Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't believe and my kids weren't christened but I fully understand why people do believe. God is real for some people, that should always be respected when we're chastising religion." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" It’s a personal thing, each to their own. I’m not religious, I was brought up catholic. Last year I had cancer, I lay in bed some days asking if there was a God please could they help me. Sometimes in your hour of need you’ll grasp at straws. Thankfully I’m on the mend, was it God ? Who knows, to me it was another straw I could grab. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Glad your on the mend xx" Thank you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Glad your on the mend xx Thank you " xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Glad your on the mend xx Thank you xxx" It makes you appreciate life more, live every day like it’s your last. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" Its a fail safe knowing someone out there has your back no matter what. Opened armed and always forgiving especially when you get on those knees and do that good good deed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it hard to believe that people believe in the 21st century, but each to their own. A lot of good people do good things in the name of religion. As with most things that hinge on a belief system it is those that shout loudest, believe in the '1 true..whatever' & go the kill or convert route that I despise be that religion/cult/belief of any type." Maybe some people do good in the name of religion but would those same people do good without the religion? Without the fear of punishment or the hope of reward. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it hard to believe that people believe in the 21st century, but each to their own. A lot of good people do good things in the name of religion. As with most things that hinge on a belief system it is those that shout loudest, believe in the '1 true..whatever' & go the kill or convert route that I despise be that religion/cult/belief of any type. Maybe some people do good in the name of religion but would those same people do good without the religion? Without the fear of punishment or the hope of reward." Would they fuck lol the amount of confessions the police get because of it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Everyone prays in the end. https://youtu.be/hhREiAarjVY" I don't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can any intelligent person believe in such tosh! There is no god or any manifestation of a god. Complete load of brain washing. Someone said in your hour of need you pray, no chance, I would curse and fight any god who, if was real, could be so unbelievably cruel and allow such horrible things to happen. No proof......heresay...... used by society makers to keep society in order..... used to commit atrocities from child abuse to wars......good points... soup kitchens occasionally. " This ^ Spot on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Everyone prays in the end. https://youtu.be/hhREiAarjVY" I intend to go out cursing.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" In the olden days it was used as a way to keep people law abiding as we didn’t have a real justice system so the “fear of god” was put in them. We both like values most religions have, but we don’t follow the imaginary friend, we feel it’s now outdated and just a means for people to fall out, so really the opposite of what it was designed to do (in our opinion of course, and no intent to insult/offend anybody apologies in advance for that) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Everyone prays in the end. https://youtu.be/hhREiAarjVY" No they do not x Atheist here and happy x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" All of that. It is different things to different people and is propagated by others with many different intensions/motives. I know many people and freinds of faith (various ones) and was raised in a faith community (family, church and school). But honestly i find it hard how other people can read all the bible and still believe in god? True faith is a powerful force. I have seen with my own eyes what amazing powerful things it can make a person do/archive. It's also a force that can do such evil. But personally I don't believe in a higher power or at least the existantce of a creative force is of no importance to me. I would the evidence for such at thing is highly negligible. So I prefer to concentrate on the world we live on, the here & now and investigating the forces we have evidence of. It's not that my mind has not the capacity to envisage a higher power. It's more one in the face of our understanding of the world it's highly improbable and two surely our efforts are best dealing with the things we can prove and change on this earth. But I have nothing wrong with people of faith as long as they are compationate and ethical just same as I feel about everyone else. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Everyone prays in the end. https://youtu.be/hhREiAarjVY" Some might say you may as well believe because if you're wrong,you've nothing to lose and if it all turns out to be true then you've everything to gain. Well, wouldn't an omnipotent,all seeing god be able too see through that kind of insincerity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I religiously drink wine at the weekend...does that count?! " not a bad choice for religion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Everyone prays in the end. https://youtu.be/hhREiAarjVY Some might say you may as well believe because if you're wrong,you've nothing to lose and if it all turns out to be true then you've everything to gain. Well, wouldn't an omnipotent,all seeing god be able too see through that kind of insincerity?" That's Pascals wager. It also assumes that God rewards belief and punishes disbelief. It's entirely possible that even if God existed he might punish insincere belief and reward sincere non belief. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't believe and my kids weren't christened but I fully understand why people do believe. God is real for some people, that should always be respected when we're chastising religion." Yet atheism seems so often not respected in my experience. I have been subjected to religious talk which I find offensive, yet I'm not allowed to say I'm atheist because it's seen as rubbishing religion, even though atheism is MY reality. Why do I have to put up with people coming to my door trying to sell religion, or have to listen to "god bless"? I never mention the fact I don't believe unless I'm asked. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't believe and my kids weren't christened but I fully understand why people do believe. God is real for some people, that should always be respected when we're chastising religion. Yet atheism seems so often not respected in my experience. I have been subjected to religious talk which I find offensive, yet I'm not allowed to say I'm atheist because it's seen as rubbishing religion, even though atheism is MY reality. Why do I have to put up with people coming to my door trying to sell religion, or have to listen to "god bless"? I never mention the fact I don't believe unless I'm asked." Chill... There are people with all kinds of crazy beliefs out there from conspiracy theories, through religious zealots to political campaigners! it's called having an opinion -you're quite free to either close the door on them or engage them in a rational debate -but surely hardly worth the effort to get enraged over -or next thing you'll be frothing at the mouth and shouting at the TV/ Radio etc... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can any intelligent person believe in such tosh! There is no god or any manifestation of a god. Complete load of brain washing. Someone said in your hour of need you pray, no chance, I would curse and fight any god who, if was real, could be so unbelievably cruel and allow such horrible things to happen. No proof......heresay...... used by society makers to keep society in order..... used to commit atrocities from child abuse to wars......good points... soup kitchens occasionally. " This matches my personal view, however I do respect what religion means to others. My job involves people at the end of their life. If religion gives them and their families hope and peace, I will do whatever it takes to meet their religious needs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can any intelligent person believe in such tosh!" Um -in the same way we have ultimate faith in Newtonian world model and modern science despite the fact that scientific theory is not set in stone -i.e the Newonian world view was disproved by Einstein yet most of our Engineering still revolves around Newtonian calculations? "There is no god or any manifestation of a god." How about the fact that logical order is all pervasive and embedded in everything around us -take for instance the infallibility of Mathamatical laws (in that, once proven, they hold true for all time -which is quite unlike the rest of science/ logic and reasoning) -what I am trying to get at is that Logic/ logical order, although abstract, could in itself be a god/ creator (the all seeing eye) and that god doesn't have to live in the conventional deity form -I'd even posit that deity based religions may have just been a way for primitive cultures to make sense of all this logical order around them -and no more outrageous than now discredited scientific theories. After all, Newton was as much an alchemist as he was a physicist! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can any intelligent person believe in such tosh! Um -in the same way we have ultimate faith in Newtonian world model and modern science despite the fact that scientific theory is not set in stone -i.e the Newonian world view was disproved by Einstein yet most of our Engineering still revolves around Newtonian calculations? There is no god or any manifestation of a god. How about the fact that logical order is all pervasive and embedded in everything around us -take for instance the infallibility of Mathamatical laws (in that, once proven, they hold true for all time -which is quite unlike the rest of science/ logic and reasoning) -what I am trying to get at is that Logic/ logical order, although abstract, could in itself be a god/ creator (the all seeing eye) and that god doesn't have to live in the conventional deity form -I'd even posit that deity based religions may have just been a way for primitive cultures to make sense of all this logical order around them -and no more outrageous than now discredited scientific theories. After all, Newton was as much an alchemist as he was a physicist!" Love that guy ^ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is it not possible to believe in both science and religion? At this time, there is no scientific proof that can definitively state there is no existence of a god, or the opposite. Where evidence is lacking, either way, we cannot obtain concrete proof. I don’t believe that religion was used solely as a tool to control the masses. I believe it was used to explain the unknown in times when science was too early in its infancy to provide an explanation. I still believe it can have that purpose in the modern day, provided it is used correctly and without malice. " Yes -I wholly agree -most of my rants above are to do with the absolute certainty of both camps and the lack of perspective to see that there could indeed be a commonality between both. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Religion causes wars" No. Humans cause war. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion causes wars No. Humans cause war." Humans with different religious beliefs cause wars | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion causes wars No. Humans cause war. Humans with different religious beliefs cause wars" And for those that do use religion as an excuse for war or violence, there are very many more that wish to practice their chosen religion in peace and in harmony with other different religions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. " Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it..." That statement is of course only an opinion with no valid data to substantiate it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... That statement is of course only an opinion with no valid data to substantiate it " The fool says in his heart there is no God.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I spent some time in Northern Ireland during the troubles, and what was being done ‘in the name of religion’ was beyond belief. I thought ‘thank God I’m not religious......’" So did I and most of that was fuck all to do with religion and more a toxic mix of politics and sheer criminality. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I spent some time in Northern Ireland during the troubles, and what was being done ‘in the name of religion’ was beyond belief. I thought ‘thank God I’m not religious......’ So did I and most of that was fuck all to do with religion and more a toxic mix of politics and sheer criminality. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it..." How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We will all find out one day " Afterlife doesn't have to be sentient -think of electrons w.r.t. quantum theory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We will all find out one day " We will all cease to exist one day and so will find out nothing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"“The more I read, the more I acquire, the more certain I am that I know nothing.” ? Voltaire" Hell yeah Tell me about it! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" I'm an athiest but thankfully my personal take on atheism doesn't include belittling other people's beliefs. If people find comfort on their beliefs and those beliefs don't hurt other people then it's all good by me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol I'm an athiest but thankfully my personal take on atheism doesn't include belittling other people's beliefs. If people find comfort on their beliefs and those beliefs don't hurt other people then it's all good by me" With all this rational talk you're way out numbered on here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... That statement is of course only an opinion with no valid data to substantiate it The fool says in his heart there is no God.... " I think there is a rule on the forums about calling names ! You are directly calling me a fool for my opinion, that is offensive . I hope the mods apply the rules fairly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it hard to believe that people believe in the 21st century, but each to their own. A lot of good people do good things in the name of religion. As with most things that hinge on a belief system it is those that shout loudest, believe in the '1 true..whatever' & go the kill or convert route that I despise be that religion/cult/belief of any type. Maybe some people do good in the name of religion but would those same people do good without the religion? Without the fear of punishment or the hope of reward." I think many would, it is simply a convenient place to hang your hat, likewise the 'crazies' with their bombs & wars..they would find a way anyway. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is it not possible to believe in both science and religion? At this time, there is no scientific proof that can definitively state there is no existence of a god, or the opposite. Where evidence is lacking, either way, we cannot obtain concrete proof. I don’t believe that religion was used solely as a tool to control the masses. I believe it was used to explain the unknown in times when science was too early in its infancy to provide an explanation. I still believe it can have that purpose in the modern day, provided it is used correctly and without malice. Yes -I wholly agree -most of my rants above are to do with the absolute certainty of both camps and the lack of perspective to see that there could indeed be a commonality between both." Your wrong there though, ask any religious person if a non believer can enter the heaven that they think they are going too! Nope, your a sinner, an infidel etc etc so you cannot get there. There can be commonality from the non believers, but not from the faithful. Maths and science do not enter it in any way, nothing to do with religion, you pull things out of context to suit your needs, you could be a minister in fact. We are born, we live, we copulate and have further young, we die. That’s the process, how we choose to live is key, but fundamentally we do not need maths, science or religion to survive. Water, food and shelter is all we need to go back to basics. I am not suggesting we do but that’s all we need as a species. I am happy for people to believe, some people need that, but it’s not for me. I would rather live happily with happy people!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is a cool documentary on netflix I think its called patterns of exodus, its really interesting and archaeologists compare things they have found during digs with the events in the bible... great floods, plagues, killing of sons... and everything matches up perfectly with the bible, they even found a site where all the kings are buried but there is one grave that is not a king but was given the honour of a kings burial and when they dug up the statue of whoever the grave belongs to it was wearing an unusual bright multicoloured coat which matches up to the time and place of joseph and the technicolour dream coat. Most things have a logical explanation i guess but its still a really interesting documentary" Must be true then...Netflix never lies... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that " What do you mean by "God"? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that " I doubt you could articulate why you directly think I am confused ! I suggest you validate your accusations or retract your wild generalisation | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? " My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? " What everyone who uses that word means... a universal mind/spirit. Only atheists are confused over what it means and their efforts to make out that there's no agreement on it is just one of those yawn arguments that don't actually add up under the microscope | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Your wrong there though, ask any religious person if a non believer can enter the heaven that they think they are going too! Nope, your a sinner, an infidel etc etc so you cannot get there. There can be commonality from the non believers, but not from the faithful. Maths and science do not enter it in any way, nothing to do with religion, you pull things out of context to suit your needs, you could be a minister in fact. We are born, we live, we copulate and have further young, we die. That’s the process, how we choose to live is key, but fundamentally we do not need maths, science or religion to survive. Water, food and shelter is all we need to go back to basics. I am not suggesting we do but that’s all we need as a species. I am happy for people to believe, some people need that, but it’s not for me. I would rather live happily with happy people!! " Hmmm. Do I think others can enter heaven? I don’t know. I don’t know I will enter heaven. I see no reason why others wouldn’t though. I’ve often met with other faiths, shared their traditions and shared mine with them. Why is there no commonality between faiths? Just because we see religion differently doesn’t mean we are blind to others. I have a maths and physics degree. I still regularly attend lectures various aspects of science. So where do I fit in your diatribe? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that I doubt you could articulate why you directly think I am confused ! I suggest you validate your accusations or retract your wild generalisation" I could. And I doubt you'd win an argument with me over this so the feeling is entirely mutual | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything " Most people want God to be a lot more than that. As I see it, the idea of a deist type God, some kind of intelligence that created the universe, but has no concern for human beings is intellectually feasible. However the idea that there exists a God who cares and loves human beings is contrary to all the evidence. You have to engage in serious mental gymnastics to posit such a being. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? What everyone who uses that word means... a universal mind/spirit. Only atheists are confused over what it means and their efforts to make out that there's no agreement on it is just one of those yawn arguments that don't actually add up under the microscope " Do you really not know that God has been defined on many different ways by different people? Does this universal mind /spirit care about human beings? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything Most people want God to be a lot more than that. As I see it, the idea of a deist type God, some kind of intelligence that created the universe, but has no concern for human beings is intellectually feasible. However the idea that there exists a God who cares and loves human beings is contrary to all the evidence. You have to engage in serious mental gymnastics to posit such a being. " The deist god definitely doesn't exist by dint of it being something that's defined as existing wholly outside the universe. Seeing as "the universe" roughly translates into "that which exists", deists are actually making an atheist claim and positing the existence of a non existent god. I would agree with you that the idea of an intervening god who favours mankind above the rest of the things in existence is a fallacy. But the idea that the basis of reality is a mind which is manifesting everything and which loves everything equally is not imo. That actually helps explain an awful lot and provides a better basis for science than atheism imo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can any intelligent person believe in such tosh! Um -in the same way we have ultimate faith in Newtonian world model and modern science despite the fact that scientific theory is not set in stone -i.e the Newonian world view was disproved by Einstein yet most of our Engineering still revolves around Newtonian calculations? There is no god or any manifestation of a god. How about the fact that logical order is all pervasive and embedded in everything around us -take for instance the infallibility of Mathamatical laws (in that, once proven, they hold true for all time -which is quite unlike the rest of science/ logic and reasoning) -what I am trying to get at is that Logic/ logical order, although abstract, could in itself be a god/ creator (the all seeing eye) and that god doesn't have to live in the conventional deity form -I'd even posit that deity based religions may have just been a way for primitive cultures to make sense of all this logical order around them -and no more outrageous than now discredited scientific theories. After all, Newton was as much an alchemist as he was a physicist!" Yes, that is a more accurate perception in my mind to, lots of 'true believers' expressing their view here, atheist mostly! I was raised with agnosticism and atheism, but have experienced, witnessed, observed or understood so much spiritual reality that is so logical, ordered, and predictable (if sometimes surprising) that I see no conflict. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything Most people want God to be a lot more than that. As I see it, the idea of a deist type God, some kind of intelligence that created the universe, but has no concern for human beings is intellectually feasible. However the idea that there exists a God who cares and loves human beings is contrary to all the evidence. You have to engage in serious mental gymnastics to posit such a being. The deist god definitely doesn't exist by dint of it being something that's defined as existing wholly outside the universe. Seeing as "the universe" roughly translates into "that which exists", deists are actually making an atheist claim and positing the existence of a non existent god. I would agree with you that the idea of an intervening god who favours mankind above the rest of the things in existence is a fallacy. But the idea that the basis of reality is a mind which is manifesting everything and which loves everything equally is not imo. That actually helps explain an awful lot and provides a better basis for science than atheism imo " Does this mind exists separate from the minds of individual human beings? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Your wrong there though, ask any religious person if a non believer can enter the heaven that they think they are going too! Nope, your a sinner, an infidel etc etc so you cannot get there. There can be commonality from the non believers, but not from the faithful. Maths and science do not enter it in any way, nothing to do with religion, you pull things out of context to suit your needs, you could be a minister in fact. We are born, we live, we copulate and have further young, we die. That’s the process, how we choose to live is key, but fundamentally we do not need maths, science or religion to survive. Water, food and shelter is all we need to go back to basics. I am not suggesting we do but that’s all we need as a species. I am happy for people to believe, some people need that, but it’s not for me. I would rather live happily with happy people!! " That's a very blanket statement /narrow understanding & interpretation of faith -it somehow assumes that all people of a religion share the same view (much like any ism tries to pigeonhole people) -I for one have met many who would argue that you would be welcome in their respective religious heaven no matter your faith so long as you adhered to their respectiv religions moral code. Whether or not there is such a "place" is another issue entirely and it seems that you have completely missed the core of my point -that there are a lot more parrallels in the underlying structures behind the opinions of believers/ non-believers as to what formed/ guides their existence. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Do you really not know that God has been defined on many different ways by different people?" I've studied it extensively and superficially there's many differences. But on the essence of what god actually is there's surprising uniformity. Even among polytheistic peoples they usually have a father god of all gods who is a universal spirit. As with much else in atheism, it's an intellectually disengenuous argument with an agenda... not a factually defendable truism | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Practising Christian, like a surprisingly large number of other Fabbers. I find it hard to understand people who claim to have never had any kind of spiritual experience in their lives. (Well, if you ask them more closely, they have, of course. They just didn't know what to make of it.) Janet xxxxxx" I don't think I have ever had a spiritual experience. Tell me why you think I am wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything Most people want God to be a lot more than that. As I see it, the idea of a deist type God, some kind of intelligence that created the universe, but has no concern for human beings is intellectually feasible. However the idea that there exists a God who cares and loves human beings is contrary to all the evidence. You have to engage in serious mental gymnastics to posit such a being. The deist god definitely doesn't exist by dint of it being something that's defined as existing wholly outside the universe. Seeing as "the universe" roughly translates into "that which exists", deists are actually making an atheist claim and positing the existence of a non existent god. I would agree with you that the idea of an intervening god who favours mankind above the rest of the things in existence is a fallacy. But the idea that the basis of reality is a mind which is manifesting everything and which loves everything equally is not imo. That actually helps explain an awful lot and provides a better basis for science than atheism imo Does this mind exists separate from the minds of individual human beings? " I've experienced it. So it exists. That's all I can state with certainty. Is it separate from us? I'd hazard a guess that we are incarnations of it... that materialist neuroscietists are mistaken to think the brain generates mind but instead receives it like a radio. This universal consciousness is to us what our own minds are to a plant's. That's just my own feelings on the issue. But it helps make sense of a lot imo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Do you really not know that God has been defined on many different ways by different people? I've studied it extensively and superficially there's many differences. But on the essence of what god actually is there's surprising uniformity. Even among polytheistic peoples they usually have a father god of all gods who is a universal spirit. As with much else in atheism, it's an intellectually disengenuous argument with an agenda... not a factually defendable truism " Oh come on. I could just as easily say, people think capitalism and communism are different, but if you look deeply, there's a surprising uniformity, both claim for example to make people happy. If you spread the net wide enough you can point out Similarities in everything. Are you really telling me the concept of God in Christianity is the same as in the Olympian religion? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that I doubt you could articulate why you directly think I am confused ! I suggest you validate your accusations or retract your wild generalisation I could. And I doubt you'd win an argument with me over this so the feeling is entirely mutual " Hmmm you are still directly accusing me of being confused without any justification that's a little bit personal don't you think | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I grew up in an atheist/agnostic family where even being spiritual was frowned upon. But I naturally leaned towards a more spiritual outlook... beit in an atheist way. That all messed up later in life when I had a god experience and was forced to acknowledge god does actually objectively exist. Since then I've blazed my own trail independent of any of the world's faiths and with a strong critical questioning approach to all the issues surrounding this. I'm now entirely comfortable that atheists are as intellectually confused as most people in the faiths. In hindsight, and all things considered, it is far more rationally credible to believe in a god than not. But I'm rarely in the mood to bother trying to argue as much with ideologues online or off. It's just the way I see it and I'm happy with that What do you mean by "God"? My experience tells me the single and only connection that almost all god concepts hold is one of creator of everything Most people want God to be a lot more than that. As I see it, the idea of a deist type God, some kind of intelligence that created the universe, but has no concern for human beings is intellectually feasible. However the idea that there exists a God who cares and loves human beings is contrary to all the evidence. You have to engage in serious mental gymnastics to posit such a being. The deist god definitely doesn't exist by dint of it being something that's defined as existing wholly outside the universe. Seeing as "the universe" roughly translates into "that which exists", deists are actually making an atheist claim and positing the existence of a non existent god. I would agree with you that the idea of an intervening god who favours mankind above the rest of the things in existence is a fallacy. But the idea that the basis of reality is a mind which is manifesting everything and which loves everything equally is not imo. That actually helps explain an awful lot and provides a better basis for science than atheism imo Does this mind exists separate from the minds of individual human beings? I've experienced it. So it exists. That's all I can state with certainty. Is it separate from us? I'd hazard a guess that we are incarnations of it... that materialist neuroscietists are mistaken to think the brain generates mind but instead receives it like a radio. This universal consciousness is to us what our own minds are to a plant's. That's just my own feelings on the issue. But it helps make sense of a lot imo " I accept that you have this particular mind experience. As I haven't, your experience cannot be evidence that it exists outside your mind. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Practising Christian, like a surprisingly large number of other Fabbers. I find it hard to understand people who claim to have never had any kind of spiritual experience in their lives. (Well, if you ask them more closely, they have, of course. They just didn't know what to make of it.) Janet xxxxxx" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I accept that you have this particular mind experience. As I haven't, your experience cannot be evidence that it exists outside your mind. " I accept my experience can't be used as evidence. Yes. Such an argument is folly. Like trying to prove love exists by claiming to be in love. As for being unable to prove god exists outside my mind. The same could be said about the material universe... and descartes did famously say pretty much that with his "I think therefore I am". At least descartes was thorough, doubting any experience that was doubtable. Atheists trust some experiences and doubt others purely based on an intellectual agenda. There's absolutely no rhyme or reason to where they delineate the existence or non existence of something. Some atheists will quite happily deny the existence of pain, love, even mind... yet accept the existence of completely unproven and unseen things such as dark matter | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I accept that you have this particular mind experience. As I haven't, your experience cannot be evidence that it exists outside your mind. I accept my experience can't be used as evidence. Yes. Such an argument is folly. Like trying to prove love exists by claiming to be in love. As for being unable to prove god exists outside my mind. The same could be said about the material universe... and descartes did famously say pretty much that with his "I think therefore I am". At least descartes was thorough, doubting any experience that was doubtable. Atheists trust some experiences and doubt others purely based on an intellectual agenda. There's absolutely no rhyme or reason to where they delineate the existence or non existence of something. Some atheists will quite happily deny the existence of pain, love, even mind... yet accept the existence of completely unproven and unseen things such as dark matter " Obviously abstract concepts exist, but they only exist as concepts within the human mind. Unless you go down the clearly solipstic route, there clearly are material things that exist outside of and independent of the minds of human beings. If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hmmm you are still directly accusing me of being confused without any justification that's a little bit personal don't you think" Atheists often accuse the religious or spiritual of being deluded, weak minded, irrational, fools, and confused. They always claim these aren't personal attacks, just statements of fact. Are you now conceding that such atheists have actually been personally attacking religious and spiritual people all this time? Or are you happy to concede that I'm simply stating that you're confused and intellectually compromised... just as a statement of fact? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. " As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is " What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? " Science works | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Those who do believe in their God do seem happy especially when clapping and singing. " I sense a tongue in cheek there. But I, and only in my little orbit down here in sunny Wales, feel that faithless people often seem more jaded and sad. And the atheiists who just-will-not-leave-people-alone seem the saddest of all. To me! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"a little thought experiment (before we have an interfaith meltdown): Newtons first law on the conservation of energy states: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed". (like a system in eternal balance/ an afterlife or heaven and hell/ yin and yang etc.) The quantum uncertainty principle states that matter can be in the form of either waves or particles (depending on what you are trying to measure) and can appear simultaneously in different locations. (like an all pervasive presence and connected logic). Newtons Laws of Motion were largelly made redundant by Einstein's thesis on general relativity but he refused to believe in the consequence of Quantum Mechanics that came out of his theories (famously declaring that "God doesn't play dice") Mathematics is the tool used to prove all of these theories in turn at a theoretical level well before the observable experiments were put in place to verify the theories. Mathematics is unique in all spheres of science in that once a theory is proven it is true for all time (why else are we still using theorems from the ancient greeks). Even primitive insects make use mathematical systems (think concurrent breeding/ germination cycles used by insects , bats to coincide with plant germinations or the hexagonal honeycombs created by bees). If I was in any way curious i would imagine that all the above was created by some level of higher intelligence -a polytheistic presence if you will. That higher intelligence may not be a living breathing being/ or spiritual deity but it sure as hell is a lot more intelligent than we give ourselves credit for. Call it logic/ rationality or call it religion/ irrationality -they both are looking at the same thing just from different perspectives -who are we to say who is right or wrong -none of us on this forum have the brain capacity/ mathamatical capacity to do more than make our best educated guess." I don't believe in God in the sense as he is traditionally concieved in the monotheistic religions. That is a being who cares about human beings and wants was is good for them. It seems to me that the evidence that such a being doesn't exist is overwhelming. As to whether there is some kind of nebulous wider intelligence that you might call God, I am pretty neutral. As this intelligence can't intervene to alter the world as God is traditionally supposed to do, it seems to me unimportant as to whether or not this thing exists | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? Science works " All that is evidence of is that there is a some regularity in the universe. I suppose you can call that God if you like m | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? Science works All that is evidence of is that there is a some regularity in the universe. I suppose you can call that God if you like m" Not really. Given what we now know, that we're just a bunch of apes on a spinning rock, we have absolutely no right to be decoding the workings of the universe. To suggest as much is sheer lunacy.... except if you can account in some way for these apes having access to intelligence beyond their own This is the absurd cognitive dissonance at the heart of atheism... it worships human reason but has absolutely no idea of how to account for it. I liked your previous statement... except that I believe the existence of such an underlying intelligence is deeply important even if it doesn't intervene.... firstly because it's our parent but also because it's such an important underpinning to the rest of western thought "I don't believe in God in the sense as he is traditionally concieved in the monotheistic religions. That is a being who cares about human beings and wants was is good for them. It seems to me that the evidence that such a being doesn't exist is overwhelming. As to whether there is some kind of nebulous wider intelligence that you might call God, I am pretty neutral. As this intelligence can't intervene to alter the world as God is traditionally supposed to do, it seems to me unimportant as to whether or not this thing exists " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't believe in God in the sense as he is traditionally concieved in the monotheistic religions. " believe it or not neither do I. " As to whether there is some kind of nebulous wider intelligence that you might call God, I am pretty neutral. As this intelligence can't intervene to alter the world as God is traditionally supposed to do, it seems to me unimportant as to whether or not this thing exists " I never said whether or not such a higher level of intelligence did / wanted to or was effective in their interventions -and even if they/ it did interfere with our day too day lives, who's to say theat the outcomes weren't as intended or would even align with our somewhat limited intelligence/ moral code? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... That statement is of course only an opinion with no valid data to substantiate it The fool says in his heart there is no God.... I think there is a rule on the forums about calling names ! You are directly calling me a fool for my opinion, that is offensive . I hope the mods apply the rules fairly " Not calling you a fool, the Jewish Prophets of old are.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? Science works All that is evidence of is that there is a some regularity in the universe. I suppose you can call that God if you like m Not really. Given what we now know, that we're just a bunch of apes on a spinning rock, we have absolutely no right to be decoding the workings of the universe. To suggest as much is sheer lunacy.... except if you can account in some way for these apes having access to intelligence beyond their own This is the absurd cognitive dissonance at the heart of atheism... it worships human reason but has absolutely no idea of how to account for it. I liked your previous statement... except that I believe the existence of such an underlying intelligence is deeply important even if it doesn't intervene.... firstly because it's our parent but also because it's such an important underpinning to the rest of western thought I don't believe in God in the sense as he is traditionally concieved in the monotheistic religions. That is a being who cares about human beings and wants was is good for them. It seems to me that the evidence that such a being doesn't exist is overwhelming. As to whether there is some kind of nebulous wider intelligence that you might call God, I am pretty neutral. As this intelligence can't intervene to alter the world as God is traditionally supposed to do, it seems to me unimportant as to whether or not this thing exists " It's not a cognitive dissonance. All atheism is is a non belief in God. It doesn't require a positive theory as to the origin of everything. Unlike most religious types atheists are not so arrogant as to belief there particular internal emotions disclose the secrets of the universe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If all you mean by "God" is a feeling in your mind, then God clearly does exist, as that mind state clearly exists. However most believers in God posits a being who exists separate from and independent of human mind states. It seems to me that there is no evidence for the existence of God in that sense. As I said initially, I believe god exists objectively. By that I mean "physically" and independent of any person's mental awareness of it. Quite what "physically" means these days is in the hands of science. But it's pretty clear it isn't what most Newtonian minded atheists deludedly imagine it is What evidence is there that God exists independently of feelings in people's minds? Science works All that is evidence of is that there is a some regularity in the universe. I suppose you can call that God if you like m Not really. Given what we now know, that we're just a bunch of apes on a spinning rock, we have absolutely no right to be decoding the workings of the universe. To suggest as much is sheer lunacy.... except if you can account in some way for these apes having access to intelligence beyond their own This is the absurd cognitive dissonance at the heart of atheism... it worships human reason but has absolutely no idea of how to account for it. I liked your previous statement... except that I believe the existence of such an underlying intelligence is deeply important even if it doesn't intervene.... firstly because it's our parent but also because it's such an important underpinning to the rest of western thought I don't believe in God in the sense as he is traditionally concieved in the monotheistic religions. That is a being who cares about human beings and wants was is good for them. It seems to me that the evidence that such a being doesn't exist is overwhelming. As to whether there is some kind of nebulous wider intelligence that you might call God, I am pretty neutral. As this intelligence can't intervene to alter the world as God is traditionally supposed to do, it seems to me unimportant as to whether or not this thing exists " Firstly, atheism does not state that there absolutely is no god, more that there is no reason to suppose that there is (god could rectify that in a moment if he so wished,incidentally). Secondly, I don't know of anyone who worships reason. It's more that it is a tool that we lnow is at our disposal, the only tool we really have for thinking about complex matters. Thirdly, it may seem quite obvious to many of us that there is some force in the universe beyond our understanding.After all,the universe was created somehow and any force with the ability to create a universe is,As near as dammit,god. However,even if we suppose the existence of a higher force,there is a lot of work to do to demonstrate that it cares about us,knows that we are even here or that it intercede on our behalf, answers prayers and takes sides in wars or disputes.To call such a theoretical higher force god is therefore a bit misleading. Scientists and atheists do not claim to have all the answers but (the ones with integrity) are trying to work them out. Religions of various types do claim to have those answers but based on ancient texts written in times when people were trying to make sense of a universe which doesn't make sense with the limited knowledge of those times. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one " A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers...." Hang on a minute, you're begging the question and telling me Christianity is the true religion. Why should I believe Christianity is true rather than, say, Islam or Judaism? I took your advice and asked God but all I got was a resounding silence, so I am no further forward. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it..." That is a very different version of the story of Adam and Eve than the one in my Bible. I suppose I could have spent the extra money and bought a King James bible instead of £6.99 on a New International Version. This raises an interesting point (interesting to me at least). That the bible has undergone many forms and different translations from Hebrew to Greek to Latin. Can there really be said to be a definitive version of the texts? If so, what is the point of having any other version? And if not, how can anybody claim that their particular favourite is actually the word of god? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"they say there are no atheists in a fox hole" And they talk bollocks when they say that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... That is a very different version of the story of Adam and Eve than the one in my Bible. I suppose I could have spent the extra money and bought a King James bible instead of £6.99 on a New International Version. This raises an interesting point (interesting to me at least). That the bible has undergone many forms and different translations from Hebrew to Greek to Latin. Can there really be said to be a definitive version of the texts? If so, what is the point of having any other version? And if not, how can anybody claim that their particular favourite is actually the word of god?" Because they have a very strong internal feeling that they have the right one. That's pretty much what it amounts to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers.... Hang on a minute, you're begging the question and telling me Christianity is the true religion. Why should I believe Christianity is true rather than, say, Islam or Judaism? I took your advice and asked God but all I got was a resounding silence, so I am no further forward. " I've heard this question a lot "have you asked Jesus into your heart?" Well,yes I have actually.Many times, including at some pretty low points in my life. No answer....which I take to be an answer of sorts. An evangelist may say "have faith,keep asking" but why? Why keep knocking on a door if there is no reason to believe there is anyone home? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers.... Hang on a minute, you're begging the question and telling me Christianity is the true religion. Why should I believe Christianity is true rather than, say, Islam or Judaism? I took your advice and asked God but all I got was a resounding silence, so I am no further forward. I've heard this question a lot "have you asked Jesus into your heart?" Well,yes I have actually.Many times, including at some pretty low points in my life. No answer....which I take to be an answer of sorts. An evangelist may say "have faith,keep asking" but why? Why keep knocking on a door if there is no reason to believe there is anyone home?" Basically some people are able to convince themselves that there is some super being who is interested in them and will make things alright in the end. . That's called faith. Some people don't have that ability. Seems like you and I are in that club. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers.... Hang on a minute, you're begging the question and telling me Christianity is the true religion. Why should I believe Christianity is true rather than, say, Islam or Judaism? I took your advice and asked God but all I got was a resounding silence, so I am no further forward. " Am doubtfull you have, for you seek to contend and have a closed mind.. Those that seek God in humility and sincerity shall surely find him... He keeps His promises... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think religious beliefs were part of primitive humans attempts to find meaning and gain indirect control of a harsh world. Couple this with some peoples desire to control and benefit from others, where a larger population is under 24/7 observation by an all seeing god, whilst a ruler sits back gaining from the work of others. Such a god was the perfect CCTV plus system, people in fear of doing wrong and getting punished or cast out of society. Strongly knit cultures were good fighting machines too, defending their ruler and themselves against others. A really powerful system for law and order , with a comfort blanket from birth to death for the harsh times. And a get out of jail free card for a bad leader, who could also blame the gods for things going badly. Our Father Adam was no ignorant primitive savage, he came to this earth, an earth created for him and his posterity, he took along with him his wife and they replenished the earth... He was taught in all the arts and the way of heaven, was given signs and tokens so he could discern true messengers from the false... Never think that a faith in a loving Creator and his doctrine is the stuff of ignorant savages... It is the foundation that creates civilization and advancement, save when corrupt men and their false religions pollute it... How do I distinguish between a true religious and a false one A good question with a simple answer... James brother of Jesus and an Apostle said..... If any man lack wisdom he only has to ask God whom gives generously to those that ask Him in sincerity... Jesus also said ... Anybody that come unto me and asks shall surely recieve... So the key is to ask God Himself, for instance, do you exist, do I have a purpose in life, what Church is yours and so forth... Gods challenges to mankind to seek Him out in sincere prayer and He has promised to answer their prayers.... Hang on a minute, you're begging the question and telling me Christianity is the true religion. Why should I believe Christianity is true rather than, say, Islam or Judaism? I took your advice and asked God but all I got was a resounding silence, so I am no further forward. Am doubtfull you have, for you seek to contend and have a closed mind.. Those that seek God in humility and sincerity shall surely find him... He keeps His promises..." No I asked him and got no answer. Could you tell me why I should think Christianity is true rather than any other religion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol I'm an athiest but thankfully my personal take on atheism doesn't include belittling other people's beliefs. If people find comfort on their beliefs and those beliefs don't hurt other people then it's all good by me With all this rational talk you're way out numbered on here " I don't think I;ve ever been called rational on here before! As the thread goes on though I think you are very much right. Professor Stephen Hawkings was an athiest, at his funeral there was a religious reading for no other reason than some of those there would have found comfort in it. I think most people could learn from that level of tolerence | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wont spar with you as you do not seek truth" Yes I do. That's very much what I seek. I just want to know why you think Christianity is the truth. Can't see it myself, but I am open to persuasion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? " You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go..." Didn't Jesus tell you to love your enemies? Calling people who disagree with you "mean spirited" and "unhappy entities" doesn't seem very loving to me. It's a curious fact that people who do ostensibly adhere to the teachings of Jesus often blatantly contradict those teachings in the way in which they live their lives. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go..." All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you?" No one's ridiculing anyone on here but,you may notice,those who do profess to have a faith are often not open to having their beliefs questioned or examined. It may also be noticed that people of faith quite often do try to force it on others. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! " Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists" And I do hope your feeling ok Mara x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists" Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not religious at all.... but I am a scientist, whilst science is yet to prove there is no god in existence it has proved that the Big Bang created the universe, not god. So we know that bit is utter ***insert word here**** lol I also think that religion is out dated. Yeah ok I suppose if you want to believe in something then that’s ok, which realistically its just an old story cuz that’s all it is. Passed down over thousands of years. But a lot of aspects are well out of date and not even legal now... if you actually read the bible it talks about the R word and stoning to death. If this “story” of a man performing “miracles” happened in the present time then it would just be a magician and pretty much no one would remember, it wouldn’t be passed down to future generations. What if “Jesus” was just a magician or illusionist.... the tricks would have been new then and no one would be able to figure them out... therefore it would have been a “miracle”.. now the tricks are old and commonly seen doesn’t change that it’s the same tricks. The thing I hate most is when people force religion on others. You should be allowed to make your own choice. You should decide what to believe, not have it forced on you from the second you’re born. Why should religion decide how you choose to live your life. I.e. no sex before marriage.... how boring life would be. Or no alcohol in some religions... what is that about. And don’t even get me started on jehovahs witness’ - no blood!! Those people are awful.. the ones that won’t let their child have a blood transfusion to save their life, they would rather let their child die than give them blood.... like I said, outdated.... medical science far surpasses it. Rant over for now haha " I have met many scientists that thru their research have come to believe in the existance of a Creator... One a top nuclear scientist in his day I listened to his lecture whilst I did a wee stint in the Jail, he said it was thru the study in goverment reasearch centres that both he and many of his collegues as they astudied atoms, structures,and the make up of variedelements and biulding blocks that this was work not of chance but of some higher intelligence organising said atoms etc.. He spoke without passion using cold logic... Regarding miracles, healings etc,I know of academics, specialist nurses, others of sound and good reputation that have been dramaticly healed of illnesses and afflictions that medical science cannot, even animals amazingly in front of vets springing back to full health... As for me do not consider myself worthy of the title of Christian, but what I have studied, seen etc , I cannot deny and am sure that many as they read my words deep down are of same mind as me and are seeking answers and comfort that the so called scientists , academics and the learned for all their high sounding words cannot give them... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol" religion has personally impacted my life in a negative way. when my mom was little, the government took all of the children on her reservation and put them in a boarding school. that action caused trauma for all families. in fact, we still feel the effects today. i am a very spiritual person and attend ceremony still, but i don't consider it religious. my god does not punish. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. " Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none..." As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Religion what's your take on it, is it a form of brain washing or a guide to a happy life ect. I'm atheist personally no way one god or creator made this all in 7 days bible hocus pocus lol religion has personally impacted my life in a negative way. when my mom was little, the government took all of the children on her reservation and put them in a boarding school. that action caused trauma for all families. in fact, we still feel the effects today. i am a very spiritual person and attend ceremony still, but i don't consider it religious. my god does not punish." I feel for you as I am also of an ethnic minority which is the most villified and persecuted in the UK, what a former deputy prime minister called the Last form of respectable racismn...Gipsy Baiting... Many of our children have been taken by Goverment institutions to give to wealthy middle class foster carers.. However those in goverment are not Christians, most are cultural marxists and policticly corect entities that seek the destruction of traditional family units based on the christian ideal... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo " You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. " Yes have studied history and I noted that in christian lands it was the greed of Kings and nobles, their desire to gain power and wealth that caused such, and the Christian priests were silenced....oft replaced by the kings stooges... Wars and persecutions were not over christianity, but politics and kings seeking to consolidate their power bases , gain power and wealth... Indeed one old baily judge said in his memiors that he had studied all the ancient english court records concerning the executions and so called martyrdoms and all were convicte not on religous grounds but on common law, such as treason against the king... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. Yes have studied history and I noted that in christian lands it was the greed of Kings and nobles, their desire to gain power and wealth that caused such, and the Christian priests were silenced....oft replaced by the kings stooges... Wars and persecutions were not over christianity, but politics and kings seeking to consolidate their power bases , gain power and wealth... Indeed one old baily judge said in his memiors that he had studied all the ancient english court records concerning the executions and so called martyrdoms and all were convicte not on religous grounds but on common law, such as treason against the king..." So when people were burned alive for denying Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christians burned other Christians alive for minor disagreements in Christian doctrine, that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christisn crusaders massacred the populations of entire towns because they considered them heretics that had nothing to do with Christians? When as late as the 20th century people in the UK were put in prison for denying the truth of Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. " Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare " I challenge you to find one atheist who thinks the abstract concept of God is exactly the same as the concept of God in in any given religion. You posit some kind of deist universal mind. Most atheists will agree that such a being is at least logically possible, but that if such a being does exist but does not intervene in the world, for all practical purposes that's the same as a God in this sense not existing. Seriously, you'd be better making your arguments without ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. Yes have studied history and I noted that in christian lands it was the greed of Kings and nobles, their desire to gain power and wealth that caused such, and the Christian priests were silenced....oft replaced by the kings stooges... Wars and persecutions were not over christianity, but politics and kings seeking to consolidate their power bases , gain power and wealth... Indeed one old baily judge said in his memiors that he had studied all the ancient english court records concerning the executions and so called martyrdoms and all were convicte not on religous grounds but on common law, such as treason against the king... So when people were burned alive for denying Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christians burned other Christians alive for minor disagreements in Christian doctrine, that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christisn crusaders massacred the populations of entire towns because they considered them heretics that had nothing to do with Christians? When as late as the 20th century people in the UK were put in prison for denying the truth of Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? " You have your own agenda, and its certainly not to seek truth for you utter forth the usual distortions of history as promoted by bitter and unhappy entities... As said go read Christs sermon on the mount, then you will see what sound christian teaching is... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. " I cant speak for 'most' atheists,of course but I never thought Stephen Hawking,Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins,to name but 3 big names,ever came across as confused and bamboozled by science or philosophy.They always did seem to have enough humility,however, to say they did not know and could not know all the answers to life the universe and everything. This is a claim reserved for the religious apologists among us who,when asked how they know,can only really answer that they learned it from a book.(a very old book that has been proved inaccurate many times). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. Yes have studied history and I noted that in christian lands it was the greed of Kings and nobles, their desire to gain power and wealth that caused such, and the Christian priests were silenced....oft replaced by the kings stooges... Wars and persecutions were not over christianity, but politics and kings seeking to consolidate their power bases , gain power and wealth... Indeed one old baily judge said in his memiors that he had studied all the ancient english court records concerning the executions and so called martyrdoms and all were convicte not on religous grounds but on common law, such as treason against the king... So when people were burned alive for denying Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christians burned other Christians alive for minor disagreements in Christian doctrine, that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christisn crusaders massacred the populations of entire towns because they considered them heretics that had nothing to do with Christians? When as late as the 20th century people in the UK were put in prison for denying the truth of Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? You have your own agenda, and its certainly not to seek truth for you utter forth the usual distortions of history as promoted by bitter and unhappy entities... As said go read Christs sermon on the mount, then you will see what sound christian teaching is..." As I have said I have read the sermon on the mount. There's the bit in it about loving your enemies that I reminded you of yesterday. Like any the adherents of any other ideology, religious or secular, which is convinced it holds universal truth, Christians will, given half a chance, impose their doctrine on others using torture and violence. That's bleeding obvious to everyone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare I challenge you to find one atheist who thinks the abstract concept of God is exactly the same as the concept of God in in any given religion. You posit some kind of deist universal mind. Most atheists will agree that such a being is at least logically possible, but that if such a being does exist but does not intervene in the world, for all practical purposes that's the same as a God in this sense not existing. Seriously, you'd be better making your arguments without ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with you. " They're not ad hominem. People who are confused and bamboozled by philosophy and science are just that and can be shown to be. You seem to be labouring under the illusion that a non intervening god is a useless unimportant god. You have failed to recognise the possibility that it is only not intervening because it is controlling everything at all times. You cannot intervene nor interrupt your own actions. This is an example of what I mean about atheists generally tending to be philosophically challenged thinkers. They usually have massive blindspots to quite major and simple ways in which their contentions don't add up. All it takes is a little applied critical thought and pretty quickly the house of cards starts to fall. That is no more ad hominem than the opposite contention that atheists have long thrown at the religious as being muddled fools. To me, as to them, it is eminently demonstrable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare I challenge you to find one atheist who thinks the abstract concept of God is exactly the same as the concept of God in in any given religion. You posit some kind of deist universal mind. Most atheists will agree that such a being is at least logically possible, but that if such a being does exist but does not intervene in the world, for all practical purposes that's the same as a God in this sense not existing. Seriously, you'd be better making your arguments without ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with you. They're not ad hominem. People who are confused and bamboozled by philosophy and science are just that and can be shown to be. You seem to be labouring under the illusion that a non intervening god is a useless unimportant god. You have failed to recognise the possibility that it is only not intervening because it is controlling everything at all times. You cannot intervene nor interrupt your own actions. This is an example of what I mean about atheists generally tending to be philosophically challenged thinkers. They usually have massive blindspots to quite major and simple ways in which their contentions don't add up. All it takes is a little applied critical thought and pretty quickly the house of cards starts to fall. That is no more ad hominem than the opposite contention that atheists have long thrown at the religious as being muddled fools. To me, as to them, it is eminently demonstrable " OK, one last try. Your God appears to be nothing more than an amalgam of the principle of regularity in nature and the principle of intelligence. Obviously all atheists accept those things exist. When we talk of God intervening in the world what is usually meant by that is God doing something outside the usual regulatity of nature. Causing a blind man to see, that sort of thing. You appear to accept your God doesn't intervene in that way and appear to equate God's actions with the regular actions of nature and intelligence. As atheists accept that nature and intelligence operates in this way your only difference with them is that you call these things God and they don't. It's purely a semantic difference. Hence for all practical purposes you agree with atheists about how the world works. Thus the fact that you call this thing God doesn't really matter. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. I cant speak for 'most' atheists,of course but I never thought Stephen Hawking,Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins,to name but 3 big names,ever came across as confused and bamboozled by science or philosophy.They always did seem to have enough humility,however, to say they did not know and could not know all the answers to life the universe and everything. This is a claim reserved for the religious apologists among us who,when asked how they know,can only really answer that they learned it from a book.(a very old book that has been proved inaccurate many times)." I think just the simple fact that Hawking vacillated significantly throughout his life on the issue of whether there's a god or not is already a powerful proof that Dawkins assertion that science backs atheism is at best hyperbole and at worst flat out wrong. I don't hold Dawkins in high regard at all. He's an appalling thinker imo and quite thoroughly misguided on quite a shocking amount of science... even his own beloved Darwinism! I don't have any issue with Hitchens. He was a social atheist, complaining about the faults of the faiths, and I'm quite happy to agree with him on most of those complaints I agree with you about religious apologists, by which I take that to mean apologists for the faiths. They're usually awful imo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm always surprised at the lengths people want to go to, in order to ridicule those that practice religion. It's their belief, so why take so much pleasure in trying to ridicule them if they're not forcing it upon you? You can discern what spirit is operating in them, the contents of their characters, when you see people getting angry and abusive towards the simple teachings of Christ or of Christ Himself, you can mark it down as a sure sign that those characters are bitter, unhappy entities,not to be trusted, you will find them mean spirited and bringing a deppressive atmosphere were ever they go... All through this thread you are spouting hearsay and telling every non believer they are basically of immoral standard and below your high and mighty stance. You mention promises all the time, yet no promises are ever forthcoming, you talk like someone possessed, brain washed, institutionalised. Races bring arms to beliefs like yours. It causes war. There is not one shred of proof that an entity exists, but we all in the here and now do exist, it’s a shame we cannot spend more time in the living than on the dead in a moralistic storybook. That’s the tragedy of our race, why can we not be happy with our lot, why do we seek solace when we’re dead, content whilst living should be the real goal. No doubt you will spout more moralistic tosh, throw in a verse or two, mention some names and say you take pity on me, it’s laughable! Its always the same with your kind, your allowed without restraint to promote whatev er theory or idea you like, be scornfull towards those that for whatever reason foster the view for the existance of the God of Israel, and we that do foster the view of the existance of the God of Israel are not tolerated and immediatly dismissed... I am neither brainwashed, posessed nor indoctrinated, common sense, a discerning mind reveals plainly of the existance of a being of unimaginable intelligance that organised the eternal elements into the material universe... It is yourselves that are blinkered and stubborn, for if you were honest in heart like some in this thread you would be open and tolerant towards the view that God exists Could you explain why we should think that this "being of unimaginable intelligence" is identical to the God portrayed in the Christian Bible. Ancient Jewish Prophets all spoke of a time that the God of Israel would incarnate into a human body, they gave many signs this event,the only historical Jewish person to fullfill all these signs and prohecies was Jesus of Nazerath.. His simple teaching outshine and have a sweet gentle authority not to be found in the religions of the world.. They are in direct opposition to many such as Islam, for Christ teachs by gentle persuasion,gives freedom to accept or reject, are based totally on love, mercy and grace, were as most other religions are based on fear, force and deny your right of freedom of conscience... Go get yourself a new testament in modern english and read Christs Sermon on the mount, of how He reached out for the poor and the sick and how even on the Cross He forgave His enemies and gave hope to the theif that was crucified beside Him.. What other religions God was willing to suffer and die for their childrens sins...none... As it happens I have read the Bible (and the Quran) in their entirety. I found them about as convincing as Greek myths. Why should I accept what. "ancient Jewish prophets" say? I presume you know a bit about the history of christianity and are aware that through tg and vast majority of its existence Christianity has been enforced by fear and force and denied people the right to freedom of conscience. Yes have studied history and I noted that in christian lands it was the greed of Kings and nobles, their desire to gain power and wealth that caused such, and the Christian priests were silenced....oft replaced by the kings stooges... Wars and persecutions were not over christianity, but politics and kings seeking to consolidate their power bases , gain power and wealth... Indeed one old baily judge said in his memiors that he had studied all the ancient english court records concerning the executions and so called martyrdoms and all were convicte not on religous grounds but on common law, such as treason against the king... So when people were burned alive for denying Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christians burned other Christians alive for minor disagreements in Christian doctrine, that had nothing to do with Christians? When Christisn crusaders massacred the populations of entire towns because they considered them heretics that had nothing to do with Christians? When as late as the 20th century people in the UK were put in prison for denying the truth of Christianity that had nothing to do with Christians? You have your own agenda, and its certainly not to seek truth for you utter forth the usual distortions of history as promoted by bitter and unhappy entities... As said go read Christs sermon on the mount, then you will see what sound christian teaching is... As I have said I have read the sermon on the mount. There's the bit in it about loving your enemies that I reminded you of yesterday. Like any the adherents of any other ideology, religious or secular, which is convinced it holds universal truth, Christians will, given half a chance, impose their doctrine on others using torture and violence. That's bleeding obvious to everyone. " I have said enough to you, go in peace | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare I challenge you to find one atheist who thinks the abstract concept of God is exactly the same as the concept of God in in any given religion. You posit some kind of deist universal mind. Most atheists will agree that such a being is at least logically possible, but that if such a being does exist but does not intervene in the world, for all practical purposes that's the same as a God in this sense not existing. Seriously, you'd be better making your arguments without ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with you. They're not ad hominem. People who are confused and bamboozled by philosophy and science are just that and can be shown to be. You seem to be labouring under the illusion that a non intervening god is a useless unimportant god. You have failed to recognise the possibility that it is only not intervening because it is controlling everything at all times. You cannot intervene nor interrupt your own actions. This is an example of what I mean about atheists generally tending to be philosophically challenged thinkers. They usually have massive blindspots to quite major and simple ways in which their contentions don't add up. All it takes is a little applied critical thought and pretty quickly the house of cards starts to fall. That is no more ad hominem than the opposite contention that atheists have long thrown at the religious as being muddled fools. To me, as to them, it is eminently demonstrable OK, one last try. Your God appears to be nothing more than an amalgam of the principle of regularity in nature and the principle of intelligence. Obviously all atheists accept those things exist. When we talk of God intervening in the world what is usually meant by that is God doing something outside the usual regulatity of nature. Causing a blind man to see, that sort of thing. You appear to accept your God doesn't intervene in that way and appear to equate God's actions with the regular actions of nature and intelligence. As atheists accept that nature and intelligence operates in this way your only difference with them is that you call these things God and they don't. It's purely a semantic difference. Hence for all practical purposes you agree with atheists about how the world works. Thus the fact that you call this thing God doesn't really matter. " Haha No that's not how it works. If you concede that a universal mind either exists or might exist you're either a theist or an agnostic. My saying as much doesn't make me an atheist. This mind is, after all, accessible to us to experience and possibly converse with... it loves us and enlivens us... it continually manipulates the "physical" world around us to achieve a given end... it is the creator of everything... it is the basis of everything (not matter). All of these points are central to the theistic message of the world's faiths. It is the underlying point they've all been trying to say all this time. If you agree with it then you've been arguing either against a straw man (likely with atheists to be honest) or with a bunch of people you agree with but didn't realise you did. In general, atheists do not believe that a universal mind created and enlivens nature. They're usually reductionist matetialists. Something like 5% of American atheists, when asked, said they believed in a god. Maybe you're one of those confused souls? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The issue of whether a god exists is entirely separate from the question of whether any of the world's faiths have any insight into that. The former is a question about the existence of something and, as such, is an issue solely for science and philosophy to answer. The latter is a "by their fruits" type of question and, at this point, if there is a higher moral intelligence there ain't much evidence any of it has rubbed off on any of the world's faiths imo. Atheists make the mistake of conflating the two issues and of imagining the failings of the faiths amounts to an argument against a universal mind. Most atheist arguments against the faiths are entirely sound and moral. But unfortunately when it comes to science and philosophy most atheists are deeply confused and quite often utterly bamboozled. I think this suggests that atheism is, and has largely historically been, a social argument against the excesses of the faiths rather than a seriously credible philosophical argument on the nature of reality. That's all very cool and well and, on that front, I'm happy to support atheists social cause to hold the faiths to account. But unfortunately in recent years various big names have tried to assert atheism as having philosophical and scientific credibility when it doesn't. So it's time to push back imo You do realize that most atheists are not as stupid as you seem to think. Most are. A few are not. I don't know which you are. If your atheism is supported by the two usual arguments of there being no scientific evidence or the problem of evil then unfortunately you're not one of the few. But there are a few atheists who recognise the fallacies in these arguments and are genuinely free thinkers shirking the usual cookie cutter atheism. So maybe you're one of those. You seem relatively intelligent and metered in your responses so maybe you are. If so good on you! I like those kinds of atheists... but they are pretty rare I challenge you to find one atheist who thinks the abstract concept of God is exactly the same as the concept of God in in any given religion. You posit some kind of deist universal mind. Most atheists will agree that such a being is at least logically possible, but that if such a being does exist but does not intervene in the world, for all practical purposes that's the same as a God in this sense not existing. Seriously, you'd be better making your arguments without ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with you. They're not ad hominem. People who are confused and bamboozled by philosophy and science are just that and can be shown to be. You seem to be labouring under the illusion that a non intervening god is a useless unimportant god. You have failed to recognise the possibility that it is only not intervening because it is controlling everything at all times. You cannot intervene nor interrupt your own actions. This is an example of what I mean about atheists generally tending to be philosophically challenged thinkers. They usually have massive blindspots to quite major and simple ways in which their contentions don't add up. All it takes is a little applied critical thought and pretty quickly the house of cards starts to fall. That is no more ad hominem than the opposite contention that atheists have long thrown at the religious as being muddled fools. To me, as to them, it is eminently demonstrable OK, one last try. Your God appears to be nothing more than an amalgam of the principle of regularity in nature and the principle of intelligence. Obviously all atheists accept those things exist. When we talk of God intervening in the world what is usually meant by that is God doing something outside the usual regulatity of nature. Causing a blind man to see, that sort of thing. You appear to accept your God doesn't intervene in that way and appear to equate God's actions with the regular actions of nature and intelligence. As atheists accept that nature and intelligence operates in this way your only difference with them is that you call these things God and they don't. It's purely a semantic difference. Hence for all practical purposes you agree with atheists about how the world works. Thus the fact that you call this thing God doesn't really matter. Haha No that's not how it works. If you concede that a universal mind either exists or might exist you're either a theist or an agnostic. My saying as much doesn't make me an atheist. This mind is, after all, accessible to us to experience and possibly converse with... it loves us and enlivens us... it continually manipulates the "physical" world around us to achieve a given end... it is the creator of everything... it is the basis of everything (not matter). All of these points are central to the theistic message of the world's faiths. It is the underlying point they've all been trying to say all this time. If you agree with it then you've been arguing either against a straw man (likely with atheists to be honest) or with a bunch of people you agree with but didn't realise you did. In general, atheists do not believe that a universal mind created and enlivens nature. They're usually reductionist matetialists. Something like 5% of American atheists, when asked, said they believed in a god. Maybe you're one of those confused souls? " I love it how you know the minds of both atheists and religious believers better than they know their minds themselves. I agree that philosophically your semi Spinoza type argument is fundamentally different to an atheist epistemology. My point is that for practical purposes, given that your God does not act in the world other than via verifiable natural means, all of which are accepted by atheists, it makes no difference whether this God exists or not. Put it this way, say you are wrong and the atheist argument is right, would there be any observable difference as to how the world operates? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love it how you know the minds of both atheists and religious believers better than they know their minds themselves. I agree that philosophically your semi Spinoza type argument is fundamentally different to an atheist epistemology. My point is that for practical purposes, given that your God does not act in the world other than via verifiable natural means, all of which are accepted by atheists, it makes no difference whether this God exists or not. Put it this way, say you are wrong and the atheist argument is right, would there be any observable difference as to how the world operates? " I'm not really talking about the minds. I'm talking about the arguments. I'm well versed in the arguments of either side. It's something I've been studying. Accompanying those arguments is also a stereotypical mindset on either side which can be engaged with imo. I'm more than happy to concede that different arguments and mindsets exist which may be more credible. But my main criticism is against the mainstream on both sides. I like your question though As you know my view on your dismissal of such a non intervening god is that it's like saying, given that a mother doesn't intervene in our life, what need would we have for such a mother? So I fundamentally disagree with you on your conclusion... But I do like the question you posit at the end. I think the best answer to it is that if atheism is right and theism is wrong then you've just created a new puzzle. How the heck have a bunch of apes on a spinning rock come into being in such a way as they can determine the workings of the universe. Obviously the answer to this couldn't be that there would be a god in your scenario. But I think you'd have to posit a miracle. So basically a universe without god is one in which miracles exist. Whilst one with a god doesn't have miracles. That's one difference I can think of to start with. But I shall enjoy pondering it more The trouble with your question is, though, that it infers atheism's worldview adds up i.e it offers a credible alternative to theism. I'm happy to ponder a "what if" scenario where it wins. But there's a lot more atheism has to do to even get near that point. It's also difficult as I've had a god experience. So, for atheism to succeed for me, it's worldview would also need to successfully explain that. I think you'd agree that a successful atheist theory should be cohesive with all of reality and not just some of it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you'd agree that a successful atheist theory should be cohesive with all of reality and not just some of it " On this last note I should also add that I feel strongly that if "atheism" is to mean anything it should be to denote the contention that no god exists. It has no intellectual purpose or value if not this. Given that it clearly contends no gods exist it needs to pursue precisely that point and not the ridiculous "not many gods exist" or "no gods, except one, exist" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I love it how you know the minds of both atheists and religious believers better than they know their minds themselves. I agree that philosophically your semi Spinoza type argument is fundamentally different to an atheist epistemology. My point is that for practical purposes, given that your God does not act in the world other than via verifiable natural means, all of which are accepted by atheists, it makes no difference whether this God exists or not. Put it this way, say you are wrong and the atheist argument is right, would there be any observable difference as to how the world operates? I'm not really talking about the minds. I'm talking about the arguments. I'm well versed in the arguments of either side. It's something I've been studying. Accompanying those arguments is also a stereotypical mindset on either side which can be engaged with imo. I'm more than happy to concede that different arguments and mindsets exist which may be more credible. But my main criticism is against the mainstream on both sides. I like your question though As you know my view on your dismissal of such a non intervening god is that it's like saying, given that a mother doesn't intervene in our life, what need would we have for such a mother? So I fundamentally disagree with you on your conclusion... But I do like the question you posit at the end. I think the best answer to it is that if atheism is right and theism is wrong then you've just created a new puzzle. How the heck have a bunch of apes on a spinning rock come into being in such a way as they can determine the workings of the universe. Obviously the answer to this couldn't be that there would be a god in your scenario. But I think you'd have to posit a miracle. So basically a universe without god is one in which miracles exist. Whilst one with a god doesn't have miracles. That's one difference I can think of to start with. But I shall enjoy pondering it more The trouble with your question is, though, that it infers atheism's worldview adds up i.e it offers a credible alternative to theism. I'm happy to ponder a "what if" scenario where it wins. But there's a lot more atheism has to do to even get near that point. It's also difficult as I've had a god experience. So, for atheism to succeed for me, it's worldview would also need to successfully explain that. I think you'd agree that a successful atheist theory should be cohesive with all of reality and not just some of it " As I have said before, all atheism is is the rejection of the God concept. It implies no other world view. It appears you have the same view as to practical reality as me. You don't argue that there is some sort of God as conceived in monotheistic religions who answers prayers and punishes people for bad behaviour. You just call a combination of nature and intelligence God. You accept that if this concept is incorrect then nothing will change in reality as it is now, just that you would think the origin of the universe was a miracle. Hence my statement that for all practical every day purposes whether you take my view that nature and intelligence exists but it's not God or take your view that nature and intelligence exists and are identical with God, makes no difference. I am always curious as to why people think their internal mind states are evidence of anything outside their mind. If your God experience is a very strong feeling in your head that God exists, all that is evidence of is that you had a very strong feeling in your head that God exists. It says nothing as to whether God exists outside your head. All those Christians, Muslims and so on who you think have an incorrect idea of God also have very strong God experiences in their heads. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It appears you have the same view as to practical reality as me. You don't argue that there is some sort of God as conceived in monotheistic religions who answers prayers and punishes people for bad behaviour. You just call a combination of nature and intelligence God. You accept that if this concept is incorrect then nothing will change in reality as it is now, just that you would think the origin of the universe was a miracle." Yes. Although I'm actually claiming that the success of atheism in disproving the existence of god would be the miracle "Hence my statement that for all practical every day purposes whether you take my view that nature and intelligence exists but it's not God or take your view that nature and intelligence exists and are identical with God, makes no difference." This is a fallacy similar to saying that some one who insists there is no chef is equally as vindicated by the arrival of food as someone who can fully describe the process by which that food has been made by a chef. Since, to all purposes, the food still arrived... both are viable beliefs. Not so. Atheism needs to offer a credible alternative. If there's no chef who made the food? Until then the default intellectual position on any food arriving at our table is that a chef made it. I don't know if that analogy works but I hope you get the point. "I am always curious as to why people think their internal mind states are evidence of anything outside their mind. If your God experience is a very strong feeling in your head that God exists, all that is evidence of is that you had a very strong feeling in your head that God exists. It says nothing as to whether God exists outside your head. All those Christians, Muslims and so on who you think have an incorrect idea of God also have very strong God experiences in their heads. " I agree. It seems pretty evident that most people frame the god experiences they have in the clothing of their culture. Hence most people who devoutly believe in Jesus, when pressed, will admit they only really had a god experience but that they immediately equated that as being Jesus. It's a flaw imo. But it's one that the faiths all capitalise on to their advantage. I was an atheist when I had my god experience and it pointed to no faith. Hence why I'm happy to stay neutral. This also affirms my theory that we each see it from our own cultural view point. As for the existence of anything outside my thinking it... I'm agnostic about that whole issue as it seems impossible to frame a winning argument for it. So all we're left with is the strong feeling we get when having an authentic experience vs a fraudulent one. The god experience is marked by a very strong sense that it is real in the very realest sense. It's that which troubles it. People suffer from all sorts of delusions. But the god experience is differentiated sharply by its sense of importance and authenticity. It's an inherent part of the nature of the experience that differentiates it strongly from other hallucinations | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't believe and my kids weren't christened but I fully understand why people do believe. God is real for some people, that should always be respected when we're chastising religion." Don't worry about it. The bible doesn't tell you to chisten your children. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It appears you have the same view as to practical reality as me. You don't argue that there is some sort of God as conceived in monotheistic religions who answers prayers and punishes people for bad behaviour. You just call a combination of nature and intelligence God. You accept that if this concept is incorrect then nothing will change in reality as it is now, just that you would think the origin of the universe was a miracle. Yes. Although I'm actually claiming that the success of atheism in disproving the existence of god would be the miracle Hence my statement that for all practical every day purposes whether you take my view that nature and intelligence exists but it's not God or take your view that nature and intelligence exists and are identical with God, makes no difference. This is a fallacy similar to saying that some one who insists there is no chef is equally as vindicated by the arrival of food as someone who can fully describe the process by which that food has been made by a chef. Since, to all purposes, the food still arrived... both are viable beliefs. Not so. Atheism needs to offer a credible alternative. If there's no chef who made the food? Until then the default intellectual position on any food arriving at our table is that a chef made it. I don't know if that analogy works but I hope you get the point. I am always curious as to why people think their internal mind states are evidence of anything outside their mind. If your God experience is a very strong feeling in your head that God exists, all that is evidence of is that you had a very strong feeling in your head that God exists. It says nothing as to whether God exists outside your head. All those Christians, Muslims and so on who you think have an incorrect idea of God also have very strong God experiences in their heads. I agree. It seems pretty evident that most people frame the god experiences they have in the clothing of their culture. Hence most people who devoutly believe in Jesus, when pressed, will admit they only really had a god experience but that they immediately equated that as being Jesus. It's a flaw imo. But it's one that the faiths all capitalise on to their advantage. I was an atheist when I had my god experience and it pointed to no faith. Hence why I'm happy to stay neutral. This also affirms my theory that we each see it from our own cultural view point. As for the existence of anything outside my thinking it... I'm agnostic about that whole issue as it seems impossible to frame a winning argument for it. So all we're left with is the strong feeling we get when having an authentic experience vs a fraudulent one. The god experience is marked by a very strong sense that it is real in the very realest sense. It's that which troubles it. People suffer from all sorts of delusions. But the god experience is differentiated sharply by its sense of importance and authenticity. It's an inherent part of the nature of the experience that differentiates it strongly from other hallucinations " People who disagree radically with you as to the nature of God have equally strong God experiences. You can't both be correct as to the nature of any God that might exist and I have no means of judging which of you might be correct. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People who disagree radically with you as to the nature of God have equally strong God experiences. You can't both be correct as to the nature of any God that might exist and I have no means of judging which of you might be correct. " I know of no one who has had a god experience and who differs from me in any meaningful way on the nature of god. I'm quite comfortable that we're all experiencing the same phenomena. Since we all agree, there's nothing at all for you to choose between. You simply have to decide if you believe a universal mind/spirit exists or not. That's what all us theists have ever said all along. Whether our shared god experiences genuinely relate to an actually existing being or is a fraudulent and meaningless hallucination... that's a different issue. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People who disagree radically with you as to the nature of God have equally strong God experiences. You can't both be correct as to the nature of any God that might exist and I have no means of judging which of you might be correct. I know of no one who has had a god experience and who differs from me in any meaningful way on the nature of god. I'm quite comfortable that we're all experiencing the same phenomena. Since we all agree, there's nothing at all for you to choose between. You simply have to decide if you believe a universal mind/spirit exists or not. That's what all us theists have ever said all along. Whether our shared god experiences genuinely relate to an actually existing being or is a fraudulent and meaningless hallucination... that's a different issue. " The vast majority of people who believe in God believe in a personal God who can intervene in the world outwith the laws of nature and who can answer prayers. You may have noticed religions like Christianity and Islam who believe in such a God and which have millions of adherents. Your concept of God is a million miles away from that concept. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |