FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Most fabbed pic

Jump to newest
 

By *ools and the brain OP   Couple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

OK so I'm confused,we have had pic's refused before due to people being in the background, yet the current most fabbed pic has about four people two of whom you can clearly see face's .it has over 4k fabs.

This is NOT a dig at the op.

But confusion as regards the rules?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can't see faces? The two that could possibly been seen have been blurred?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

Have just looked and none of the people in the background are recognisable - in fact two of the faces have been blurred out - and think that's the distinction that is made i.e. are people in the background recognisable

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"OK so I'm confused,we have had pic's refused before due to people being in the background, yet the current most fabbed pic has about four people two of whom you can clearly see face's .it has over 4k fabs.

This is NOT a dig at the op.

But confusion as regards the rules?"

Your CSI software must be way better than mine, I can't make out what the other people's faces look like

But seriously: I think the rules are that identifiable faces have to be obscured somehow unless it's the person or people from the profile.

C

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brain OP   Couple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.


"Have just looked and none of the people in the background are recognisable - in fact two of the faces have been blurred out - and think that's the distinction that is made i.e. are people in the background recognisable"

So did we blur them but got told that as they hadn't consented even though blurred it was declined.

This was a couple of years ago mind, things may be different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit


"Have just looked and none of the people in the background are recognisable - in fact two of the faces have been blurred out - and think that's the distinction that is made i.e. are people in the background recognisable

So did we blur them but got told that as they hadn't consented even though blurred it was declined.

This was a couple of years ago mind, things may be different.

"

I think it comes very much down to the discretion of the person vetting the pics - if however you ever feel a pic has been wrongly rejected you can resubmit with an explanation I believe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top