Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." Sad but true. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." That’s a pretty sad state of affairs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." It’s true. I was actually at a training course two week ago about managing behaviours in the early years. We were taught how to hand cuddle! I’ll always give the kids a hug if they ask for one. Or if they’re upset I’ll ask if they need a hug. If they say no, they say no. I just always ensure I’m where another member of staff can see me. It’s sad | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." Better not wear anything black in case you get accused of witchcraft | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain. Better not wear anything black in case you get accused of witchcraft " Oh, the kids already think I’m a witch I go along with it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Better to be safe than sorry." Better for who? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Better to be safe than sorry. Better for who? " The teacher accused of some misconduct who ends up being sacked, banned from teaching or with some criminal penalty. Remember the song in The Italian Job film - The Self Preservation Society. It has never been so apt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Better to be safe than sorry. Better for who? The teacher accused of some misconduct who ends up being sacked, banned from teaching or with some criminal penalty. Remember the song in The Italian Job film - The Self Preservation Society. It has never been so apt." Agreed. At what point do we consider what is best for the children? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a teacher in a SN Primary... I got & gave a lot of hugs. But working in a main stream school, holding a child's hand was the most allowed It's a sad era we live in when the most innocent of actions is frowned upon " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. " And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a teacher in a SN Primary... ... It's a sad era we live in when the most innocent of actions is frowned upon " Sums it up. Ex headteacher- I've watched schools move from open, touchy-feely places to rather more closed, suspicious environments. If a child was hurt, I'd need a chaperone to help; or a female to take over. Kid missed a bus? I'd often take them home. Latterly, there were only certain children I would take, because I knew the parents over 15 years. But I'd still phone and have them explicitly tell me it was ok for me to take Mary home by myself. Otherwise, it's come and get them; or 2 staff members go. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher " At my school we have one Male teacher and the rest are all female. I asked all of the kids who they wanted last year, and all but one said the Male teacher. The one who didn’t want him? His niece | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher At my school we have one Male teacher and the rest are all female. I asked all of the kids who they wanted last year, and all but one said the Male teacher. The one who didn’t want him? His niece " Cos she knows he's a bastard | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher " Agreed. At my children’s Primary School there is only one male teacher but the children respond well to him. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... " Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . " Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". " There are still a lot of middle class or stuffy teachers, but some are more down to Earth and open to a hug or fist bump. I used to fist bump the boys when they did well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". There are still a lot of middle class or stuffy teachers, but some are more down to Earth and open to a hug or fist bump. I used to fist bump the boys when they did well. " It wasn't so much teachers being stuffy, as being from another social world. Hugging teachers would have been like hugging a doctor or bank manager. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher At my school we have one Male teacher and the rest are all female. I asked all of the kids who they wanted last year, and all but one said the Male teacher. The one who didn’t want him? His niece Cos she knows he's a bastard " A hot bastard | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's probably best not to. " its a shame, but your right its best not too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." Very similar to the training and advice given in the secondary school I work in. Don't do anything which might be misconstrued, don't put yourself in a situation where you could be accused of anything inappropriate. Don't touch a child unless their safety depends on it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". " Yep, same here. Although my aunt was a teacher we very much saw teachers, doctors and other authority figures as from a different world. It would just have never entered our head to even touch them. We didn't do much in the way of hugging anybody in the sixties. Friends didn't hug each other when they met like they do now. I blame the EU for all this had hugging malarkey and confidently expect it all to stop next March so we can return to the proper stiff upper lipped tradition. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". Yep, same here. Although my aunt was a teacher we very much saw teachers, doctors and other authority figures as from a different world. It would just have never entered our head to even touch them. We didn't do much in the way of hugging anybody in the sixties. Friends didn't hug each other when they met like they do now. I blame the EU for all this had hugging malarkey and confidently expect it all to stop next March so we can return to the proper stiff upper lipped tradition. " Indeed. Hugging people you don't know that well wasn't a thing in the seventies either. Do kids these days really want to be hugged by teachers? Once you are over, say, the age of seven isn't it just monumentally embarrassing? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But hugging is inappropriate for teachers. They are the child's teacher, not their parent, family member of friend. There needs to be boundaries and a clear distinction. If a teacher cannot sort out an upset child, without resorting to physical contact with the child, then that teacher needs to be retrained. " I’m guessing you’ve never had a child come to you after lesson to tell you there relative has passed away and they don’t know what they will do whilst being in floods of tears? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But hugging is inappropriate for teachers. They are the child's teacher, not their parent, family member of friend. There needs to be boundaries and a clear distinction. If a teacher cannot sort out an upset child, without resorting to physical contact with the child, then that teacher needs to be retrained. I’m guessing you’ve never had a child come to you after lesson to tell you there relative has passed away and they don’t know what they will do whilst being in floods of tears?" I'm guessing he's never had kids | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. And yet many respond more favourably to a male teacher " I think boys with abscent fathers are much more likely to. My favourite primary school teacher was a (the) guy. It might have helped that he taught the final year, which was awesome. I had many excellent female teachers too, primary school was good really. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately " Not best for the kids. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. " no. not best for the teacher really... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really..." So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. " Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. " Maybe I'm a soft southerner, but yes at primary school I shed a few teachers and appreciated being comforted. It's undistiputable that kids need physical contact with other people in order to develop properly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules " The overwhelmingly majority of paedophiles are men. But the overwhelming majority of men aren't paedophiles. Until 'the general public' can wrap their head around that then the proportion of male primary school teachers is likely to stay at 15%. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules The overwhelmingly majority of paedophiles are men. But the overwhelming majority of men aren't paedophiles. Until 'the general public' can wrap their head around that then the proportion of male primary school teachers is likely to stay at 15%. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. Maybe I'm a soft southerner, but yes at primary school I shed a few teachers and appreciated being comforted. It's undistiputable that kids need physical contact with other people in order to develop properly. " They do, but not from everyone and only from people they feel comfortable with. I certainly did not feel comfortable enough with any teachers to want physical contact with them. I had relatives for that. Ditto my kids (who are also soft southerners). My anecdotal belief is that most kids view teachers like Teach in the Bash Street Kids rather than Robin Williams in the Dead Poets Society. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. Maybe I'm a soft southerner, but yes at primary school I shed a few teachers and appreciated being comforted. It's undistiputable that kids need physical contact with other people in order to develop properly. They do, but not from everyone and only from people they feel comfortable with. I certainly did not feel comfortable enough with any teachers to want physical contact with them. I had relatives for that. Ditto my kids (who are also soft southerners). My anecdotal belief is that most kids view teachers like Teach in the Bash Street Kids rather than Robin Williams in the Dead Poets Society. " Both those references when straight over my head. I think it's different up north. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. Maybe I'm a soft southerner, but yes at primary school I shed a few teachers and appreciated being comforted. It's undistiputable that kids need physical contact with other people in order to develop properly. They do, but not from everyone and only from people they feel comfortable with. I certainly did not feel comfortable enough with any teachers to want physical contact with them. I had relatives for that. Ditto my kids (who are also soft southerners). My anecdotal belief is that most kids view teachers like Teach in the Bash Street Kids rather than Robin Williams in the Dead Poets Society. Both those references when straight over my head. I think it's different up north. " Like I say, both my kids went to school in the south... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it me or does it read like there's a lot of teachers on here and in the swinging world? " Most likely, does a certain profession exclude? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules " My daughter was hugged by a teacher (lady) who she used to go to when she was having a hard time at school and head of pastoral care saw this and told them both it wasn't appropriate. I'm in two minds really,my daughter was told if she needed someone to speak to then it should be the pastoral lady that deals with that side of things,which I agree as my daughter got quite attached to this other young teacher as they were closer in age. I wouldn't find it appropriate for her to hug and seek comfort in a male teacher,so why would I a woman. Boundaries need to be the same surely. Don't know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't be hugging no children!! Not in this day in age anyway What's wrong with a high five and a welldone Surely they don't need a cuddle That's for there mum n dad ? " So a kid falls over and scrapes their knee, blood all over it. They look up and see you stood there and in your best not at voice you say "high five" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules My daughter was hugged by a teacher (lady) who she used to go to when she was having a hard time at school and head of pastoral care saw this and told them both it wasn't appropriate. I'm in two minds really,my daughter was told if she needed someone to speak to then it should be the pastoral lady that deals with that side of things,which I agree as my daughter got quite attached to this other young teacher as they were closer in age. I wouldn't find it appropriate for her to hug and seek comfort in a male teacher,so why would I a woman. Boundaries need to be the same surely. Don't know." It's really a case of damned if you do and damned if you don't. I've known cases of children becoming too attached to a teacher because they've misread their friendly intentions. It then becomes very difficult for everyone. However if a kid hurts itself most people would instinctively, hug the child or at least offer physical comfort of some sort. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't be hugging no children!! Not in this day in age anyway What's wrong with a high five and a welldone Surely they don't need a cuddle That's for there mum n dad ? So a kid falls over and scrapes their knee, blood all over it. They look up and see you stood there and in your best not at voice you say "high five"" The op was about doing well on a test. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't be hugging no children!! Not in this day in age anyway What's wrong with a high five and a welldone Surely they don't need a cuddle That's for there mum n dad ? So a kid falls over and scrapes their knee, blood all over it. They look up and see you stood there and in your best not at voice you say "high five" The op was about doing well on a test." Oh Hell no. What kind of stupid question is that. Kids don't need a hug for a fucking test result. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the vast majority would agree a hug in the right moment can help BUT in this day and age its best not too unfortunately Not best for the kids. no. not best for the teacher really... So there's a needle in a haystack, so we burn down the barn. Do you think most kids want to be hugged by teachers? I certainly wouldn't and I am pretty sure my kids wouldn't have wanted it either. Maybe I'm a soft southerner, but yes at primary school I shed a few teachers and appreciated being comforted. It's undistiputable that kids need physical contact with other people in order to develop properly. " WOW. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do some voluntary work with children, and whilst we aren't allowed to be alone with a child we aren't expected to brush off a child's hugs, but we wouldn't be expected to initiate them either. Some children take a shine to adults and when they are young, it's just their way of saying they are comfortable with you and like you, and when they are upset it's a bit harsh to push them away. From a selfish point of view, it makes the time I spend with children entirely worth it when they run to hug you because they are pleased to see you, hold your hand because it makes them feel safe. Btw these are quite young children not teenagers. Ginger " harsh but a necessity. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't be hugging no children!! Not in this day in age anyway What's wrong with a high five and a welldone Surely they don't need a cuddle That's for there mum n dad ? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There were some students I wanted to hold tightly and tell them that everything will be ok. " That directly contravenes your child protection training. Never tell a child "everything will be OK". On to the OP Speaking as a retired secondary school teacher (11-19) the answer is a categorical NO. It is never appropriate to hug a student. It happens and in 99.99999% of cases it is well meant BUT there is the risk of an inappropriate relationship developing from it. I have seen a teacher fired and removed from the GTC (ending his career) just for messaging pupils on facebook and being their friend rather than teacher. Likewise I have seen two teaching assistants fired for pretty much the same reasons. Listen to the lyrics of "don't stand so close to me" by the Police | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There were some students I wanted to hold tightly and tell them that everything will be ok. That directly contravenes your child protection training. Never tell a child "everything will be OK". On to the OP Speaking as a retired secondary school teacher (11-19) the answer is a categorical NO. It is never appropriate to hug a student. It happens and in 99.99999% of cases it is well meant BUT there is the risk of an inappropriate relationship developing from it. I have seen a teacher fired and removed from the GTC (ending his career) just for messaging pupils on facebook and being their friend rather than teacher. Likewise I have seen two teaching assistants fired for pretty much the same reasons. Listen to the lyrics of "don't stand so close to me" by the Police " Does that go for primary school as well? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just had an interesting discussion about it of who is allowed to initiate it first? Can a teacher do it, for example saying well done on a test with a hug, without getting reported or can a pupil randomly hug the teacher first, whats your view?" yes but fingering is out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There were some students I wanted to hold tightly and tell them that everything will be ok. That directly contravenes your child protection training. Never tell a child "everything will be OK". On to the OP Speaking as a retired secondary school teacher (11-19) the answer is a categorical NO. It is never appropriate to hug a student. It happens and in 99.99999% of cases it is well meant BUT there is the risk of an inappropriate relationship developing from it. I have seen a teacher fired and removed from the GTC (ending his career) just for messaging pupils on facebook and being their friend rather than teacher. Likewise I have seen two teaching assistants fired for pretty much the same reasons. Listen to the lyrics of "don't stand so close to me" by the Police Does that go for primary school as well?" Honestly, I have no idea. As daft as it may seem, they are different worlds. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am ancient I know, but if any teacher, male or female had hugged me when I was at school, I would have thought it weird. And that was even before I knew anything about child abuse etc. They're your teacher, not your mum or dad. What on earth would they be doing hugging you. Maybe that's me being brought up in a northern working class culture when there wasn't much physical affection all round and that things have moved on... Same here and I'm from the south. Things have changed I suppose but none of us looked to teachers for emotional support. If we fell we were sent to the school secretary who put a plaster on you. If we did well we got a gold star. If we were bad we got told off. I suppose you could say that it's a good idea that children know that there are boundaries around which adults can touch you and which ones can't . Indeed. I think there was a bit of class going on as well in my case. Teachers and doctors were literally the only middle class people I knew when I was at primary school. They were very definitely not "us" but "them". Yep, same here. Although my aunt was a teacher we very much saw teachers, doctors and other authority figures as from a different world. It would just have never entered our head to even touch them. We didn't do much in the way of hugging anybody in the sixties. Friends didn't hug each other when they met like they do now. I blame the EU for all this had hugging malarkey and confidently expect it all to stop next March so we can return to the proper stiff upper lipped tradition. Indeed. Hugging people you don't know that well wasn't a thing in the seventies either. Do kids these days really want to be hugged by teachers? Once you are over, say, the age of seven isn't it just monumentally embarrassing? " No. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I work in Early Years Foundation Stage... We get and give hugs all day. The kids are 4 and 5 and often need a hug. We always say "Do you need a hug?" And if they say no or show reluctance we don't do it." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There were some students I wanted to hold tightly and tell them that everything will be ok. That directly contravenes your child protection training. Never tell a child "everything will be OK". On to the OP Speaking as a retired secondary school teacher (11-19) the answer is a categorical NO. It is never appropriate to hug a student. It happens and in 99.99999% of cases it is well meant BUT there is the risk of an inappropriate relationship developing from it. I have seen a teacher fired and removed from the GTC (ending his career) just for messaging pupils on facebook and being their friend rather than teacher. Likewise I have seen two teaching assistants fired for pretty much the same reasons. Listen to the lyrics of "don't stand so close to me" by the Police " brilliant. well said. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." One of the reasons I stopped teaching was I was unable to comfort a crying five year old. They sat on my knee whilst crying and I had a telling off by the head saying she should take it further. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain. One of the reasons I stopped teaching was I was unable to comfort a crying five year old. They sat on my knee whilst crying and I had a telling off by the head saying she should take it further. " Talk about baby and bath water | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes as a primary school teacher and I'm allowed to give and recieve an appropriate 'sideways hug.' Some children don't receive any type of positive touch from an adult and it's a really sad time if they can't get it from a trusted adult that they care about because of policies. As a mother I'd be more than happy for my child to be comforted or congratulated in this way also. School staff have all the checks, safeguarding ans positive behaviour managament training in place to ensure that it's done in the safest way. Dee " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just had an interesting discussion about it of who is allowed to initiate it first? Can a teacher do it, for example saying well done on a test with a hug, without getting reported or can a pupil randomly hug the teacher first, whats your view?yes but fingering is out " What sort of comment is that? Words can’t describe how stupid it is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most important factor is the way the teachers conducts themselves. For example a female teacher is alot safer to give hugs of approval or consolation. However, a male teacher is far more limited. With that being said if I were a teacher as a man I would pat the lads on the back to congratulate them and the girls I wouldn’t physically engage with at all. If they were visually distressed or something I’d crouch down and talk to them so they are aware they have my attention to speak then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. " However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a sad era we live in when the most innocent of actions is frowned upon " I was just about to make the same comment x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most.....snip..... then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else." When it comes to child protection, confidentiality simply doesn't exist, so, depending on what you are told, it gets passed to pastoral care or not. If serious it would get passed to the child protection team as a matter of urgency. Child protection policy (which should be followed by all members of staff in a school (and every member of staff should get one hours training per year), this includes dinner ladies, caretakers etc.) states that the adult should: Never make promises (It will be OK) Make sure that the child understands that the adult can not 'keep a secret' Not ask questions record the conversation (on paper asap)if a child protection issue is identified report as appropriate. Handing it on to pastoral is frequently the best, and safest, option as the frequently have additional training and experience | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most important factor is the way the teachers conducts themselves. For example a female teacher is alot safer to give hugs of approval or consolation. However, a male teacher is far more limited. With that being said if I were a teacher as a man I would pat the lads on the back to congratulate them and the girls I wouldn’t physically engage with at all. If they were visually distressed or something I’d crouch down and talk to them so they are aware they have my attention to speak then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else." You have a duty to pass on concerns to the child protection/safeguarding officer in the school. Every school has one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most important factor is the way the teachers conducts themselves. For example a female teacher is alot safer to give hugs of approval or consolation. However, a male teacher is far more limited. With that being said if I were a teacher as a man I would pat the lads on the back to congratulate them and the girls I wouldn’t physically engage with at all. If they were visually distressed or something I’d crouch down and talk to them so they are aware they have my attention to speak then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else. You have a duty to pass on concerns to the child protection/safeguarding officer in the school. Every school has one. " Fully aware of that (teacher too) simply replying to the comment about just chinning them off to pastoral care. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules The overwhelmingly majority of paedophiles are men. But the overwhelming majority of men aren't paedophiles. Until 'the general public' can wrap their head around that then the proportion of male primary school teachers is likely to stay at 15%. " My kids were very lucky they have had 4 male teachers in their primary school. This is definitely not the norm and it’s the children that are missing out. Male teachers in primary schools have a lot to offer. As you say, until people’s perception change the lack of male teachers at Key stage 2 and below won’t improve | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an ex teaching assistant. Female staff are but male staff are advised not too . It's a mine field and best to keep to the rules The overwhelmingly majority of paedophiles are men. But the overwhelming majority of men aren't paedophiles. Until 'the general public' can wrap their head around that then the proportion of male primary school teachers is likely to stay at 15%. My kids were very lucky they have had 4 male teachers in their primary school. This is definitely not the norm and it’s the children that are missing out. Male teachers in primary schools have a lot to offer. As you say, until people’s perception change the lack of male teachers at Key stage 2 and below won’t improve " You can see the attitudes on this thread though. Most people aren't interested in the truth or what's best for children. It's about avoiding the potential for trouble. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most important factor is the way the teachers conducts themselves. For example a female teacher is alot safer to give hugs of approval or consolation. However, a male teacher is far more limited. With that being said if I were a teacher as a man I would pat the lads on the back to congratulate them and the girls I wouldn’t physically engage with at all. If they were visually distressed or something I’d crouch down and talk to them so they are aware they have my attention to speak then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else. You have a duty to pass on concerns to the child protection/safeguarding officer in the school. Every school has one. Fully aware of that (teacher too) simply replying to the comment about just chinning them off to pastoral care." Although I understand where you are coming from I just feel like as well as safeguarding children you have to safeguard yourself. I’m not saying just palm them off to someone else, my point was that someone adequately trained for the situation would need to be present. I’m always open to helping people when they need it and hearing their voice but there’s nothing wrong with admitting when you need a bit of support yourself to adequately deal with something. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a teacher in a SN Primary... I got & gave a lot of hugs. But working in a main stream school, holding a child's hand was the most allowed It's a sad era we live in when the most innocent of actions is frowned upon " It's more than sad. But the teachers also have to protect themselves from any possible problems. A hug at my age is great, for a child not to get one if required, sad sad sad. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Any teacher giving out hugs must be living in cloud cuckcoo land as they are leaving them selves wide open for been accused of child abuse. May be innocent but in a court room in the future it could be misconstrued as more than a hug.. " Absolute garbage. Are you frightened of the dark , and your own shadow? Life is a risk but if you do the right thing the only fear is fear itself. Think Daily Mail readers get a little too cautious | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Any teacher giving out hugs must be living in cloud cuckcoo land as they are leaving them selves wide open for been accused of child abuse. May be innocent but in a court room in the future it could be misconstrued as more than a hug.. Absolute garbage. Are you frightened of the dark , and your own shadow? Life is a risk but if you do the right thing the only fear is fear itself. Think Daily Mail readers get a little too cautious " I agree...... If you're genuine you have nothing to fear, don't let a very small minority of weirdos who are probably all here rule | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples." Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In reality, female primary school teachers do it all the time and everyone's happy. If men do it then they are presumed to be paedophiles. Hence there are very few male primary school teachers. Kids need hugs. " I’d go with that too, female teachers tend to be more touchy feely whereas the male ones in my kids school are just as nice but more standoffish. I havnt got an issue with any teachers hugging my primary school aged daughter under the right circumstance. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences." Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line....." As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. " I suspect there are no children in the history of childhood who were damaged because their teacher didn't give them a hug It was a very small window when it was thought a good thing for teachers to hug children. As I say in my childhood up until the early eighties it didn't happen because teachers were thought to be authority figures and hugging them would have been like hugging your bank manager. I reckon the paedophile panic started around 2000ish, so that leaves us about ten or so years when teachers hugging kids was seen as a good thing. Coincidentally when you were a child. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. I suspect there are no children in the history of childhood who were damaged because their teacher didn't give them a hug It was a very small window when it was thought a good thing for teachers to hug children. As I say in my childhood up until the early eighties it didn't happen because teachers were thought to be authority figures and hugging them would have been like hugging your bank manager. I reckon the paedophile panic started around 2000ish, so that leaves us about ten or so years when teachers hugging kids was seen as a good thing. Coincidentally when you were a child. " Yes we've been over your northern childhood where the only lesson was chimney sweeping and your parents had scrub you with sand paper to get to soot off. I left primarily school in 1998. I wouldn't advocate secondary school teachers hugging kids or even the last years of primary school. So that takes us back to about 1996. Maybe you'd like to bring back the cane so teachers can be proper authority figures again, since they aren't very effective without it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, trust me on this, the training we get on Safeguarding means we won’t even help them take off a heavy rucksack for fear of an accusation of inappropriate touching. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you are open to a world of pain." Sadly this is the era we live in. Something completely innocent can be so incriminating. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. I suspect there are no children in the history of childhood who were damaged because their teacher didn't give them a hug It was a very small window when it was thought a good thing for teachers to hug children. As I say in my childhood up until the early eighties it didn't happen because teachers were thought to be authority figures and hugging them would have been like hugging your bank manager. I reckon the paedophile panic started around 2000ish, so that leaves us about ten or so years when teachers hugging kids was seen as a good thing. Coincidentally when you were a child. Yes we've been over your northern childhood where the only lesson was chimney sweeping and your parents had scrub you with sand paper to get to soot off. I left primarily school in 1998. I wouldn't advocate secondary school teachers hugging kids or even the last years of primary school. So that takes us back to about 1996. Maybe you'd like to bring back the cane so teachers can be proper authority figures again, since they aren't very effective without it. " I am making a point that this idea that kids need hugs from teachers is a comparatively new idea and would have been thought very strange by anyone before 1980ish. I actually asked Katies eleven year old daughter if teachers hugged her. She said. "no" in a tone she would use as if I had asked her if she wanted double sprouts due dinner. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here. Most kids are indifferent or actively hostile to hugs from teachers. If they are getting plenty of affection at home they are not going to miss pedagogic hugs. If they aren't getting affection at home then the problem is not the lack of hugs from teacher. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. I suspect there are no children in the history of childhood who were damaged because their teacher didn't give them a hug It was a very small window when it was thought a good thing for teachers to hug children. As I say in my childhood up until the early eighties it didn't happen because teachers were thought to be authority figures and hugging them would have been like hugging your bank manager. I reckon the paedophile panic started around 2000ish, so that leaves us about ten or so years when teachers hugging kids was seen as a good thing. Coincidentally when you were a child. Yes we've been over your northern childhood where the only lesson was chimney sweeping and your parents had scrub you with sand paper to get to soot off. I left primarily school in 1998. I wouldn't advocate secondary school teachers hugging kids or even the last years of primary school. So that takes us back to about 1996. Maybe you'd like to bring back the cane so teachers can be proper authority figures again, since they aren't very effective without it. I am making a point that this idea that kids need hugs from teachers is a comparatively new idea and would have been thought very strange by anyone before 1980ish. I actually asked Katies eleven year old daughter if teachers hugged her. She said. "no" in a tone she would use as if I had asked her if she wanted double sprouts due dinner. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here. Most kids are indifferent or actively hostile to hugs from teachers. If they are getting plenty of affection at home they are not going to miss pedagogic hugs. If they aren't getting affection at home then the problem is not the lack of hugs from teacher. " So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences. Do you realise how low the probability of a primary school teacher being a paedophile is? The people who are thinking of an ideal world are the people who think there are no consequences to these over the top 'safe guarding' practices. I suspect there are no children in the history of childhood who were damaged because their teacher didn't give them a hug It was a very small window when it was thought a good thing for teachers to hug children. As I say in my childhood up until the early eighties it didn't happen because teachers were thought to be authority figures and hugging them would have been like hugging your bank manager. I reckon the paedophile panic started around 2000ish, so that leaves us about ten or so years when teachers hugging kids was seen as a good thing. Coincidentally when you were a child. Yes we've been over your northern childhood where the only lesson was chimney sweeping and your parents had scrub you with sand paper to get to soot off. I left primarily school in 1998. I wouldn't advocate secondary school teachers hugging kids or even the last years of primary school. So that takes us back to about 1996. Maybe you'd like to bring back the cane so teachers can be proper authority figures again, since they aren't very effective without it. I am making a point that this idea that kids need hugs from teachers is a comparatively new idea and would have been thought very strange by anyone before 1980ish. I actually asked Katies eleven year old daughter if teachers hugged her. She said. "no" in a tone she would use as if I had asked her if she wanted double sprouts due dinner. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here. Most kids are indifferent or actively hostile to hugs from teachers. If they are getting plenty of affection at home they are not going to miss pedagogic hugs. If they aren't getting affection at home then the problem is not the lack of hugs from teacher. So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? " No. You need to re read that logic for beginners book again. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? " Without a doubt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? Without a doubt. " Could you expand upon that? what's the evidence? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. " The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like." The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. " Well where have you been hiding the last 10 years! Well depends on what paper one reads on a Sunday morning after walking ones dogs,a lot of the issues are not covered by mainstream media and it’s all the “fake news” that is more common.Dig a little deeper and one will find that the actual percentages are really quite high,court case convictions are a good start and google is your friend if you use it correctly,avoid sky news and other similar sources. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. Well where have you been hiding the last 10 years! Well depends on what paper one reads on a Sunday morning after walking ones dogs,a lot of the issues are not covered by mainstream media and it’s all the “fake news” that is more common.Dig a little deeper and one will find that the actual percentages are really quite high,court case convictions are a good start and google is your friend if you use it correctly,avoid sky news and other similar sources." So what percentage of men are paedophiles? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. Well where have you been hiding the last 10 years! Well depends on what paper one reads on a Sunday morning after walking ones dogs,a lot of the issues are not covered by mainstream media and it’s all the “fake news” that is more common.Dig a little deeper and one will find that the actual percentages are really quite high,court case convictions are a good start and google is your friend if you use it correctly,avoid sky news and other similar sources. So what percentage of men are paedophiles? " How many men walk the earth?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. Well where have you been hiding the last 10 years! Well depends on what paper one reads on a Sunday morning after walking ones dogs,a lot of the issues are not covered by mainstream media and it’s all the “fake news” that is more common.Dig a little deeper and one will find that the actual percentages are really quite high,court case convictions are a good start and google is your friend if you use it correctly,avoid sky news and other similar sources. So what percentage of men are paedophiles? How many men walk the earth?? " Let's go with 3.5 billion. So how many of them are paedophiles? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? Without a doubt. Could you expand upon that? what's the evidence? " Personal observation and experience. Pre 1990s school was about education. Mid 1990s it turned into being all about results. Now there is no time to 'talk around a subject' giving a broader understanding, it is all about the student getting 'points' for the school. Until very recently, school leaders didn't give two hoots about students getting A's and B's, it was all about getting as many students through the C barrier as possible. Once a child was past the C they were effectively ignored and not pushed. However, that is changing now with the reintroduction of 'Value Added' measurements and grading points depending on the importance of a subject (but that has a downside of narrowing the syllabus) As regards how the syllabus was manipulated by schools and the exam boards I could write an essay. In a nutshell the content of courses was narrowed down to the bare minimum that the exam boards could push past the government. Schools adopted the easiest syllabus they could, other exam boards lost out so they made their syllabus more 'streamlined' to compete and the cycle goes on. Coursework. Introduced to give pupils who fail exams a chance. Here is the news .... schools who are facing a falling ofsted rating because their results are falling inevitably cheat and pressure is applied to teachers to 'perform in line with the school' You will not find any 'evidence' as they are not comparable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So are you trying to say that the education system had better outcomes before the 1980's? Without a doubt. Could you expand upon that? what's the evidence? Personal observation and experience. Pre 1990s school was about education. Mid 1990s it turned into being all about results. Now there is no time to 'talk around a subject' giving a broader understanding, it is all about the student getting 'points' for the school. Until very recently, school leaders didn't give two hoots about students getting A's and B's, it was all about getting as many students through the C barrier as possible. Once a child was past the C they were effectively ignored and not pushed. However, that is changing now with the reintroduction of 'Value Added' measurements and grading points depending on the importance of a subject (but that has a downside of narrowing the syllabus) As regards how the syllabus was manipulated by schools and the exam boards I could write an essay. In a nutshell the content of courses was narrowed down to the bare minimum that the exam boards could push past the government. Schools adopted the easiest syllabus they could, other exam boards lost out so they made their syllabus more 'streamlined' to compete and the cycle goes on. Coursework. Introduced to give pupils who fail exams a chance. Here is the news .... schools who are facing a falling ofsted rating because their results are falling inevitably cheat and pressure is applied to teachers to 'perform in line with the school' You will not find any 'evidence' as they are not comparable " Thanks, I certainly recognise many of the things you said being prevelant in state schools. Private schools, much less so. I do think value added is a better measure as i was at a state school which was all about getting people over the magic c grade, therefore I was pretty much ignored during my time there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Private schools are the same, they are still graded by ofsted...they are just better at it because they have a lower pupil to teacher ratio." They really aren't the same. I very much doubt you've been in both systems as a pupil. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Private schools are the same, they are still graded by ofsted...they are just better at it because they have a lower pupil to teacher ratio. They really aren't the same. I very much doubt you've been in both systems as a pupil. " Both systems as an adult. Probably gives me a better perspective. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Private schools are the same, they are still graded by ofsted...they are just better at it because they have a lower pupil to teacher ratio. They really aren't the same. I very much doubt you've been in both systems as a pupil. Both systems as an adult. Probably gives me a better perspective." I disagree, you wouldn't possibly see some of the major benefits as an outsider. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Private schools are the same, they are still graded by ofsted...they are just better at it because they have a lower pupil to teacher ratio. They really aren't the same. I very much doubt you've been in both systems as a pupil. Both systems as an adult. Probably gives me a better perspective. I disagree, you wouldn't possibly see some of the major benefits as an outsider. " And as a pupil you would have no idea of what goes on in the staff room and meetings. I much preferred teaching in state schools. The kids were nicer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Private schools are the same, they are still graded by ofsted...they are just better at it because they have a lower pupil to teacher ratio. They really aren't the same. I very much doubt you've been in both systems as a pupil. Both systems as an adult. Probably gives me a better perspective. I disagree, you wouldn't possibly see some of the major benefits as an outsider. And as a pupil you would have no idea of what goes on in the staff room and meetings. I much preferred teaching in state schools. The kids were nicer." Pretty sure you're just projecting on to the kids. The life outcomes for private school kids are an order of magnitude better than state school kids, hence why parents pay ~£30,000 to go there after they've already paid taxes for a state school place they won't use. Unless you want to claim that nice kids finish last. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the most.....snip..... then have the pastoral officer or whoever is best qualified to handle it take over. However, that child has come to you to tell you! Not somebody else. When it comes to child protection, confidentiality simply doesn't exist, so, depending on what you are told, it gets passed to pastoral care or not. If serious it would get passed to the child protection team as a matter of urgency. Child protection policy (which should be followed by all members of staff in a school (and every member of staff should get one hours training per year), this includes dinner ladies, caretakers etc.) states that the adult should: Never make promises (It will be OK) Make sure that the child understands that the adult can not 'keep a secret' Not ask questions record the conversation (on paper asap)if a child protection issue is identified report as appropriate. Handing it on to pastoral is frequently the best, and safest, option as the frequently have additional training and experience" You've had good training, nice one! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Unless you want to claim that nice kids finish last. " That does tend to be the case if you see life as a competition. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you want your daughters male teachers touching your daughter in anyway at all? I wouldn’t especially if something sinister comes out about them at a later date,she might get confused and if other boys men do it she might think it’s acceptable when it’s not.Food for thought on a fine line..... As opposed to what? Telling her to start with the presumption that adults are paedophiles and can't be trusted. The harsh factual reality that across the country that grooming is going on and on a massive scale more like. The great reality is that it's on a tiny scale, assuming one understands percentages. Well where have you been hiding the last 10 years! Well depends on what paper one reads on a Sunday morning after walking ones dogs,a lot of the issues are not covered by mainstream media and it’s all the “fake news” that is more common.Dig a little deeper and one will find that the actual percentages are really quite high,court case convictions are a good start and google is your friend if you use it correctly,avoid sky news and other similar sources. So what percentage of men are paedophiles? How many men walk the earth?? Let's go with 3.5 billion. So how many of them are paedophiles? " Still waiting... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training." You cannot avoid contact with babies and toddlers, I work with 4 year olds and they still need to have a reassuring hug from time to time, they will often hug when they arrive in the morning or at various points throughout the day. We are trained to turn to the side and allow the hug for a moment. If a child is particularly clingy as some are we encourage funny hand shakes or shoulder pat's as an alternative. Hugging is not encouraged but neither is it actively discouraged. As the children grow up through the school we will often come into contact with them and it's not unusual to get a random hug or funny handshake from an older child. It shows trust. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training. You cannot avoid contact with babies and toddlers, I work with 4 year olds and they still need to have a reassuring hug from time to time, they will often hug when they arrive in the morning or at various points throughout the day. We are trained to turn to the side and allow the hug for a moment. If a child is particularly clingy as some are we encourage funny hand shakes or shoulder pat's as an alternative. Hugging is not encouraged but neither is it actively discouraged. As the children grow up through the school we will often come into contact with them and it's not unusual to get a random hug or funny handshake from an older child. It shows trust." Yes thats exactly what i have been trained to do although i usually work with 2 to 3 year olds so they tend to want more hugs than the 4 year olds. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training. You cannot avoid contact with babies and toddlers, I work with 4 year olds and they still need to have a reassuring hug from time to time, they will often hug when they arrive in the morning or at various points throughout the day. We are trained to turn to the side and allow the hug for a moment. If a child is particularly clingy as some are we encourage funny hand shakes or shoulder pat's as an alternative. Hugging is not encouraged but neither is it actively discouraged. As the children grow up through the school we will often come into contact with them and it's not unusual to get a random hug or funny handshake from an older child. It shows trust. Yes thats exactly what i have been trained to do although i usually work with 2 to 3 year olds so they tend to want more hugs than the 4 year olds. " How many men where you work? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is clear for me. It's all to do with consent. If the hug is initiated by the child then of course it should be reciprocated. Hugs should never be adult initiated. Great believer in children being an advocate of their own bodies, by allowing them to make the rules on what is acceptable for them, of they feel uncomfortable with contact then they should be able to say abd have that view respected, this builds up resilience and sense of self. They will grow up having a clear sense of what is acceptable and what is not Their body, their boundary. Consent, that's what it's all about. Simples. Paedophiles charter. You base your opinion on all adults and children being 'normal' and an ideal world. Sting from the Police was a teacher and wrote "Don't stand so close to me" based on his experiences." No I base my opinion on whether the child consents to a hug or not. Wtf has paedophiles got to do with that! It's about children and their rights being respected. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training." I work in early years and my poibt above stands, I do hug my charges but only if they initiate it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training. You cannot avoid contact with babies and toddlers, I work with 4 year olds and they still need to have a reassuring hug from time to time, they will often hug when they arrive in the morning or at various points throughout the day. We are trained to turn to the side and allow the hug for a moment. If a child is particularly clingy as some are we encourage funny hand shakes or shoulder pat's as an alternative. Hugging is not encouraged but neither is it actively discouraged. As the children grow up through the school we will often come into contact with them and it's not unusual to get a random hug or funny handshake from an older child. It shows trust. Yes thats exactly what i have been trained to do although i usually work with 2 to 3 year olds so they tend to want more hugs than the 4 year olds. How many men where you work? " Non with the 4 and under but we also have after school clubs etc and men work there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people think that staff that work in Early Years Education should or shouldn't hug the children in their care when appropriate. These are children from approx 6 weeks to 5 years. Staff do extensive Safeguarding Training among lots of other training. I work in early years and my poibt above stands, I do hug my charges but only if they initiate it. " Same for me with the children i look after. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |