FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Conrad Murray

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Found Guilty of Michael Jackson all 12 jurors found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emmefataleWoman
over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville


"Found Guilty of Michael Jackson all 12 jurors found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter"
right well thats a load off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *umpkinMan
over a year ago

near the sounds of the wimborne quarter jack!

I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....

Jacko could well have injected himself

The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......

The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....

etc. etc.

Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

They said during the trial that Jackson had a deep fear of needles.....so unlikely he would have injected himself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

there will be a book and a film made of the trial, more bloody waste of time.

who cares at the end of the day without being nasty.

Only he knows if he did or didn't do it, my _iew he did but not by choice, jacko asked him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....

Jacko could well have injected himself

The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......

The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....

etc. etc.

Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either "

It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right.

One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery.

If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty.

If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin!

A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It was a foregone conclusion that he'd be found guilty regardless of his guilt or blame.

After all, someone has to shoulder the blame for Jackos demise don't they ........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

all in all... very sad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Malicious? no gross stupidity on both the Drs and Michaels side yes

Must be the saddest case Ive ever heard and i feel for both the families and to some extent the Dr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unky monkeyMan
over a year ago

in the night garden

He was just a glorified drug dealer really. Pandering to Jackson's whims, his professional ethics disintegrating as he chased after Jackson's cash.

Apparently the prison guards keep moon walking past him in his cell.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

Michael was a cash cow to many, albeit a very vulnerable one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod
over a year ago

I agree the whole thing is very sad and has been turned into a complete circus

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm wondering if they have already cast the Bo Selecta mask for him !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onnoisseur100Man
over a year ago

Woking-ish

Michael is apparently looking down on (and after) his family now! according to his sister! she didn't care too much for him when he was alive, shame really!

oh and apparently his death was a conspiracy as well......also according to the same sister....

Only in American!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lack_BoltMan
over a year ago

oxford


"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....

Jacko could well have injected himself

The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......

The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....

etc. etc.

Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either

It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right.

One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery.

If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty.

If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin!

A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911 "

Agreed! I think you've highlighted the most salient points. Hiwever what's sad about all of this is the whole media circus element to it, and the typical lazy approach of news journalists to reduce everything to pantomime characters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *rummpsMan
over a year ago

thanet


"It was a foregone conclusion that he'd be found guilty regardless of his guilt or blame.

After all, someone has to shoulder the blame for Jackos demise don't they ........ "

Totally agree. The whole thing has been a charade.

The one thing that sticks in my mind is why would you kill a golden egg laying goose?

_rummps x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top