FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Simply sex relationship ...

Jump to newest
 

By *ayMyName123 OP   Man
over a year ago

Barnsley

Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ... "

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sex without obligation or commitment, rare but yes. I still want the pleasant company, chemistry thing too though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ... "

You mean like a fuck buddy or a friends with benefits? These have been around in the real world for a very long time. Nothing new there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ayMyName123 OP   Man
over a year ago

Barnsley


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some "

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Yes, I've had them, one for almost 10 years. Find the right person and negotiate the rules etc and stop if there are complications

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

Isn’t that what a Fuck Buddy is?

I always assume a FWB is more a “friend” that you do other non-sexual things with as well, whereas a FB was just that : a regular fuck with no other strings attached

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

A fuck buddy then. Plenty do on here. Not for me as I like a friendship also.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

Isn’t that what a Fuck Buddy is?

I always assume a FWB is more a “friend” that you do other non-sexual things with as well, whereas a FB was just that : a regular fuck with no other strings attached "

Yes I think there is a difference between a fb and a fwb as you say. I have been looking for a fwb for a long time without result but still live in hopes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

Yes...its called having a fuck buddy..

Where have you been hiding?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

Yeah - I think this is a fuck buddy your after. No feelings other than passion which go away straight after the deed is done...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!

Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ayMyName123 OP   Man
over a year ago

Barnsley


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!

Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need? "

Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though

Very blunt way of phrasing it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!

Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?

Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though

Very blunt way of phrasing it "

Why dress it up, it is what it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!

Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?

Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though

Very blunt way of phrasing it

Why dress it up, it is what it is. "

Exactly! Why pretend its anything else, that's being dishonest about your intentions. Be upfront with what you want and you're more likely to find what you are after.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlo82Couple
over a year ago

the gym and random places

It can and does happen. Sometimes relationships exist more on a physical level and can't be anything more than that. Rare tho as usually 1 person feels more than the other. However when they do work they are ace!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

I hope it’s possible to be friends, respect one another and look after one another without a romantic element to the relationship you have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you just want someone to fuck when you're horny, just hope that they are horny at exactly the same time??? Or do you just want someone to satisfy your needs only? Is there anything in it for them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ... "

yes i have had a few in my time, long as people are honest noissues

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...

That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!

Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?

Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though

Very blunt way of phrasing it "

do you not think women want that from a man too. Although I found men get to wanting more and throw a hissy fit when you have met someone else for sex hence I don't do regular when I'm meeting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naquest321Man
over a year ago

Carlisle

Where’s the best place to find, one of these Fwb?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Seems to me that’s what the majority of people on this site want no? The reason I can’t seem to find anyone compatible with what I want.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though. "

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting. "

Exactly. If it's purely sexual relief you are looking for, a wank is far less complicated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting. "

I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.

I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucyfur77Woman
over a year ago

Pleasuretown

Yes

Not a relationship though. I'll just skip to the mind-blowing sex please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish."

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where’s the best place to find, one of these Fwb? "

You can't...

They are as mythical as unicorns, which are rarer than rocking horse shit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where’s the best place to find, one of these Fwb?

You can't...

They are as mythical as unicorns, which are rarer than rocking horse shit "

Yep this!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes, they are always so far away!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he riverdeep69Couple
over a year ago

North west ish

A fuck buddy course it exists. People I would fuck but not be seen dead with in public. Prefer FWB tho cos need to at least like people I bump uglies with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlo82Couple
over a year ago

the gym and random places


"A fuck buddy course it exists. People I would fuck but not be seen dead with in public. Prefer FWB tho cos need to at least like people I bump uglies with."

I couldn't fuck someone I felt like that about. If they're that minging I just couldnt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it."

I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago

Northampton Somewhere

In the real world, unlikely. On here, very likely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

These relationships are a myth.....

Women catch feelings to quick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he riverdeep69Couple
over a year ago

North west ish


"These relationships are a myth.....

Women catch feelings to quick "

Nah all the decent fellas are already taken.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.

I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.

I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.

I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.

I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together.

"

Good description of what I am looking for (and not yet found alas)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.

I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics."

We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"These relationships are a myth.....

Women catch feelings to quick

Nah all the decent fellas are already taken."

Exactly, I've had some great fb/fwb relationships without any romantic feelings involved, they were not what I was looking for.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"These relationships are a myth.....

Women catch feelings to quick

Nah all the decent fellas are already taken.

Exactly, I've had some great fb/fwb relationships without any romantic feelings involved, they were not what I was looking for."

Most guys that are decent are married or involved with someone....

The problem I found is women on swinging/sex sites expect the great guys to be single.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nothing is simple when sex is involved

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.

I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.

We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility."

I guess so.

Even if it was just an arrangement, I'd still expect respect, honesty, and kindness. I expect that from most people in general anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.

I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.

We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility.

I guess so.

Even if it was just an arrangement, I'd still expect respect, honesty, and kindness. I expect that from most people in general anyway. "

Me too - sadly nsa can be used as an excuse not to give them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ ."

Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card."

Yup

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

yes thats what many people do on here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.

I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.

We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility."

what kind of responsability

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."

oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card.

Yup"

Totally agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that"

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.

Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it."

You are correct.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...

How do you mean?

Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?

Think it does for some

Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "

Yes, nothing rare about it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. "

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.

I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.

I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "

That sounds perfect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ ."

So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us"

I’m working a flight home tonight. I will form a brief relationship with my passengers to ensure they have the best experience. It can mean many things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sex without obligation or commitment, rare but yes. I still want the pleasant company, chemistry thing too though."

Indeed, it isn't sex otherwise. Otherwise its just a fuck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "

It should be a basic thing that happens.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm sure it does happen and in theory it sounds like a great option but in reality, and I'm only talking from my own experiences, feelings can and do start to develop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "

i tbink thats where the confusion lies with some. If i say i look for nsa it doesnt really enter into my head that i should consider the fact that some people think that simple basic thing of two humans being together is a string

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way.

It should be a basic thing that happens. "

You're right. If they can't manage something so simple with me, yet they can with others, is that their fault or mine?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us"

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.

I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.

I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "

Not many want connections. Fuck n go. Rare are the ones who actually engage in conversation other than sex.

If you have sex with same person and just that person and not fuck and go then it's sexual relations. In fact any fuck is a relation. Fuck, sex same thing.

Many fuck many here it's a fuck site for singles. Couples it's swinging.

Swinging is for couples to wife swap.

Just have fun op

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

"

Yes, They mean 2 different things in that context.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

Yes, They mean 2 different things in that context. "

Exactly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. "

We all are - friends, relations, lovers, working relationships, all kinds, and they all require some kind of correct behaviour from us.

I was going to say if someone doesn't want that they should pay an escort, but even they should be treated with due respect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

"

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "

Polite and charming. Sounds much better than fuck buddies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

It does for me.

Mrs M

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.

Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .

So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "

Yup, and that's why I labour the point at times - because to them, nsa means no relationship of any kind, and so the freedom to act as badly as they choose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "

Yes, that's nice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "

I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends

I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends. "

I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sounds meh to me I like the above but with friendship too, the occasional night out together etc too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 30/08/18 19:18:08]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends

I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.

I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. "

ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "

I didn't mean you as in you

I just used fb as an example.

I don't have either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends

I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.

I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you"

Love it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.

I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that

Relationship- noun

The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us

I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.

i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends

I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.

I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you

Love it. "

perfect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top