FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Feminism - recommend your sources

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Okay, who should be reading/listening to?

Do me a recommend this person, that person, this source, that source.

Equality and feminism.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

*we

Who should we*....(damn)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What if you believe equality to be a flawed concept?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r MoriartyMan
over a year ago

The Land that time forgot (Norfolk)

Katie Price in "Katie Price; My Crazy Life".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

I’m not a feminist, I’m a person. I expect to be given the same rights as the next person.

Apart from golf of course where us ladies have the advantage of teeing off closer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uteness69Woman
over a year ago

Walthamstow


"Okay, who should be reading/listening to?

Do me a recommend this person, that person, this source, that source.

Equality and feminism."

Good luck with this.

I would follow Nikita Gill on twitter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cher

I follow her on twitter too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hate men, bloody oppressors.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubiousOatcakeMan
over a year ago

Aberdeenshire

Caitlin Moran

Also, watch Bridget Christie’s stand up show on Netflix. If you like her, there’s a good episode of the Adam Buxton podcast with her, too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescplCouple
over a year ago

brecon


"I’m not a feminist, I’m a person. I expect to be given the same rights as the next person.

Apart from golf of course where us ladies have the advantage of teeing off closer "

Yes... and the tennis matches, where you get equal prize money for less games...…..hmmmmm, not very equal after all is it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Let’s not badmouth people, please.

Recommend your reading/watching/listening materials or people to put forward whichever aspect/opinion of the topic you hold of worth or interest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubiousOatcakeMan
over a year ago

Aberdeenshire


"Is there a certain irony..."

We need an emoji for squishing your mouth to one side in disapproval.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Equality and feminism are two completely different things

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Equality and feminism are two completely different things"

Oh don’t start ffs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entish79Man
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Okay, who should be reading/listening to?

Do me a recommend this person, that person, this source, that source.

Equality and feminism."

Caitlin Moran is rarely wrong about anything. She should probably be in charge of everything.

And must have articles on feminism out there.

I’d post a link, but I was banned recently for posting a totally innocuous link.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ervent_fervourMan
over a year ago

Halifax

These may be a bit old had by now, bit I enjoyed reading Elaine Showalter, and also Julia Kristeva. More lit crit but good nonetheless.

Could always start with Mary Wollstonecraft!

And follow up with her daughter's very famous novel. Completely skewers patriarchy.

I'll have a think about others.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Equality and feminism are two completely different things"

Missing the point of the thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an_WoodMan
over a year ago

Stafford

Julie Bindel's Twitter is in my "political" feed. Fascinating views makes me think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hetalkingstoveMan
over a year ago

London

Not explicitly about feminism, but Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" is a great book dissecting and discrediting the history of "scientific" attempts to portray men and women as these vastly different beings - 'men are better at spacial awareness', 'men are more naturally good with numbers' kinda stuff.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubiousOatcakeMan
over a year ago

Aberdeenshire


"Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender”"

Added to my Kindle wish list, cheers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Dame Mary Beard “Women and Power: A Manifesto”.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Not explicitly about feminism, but Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" is a great book dissecting and discrediting the history of "scientific" attempts to portray men and women as these vastly different beings - 'men are better at spacial awareness', 'men are more naturally good with numbers' kinda stuff. "

I wouldn't say she discredits it. She just points out some exceptions to the rules and correctly calls out journalists who misrepresent science. She doesn't prove the case that Men and women are essential the same.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford

A slight tangent but: "Eleanor Marx" - Rachel Holmes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hetalkingstoveMan
over a year ago

London


"Not explicitly about feminism, but Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" is a great book dissecting and discrediting the history of "scientific" attempts to portray men and women as these vastly different beings - 'men are better at spacial awareness', 'men are more naturally good with numbers' kinda stuff.

I wouldn't say she discredits it. She just points out some exceptions to the rules and correctly calls out journalists who misrepresent science. She doesn't prove the case that Men and women are essential the same. "

Not what I said, but thanks for chipping in as usual.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Not explicitly about feminism, but Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" is a great book dissecting and discrediting the history of "scientific" attempts to portray men and women as these vastly different beings - 'men are better at spacial awareness', 'men are more naturally good with numbers' kinda stuff.

I wouldn't say she discredits it. She just points out some exceptions to the rules and correctly calls out journalists who misrepresent science. She doesn't prove the case that Men and women are essential the same.

Not what I said, but thanks for chipping in as usual. "

You used a very vauge term that Men and women a

"aren't vastly different", whatever that means. I don't want to get bogged down in semantics, but they aren't vastly different at the mean, but they are at the tail of the distribution, which she acknowledges. Even at the mean, there are differences of 0.33 which have pretty big implications, which again - she acknowledges.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

Don't attack people when you post ( this and the last thread ) Don't talk about bans you have received.

It might be best to read forum rules so you know what you can post then there wouldn't be a reason to complain about being banned

For the people who want to read them, here you go.

https://www.fabswingers.com/content/forum-rules

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Equality doesn't mean same

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Rob burgundy - Anchorman

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 23/06/18 20:06:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not explicitly about feminism, but Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" is a great book dissecting and discrediting the history of "scientific" attempts to portray men and women as these vastly different beings - 'men are better at spacial awareness', 'men are more naturally good with numbers' kinda stuff.

I wouldn't say she discredits it. She just points out some exceptions to the rules and correctly calls out journalists who misrepresent science. She doesn't prove the case that Men and women are essential the same.

Not what I said, but thanks for chipping in as usual. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Equality doesn't mean same "
But it does...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Equality doesn't mean same But it does..."

No, equality is about treating people so the outcome is the same. There is a difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Equality doesn't mean same But it does...

No, equality is about treating people so the outcome is the same. There is a difference. "

No equality is about giving everyone the same rights and opportunities.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Equality doesn't mean same But it does...

No, equality is about treating people so the outcome is the same. There is a difference. "

The equality act 2010 was anti-discrimination legislation, meaning that it gives the same opportunities rather than outcomes. Expecting the same outcomes in niave in the extreme for the reasons talkingstove and I have already discussed on this thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. Feminism is a tool to divide and sets men and women as adversaries. The real battle is the battle between rich and poor. Most injustices between the genders are caused by economic constraints. Women who want children have their careers effected by having children and contrary to what most feminists say some women enjoy the roll of being a mother, but are made to feel that to enjoy being a mother makes you a failure. Most people at the end of their life don’t wish they’d spent more time at work, they yearn to have worked less and spent more time with those they loved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Another vote for Caitlin Moran

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. Feminism is a tool to divide and sets men and women as adversaries. The real battle is the battle between rich and poor. Most injustices between the genders are caused by economic constraints. Women who want children have their careers effected by having children and contrary to what most feminists say some women enjoy the roll of being a mother, but are made to feel that to enjoy being a mother makes you a failure. Most people at the end of their life don’t wish they’d spent more time at work, they yearn to have worked less and spent more time with those they loved. "

So what reading material etc are you recommending? That’s what I’m asking for.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Another vote for Caitlin Moran "

She’s my

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Dame Mary Beard “Women and Power: A Manifesto”. "

Bloody love a bit of Mary Beard!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another vote for Caitlin Moran

She’s my "

I just adore her!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. "

It's worse than that. It's a filter on what we have 'facts' for and so any subjects that aren't useful to certain narratives, won't get funding. Therefore every view on them will be relegated to the status of an opinion, whilst the truth is obvious to almost everyone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. Feminism is a tool to divide and sets men and women as adversaries. The real battle is the battle between rich and poor. Most injustices between the genders are caused by economic constraints. Women who want children have their careers effected by having children and contrary to what most feminists say some women enjoy the roll of being a mother, but are made to feel that to enjoy being a mother makes you a failure. Most people at the end of their life don’t wish they’d spent more time at work, they yearn to have worked less and spent more time with those they loved. "

I'd love to know what your personal experiences of the peer-review process is, because it certainly seems different to mine....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. Feminism is a tool to divide and sets men and women as adversaries. The real battle is the battle between rich and poor. Most injustices between the genders are caused by economic constraints. Women who want children have their careers effected by having children and contrary to what most feminists say some women enjoy the roll of being a mother, but are made to feel that to enjoy being a mother makes you a failure. Most people at the end of their life don’t wish they’d spent more time at work, they yearn to have worked less and spent more time with those they loved.

I'd love to know what your personal experiences of the peer-review process is, because it certainly seems different to mine...."

Bias, politics and massive egos. Often poor standards too. Peer reviewed is often accepted as absolute truth/proof when it is is in reality heavily biased with vested interests.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"The annoying thing about academia is the repetition of other people’s views. The peer reviewed system is just an establishment hierarchy that does nothing but stifle fresh creative thinking through conformity. Feminism is a tool to divide and sets men and women as adversaries. The real battle is the battle between rich and poor. Most injustices between the genders are caused by economic constraints. Women who want children have their careers effected by having children and contrary to what most feminists say some women enjoy the roll of being a mother, but are made to feel that to enjoy being a mother makes you a failure. Most people at the end of their life don’t wish they’d spent more time at work, they yearn to have worked less and spent more time with those they loved.

I'd love to know what your personal experiences of the peer-review process is, because it certainly seems different to mine....

Bias, politics and massive egos. Often poor standards too. Peer reviewed is often accepted as absolute truth/proof when it is is in reality heavily biased with vested interests. "

In what field? How many papers have you submitted for peer review?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top