I'm not budging " You'd not get much pumping done lady....don't imagine you stay quiet for long! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have come to the conclusion quite late in life that rigidity is not good in most areas of my life.." In the trouser dept. too? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. " You can dislike the concept of market value, but it is proven to exist and measurable. I think you're just pumping out loaded terms that don't mean very much in the real world. If you truly met your "ideal person" then I'd just say you had extremely low expectations of your ideal. You need to distinguish between things that are worth compromising and things that aren't. There's nothing clever or cool about being single because you are delusional and think the UPS guy is going to deliver your ideal partner next week. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Age prefference is the hardest when you are 42!!! People either want up to 40 or over 50!! Oh well 8 years in the gym for me" Wait till you hit 46, I’ve never seen so many 45 upper age limits, lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems to me that some people are so prescriptive in what they want that it seems they use their preferences as a barrier to actually getting meets. I see it all the time on the forums,people with a list or profile as long as your arm of what they don't want/like, and then the same people complaining they can't find anyone suitable... I just think really? Some profiles pretty much state the shoe size and star signs they are willing to consider . Maybe it's easier to hide behind an unrealistic list of "don't likes "than actually getting out there on real actual meets with real actual people. " well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t seem to have a type. I have people that I’m attracted to and people that I’m not. Personally is as important as looks. " This for me too x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm SoulfulKinky and I approve this message " You wrote a a lovely message. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have preferences looks wise as such, it's more personality that does it for me. The only ones I'm rigid about are that they are not cheating, live within a reasonable distance and are in my age range. I hope you find what you are looking for. Thanks. It's stupid when I think about how I've been on here. Like I never even gave people a chance to even see what their personality was like, was just instant nope, not you, you're not what I want. They could've been all I wanted and more but never gave anyone a chance. " Perhaps talk to people a bit more and see if you gel with their personality, if you find your not attracted to them physically when they send a pic, nothing lost and you've gained some nice social interaction. I've done this and made some lovely friends that perhaps I wouldn't have done if I just went for looks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have preferences looks wise as such, it's more personality that does it for me. The only ones I'm rigid about are that they are not cheating, live within a reasonable distance and are in my age range. I hope you find what you are looking for. Thanks. It's stupid when I think about how I've been on here. Like I never even gave people a chance to even see what their personality was like, was just instant nope, not you, you're not what I want. They could've been all I wanted and more but never gave anyone a chance. Perhaps talk to people a bit more and see if you gel with their personality, if you find your not attracted to them physically when they send a pic, nothing lost and you've gained some nice social interaction. I've done this and made some lovely friends that perhaps I wouldn't have done if I just went for looks. " It is nice to see you two getting on well. It makes my penis happy x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t seem to have a type. I have people that I’m attracted to and people that I’m not. Personally is as important as looks. This for me too x" il add a me to that too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There may be a tendency to misread the op as about some kind of lowering of standards. I think what's actually hit Annie is how much more important a man's personality is in his sex appeal compared to certain physical attributes. So in fact I read the op as a raising or shifting of standards... a willingness to meet guys with more varied physiques. But in the quest to meet a very special gem of a person " Spot on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t seem to have a type. I have people that I’m attracted to and people that I’m not. Personally is as important as looks. This for me too x" Agreed best sex I’ve had is with someone who wasn’t my ‘type’. Unfortunately, Fab isn’t the place where you can get to know the personality in a pic and we all have to have some way of working out who would fit our needs the best. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. You can dislike the concept of market value, but it is proven to exist and measurable. I think you're just pumping out loaded terms that don't mean very much in the real world. If you truly met your "ideal person" then I'd just say you had extremely low expectations of your ideal. You need to distinguish between things that are worth compromising and things that aren't. There's nothing clever or cool about being single because you are delusional and think the UPS guy is going to deliver your ideal partner next week. " That's incredibly sad that you don't think it's possible for anyone to meet their ideal partner without having low expectations. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I, of course, have a preference, but I will not, and never have, allowed it to get in the way of meeting new friends. People may be the complete opposite of what I believe is my preference and yet there's still chemistry, an attraction. Open up. Meet new people. Nobody says you have to have sex with them ... Just be open and friendly with everyone. You may surprise yourself." wonderfully refreshing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I observe a lot of people whose 'preferences' work against them. Not just in swinging, but in dating generally. I know single people who are desperately lonely but delusional about their market value and make virtually no effort to meet new people. People who end up with totally incompatible partners because they had one major physical criteria and forgot the rest. However, in swinging you don't tend to think about people you haven't played with as it's just par for the course that a 4 way attraction is complex and rare. I strongly dislike the idea that anyone has a market value or should compromise their values and preferences... And I would imagine that finding out that someone had 'settled' on meeting you because they couldn't find their ideal wouldn't sit too well with many either. You can dislike the concept of market value, but it is proven to exist and measurable. I think you're just pumping out loaded terms that don't mean very much in the real world. If you truly met your "ideal person" then I'd just say you had extremely low expectations of your ideal. You need to distinguish between things that are worth compromising and things that aren't. There's nothing clever or cool about being single because you are delusional and think the UPS guy is going to deliver your ideal partner next week. That's incredibly sad that you don't think it's possible for anyone to meet their ideal partner without having low expectations." Sad for the people who engage the delusion, especially if you read the research about what happens to people with that mindset | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have any particular requirements, I tend to find different things attractive in different people." I'd mostly go along with this. The physical qualities I do tend to go for aren't going to reveal themselves via profile, so I never know for sure until a personal meet. Which is fair enough. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very common OP Lots of women claim to have ‘types’ The fact that they do and that they are users of this website indicates to me, both that their ‘type’ has always been exactly the wrong type of person for them and that they have a total lack of imagination. Surely it’s better to keep an open mind. I think it’s a credit to anyone that does, and doesn’t discount the possibility that you might find something attractive and interesting in absolutely anybody. Yes, yes, I know on this site it’s a woman’s prerogative and all men are just there to be objectified and all that. I’m talking about taking these principles and applying them to every aspect of your life.." I don't know that many claim to have a type. There may be certain physical features or personality traits that they gravitate towards, but unless you're trying to find a duplicate of someone, is that really having a type? OP's preferences here are probably a little more specific than most, and may be an atypical example, but why does using this site identify someone as persistently looking for the wrong type? Surely if you're finding people whom you enjoy, the site is fulfilling it's purpose. I've met people through Fab who have made me far happier than anyone I'd met through conventional means | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've gone the other way There was a time when I'd shagged a damp loaf These days though, it'd take someone pretty special to make me wanna meet them I can't remember the last message I just didn't delete without reading" wow man your ruthless. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really have any particular requirements, I tend to find different things attractive in different people. I do sometimes wonder if I've missed out because I've not replied to a crap first message or because they didn't send a pic so I couldn't judge attraction. " That's why I always reply to first messages. "Hi" might be boring but if their messages are always getting deleted I can't blame them for making no effort. The 2nd message usually helps me to decide if we're compatible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did Frankinstein apply ? your preferences make him the perfect guy for you !" god brutal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t seem to have a type. I have people that I’m attracted to and people that I’m not. Personally is as important as looks. " Very true | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Age prefference is the hardest when you are 42!!! People either want up to 40 or over 50!! Oh well 8 years in the gym for me" Really??. Most appear to want anything between 18 and 99! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I, of course, have a preference, but I will not, and never have, allowed it to get in the way of meeting new friends. People may be the complete opposite of what I believe is my preference and yet there's still chemistry, an attraction. Open up. Meet new people. Nobody says you have to have sex with them ... Just be open and friendly with everyone. You may surprise yourself." Ive done this "be open" attitude against what my real life preference would be. So I've met people outside my preference but I didn't find them attractive my fab standard has been a lot lower then real life. Yep connections are great but if its not there physically it not there. I dont think you have missed out OP. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please Annie tell me who or what meets this criteria. *****^^obscene facial attractiveness!!*****! Please don’t do what you usually do and stay away till the thread reaches 175 then say you missed giving a reply to a perfectly relevant question. I want to know what is seen as obscene attractiveness Thanks " Dick on the forehead? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very common OP Lots of women claim to have ‘types’ The fact that they do and that they are users of this website indicates to me, both that their ‘type’ has always been exactly the wrong type of person for them and that they have a total lack of imagination. Surely it’s better to keep an open mind. I think it’s a credit to anyone that does, and doesn’t discount the possibility that you might find something attractive and interesting in absolutely anybody. Yes, yes, I know on this site it’s a woman’s prerogative and all men are just there to be objectified and all that. I’m talking about taking these principles and applying them to every aspect of your life.. I don't know that many claim to have a type. There may be certain physical features or personality traits that they gravitate towards, but unless you're trying to find a duplicate of someone, is that really having a type? OP's preferences here are probably a little more specific than most, and may be an atypical example, but why does using this site identify someone as persistently looking for the wrong type? Surely if you're finding people whom you enjoy, the site is fulfilling it's purpose. I've met people through Fab who have made me far happier than anyone I'd met through conventional means " Don’t know many that have a ‘type’? In that case why do they all message me with ‘sorry, you’re just not my type’!! I disagree with your final paragraph too. If you’ve been having fun with lots of your ‘type’ of people, if they really are your ‘type’ eventually one of them will be enough for you. It would seem more reasonable that the very best type of person for you is not the one you think is the arche’type’ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please Annie tell me who or what meets this criteria. *****^^obscene facial attractiveness!!*****! Please don’t do what you usually do and stay away till the thread reaches 175 then say you missed giving a reply to a perfectly relevant question. I want to know what is seen as obscene attractiveness Thanks Dick on the forehead?" Oh my ! perfect comment laugh out loud thank you ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please Annie tell me who or what meets this criteria. *****^^obscene facial attractiveness!!*****! Please don’t do what you usually do and stay away till the thread reaches 175 then say you missed giving a reply to a perfectly relevant question. I want to know what is seen as obscene attractiveness Thanks " Stop being so needy, sometimes comments are not worth a response. It’s pointless me naming celebrities who I think meet the extremely handsome requirements that I’m attracted to because people will just say they aren’t that attractive. It’s all subjective. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |