FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Cyclist shoots man

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Another angry cyclist

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London

Was it a ride by???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

A mile from my house!

An absolute disgrace

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

BMX bandits just got real .......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If true.

Worrying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LIRTWITHUSCouple
over a year ago

Chester

Shocking just seen on news thread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Where was it? Gangs often use bikes to get away?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist "

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Does not sound like being a cyclist was an aggravating factor let’s be honest here. Sounds gang related.

Either way very sad. About ten miles from my leafy world someone was gunned down and killed this week.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

In fact I think rather distasteful for you to use the tragic death of someone to troll and create a flame thread.

Cant think of any other reason you'd simply state it was 'another angry cyclist'

For the record, yes I cycle but today that's not why I'm angry, before you try to dismiss my comments. Just an angry decent human being.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really. "

Actually it is very relevant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant "

Oh, please inform us why ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant "

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

Aggressive car drivers be aware, the next cyclist you gob off at might ve your last

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That was a hit either gang or higher level

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they? "

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant "

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they? "

sorry OP..the point is, this said nothing about an "angry" cyclist...If you said that while reporting it would be misleading.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Aggressive car drivers be aware, the next cyclist you gob off at might ve your last "

?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

sorry OP..the point is, this said nothing about an "angry" cyclist...If you said that while reporting it would be misleading."

My bad I suppose I'm guessing he was angry if he was shooting somebody.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up. "

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I never ride into London now because scooter crime is out of control.

It's just not worth it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is the sort of thread I would pull to be honest...

lets all make jokes about a man that has been murdered today...we dont know anything about him..but lets just make some jokes.

bit pathetic really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant "

Were mopeds mentioned in the headline, nah, probably not. Also, he was wearing an orange hi - viz vest, I presume this is relevant too ?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

From what I've read, it was one shot to the head which sounds like a specific hit to me. A bicycle is an excellent way to get away in the city - lots of alleyways to avoid police cars, even narrow enough ones to avoid police motorbikes. And if on the open road, the police seem to avoid taking any decisive action in case they injure the poor scumbag.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

Were mopeds mentioned in the headline, nah, probably not. Also, he was wearing an orange hi - viz vest, I presume this is relevant too ?!

"

Yes actually all in black with a hi viz.

He won’t becwearing the hi viz for long.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?"

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

sorry OP..the point is, this said nothing about an "angry" cyclist...If you said that while reporting it would be misleading.

My bad I suppose I'm guessing he was angry if he was shooting somebody."

Or paid to do it, or mentally unwell. There's a few reasons people shoot other people.

Just a poorly thought out thread on all counts from you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

Were mopeds mentioned in the headline, nah, probably not. Also, he was wearing an orange hi - viz vest, I presume this is relevant too ?!

"

Yes it was "moped riding robbers",was early August in the leicester mercury feel free to check it out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Right cycles were before mopeds the main one for gangs.

The kid shot up liverpool by a teen gang member is a good example.

You can dump a cycle it’s not registered

He had hi viz on top of black or dark clothing. That’s his description

Dump the bike, dump the viz, hide the gun

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

sorry OP..the point is, this said nothing about an "angry" cyclist...If you said that while reporting it would be misleading.

My bad I suppose I'm guessing he was angry if he was shooting somebody.

Or paid to do it, or mentally unwell. There's a few reasons people shoot other people.

Just a poorly thought out thread on all counts from you. "

Thanks for your opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

sorry OP..the point is, this said nothing about an "angry" cyclist...If you said that while reporting it would be misleading.

My bad I suppose I'm guessing he was angry if he was shooting somebody.

Or paid to do it, or mentally unwell. There's a few reasons people shoot other people.

Just a poorly thought out thread on all counts from you.

Thanks for your opinion. "

You're welcome

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant. "

Completely relevant I'm afraid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant.

Completely relevant I'm afraid."

Ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant.

Completely relevant I'm afraid.

Ok "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/10/18 15:19:34]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant.

Completely relevant I'm afraid.

Ok "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another angry cyclist

mode of transport is irrelevant really.

Actually it is very relevant

No it isn't. No One quotes what mode of transport most other shootings occur on or in. Why is this one different?

No one says 'another angry car driver' or 'another angry pedestrian' do they?

Yes they do it was in the news the other week about gangs going around on mopeds in London stealing robbing people.And it also happened in The middle of Leicester.Somebody driving somebody else on the back jumping off and stealing,so it is completely relevant

That's not shooting people so doesn't really prove the point you can't back up.

So the weapon is relevant but the mode of transport isn't?

Yes..... A person died from a gun shot wound.

You do get that don't you, a person died yet you flippantly make a thread about being an angry cyclist.

Wether they were driving a car, riding a bike, scooting a scooter, someone made the decision to shoot someone. Ergo mode of transport not relevant, act of killing someone very relevant, weapon used very relevant.

Completely relevant I'm afraid.

Ok

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

lets just say it was a child that had been murdered by a cyclist...would the thread title be the same?

I highly doubt it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

[Removed by poster at 07/10/18 15:27:16]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

I think we should all just get back on track and remember that, for whatever reason, a person has lost their life. A family is in mourning.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Yes very sad,now it's time for a ride out,shame to waste a nice crisp afternoon being inside.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top