Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think we will ever have a third world war? " With mankind its actually inevitable Not a matter of if but when xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"no it`ll never happen. might be some in-fighting but world war 3, no chance. these are different times we`re living in now. we know the devastation a war of that magnitude could cause. the outcry would be too great " agree, pestulance would be more likely to take us out methinks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"you're a cheeful kind o chappy aren't ya? " Sorry I don't mean tto be lol. I just get worried about these things when I read them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Einstein" so ya reckon we'll survive then. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Einstein" They may break your bones, but these days, words seem to cause more damage. Personally, I'm backing the winner - I'm learning Mandarin Chinese | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its so easy to start world war 3, just hide the remote " that's some real twisted shit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bring it on , fed up with x-factor and celebrity on the TV need something else to watch" To be so flipent about the subject I take it you have experience of warzones and how truly nasty they can be??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The world wars were not of course, the Empire meant that many parts of Asia got involved,and European historians included the Sino/Japanese war which was in fact a totally separate conflict. So there will never be another world war as the concept is based on the westocentric view of the world." Urguay sent pilots to fight for the free french, large parts of North Africa were battlefields, land was taken on every continent, in essence every continent was involved on one side or another, very few countries remained truly neutral, so aside from europe, asia, africa, not forgeting the involvement of the North Americans, and the Australasian campaign in Asia, I guess we could argue that the Inuit didnt get involved. Seriously, it was a world at war, in essence a "world war". Of course everyone has an opinion, this is mine | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think we will ever have a third world war? With mankind its actually inevitable Not a matter of if but when xx " well if we do, we can rest assure there will never be a 4th world war | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I try not to think about it, but can promise you now, if we go to war with Iraq, its all over. I pray that never happens." Might be a bit late for Iraq. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bring it on , fed up with x-factor and celebrity on the TV need something else to watch To be so flipent about the subject I take it you have experience of warzones and how truly nasty they can be???" yep | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Coming back to the OP, I can't find a single source hosting the 'news' he claims to be commenting on. I can find a lot of sites and reposts by people like the Alien Disclosure Group UK, and lots of stuff from people who are also obsessed with American right wing politics and the New World Order. I can't find the professor who's quoted on Google either, outside these badly sourced and slightly dotty reposts of the same basic theme. SO I can't be sure if most of this isn't just a crock of conspiracy theorist bullshit...." The story stems back from May 2011, after the Bin Laden raid, but before America shot the fook outta a load of Pakistani border troops - which kinda makes the threat by China and bit thin as they didn't retaliate like the threatened to. Look on eutimes.net for the date in question (May 22nd 2011) the article was written by Webster G Tarpley (tarpley.net) who has an oh-so obvious anti-American bias to his writing. Loada bollox if you ask me though. China aren't going to launch WW3 over Pakistan and Israel can handle itself against a bunch of Arab countries who've only just learned how to shoot an Uzi from a moving camel. Besides, Pakistan is part of the Commonwealth, so we won't be endorsing any US action against a member state. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't see it happening tbh. Pakistan is part of the Commonwealth of Nations and it would have to leave it to embark on a war with the West and it's Allies, or risk breaking up the Commonwealth altogether and we won't allow that to happen. America would find our support very thin on the ground if they were to think about incursions into Iran and/or Pakistan, as we wouldn't let American foreign policy threaten the stability of the Commonwealth, some 394m people." Didnt seem to bother anyone when Grenada was invaded | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't see it happening tbh. Pakistan is part of the Commonwealth of Nations and it would have to leave it to embark on a war with the West and it's Allies, or risk breaking up the Commonwealth altogether and we won't allow that to happen. America would find our support very thin on the ground if they were to think about incursions into Iran and/or Pakistan, as we wouldn't let American foreign policy threaten the stability of the Commonwealth, some 394m people. Didnt seem to bother anyone when Grenada was invaded " Grenada doesn't have a population of 177m and few nukes to lob around. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The world wars were not of course, the Empire meant that many parts of Asia got involved,and European historians included the Sino/Japanese war which was in fact a totally separate conflict. So there will never be another world war as the concept is based on the westocentric view of the world. Urguay sent pilots to fight for the free french, large parts of North Africa were battlefields, land was taken on every continent, in essence every continent was involved on one side or another, very few countries remained truly neutral, so aside from europe, asia, africa, not forgeting the involvement of the North Americans, and the Australasian campaign in Asia, I guess we could argue that the Inuit didnt get involved. Seriously, it was a world at war, in essence a "world war". Of course everyone has an opinion, this is mine" The idea of neutrality was defunct as we controlled countries,deciding whether they fought or not. The anti war debate in India and the arrest and imprisonment of those who argued Indians should not be sent to fight in a white war is very interesting.Of course there support of hitler was based on ignorance and self interest, but there was never any total support . The fact large parts of the world were made into battle fields as the European powers fought it each other,often with little concern for the indigenous population still does not make it a world war. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The fact large parts of the world were made into battle fields as the European powers fought it each other,often with little concern for the indigenous population still does not make it a world war." The USA suffered attacks on it's home soil. South America were involved in the episode concerning the Graf Spee, Europe were obviously in it, as was Asia, and so was Africa. That accounts for the five continents that man populates on this planet, the exceptions being Antarctica and The Arctic (which technically isn't a continent). Sounds like a world war to me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |