Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me" If you disagree with them, why not cash in on your insights? Put your money where your mouth is, so to speak. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me" Probably because Belgium have less chance of reaching the final (playing France in their Semi Final) than we do (playing Croatia). If we meet Belgium in the final then they are likely to be favourites for that match. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My bet was put on at 18/1 befure the tournament started " Damn! I never appreciated the fact that the top of each group progress in a predictable fashion. I assumed the quarter final would be randomly drawn like the FA cup. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Probably because Belgium have less chance of reaching the final (playing France in their Semi Final) than we do (playing Croatia). If we meet Belgium in the final then they are likely to be favourites for that match." Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me" Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening." utter Trollope. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening." Actually the market averages nicely and the fools are a minority. The combined probability of belgium beating France and England should be less than the combined probability of England beating Croatia and France or Belgium, given the perceived difference in quality of France and Croatia. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fuck the stats and %s. England, World Champions! Has a nice ring to it." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening." Exactly this! Betting odds only reflect the way that people are betting, not the actual likelihood of winning. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening. Exactly this! Betting odds only reflect the way that people are betting, not the actual likelihood of winning. " nonsense. they have odds before a balls been kicked | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"form... squad strength... these factors come 1st, hence Leicester being 5000/1 to win the league before a ball was kicked their form and squad was supposedly poor" But it wasn’t poor though was it? Initial odds will be based on form but they very quickly become skewed according to betting patterns. The bookmakers do this to protect against significant loses if that outcome should arise. No bookmaker ever went out of business from outcomes. It’s all part of the game. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"form... squad strength... these factors come 1st, hence Leicester being 5000/1 to win the league before a ball was kicked their form and squad was supposedly poor" Frankly the bookies were foolish to accept 5,000-1. That's an implied probability of 0.02%. Every ~20 years a team that nobody expected has won the top division. Would anyone who bet a 5,000-1, not accepted 2,000-1? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"form... squad strength... these factors come 1st, hence Leicester being 5000/1 to win the league before a ball was kicked their form and squad was supposedly poor But it wasn’t poor though was it? Initial odds will be based on form but they very quickly become skewed according to betting patterns. The bookmakers do this to protect against significant loses if that outcome should arise. No bookmaker ever went out of business from outcomes. It’s all part of the game. " as i said 'supposedly' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me Football odds are based on money staked, it's not got a lot to with the actual chances of any particular outcome happenening. Exactly this! Betting odds only reflect the way that people are betting, not the actual likelihood of winning. " And also given that I'm guessing the figures are taken from a British based betting company where of course people will back the home team. Try finding the stats/odds from French, Belgium or Croatian based companies and you'll find that the 'home' team will be favoured by the country where the company is based. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me" Does it make sense now? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"what's the current odds on England winning....time to get a bet on " 5/2 mostly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those numbers mean about as much as the paper they are written on They have to be blind betting numbers from england England have a higher percent chance of winning than Belgium even tho Belgium beat you already,played much better football and played Brazil off the pitch? Explain that one to me" Aside from the obvious flaw in your argument, if you think that Belgium played Brazil off the pitch then football obviously isn't your sport. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |