FabSwingers.com forum: TOMMY

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

now that freedom of speech has gone does that mean there is no speakers corner now ???

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

When did freedom of speech go?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

About 3 days ago

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"About 3 days ago"

How?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Go on you tube look at Tommy Robinson arrest

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

I can see a lot of trouble on the streets of the uk

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Establishment is to blame if it does

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Are you taking the piss

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"Are you taking the piss"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

the public have a right to no the media wont cover it I think tommy Robison is doing a good job

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is he the guy who makes orange juice for tennis players?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"Are you taking the piss"

Contempt of court is a criminal offence that can see people jailed for speeches or publications that create a "substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced".

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free)."
so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

Oh please, not here too.

He's a bloody racist thug. He deserves to be locked up and the key thrown away.

He doesnt even use his real name... Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, known by the pseudonym Tommy Robinson, and previously by Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris.

He is no stranger to the police having been arrested numerous times for football hooliganism.

Is this a man you look up to? Really?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

Let's not let silly things like the law get in the way of this outrage!

Tommy knows exactly what he is doing. he knew he would get arrested for doing it, that's why he filmed it! There's no such thing as bad publicity huh and stirring up the EDL masses by claiming wrongful arrest and the end of free speech just gets his name out there more.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial "

Which trial? His or the one he was filming outside?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You can't educate pork no point

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"You can't educate pork no point "

What's that supposed to mean?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"You can't educate pork no point "

Which side are you describing as pork?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *illy_the_tvTV/TS
over a year ago

hoorn, Netherlands

Oh yeah, Tommy Robinson, what a pillar of the community. Committing contempt of court outside a court, whilst on a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court....also has previous convictions for mortgage fraud, any, drug offences and travelling on a false passport. But please, tell me how him going on about Muslims ignoring the law whilst constantly breaking it himself is who we want spouting his so called 'free speech', or more honestly named, hate speech

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

"Oh please, not here too.

He's a bloody racist thug. He deserves to be locked up and the key thrown away.

He doesnt even use his real name... Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, known by the pseudonym Tommy Robinson, and previously by Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris.

He is no stranger to the police having been arrested numerous times for football hooliganism.

Is this a man you look up to? Really?"

I thought I recognised the name. Thank you for confirming.

Sexual preferences is one thing on here and we’ve no problem with that. Racism is quite another

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *electableDalliancesCouple
over a year ago

leeds

I despair, the pointless hate and vitriol towards people who are "threatening Britishness " what is Britain but a merging of societies through the ages. There is no one genetic thing that is British, check your DNA you are made up of people's from many countries. People move and migrate they always have and always will. The only solution is to take down all borders , have one world government spread the wealth and resources saved by not fighting incessantly. And live in peace on this beautiful fucking planet.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?"

Tommy Robinson is a racist thug. Two of you in this thread clear supporters.

Leaving the thread. Answer the questions others are posing to you

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial

Which trial? His or the one he was filming outside? "
not his

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"Oh please, not here too.

He's a bloody racist thug. He deserves to be locked up and the key thrown away.

He doesnt even use his real name... Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, known by the pseudonym Tommy Robinson, and previously by Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris.

He is no stranger to the police having been arrested numerous times for football hooliganism.

Is this a man you look up to? Really?

I thought I recognised the name. Thank you for confirming.

Sexual preferences is one thing on here and we’ve no problem with that. Racism is quite another

He co founded the EDL. I find it difficult to comprehend how anyone can look up to him. He knew he was going to be arrested hense recording it. He also knew his arrest would stir up the neanderthal EDL followers. Im sure he gets off on trouble.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 29/05/18 07:57:15]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is this what fb is like?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Tommy Robinson is a racist thug. Two of you in this thread clear supporters.

Leaving the thread. Answer the questions others are posing to you

"
im not rasict and he might be all the things people are saying how ever as a parent then I feel it should be open too the public

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Tommy Robinson is a racist thug. Two of you in this thread clear supporters.

Leaving the thread. Answer the questions others are posing to you

im not rasict and he might be all the things people are saying how ever as a parent then I feel it should be open too the public "

I'm sorry, but you have no right whatsoever to know anything about a trial unless you are directly involved. You don't need to know either. The verdict is public, not the proceedings of the trial. If you want to know what's happening then go to the trial and sit in the public gallery.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?"

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial

Which trial? His or the one he was filming outside? not his"

Well just perhaps without his intervention the victims of that abhorrant crime will get the justice they deserve.

Either way he wins. He's arrested to protect the case and his band of numpties are up in arms or he is allowed to prejudice the case by his reporting and influencing the jury and the case is thrown out, the guilty walk free and again his party have cause to riot.

Fecking imbeciles the lot of them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tommy Robinson is a complete tool.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well? "
not sure on that 1 but if someone did then he / she would be put into the common bracket the racist

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"now that freedom of speech has gone does that mean there is no speakers corner now ???"

Freedom of speech isn’t gone. You can pretty much kiss it goodby if you yourself choose to stop speaking out about what you feel strongly about.

Your free to say what you want, but if your a dick, no-one is going to listen to, or support your views.....apart from other dicks.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"You can't educate pork no point

What's that supposed to mean? "

Still waiting for an answer to this as well.... If you're gonna make a statement at least have the balls to back it up.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?"

Do you honestly believe he cares who the victims are?

Ive never heard of him filming outside courts where white paedophiles are being tried. What is his party doing directly to support the victims of these crimes? Fuck all. He just wants to incite racial hatred and violence.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well? not sure on that 1 but if someone did then he / she would be put into the common bracket the racist

I don't really understand s the point you're trying to make with your rolly eyes

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

The freedom of speech and expression comes with responsibility. Racially fueled hatred cannot be ignored.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well? not sure on that 1 but if someone did then he / she would be put into the common bracket the racist

Im not getting your logic. If Tommy Robinson had done the same outside the trial of a gang of white British paedophiles how could that be racist? It would still be wrong and he would still be in breach of his suspended sentence..... but he wouldn't be bothered with the white British paedophile trial.... he doesn't give a damn about those victims any more than he does the ones who's trial he was jeopardizing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uddlybear2015Man
over a year ago

BEDFORD

"Go on you tube look at Tommy Robinson arrest"

Free speech comes with responsibilites,as with any freedom,public incitement is abuse of that freedom.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hy-tot OP Couple
over a year ago

Skellow

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well? not sure on that 1 but if someone did then he / she would be put into the common bracket the racist

I don't really understand s the point you're trying to make with your rolly eyes

"
I just liked them lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter , you pick what side your on .

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter , you pick what side your on ."

Yes Im quite sure the Hitler Youth were proud of their cause too.

Still another filter thread.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter , you pick what side your on ."

A sophistic argument at best. I know which side I'm on, British. I stand for Justice and the Rule of Law. Apparently this is not the side that Tommy Robinson (or his supporters) has chosen.

I'm also a supporter of the well written sentence and proof reading....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter , you pick what side your on ."

The irony of using the phrase freedom fighter for a vile racist like Robinson and his fascist ideology is evidence of your own twisted views..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've fought the urge to block friends on FB for posting about how this vile excuse of a human should be released. As others have put it would he be outside the old bailey if it was the likes of Gary glitter on trial? I seriously doubt it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Answer me this , why did none of the seiks outside the court arrested?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *otSoNewWalesCoupleCouple
over a year ago

South Wales

He was given explicit warning not to rock up at another trial before verdict, or his 13 month suspended sentence would be enacted. Why the serious warning? Because the defendants could claim interference & mis-trial and walk free.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"Answer me this , why did none of the seiks outside the court arrested?"

If you could tell me what a seik is then I'll engage you

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

sikhs

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

[Removed by poster at 29/05/18 08:58:37]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"sikhs"

Probably because they had no media profile and weren't under direct instruction by the courts not to protest outside a courtroom and to not disrupt and active trial...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They where there for the same reason , just like all snow flakes , you try to justify you side

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *relanddirectMan
over a year ago

cheshire

"the public have a right to no the media wont cover it I think tommy Robison is doing a good job "
the public DO NOT have a right that’s the whole point, the judge had placed reporting restrictions on the case after a conviction they would be lifted. I’m order to not prejudice the case he placed the restrictions and the fool has placed any conviction in jeopardy. By all means shout about it, but after the conviction. Wasted a load of tax payers money, ruined a trial and then his supporters bleat about it. The scumbags need to be locked up and people thinking mob rule is ok are ruining any chance the police have of securing convictions.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ipswingCouple
over a year ago

portrush

"I despair, the pointless hate and vitriol towards people who are "threatening Britishness " what is Britain but a merging of societies through the ages. There is no one genetic thing that is British, check your DNA you are made up of people's from many countries. People move and migrate they always have and always will. The only solution is to take down all borders , have one world government spread the wealth and resources saved by not fighting incessantly. And live in peace on this beautiful fucking planet. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *relanddirectMan
over a year ago

cheshire

I know I’m going to get hammered now! Oh well lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I've fought the urge to block friends on FB for posting about how this vile excuse of a human should be released. As others have put it would he be outside the old bailey if it was the likes of Gary glitter on trial? I seriously doubt it"

I fall out with family because their posts on Facebook.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

I fall out with family because their posts on Facebook. "

Ive blocked my mother and sister over it. Fecking illinformed, bigoted, racist twats

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"They where there for the same reason , just like all snow flakes , you try to justify you side "

As do most of the semi literate idiots on your side... If you're going to get personal with me....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

[Removed by poster at 29/05/18 09:08:51]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I fall out with family because their posts on Facebook.

Oh big mistake. As "Jonathan Pie" says, don't block racists engage with them. Fascism thrives underground, you can't change backward opinions by ignoring them.....

Ive blocked my mother and sister over it. Fecking illinformed, bigoted, racist twats"

If I racist is shouting in a forest, and no one is there to listen....is he really saying anything?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

[Removed by poster at 29/05/18 09:09:27]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So the snow flakes has no answer , so uses bad language and gets angry , I rest my case lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The man is an oxygen thief

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Don't post your own experiences of sexual abuse please as it isn't allowed

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper."

Utter bollocks.

Have you actually seen the footage prior to and up to his arrest?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper.

Utter bollocks.

Have you actually seen the footage prior to and up to his arrest?"

Fuck TOMMY either way the racist prick

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Tommy Robinson is a racist thug. Two of you in this thread clear supporters.

Leaving the thread. Answer the questions others are posing to you

im not rasict and he might be all the things people are saying how ever as a parent then I feel it should be open too the public

On this point, I agree.....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eorgeyporgeyMan
over a year ago

Warrington

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper.

Utter bollocks.

Have you actually seen the footage prior to and up to his arrest?"

Yes I have.

Do you know anything about the law?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper.

Utter bollocks.

Have you actually seen the footage prior to and up to his arrest?

Fuck TOMMY either way the racist prick "

TOMMEH was actually jeopardising a criminal trial. The last time he disrupted a trial He was told in no uncertain terms that if he did this AGAIN he would be locked up. He did it again. And got locked up. Attention seeking manipulative little wanker. He'll now cash in as people contribute towards his "defence". Oh, and hes lied about being attacked in prison too. Hope he gets a long sentence. So, in point of fact, what's happened is defending the independence of the judicial process from venal little pricks like TOMMEH.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper.

Utter bollocks.

Have you actually seen the footage prior to and up to his arrest?

Yes I have.

Do you know anything about the law?"

Quite a bit.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Don't attack people when you post or you may find yourself not being able to post

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I fall out with family because their posts on Facebook.

Oh big mistake. As "Jonathan Pie" says, don't block racists engage with them. Fascism thrives underground, you can't change backward opinions by ignoring them.....

Ive blocked my mother and sister over it. Fecking illinformed, bigoted, racist twats

If I racist is shouting in a forest, and no one is there to listen....is he really saying anything?

I'm happy to contribute to a one way ticket to some remote forest (perhaps in Canada or somewhere) so we can get a definitive answer to that question

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

Does he film himself outside white paedophile trials as well? "

Not to my knowledge and let's face it there is plenty of WHITE paedophile rings/gangs! Tommy is a racist thug whose well known to police, football hooliganism is one of his many crimes how many of the people on this thread are parents and are sticking up for the thug even tho he has subjected children to witnessing his violent crimes in football grounds ......... he's just as bad as the paedophiles!!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?"

This is such a big case there are 3 separate trials being processed, one of which hasn't started yet. If details from one trial gets out into the public domain any defense lawyer worth their salt will argue that the trial has been compromised and that the defendants won't get a fair trial. He's been warned about it before, he's previously come very close to screwing up two previous trials - if he does this, there's a reasonable chance that guilty people go free.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The man is a racist bell-end playing the victim card. 'Ooh help! I've been arrested by 'the establishment' - yes, comtempt of court is serious, potentially screwing up a trial - he didn't mention that in his little video did he?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why does he use the name of a notorious football hooligan instead of his own name: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Last one

He claims he is concerned for the victims so why was he not in Coventry recently when 10 people were convicted for child sex crimes going back 30 years?

Simple - the perpetrators were white, it doesn't suit his agenda to highlight white part of - he's a racist scumbag cultivating a worrying cult of personality.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?"

So why does he not do this outside the trials of the hundreds of white people being done for child abuse all the time?!?!? He doesn't care about the children this case affects, he only cares about his own publicity and stirring up more racial hatered!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

He also raises funds to further his cause by encouraging the public to finacially support him... why isn't part that money used to support the victims?

He doesn't care about the victims, just stirring up a shit storm.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial "

As a parent, I’d want to know that if my child was ever to suffer such an ordeal and was brave enough to report it and go through the tremendous pain involved in bringing their abusers to justice, that it wouldn’t all potentially come to nothing because of some vile, racist thug using my child’s abuse as a soap box for his hate speech.

And as a humanist, I’d want that for any child, not just my own.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some of you people are fucking clueless!!!

FREE TOMMY!!!!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Some of you people are fucking clueless!!!

FREE TOMMY!!!!! "

Yeah right! He's a pinball Wizard

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Some of you people are fucking clueless!!!

FREE TOMMY!!!!! "

You really need to educate yourself! He's a nuisance that doesn't know when to shut up and if he continues with his dramatic outbursts he will be enabling paedophiles to carry on walking the streets ........ he's just as bad as they are! A racist thug and children have had to witness his violent behaviour!! Do the poor children or parents of those children actually want him outside the court jeopardising the case ????

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"Some of you people are fucking clueless!!!

FREE TOMMY!!!!! "

Clearly we're the clueless ones

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"So the snow flakes has no answer , so uses bad language and gets angry , I rest my case lol"

Er you were the first to start calling people names, claiming you can't educate pork!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?"

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This is nonsense. You are not entitled to disrupt a trial. Tommy Robinson was breaching the peace and his arrest is right and proper."

Some people have no clue. You are correct and he was warned that he would face arrest after his last trial, but he clearly wants to be seen as a martyr by people who are only interested in headlines

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Now, take Sir Francis Drake; the Spanish all despise him

But to the British he's a hero and they idolize him

It's how you look at buccaneers that makes them bad or good

And I see us as members of a noble brotherhood!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Is this what fb is like?"

Depends who your friends and family are.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ynetaurusMan
over a year ago

Newcastle

If there is a demo it should start at Buckingham palace as the queen during her coronation speech had to recite the magna carte which mentions freedom of speech and her DUTY to uphold it!!!The

arrest was only the first move in a game of chess the government know there will be a backlash{ But how big?] and they will then be able to impose even more draconian measures,...See Eric Arther Blair he forseen this situation many many moons ago..Fiction becomes fact

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"the public have a right to no the media wont cover it I think tommy Robison is doing a good job "

I am sorry..... but actions have consequences!

he knew he was on thin ice with his suspended sentence.. he pushed the line! maybe he thought he was above the law, he isn't!!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tommy Robinson is more dangerous than any of the shit he preaches about. The man wants lobotomising!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *illy_the_tvTV/TS
over a year ago

hoorn, Netherlands

"If there is a demo it should start at Buckingham palace as the queen during her coronation speech had to recite the magna carte which mentions freedom of speech and her DUTY to uphold it!!!The

Yeah,I'm sure the arrest of one bigot breaking the rules of his suspended sentence will lead to us all being oppressed. Take off your tin foil hat

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

Didn't realise Baldrick was such an anarchist!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

"If there is a demo it should start at Buckingham palace as the queen during her coronation speech had to recite the magna carte which mentions freedom of speech and her DUTY to uphold it!!!The

Yeah,I'm sure the arrest of one bigot breaking the rules of his suspended sentence will lead to us all being oppressed. Take off your tin foil hat"

you’re quite funny you.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *issmehardyMan
over a year ago

blackpool

can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan
over a year ago

Den of Iniquity

18 Months he's got

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

tommy hilfieger smells nicer

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tockport_slutWoman
over a year ago

Stockport

"now that freedom of speech has gone does that mean there is no speakers corner now ???"

freedom of speech does not come with freedom of consequences

He broke the terms of his suspended sentence.

So him being banged up is perfectly reasonable.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today "

nope..... he breached the terms of his PREVIOUS sentence....

if it had been this case alone i might have seen some of the faux outrage.. but he was lucky to escape jail time last time... and he tried pushing his luck again!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some people on here need to google the durnig kreuger effect. Not only is TOMMEH a prime example of this particular psychological phenomenon, his followers are the poster boys. I can only hope he shuts the fuck up while inside.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Didn't realise Baldrick was such an anarchist!

Aye, he fucked up his cunning plan on this occasion!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *illy_the_tvTV/TS
over a year ago

hoorn, Netherlands

"If there is a demo it should start at Buckingham palace as the queen during her coronation speech had to recite the magna carte which mentions freedom of speech and her DUTY to uphold it!!!The

Yeah,I'm sure the arrest of one bigot breaking the rules of his suspended sentence will lead to us all being oppressed. Take off your tin foil hat

you’re quite funny you.

At least someones noticed

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

i do wonder how many of the people screaming and proclaiming his innocence actually realise that HE pleaded guilty and admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.....

also the other irony is that we only know this now and the guilty plea and the sentence given because journalists fought a legal order saying it could not be reported until after the trial.....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ingdiscreetMan
over a year ago

Bournemouth

"Is he the guy who makes orange juice for tennis players?"

I lol'd probably more than I should have to this ??????

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"How is it racist reporting on a trial,that involved children ?

He also raises funds to further his cause by encouraging the public to finacially support him... why isn't part that money used to support the victims?

He doesn't care about the victims, just stirring up a shit storm."

There is also a go fund me account set up to raise money for a legal team to mount a defence & fight his arrest - except there is no defence, the suspension of his sentence has been breached & he will serve the sentence for something he has already been found guilty of ... so he’s also fraudulently collecting money from his supporters who are too daft to know they are being fleeced by a conman

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

"
think your find that he was arrested for breach of the peace and he was reading from the Huddersfield examiner that had all the info and the ongoing trial was having its verdict read out the day. Fact

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"i do wonder how many of the people screaming and proclaiming his innocence actually realise that HE pleaded guilty and admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.....

also the other irony is that we only know this now and the guilty plea and the sentence given because journalists fought a legal order saying it could not be reported until after the trial....."

His supporters don’t care what he’s done - you can’t educate the wilfully ignorant

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

think your find that he was arrested for breach of the peace and he was reading from the Huddersfield examiner that had all the info and the ongoing trial was having its verdict read out the day. Fact"

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

Fact.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial "

No. I'd rather he kept fucking quiet and not risk a mistrial and the accused going free.

Why the fuck are the bnp so thick

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

he may have been originally arrested for breach.... he was then charged with contempt... and he pleaded guilty!!!

so you can scream "innocent" as much as you like... in court he pleaded guilty!!! unless you are saying he is not smart enough to know the legal system which i wouldn't buy since he was charge with the same offence and pleaded guilty to the same offence before only a few months ago... and in summing up of that case, that judge explicitly told him not to do the same thing again....

so unless the defense you want to mount is "amnesia"..... i think it is a stretch!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

"Are you taking the piss

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

He knew the score. Regardless of what you think of the case under trial it is a fundamental tenet of English Law that people are innocent until proven guilty. Tommy Robinson could well have prejudiced the case (potentially leading to it's dismissal and the accused walking free).so would you have preferred it kept in the dark or in public I no as a parent I want to no and ok as you say he broke the law lets see the outcome of the trial

No. I'd rather he kept fucking quiet and not risk a mistrial and the accused going free.

Why the fuck are the bnp so thick "

It’s a requirement for entry

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

Fact."
has anyone actually seen the live Facebook video because there’s no incitement and there’s no breach of the peace, he was arrested, changed and sentenced in 2 hrs I don’t care who you are or what you’ve done, 2 hrs is not justice and am sorry if you all think he was in the wrong about reporting on facts about people abusing kids on the day of the verdict.. what’s this world coming to

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reading threads like these makes me despair of being 'British' at times.

However the voices of integrity and those that value all people as equals do give me some hope for the future of my children in this country.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home. "

And shockingly, they’re also allowed to see the Internet, read papers & access social media ... therefore his actions can potentially prejudice the jury, leading to a mistrial & a guilty party going free. The defence team can claim the jury are not impartial and amistrial sees their clients walk free. That’s what he wants.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today

nope..... he breached the terms of his PREVIOUS sentence....

if it had been this case alone i might have seen some of the faux outrage.. but he was lucky to escape jail time last time... and he tried pushing his luck again!"

Yes if your belief is strong in what you believe in you are prepared to suffer the consequences. I have a question you have room A which is full of Pakistani Muslim men laughing a joking about grooming and having sex with children. Or room B full of Tommy supports which one would you choose. Got to pick one ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

Fact. has anyone actually seen the live Facebook video because there’s no incitement and there’s no breach of the peace, he was arrested, changed and sentenced in 2 hrs I don’t care who you are or what you’ve done, 2 hrs is not justice and am sorry if you all think he was in the wrong about reporting on facts about people abusing kids on the day of the verdict.. what’s this world coming to "

The ‘facts’ hadn’t yet been determined. That’s what was happening inside the court. And his actions were jeopardising justice for those poor children.

What is this world coming to indeed...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

He was in a win-win position as far as he was concerned.

He could stir up trouble resulting in the casebeing thrown out and the guilty walking free....

thus causing outrage and and probably riots.

Or he could get arrested for breaching the peace (HE pleaded guilty of this) thus also breaching the terms of his suspended sentence, get himself jailed....

thus causing outrage and probably riots.

How anyone can look up to convicted thug, hooligan, racist, fraudster, multiple named hate peddler I don't know.

I guess his followers are just a few steps behind on the evolution scale.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville

"can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today

nope..... he breached the terms of his PREVIOUS sentence....

if it had been this case alone i might have seen some of the faux outrage.. but he was lucky to escape jail time last time... and he tried pushing his luck again!

Why do Tommy’s supporters think his opponents condone child abuse

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him."
how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

He was under a suspended sentence for the same thing - which he pleaded guilty to. As soon as you breach your suspension, you are recalled to prison to serve his original sentence, so yes - this IS justice.

He wasn’t ‘reporting facts’ as he is not a member of the affiliated press. If he wants to talk publically about it after the trial, great. Fill your boots. But before the trial is a breach of reporting restrictions & prejudicial - which could give the defence a technical mistrial. Which is the reason for the reporting restrictions in the first place.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

Convicted convict, fraudster, rasist. He should get a seat in the House of Lords then it full for them

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

[Removed by poster at 29/05/18 15:00:50]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today

nope..... he breached the terms of his PREVIOUS sentence....

if it had been this case alone i might have seen some of the faux outrage.. but he was lucky to escape jail time last time... and he tried pushing his luck again!

I don't think i will... thank you...

wow..... having been "locked in" an irish pub on recommendation of the police because there were a lot of "tommy's" outside on one of their demo's chanting lots of not nice things about all and sundry.... that might be a harder decision than you think...

but seriously... if you want to make tommy robinson the martyr you want to cross the line for, have at it....

if i'd escape jail time the first time round, and were told if you did the same thing again then don't expect the same result!. and then you go and do the same thing again, and plead guilty to the same thing again...... and then you expect the same result.... then you are a prize idiot!!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"can see some dreadful repercussions in the wake of this.Where is our freedom of press and freedom of speech going in Briton today

nope..... he breached the terms of his PREVIOUS sentence....

if it had been this case alone i might have seen some of the faux outrage.. but he was lucky to escape jail time last time... and he tried pushing his luck again!

Either... I would want to do my uttmost to educate the occupants of the room.

You make an interesting point though.

Not every Pakistani Muslim man is a paedophile, groomer or sex trafficker.

However, every Tommy Robinson supporter is happy to be incited into fascist behaviour.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ulfilthmentMan
over a year ago

Just around the corner

As I understand it:

Commented on cases sub judice:

Got a suspended sentence;

Did it again;

Got canned instantly as per terms of suspended sentence.

He’s only got himself to blame.

If he doesn’t like the laws of this country, perhaps he should take his own advice and bugger off to somewhere he prefers.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims "

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Radicals of any faction are purveyors of hatred. People like Robinson & the Britain First idiots make young, ordinary British Muslims feel isolated & targeted. They create mistrust within schools, communities & this then turns ordinary kids into radicals - not just Muslim kids, but white kids too.

Robinson is one of the best recruitment tools Islamic State have at their disposal. They tell scared young kids who are bullied by supporters of the EDL ‘this is what they think of you’ & between both sides they create a new generation of radical Muslims, fascists, neo-nazi’s, nationalists, socialists etc ...as everyone starts to feel like they have to fight each other to survive. What they are really scared of is a bogeyman. People like Robinson & Golding who start a rumour, create some friction, light the touchpaper & then run off to leave a war behind them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

He’s also got a gofundme page set up to raise mo ey for his defence. What defence? The defence for the crime you’re in prison for, which you plead guilty to? Been & gone, so why is he fraudulently raising money for it?! "
2 Things here, how do you know he pleaded guilty when there’s a press black out and he was reading out from a national newspaper that had reported the facts it’s no different toy if you stood out side and read out to your phone the report.. I don’t support tommy it’s the injustice of what has happened to a man and then the government suppressing the press .. freedom of speech folks is being taken away from us all and when it go’s down the shitter you all wonder why

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *imal75Man
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

Let's not let silly things like the law get in the way of this outrage!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *imal75Man
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court over a gang assault (sic by poster) case heard in Canterbury last year.

Judge Heather Norton handed him a three months imprisonment in May last year but suspended it for 18 months on the condition he did not commit further offences.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Mmm quote from Baroness Warsi.

Some British Muslims do not accept or embrace the country in which they live, instead adhering to violent perversions of Islam. That, in turn, helps open a gulf of understanding between British Muslims and their fellow citizens. Rightly or not, some people feel their Muslim neighbours are not fully part of British society.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Yes, that’s actually what I said, isn’t it?!

“Radicals of any faction are purveyors of hatred.”

Totally sounds like I’m supporting Muslim radicals.

And it’s ‘paedo’ not ‘pedo’ - unless you’re American?

All radicals are the problem. But this thread is not about Abu Hamza, it’s about Tommy Robinson.

I believe the point when EDL & BF supporters resort to the ‘so you’re supporting paedos’ argument is when they have run out of credible arguments but won’t concede the point.

Maybe you should just leave it there!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Mmm quote from Baroness Warsi.

Some British people aren’t even fully part of British society.... respectful of the laws for example

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Mmm quote from Baroness Warsi.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either! "

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Mmm quote from Baroness Warsi.

Some British people aren’t even fully part of British society.... respectful of the laws for example

"
that’s right it don’t matter if you black or white if your guilty time to pay the price and yes tommy took the chance and the police knew he would plus the pedo gangs probably had mps on there books any way

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Explain how he can influance a jury from out side a court?

Jurers don't live inside the court for the duration of a trial you know! They have to leave the courtroom to go home.

No justice for the victims but Tommy & his band of fascist thugs get to protest again, claiming British justice is being soft on Muslims, causing further hatred & racism in society. No one wins but him.how can there be a miss trial on the day of the verdict and you find that the radical Muslims not the ones that are awesome to know and be friends with but the radical ones are causing hatred and racism in society but it’s a no no when anyone and I mean anyone says something that’s the injustice to the victims

The jury are not sequestered!!

I’m not defending radical Muslims. You, however are defending a radical fascist.

Mmm quote from Baroness Warsi.

Some British people aren’t even fully part of British society.... respectful of the laws for example

that’s right it don’t matter if you black or white if your guilty time to pay the price and yes tommy took the chance and the police knew he would plus the pedo gangs probably had mps on there books any way "

When you say Tommy took the chance, what you mean is he broke the law.

He also jeopardised the justice that these children deserve.

I’m glad he was arrested

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rladytoyMan
over a year ago

bournemouth

A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Islam is not a fucking race ! And he was making the names of disgusting peadophiles known because your goverment, with the backing of idiots like this are hiding them from you. Wake the fuck up silly silly people .

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society"

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"
you can’t disagree with that ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"

Where was he when white paedophile rings were being tried?

What has he done to support 'our women' the victims of these crimes?

Don't fool yourself he is doing any of this for anyone but himself.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"

Well said.

I know many people that work for local authority social services. Really you would not believe the scale of grooming gangs in the UK. Every county in the UK has cases, which the authorities and media cover up. Been going on for years.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"

To clarify, as a number of people seem to find this difficult to get their head around, I’m 100% against child abuse AND 100% against racism and hatred.

This isn’t an either or

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was."

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *layer oneMan
over a year ago

mirfield

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween

To clarify, as a number of people seem to find this difficult to get their head around, I’m 100% against child abuse AND 100% against racism and hatred.

This isn’t an either or

"
dito but ill probably get some shit my way .. all well

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so."

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?"

If its proven that she said it of course she should! What a silly question.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

https://metro.co.uk/2017/08/23/mp-shares-tweet-saying-abuse-victims-should-shut-their-mouths-for-good-of-diversity-6872181/

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?"

If that’s what she said, yes! Absolutely!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"https://metro.co.uk/2017/08/23/mp-shares-tweet-saying-abuse-victims-should-shut-their-mouths-for-good-of-diversity-6872181/"

Whilst she has tried to explain that it was a 'mistake' to retweet the post from a clearly satirical / fake Owen Jones account, it was visible for eight minutes and in this time it would have caused a significant amount of offence and distress. It was an ill thought retweet and absolutely she should resign. Or be sacked.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?

If that’s what she said, yes! Absolutely!"

Mmm but she still MP of Bradford never made accountable for her remarks. But she is a Pakistani Muslim MP so may be thats why she still in office eh.

I thought a rascist remark were against the Law in UK obviously not.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"https://metro.co.uk/2017/08/23/mp-shares-tweet-saying-abuse-victims-should-shut-their-mouths-for-good-of-diversity-6872181/

And what about her rasict remarks to Jews.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?

If its proven that she said it of course she should! What a silly question."

Silly question thats the whole point one law of one and one law for another.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"

Is that all paedophiles or just the non white ones?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?

If its proven that she said it of course she should! What a silly question.

Silly question thats the whole point one law of one and one law for another. "

Naz Shah deserves to be fired. Get behind that.

However she is not stiring up the entire country with her fascist propaganda.

Really not the same.

And really not one rule for one... she wasn't in breach of a previously suspended sentence.

Go take you moral outrage and campaign to have her out, don't be fooled that Robinson is doing all this for your freedom of speech.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *enshermanMan
over a year ago

Durham

"I feel that violent white 'british' non muslims are not part of society either!

Correct.

Radicals of any faction are nothing more than purveyors of hate ... and have no place in any decent society

Its doesn't and democracy and freedom of speach are the right and liberty of every human being,or at less it was.

The freedom of speech and expression come with responsibilities to uphold the law, not incite hatred, fear or fascism and consequences for doing so.

So do you think Naz Shah should be strip of her office as MP for Bradford for say groomed white children should shut theirs mouths ?

If its proven that she said it of course she should! What a silly question.

Silly question thats the whole point one law of one and one law for another.

Naz Shah deserves to be fired. Get behind that.

However she is not stiring up the entire country with her fascist propaganda.

Really not the same.

And really not one rule for one... she wasn't in breach of a previously suspended sentence.

Go take you moral outrage and campaign to have her out, don't be fooled that Robinson is doing all this for your freedom of speech."

I have no moral outrage and believe me I've tried to get her out of office. You just sit on your fence and believe the worlds a wonderful place

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"A racist thug ? Disrupting a trial ?? Are u for real ?

Its simple if you are not 100% against peados then you are with them. Theres no inbetween"

Utter utter bollocks

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"But this topic wont last long on here as free speak is nolong allowed in the UK.

and by "free speech" you mean that he admitted committing contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

cool!!!!!!!

you do wonder if some of the people screaming faux outrage actually really have any clue at all.....

He was arrested for incitement & breach of the peace. He’s under a suspended sentence for doing this previously so he knew he’d be jailed for it.

He pleaded guilty!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West

Shame. I quite liked Time Team

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tommy and his crew may have some worthwhile points to make but anybody with a modicum of intellugence knows what the devisive prick's real agenda is.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Only allowed links please

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"Only allowed links please"

Sorry x

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inkerbell67Woman
over a year ago

Clacton on sea essex

Never heard of this bloke lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"Only allowed links please

Sorry x "

i knew that is the case, but i think there "could" have been a little flexability because it is a brilliant explanation in simple terms of the whole situation (and actually debunks a lot of what his supporters here have been saying)

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tommy Robinson is a cock and not in a good way

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Only allowed links please

Sorry x

The the next person who thinks their links should have been allowed flexibility will want the same, which will end up lots of links on the forum that are not allowed ...I am not sure this will work.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can the link be pm'd? I'd like to see it.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Yeah it should go through on a PM...or tell people what word to google for the link to come up?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He was outside the court reading out the name's he thought we're being prosecuted, some of the name's he mentioned wasn't even involved in the trial.

Now because of his live video, the wrongly accused name's he mentioned and some of the comments on the video means there might have to be a retrial, which can result in the guilty being let off.

He's done more damage than good.

I agree with some of the work he's done (not including the EDL) trying to uncover paedophile rings and questioning the people in the cover up. But on this occasion he should have kept his mouth shut

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *riefcase_WankerMan
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

"Robinson is one of the best recruitment tools Islamic State have at their disposal. They tell scared young kids who are bullied by supporters of the EDL ‘this is what they think of you’ & between both sides they create a new generation of radical Muslims, fascists, neo-nazi’s, nationalists, socialists etc ...as everyone starts to feel like they have to fight each other to survive. What they are really scared of is a bogeyman. People like Robinson & Golding who start a rumour, create some friction, light the touchpaper & then run off to leave a war behind them."

I think this is one of the most salient posts in this thread.

I took the time, years ago, to watch his Oxford Union address, and I have to confess I was taken aback by the manner in which he presented his argument - it was considered, nuanced and dare I say it - largely valid. I found myself surprised to be agreeing with him, as he made points about Wahhabism.

So much so, I followed him on Twitter, where he reverted to type, race-baiting and inciting hatred.

I tried to make this very point to him on a number of occasions - that it was ironic that he took essentially the same stance as the people he purported to be opposing; that the extreme interpretation of the Qur'an was the only 'true' Islam, that there could never be peaceful coexistence, and that the only option was war. He was acting as the greatest poster boy for ISIS at al that they could possibly hope for...

Strangely, he never replied...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately