Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"DGI " DGI.... acronyms aren't my forte | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’d be on the blower and grass the perp to the busies so the crim gets banged to rights and does some porridge. " Trust you for that answer... haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"DGI DGI.... acronyms aren't my forte" Don’t get involved | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Report the profile to Admin - referring them to the documented evidence - and then block. Depends on the nature of the convictions, whether it would affect their membership here or the safety of other members. " This. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do." You are talking like someone who has never encountered the fab forum police! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do."  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. You are talking like someone who has never encountered the fab forum police!"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do." Do you feel the same about all crime? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime?" Careful Hine. It’s a trick! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do." I wasn't referring to fab straight. I was merely curious as to people's views | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"DGI DGI.... acronyms aren't my forte" “Don’t get involved,” here for fun not dramas | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime?" Apparently some people don't care about the safety of others. I'm not at all surprised. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Report the profile to Admin - referring them to the documented evidence - and then block. Depends on the nature of the convictions, whether it would affect their membership here or the safety of other members. " This. Certainly not my business to start telling others. Leave it to Admin | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bonked a couple of people from here who have been to prison. Did their time, decent people" Same. Think the nature of the crime would be the deciding factor. I automatically jumped to the scenario being violence or r*pe. The site terms and conditions do say somewhere those on the Sexual Offenders Register arenot allowed on here I believe. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. I wasn't referring to fab straight. I was merely curious as to people's views " Neither was I specifically. It's a simple point. The concept of breaking another's privacy for whatever reason...ie "outing" them seems just a little like the current trend for naming and shaming. Perhaps it's OK if it's done to others. But if and when it's done to you, for whatever reason... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah terms 8.c "c) you have been convicted of any offence, or subject to any court order, relating to assault, violence, sexual misconduct, harassment or dishonesty. Any breach of this clause is a serious breach of this agreement."" Good to know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah terms 8.c "c) you have been convicted of any offence, or subject to any court order, relating to assault, violence, sexual misconduct, harassment or dishonesty. Any breach of this clause is a serious breach of this agreement."" Phew! Thank goodness for that. That will keep them out..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. I wasn't referring to fab straight. I was merely curious as to people's views Neither was I specifically. It's a simple point. The concept of breaking another's privacy for whatever reason...ie "outing" them seems just a little like the current trend for naming and shaming. Perhaps it's OK if it's done to others. But if and when it's done to you, for whatever reason... " Well 1. I've nothing to be outed for... don't have a criminal record 2. I wasn't outing anyone I was merely asking peoples opinions | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is this a thread about the guy who sabotaged his wife's parachute? " Hadn't heard about that. Mine was just a generic query | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a query... if you come across someone on here and you've saw an article in the paper and they've a criminal record..... do you say? Do you advise others? Do you keep your nose out? What would you do?" Alright Alright! Jeeezzz.. You paint a few forgeries and end up doing porridge and people get all upset! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a query... if you come across someone on here and you've saw an article in the paper and they've a criminal record..... do you say? Do you advise others? Do you keep your nose out? What would you do? Alright Alright! Jeeezzz.. You paint a few forgeries and end up doing porridge and people get all upset! " I'm merely upset you didn't paint me! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick!
"Not playing? Fair enough. I am. About that ‘something you recall’. It rather contradicts the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which says that a conviction may not be ‘spent’ immediately after the sentence ends. Some are, but some remain for varying amounts of time after the end of their sentence. Bear in mind that most are released before the end of their sentence, and it could be a long time before it is considered ‘spent’. Then you’ve got sex offenders, who are monitored by the Police, sometimes for even longer. Some of them might be breaking their court orders by being on here. Even disregarding the exact times of spent/unspent convictions, this country’s justice system isn’t very good at rehabilitation. Would I feel comfortable letting someone into my home if they committed shoplifting 15 years ago? Probably. Would I feel comfortable if they’d painted a few forgeries? Probably. Would I be comfortable if they had unspent convictions for theft by housebreaking / burglary? No. Would women feel comfortable meeting somebody who’d done prison sentences for rape or attempted rape? Some might, but others definitely would not. I was going to raise the point that it is more than likely against the Ts&Cs of the site, but I see Etonmess confirmed that. I’m all for people being allowed to get on with their lives. However, I think sometimes some people have demonstrated that they should have a limit to their freedoms. Let’s face it, Fab isn’t exactly a human right or an everyday need. It is a luxury and, I’m sorry, but it’s a luxury that some can live without for the safety and comfort of others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick!
Not playing? Fair enough. I am.
About that ‘something you recall’. It rather contradicts the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which says that a conviction may not be ‘spent’ immediately after the sentence ends.
Some are, but some remain for varying amounts of time after the end of their sentence. Bear in mind that most are released before the end of their sentence, and it could be a long time before it is considered ‘spent’.
Then you’ve got sex offenders, who are monitored by the Police, sometimes for even longer. Some of them might be breaking their court orders by being on here.
Even disregarding the exact times of spent/unspent convictions, this country’s justice system isn’t very good at rehabilitation.
Would I feel comfortable letting someone into my home if they committed shoplifting 15 years ago? Probably. Would I feel comfortable if they’d painted a few forgeries? Probably. Would I be comfortable if they had unspent convictions for theft by housebreaking / burglary? No.
Would women feel comfortable meeting somebody who’d done prison sentences for r*pe or attempted r*pe? Some might, but others definitely would not.
I was going to raise the point that it is more than likely against the Ts&Cs of the site, but I see Etonmess confirmed that.
I’m all for people being allowed to get on with their lives. However, I think sometimes some people have demonstrated that they should have a limit to their freedoms. Let’s face it, Fab isn’t exactly a human right or an everyday need. It is a luxury and, I’m sorry, but it’s a luxury that some can live without for the safety and comfort of others."The courts decide the sentence and conditions attached. They are part of the punishment for the crime. Some convictions are never spent and therefore have to be declared for the rest of a person's life. The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is not about continuing that punishment beyond what the courts award. It is in essence a right to have the conviction disregard after whatever period specified in the act dependant upon the conviction. You want to play don't conflate two completely separate parts of the justice system. Or their purpose. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or you could just make your own decision about whether you choose to meet criminals or not.." Criminals don't come up to you with a big sign saying "hi I committed armed robbery - fancy a fuck?" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or you could just make your own decision about whether you choose to meet criminals or not.. Criminals don't come up to you with a big sign saying "hi I committed armed robbery - fancy a fuck?"" What would you say if they did? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theres people currently in jail on here believe it or not" Yep I met one, around 3 years ago now | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or you could just make your own decision about whether you choose to meet criminals or not.. Criminals don't come up to you with a big sign saying "hi I committed armed robbery - fancy a fuck?" What would you say if they did? "Ok if she had good banter not all criminals are bad people | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick!
Not playing? Fair enough. I am.
About that ‘something you recall’. It rather contradicts the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which says that a conviction may not be ‘spent’ immediately after the sentence ends.
Some are, but some remain for varying amounts of time after the end of their sentence. Bear in mind that most are released before the end of their sentence, and it could be a long time before it is considered ‘spent’.
Then you’ve got sex offenders, who are monitored by the Police, sometimes for even longer. Some of them might be breaking their court orders by being on here.
Even disregarding the exact times of spent/unspent convictions, this country’s justice system isn’t very good at rehabilitation.
Would I feel comfortable letting someone into my home if they committed shoplifting 15 years ago? Probably. Would I feel comfortable if they’d painted a few forgeries? Probably. Would I be comfortable if they had unspent convictions for theft by housebreaking / burglary? No.
Would women feel comfortable meeting somebody who’d done prison sentences for r*pe or attempted r*pe? Some might, but others definitely would not.
I was going to raise the point that it is more than likely against the Ts&Cs of the site, but I see Etonmess confirmed that.
I’m all for people being allowed to get on with their lives. However, I think sometimes some people have demonstrated that they should have a limit to their freedoms. Let’s face it, Fab isn’t exactly a human right or an everyday need. It is a luxury and, I’m sorry, but it’s a luxury that some can live without for the safety and comfort of others."How did you type r*pe without getting the post blocked? It was blocked for me when quoting you too!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick!
Not playing? Fair enough. I am.
About that ‘something you recall’. It rather contradicts the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which says that a conviction may not be ‘spent’ immediately after the sentence ends.
Some are, but some remain for varying amounts of time after the end of their sentence. Bear in mind that most are released before the end of their sentence, and it could be a long time before it is considered ‘spent’.
Then you’ve got sex offenders, who are monitored by the Police, sometimes for even longer. Some of them might be breaking their court orders by being on here.
Even disregarding the exact times of spent/unspent convictions, this country’s justice system isn’t very good at rehabilitation.
Would I feel comfortable letting someone into my home if they committed shoplifting 15 years ago? Probably. Would I feel comfortable if they’d painted a few forgeries? Probably. Would I be comfortable if they had unspent convictions for theft by housebreaking / burglary? No.
Would women feel comfortable meeting somebody who’d done prison sentences for r*pe or attempted r*pe? Some might, but others definitely would not.
I was going to raise the point that it is more than likely against the Ts&Cs of the site, but I see Etonmess confirmed that.
I’m all for people being allowed to get on with their lives. However, I think sometimes some people have demonstrated that they should have a limit to their freedoms. Let’s face it, Fab isn’t exactly a human right or an everyday need. It is a luxury and, I’m sorry, but it’s a luxury that some can live without for the safety and comfort of others.
How did you type r*pe without getting the post blocked? It was blocked for me when quoting you too!!"Platinum membership | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theres people currently in jail on here believe it or not Yep I met one, around 3 years ago now " What, you got a visitor's pass? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it's sexual crime then id report. Anything else is nothing to worry u x" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing at all to do with me what their past maybe. Also there is something in the justice system I recall about people having served their sentence as decided by the court then being released. Why is it then our place to "out" anyone e.g. criminal whose served sentence, fabstraight, etc etc etc rather than giving them the chance to get on with their life... just like the rest of us do. Do you feel the same about all crime? Careful Hine. It’s a trick!
Not playing? Fair enough. I am.
About that ‘something you recall’. It rather contradicts the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which says that a conviction may not be ‘spent’ immediately after the sentence ends.
Some are, but some remain for varying amounts of time after the end of their sentence. Bear in mind that most are released before the end of their sentence, and it could be a long time before it is considered ‘spent’.
Then you’ve got sex offenders, who are monitored by the Police, sometimes for even longer. Some of them might be breaking their court orders by being on here.
Even disregarding the exact times of spent/unspent convictions, this country’s justice system isn’t very good at rehabilitation.
Would I feel comfortable letting someone into my home if they committed shoplifting 15 years ago? Probably. Would I feel comfortable if they’d painted a few forgeries? Probably. Would I be comfortable if they had unspent convictions for theft by housebreaking / burglary? No.
Would women feel comfortable meeting somebody who’d done prison sentences for r*pe or attempted r*pe? Some might, but others definitely would not.
I was going to raise the point that it is more than likely against the Ts&Cs of the site, but I see Etonmess confirmed that.
I’m all for people being allowed to get on with their lives. However, I think sometimes some people have demonstrated that they should have a limit to their freedoms. Let’s face it, Fab isn’t exactly a human right or an everyday need. It is a luxury and, I’m sorry, but it’s a luxury that some can live without for the safety and comfort of others.
How did you type r*pe without getting the post blocked? It was blocked for me when quoting you too!!
Platinum membership "Wtf? There's such a thing? How do you get that? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theres people currently in jail on here believe it or not Yep I met one, around 3 years ago now What, you got a visitor's pass?" Haha no, although that would be fun! He was in an open prison and went to work during the day. I had a social with him one lunchtime then met to play a few days later | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a query... if you come across someone on here and you've saw an article in the paper and they've a criminal record..... do you say? Do you advise others? Do you keep your nose out? What would you do?" If they have a criminal record it does not stop them being on this site unless it also includes being on the sex offenders register in which case I would report to admin. Otherwise block and keep my nose out. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is not about continuing that punishment beyond what the courts award." I didn’t say that it is. "It is in essence a right to have the conviction disregard after whatever period specified in the act dependant upon the conviction." Yes. But the fact that it’s not immediate also implies that there is a period of time during which people have a right to know, hence the disclosure. A ‘right to be forgotten’ is always balanced with a right to know. "You want to play don't conflate two completely separate parts of the justice system. Or their purpose." I didn’t, thank you. . "How did you type r*pe without getting the post blocked? It was blocked for me when quoting you too!!" Mad skills. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they have a criminal record it does not stop them being on this site unless it also includes being on the sex offenders register in which case I would report to admin. Otherwise block and keep my nose out. " Incorrect. Go and read the Ts&Cs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they have a criminal record it does not stop them being on this site unless it also includes being on the sex offenders register in which case I would report to admin. Otherwise block and keep my nose out. Incorrect. Go and read the Ts&Cs." Yeah terms 8.c "c) you have been convicted of any offence, or subject to any court order, relating to assault, violence, sexual misconduct, harassment or dishonesty. Any breach of this clause is a serious breach of this agreement." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
