Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" Self Worth  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" Being a fussy bitch....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs Self Worth "This | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality is anyone I feel the urge to be naked with. " Good answer  me too, although thst tends to coincide with quantity.
Bit like people who don't want to have sex with the whole site. Nor do I, but I do ALL of the ones I want to be naked with. A not very exclusive subset. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My best meets have been 3sums, so quantity with quality for me. Quality means the guys care that i get what i want, pretty much get most of that with my fella though but not with the quantity i want so..." But you still get quality with your quantity? For some, quantity equates to a decrease in quality. What do you think? ( I like the way you answer things ) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs Self Worth "100%! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A reasonable quantity of quality is a good aim I think." That’s Eldorado! now won’t that be something lol. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't understand why people think you can't have both, I have! "You absolutely can  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meaning I'd rather go without than meet someone I don't feel will enhance the experience." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have it on our profile. To us it means we like to meet people who make an effort, are in good shape and with whom we have a connection. We would quite happily go to a club and just play with each other if their was nobody there who fit that criteria. Thats where the quality over the quantity comes in (for us anyway) "Completely agree. I would never play with someone for the sake of it. Do you feel you can have both quality and quantity? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My best meets have been 3sums, so quantity with quality for me. Quality means the guys care that i get what i want, pretty much get most of that with my fella though but not with the quantity i want so... But you still get quality with your quantity? For some, quantity equates to a decrease in quality. What do you think? ( I like the way you answer things )"I've always enjoyed NSA 3sums way more than one on one even though i've had mostly great one on ones too (and had a lot of those too). I don't think quantity decreases the quality either, when it comes to having lots of sexual encounters in whatever way with whoever. I like to take control sexually so i ensure i have the sex i like. I think maybe people see women or couples fucking loads of other people and think it's not enjoyable sex and that's why they need more sex. But some of us are hypersexual and just like a lot of sex. I'm even struggling not to make my partner feel inadequate because he thinks a sex addict is someone who gets turned on easily, cums and then is happy...lol.He's learning no it's something more than that and nothing will ever satisfy me. I am in constant arousal and so multiple partners is ideal for me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have it on our profile. To us it means we like to meet people who make an effort, are in good shape and with whom we have a connection. We would quite happily go to a club and just play with each other if their was nobody there who fit that criteria. Thats where the quality over the quantity comes in (for us anyway)
Completely agree. I would never play with someone for the sake of it. Do you feel you can have both quality and quantity?"Thats a tough one! All I can say is we’ve been to 6 club events this year and played with others once. So thats around a 17% success rate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My best meets have been 3sums, so quantity with quality for me. Quality means the guys care that i get what i want, pretty much get most of that with my fella though but not with the quantity i want so... But you still get quality with your quantity? For some, quantity equates to a decrease in quality. What do you think? ( I like the way you answer things )
I've always enjoyed NSA 3sums way more than one on one even though i've had mostly great one on ones too (and had a lot of those too).
I don't think quantity decreases the quality either, when it comes to having lots of sexual encounters in whatever way with whoever. I like to take control sexually so i ensure i have the sex i like.
I think maybe people see women or couples fucking loads of other people and think it's not enjoyable sex and that's why they need more sex. But some of us are hypersexual and just like a lot of sex. I'm even struggling not to make my partner feel inadequate because he thinks a sex addict is someone who gets turned on easily, cums and then is happy...lol.He's learning no it's something more than that and nothing will ever satisfy me. I am in constant arousal and so multiple partners is ideal for me."This I agree with! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm all about quantity all the way. Without quantity... well I'd be celebate " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have it on our profile. To us it means we like to meet people who make an effort, are in good shape and with whom we have a connection. We would quite happily go to a club and just play with each other if their was nobody there who fit that criteria. Thats where the quality over the quantity comes in (for us anyway)
Completely agree. I would never play with someone for the sake of it. Do you feel you can have both quality and quantity?
Thats a tough one! All I can say is we’ve been to 6 club events this year and played with others once. So thats around a 17% success rate "I do see that depending on what you are looking for, it may be hard to find a lot of it, even if you wanted to. So in that case quantity would definitely be low. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man." But can you be both criteria and fun orientated? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meaning I'd rather go without than meet someone I don't feel will enhance the experience." This exactly! I know what I like, want I want. If I can't have that, then I'd rather sit home with the chihuahua for company. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think exclusivity depends on if you have a vagina or not on fab "So very true | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man." Easily me favourite response so far. 100% agreement. Don't think there is any issue over only having quality, if to you that means few, but the way its put is, often a put down on those that just see sex as fun and get on with it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meaning I'd rather go without than meet someone I don't feel will enhance the experience. This exactly! I know what I like, want I want. If I can't have that, then I'd rather sit home with the chihuahua for company. " Exactly, I also want laughter conversation, to feel like that person is there for my personality as well as my cunt. I don't want someone to walk in, do their thing, and that's that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel like some people say it to make themselves feel better about fucking strangers. Like they're saying they won't just fuck anything. However I think it's totally possible to have quality *and* quantity. "Quality" to me is different to another person's perception, and their "quality" will be different to another person's perception etc. I'm sure that some would say that I'm not 'quality', and so they wouldn't meet someone who had met me. " Totally agree. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" Quality to me. Is good company. Laughing good kissing and nothing rushed and i enjoy spending time with the person. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man. But can you be both criteria and fun orientated? " It depends on the individual and their moods. You see threads of genuine gang bangs where the men will be vetted and must meet certain criteria. Whereas I have been in clubs and have seen where the gangbang has been a case of you have a pulse and an erect penis, join in. All I am saying is that on an objective basis the criteria of personal pleasure amongst consenting adults should not be seen either in a negative or positive light. It is merely preference and objectively not an either or choice. Subjectively, of course, it is an individual matter. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man. But can you be both criteria and fun orientated? It depends on the individual and their moods. You see threads of genuine gang bangs where the men will be vetted and must meet certain criteria. Whereas I have been in clubs and have seen where the gangbang has been a case of you have a pulse and an erect penis, join in. All I am saying is that on an objective basis the criteria of personal pleasure amongst consenting adults should not be seen either in a negative or positive light. It is merely preference and objectively not an either or choice. Subjectively, of course, it is an individual matter." Completely agree! I have criteria always, but my criteria are applied depending on the situation and my mood. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man. Easily me favourite response so far. 100% agreement. Don't think there is any issue over only having quality, if to you that means few, but the way its put is, often a put down on those that just see sex as fun and get on with it "But everyone has different ideas of what ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ are, and lots of people like to create an ‘other’ they can look down on. Most of us will always be seen as ‘less discerning’ or ‘too picky’ by someone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications "Ah yes, verifications. Does having a lot of verifications equate to not going for quality? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications
Ah yes, verifications. Does having a lot of verifications equate to not going for quality? "Not at all. Just means you've been lucky enough to find those who meet your needs and had the time to make it happen. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications "I'm selective and have met many men over the years. My selection doesn't exclude height, weight, race, hair colour, education level, job/career, how much money they earn/have or what car they drive. That's why I find it easier to find my quality than others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" For me it's someone who's easy going...normal looking and has good chat x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications
I'm selective and have met many men over the years.
My selection doesn't exclude height, weight, race, hair colour, education level, job/career, how much money they earn/have or what car they drive.
That's why I find it easier to find my quality than others."Get this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications
I'm selective and have met many men over the years.
My selection doesn't exclude height, weight, race, hair colour, education level, job/career, how much money they earn/have or what car they drive.
That's why I find it easier to find my quality than others."I was referring to men specifically... i can also manage to find my quality more readily than others..whereas i (personally) think most men go for the scattergun appraoch | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? " Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality is overrated, I prefer quantity, any port in a storm." Shag advisor is down so I have no idea what you class as quantity | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality is overrated, I prefer quantity, any port in a storm. Shag advisor is down so I have no idea what you class as quantity "Very very poor, best avoid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people." Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity. "It is subjective in this case because it is modified by individual bias. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality is overrated, I prefer quantity, any port in a storm. Shag advisor is down so I have no idea what you class as quantity
Very very poor, best avoid. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think a lot of men put this on their profile but have no idea what it means..they just want those that read them to think they are perhaps more selective than the next person... In reality they probably are not but they saw it elsewhere and thought it looked good... Often i see it and then further down they have loads of verifications
I'm selective and have met many men over the years.
My selection doesn't exclude height, weight, race, hair colour, education level, job/career, how much money they earn/have or what car they drive.
That's why I find it easier to find my quality than others.
Get this" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity. "Although Woody Allen is no longer respected here is a quote from his film Annie Hall. 'Alvy and Annie are seeing their therapists at the same time on a split screen] Alvy Singer's Therapist: How often do you sleep together? Annie Hall's Therapist: Do you have sex often? Alvy Singer: [lamenting] Hardly ever. Maybe three times a week. Annie Hall: [annoyed] Constantly. I'd say three times a week.' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A reasonable quantity of quality is a good aim I think." You took the words right out of my mouth. Different people and different approaches can all be quality, don't see a problem with a quantity of it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the distinction perpetuates the bad old prejudice that people who just want to get on and satisfy their needs (let's call them "fun orientated") are less worthy than those who have more criteria in regard to satisfying their needs (let's call them "criteria orientated"). In my view whether you are fun orientated or criteria orientated is merely a personal preference and one prerence objectively is not better or worthier than the other. I would even suggest that the language used by those who are criteria orientated creates an atmosphere where fun orientated women are seen in a negative light, I.e 'slags and sluts' and this allows and encourages others (primarily men) to treat fun orientated women with less respect or worth. I would suggest that other women can indirectly be as 'slut shaming' as any man. Easily me favourite response so far. 100% agreement. Don't think there is any issue over only having quality, if to you that means few, but the way its put is, often a put down on those that just see sex as fun and get on with it
But everyone has different ideas of what ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ are, and lots of people like to create an ‘other’ they can look down on. Most of us will always be seen as ‘less discerning’ or ‘too picky’ by someone."You're right, people do like to feel superior, whatever it is they are doing, I guess it's partly keeping up with the Joneses and always being taught to better yourself. But it's pretty sad people can't just live and let live. But they can't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality for me requires mutual attraction and someone who will treat you with respect and not treat you as something disposable. Even if you don't intend to meet again you should make each other feel like your encounter has meaning and could be something special. But everyone has their own measure of what is quality to them." Different perspectives. For me quality in a, single girl is her and the Mrs are civil or better to each other and I fancy the hell out of her for thst couple of hours, may or may not have been enhanced with beer goggles, time since last quality meet and what's available on the night. Quality in a couple is one of us fancies at least one of the other couple in the same way as above and the other one doesn't say "you've got to be fucking kidding" Quality in a guy is the Mrs thinks he's a bit of alright, he doesn't talk to her like I'm not there and I don't want to punch his lights out on first approach
Any or all of those scenarios a ó e would make me feel we had a quality night at the club.
I would give a similar review for dab meets but it's been so long since somebody didn't no show or cancel I can't remember. I guess quality for a fab meet would be somebody who looked like their pics and actually arranged a meet and turned up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity.
Although Woody Allen is no longer respected here is a quote from his film Annie Hall.
'Alvy and Annie are seeing their therapists at the same time on a split screen]
Alvy Singer's Therapist: How often do you sleep together?
Annie Hall's Therapist: Do you have sex often?
Alvy Singer: [lamenting] Hardly ever. Maybe three times a week.
Annie Hall: [annoyed] Constantly. I'd say three times a week.'
"I like this! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity.
Although Woody Allen is no longer respected here is a quote from his film Annie Hall.
'Alvy and Annie are seeing their therapists at the same time on a split screen]
Alvy Singer's Therapist: How often do you sleep together?
Annie Hall's Therapist: Do you have sex often?
Alvy Singer: [lamenting] Hardly ever. Maybe three times a week.
Annie Hall: [annoyed] Constantly. I'd say three times a week.'
" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" Hate the term , it is usually used by those who want to be seen as somewhat superior to the average swinger . Quality is anyone who ticks the right boxes at the right time for us . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs Hate the term , it is usually used by those who want to be seen as somewhat superior to the average swinger . " Does sometimes come across that way I agree | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs Hate the term , it is usually used by those who want to be seen as somewhat superior to the average swinger Does sometimes come across that way I agree " This is what I think too I’ve been lucky enough to meet some great men, definitely quality. Others can make their own minds up whether the quantity I’ve met is too many for them. Regardless I’m happy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does quantity mean lots of different people or can it mean lots of times with the same person or few people? Quantity is subjective so all of the above. But in general I would say in this instance the statement alludes to lots of people. Quantity really shouldn’t be subjective!
For me, I would ideally meet a couple of times a month. I would give preference to meeting with women that I have met before or whom I have been chatting to for awhile. But if that doesn’t work out and I have an opportunity to meet someone I haven’t met previously and they look good, then I would take that opportunity. "So basically when you are available you will message friends and people you know first (not so much effort required) and then if no yes from that source anyone else who is available. Fab is full of it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs" In my experience you need to be very careful with just sex. See to much of each other attachment can be an issue | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs In my experience you need to be very careful with just sex. See to much of each other attachment can be an issue " Very true. Best to have fun with lots of different people then! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see a lot of people say this on their profiles in regards to meets. While I understand what they mean, are they mutually exclusive? Also, what is quality to you? Mrs In my experience you need to be very careful with just sex. See to much of each other attachment can be an issue Very true. Best to have fun with lots of different people then! "absoloutkey | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
