FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

No sex meet?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Ladies. If a guy said he wanted to meet you and make you cum, but didn't want full sex. Would you still meet?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ladies. If a guy said he wanted to meet you and make you cum, but didn't want full sex. Would you still meet?"
no not something that would interest me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not as a first meet no. Maybe with someone I was seeing regularly and if he promised to come back later and finish the job!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As I rarely orgasm on meets anyway then no. When I'm meeting it's them cumming that is what I meet for.

So no no and no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Nope, a girl needs a damn good seeing to!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Depends what you mean by a no sex meet. I'm generally a soft player until I get to really connect with someone so if you just mean all but not intercourse then yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oooh no, it’s probably code for he can’t get it up and/or it’s a little one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Although I did it with my fuck buddy once. Wasn’t planned, but I made him cum with a blowjob and I wasn’t bothered as he has already made me cum, a lot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Nope, a girl needs a damn good seeing to! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Yes, that's what I mean. A long massage, yoni massage, licking, masturbation.....that sort of thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Conclusive results there ...... No from the fab jury

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Nope, a girl needs a damn good seeing to! "

Exactly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 06/09/18 11:35:01]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse "

It’s not all about massage either. Contrary to popular belief, not all men with eretile dysfunction are automatically qualified masseurs either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Nope, a girl needs a damn good seeing to! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, that's what I mean. A long massage, yoni massage, licking, masturbation.....that sort of thing."

That would be way too intimate for a meet from here in the first instance...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

It’s not all about massage either. Contrary to popular belief, not all men with eretile dysfunction are automatically qualified masseurs either "

I am always puzzled by the seeming obsession with massaging on this site...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse "

Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!

If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?

It's not for everyone, each to their own.

Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No, not for me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
over a year ago

Leeds

Wouldn't bother me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How dull

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 06/09/18 12:45:30]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I know that K would always want to be filled. Lucky me

C

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No sex meet is called a social lol x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nah. I rarely cum with another person, so no!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!

If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?

It's not for everyone, each to their own.

Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy. "

It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As you say no sex but still make the woman cum, I guess you mean no penetrative sex but just oral/fingering? Then it's definitely a yes from me. I don't have to get fucked every single time, love a good oral/fingering session. I cum loads from it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rickyd72Man
over a year ago

Sheffield


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!

If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?

It's not for everyone, each to their own.

Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy. "
Exactly. When I was seeing my last FB, I had a major issue with ED. She was very understanding, we worked round it and still had a bloody good time. Viagra then turned my sexual life around.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah me and the guy I see regular don't always have sex ..sometimes its over for both of us from just oral ..and sometimes when I see him I know we may not actually have sex

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Thanks for the comments. As stated, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I was just putting it out there for peoples views. This does not mean I have erectile dysfunction or a small dick, these comments were maybe a little uncalled for. Never mind, there's always some.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!

If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?

It's not for everyone, each to their own.

Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy.

It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks."

No, I won't wind my neck in. Just because someone prefers to not have full penetrative sex does not mean you have the right to jump in and accuse him of having erectil dysfunction or a small penis. That's just being plain nasty!

The op asked if anyone would enjoy such a meet, not "if someone asked for this type of meet, would you think they had a problem"?

All you needed to say is no, not for me like others have said.

shaming people who could have medical issues that can cause this problem is darn right nasty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse

Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!

If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?

It's not for everyone, each to their own.

Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy.

It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks.

No, I won't wind my neck in. Just because someone prefers to not have full penetrative sex does not mean you have the right to jump in and accuse him of having erectil dysfunction or a small penis. That's just being plain nasty!

The op asked if anyone would enjoy such a meet, not "if someone asked for this type of meet, would you think they had a problem"?

All you needed to say is no, not for me like others have said.

shaming people who could have medical issues that can cause this problem is darn right nasty. "

Because you know of course we don’t speak from experience. Assuming makes an ass out of just you in this case. We have a right to enjoy what we do. There’s a host of chaps out there who can’t get it up for whatever reason, and it’s incumbent on them to disclose that prior to a meet, simple. It’s not about shaming it’s about them being honest about it. So if you will insist on refraining to wind your neck in, at least consider the wider argument, or you risk attempting to be a Roaxanne Pallet style wannabe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top