Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Found Guilty of Michael Jackson all 12 jurors found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter" right well thats a load off | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that .... Jacko could well have injected himself The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ...... The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top ..... etc. etc. Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either " It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right. One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery. If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty. If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin! A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that .... Jacko could well have injected himself The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ...... The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top ..... etc. etc. Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right. One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery. If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty. If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin! A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911 " Agreed! I think you've highlighted the most salient points. Hiwever what's sad about all of this is the whole media circus element to it, and the typical lazy approach of news journalists to reduce everything to pantomime characters. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was a foregone conclusion that he'd be found guilty regardless of his guilt or blame. After all, someone has to shoulder the blame for Jackos demise don't they ........ " Totally agree. The whole thing has been a charade. The one thing that sticks in my mind is why would you kill a golden egg laying goose? _rummps x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |