FabSwingers.com forum: Brain teaser...

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

The battle of English & mathematics...

QUEATION:

1 Rabbit saw 6 Elephants while going to the river. Every Elephant saw 2 Monkeys going towards the river. Every Monkey had 1 Parrot in their hands.

How many Animals were going towards the river?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Three animals and two birds.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

5, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They all could have been going to the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

I love it.... all wrong.x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 20:47:37]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

1 rabbit. 12 monkeys. 24 parrots. If they elephants were going the other way.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Still everyone wrong..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

13 and 12 parrots

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 20:47:11]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iscean MaleMan
over a year ago

Darlaston

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 20:46:51]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope 2 monkeys, parrots are birds

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iscean MaleMan
over a year ago

Darlaston

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

1 r.

6(e) ×2m= 12m

12m x2 p=24p

37?

There's a catch there somewhere isn't there

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Nope 2 monkeys, parrots are birds "

6 elephants each saw two monkeys. Were they the same 2 monkeys or different ones?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"1 r.

6(e) ×2m= 12m

12m x2 p=24p

37?

There's a catch there somewhere isn't there

Maybe

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let’s go through the question again.

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

Every elephant saw 2 monkeys going towards the river. – This is the tricky part, from the sentence it seems to imply each of the 6 elephants saw 2 monkeys going towards the river, hence logically will be 6 x 2 = 12 animals (monkeys) going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

3, animals

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Still everyone wrong..

Wtf kinda sick game is this ? .....LOL

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"1 rabbit. 12 monkeys. 24 parrots. If they elephants were going the other way. "

Why 12 monkeys? Six elephants could all have seen the same two monkeys.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"1 rabbit. 12 monkeys. 24 parrots. If they elephants were going the other way.

Why 12 monkeys? Six elephants could all have seen the same two monkeys.

Yes. I wrote that just above you. The writing is ambiguous.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen

"1 rabbit. 12 monkeys. 24 parrots. If they elephants were going the other way.

Why 12 monkeys? Six elephants could all have seen the same two monkeys.

You're right!

Answer 5

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *essandpatCouple
over a year ago

chester

19 x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

None. There was no river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong.."

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen

"1 rabbit. 12 monkeys. 24 parrots. If they elephants were going the other way.

Why 12 monkeys? Six elephants could all have seen the same two monkeys.

You're right!

Answer 5

Or 7 if each monkey was holding a parrot in each hand

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys. "

Hmm so what's your answer..?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?"

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

5 is not the answer...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right. "

If it is not 5 then explain....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"5 is not the answer...

Then go on explain...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain.... "

Were the elephants going to the river?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river? "

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"5 is not the answer...

Then go on explain... "

It is 5.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

Plus 2 parrots and the rabbit equals 5.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

I won't explain just yet...

But I did pm you a clue, it took me a little while to figure out

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let’s go through the question again.

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ok you have written every elephants !! Haha got it now 6×12 !

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Let’s go through the question again.

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Nearly

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Let’s go through the question again.

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Nearly

And ?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Ok you have written every elephants !! Haha got it now 6×12 ! "

Hahaha nope...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

you just gotta read the question the answer is in the wording of it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:01:20]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close"

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Let’s go through the question again.

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Nearly

And ?"

I'm having too much fun to give answer.. but promise it's not 5.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4"

That's it.....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If this turns out to be some bullshit like not treating the parrots as animals but birds them imma lose it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *essandpatCouple
over a year ago

chester

11 x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The number of animals going towards river is 5 and they are 1 Rabbit, 2 Monkeys and 2 Parrots.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

My fab stock must surely rise after this display of intellect!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

So why was one wrong?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

My fab stock must surely rise after this display of intellect!

Haha so* off haha thats the same !! But fair doz !!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:07:55]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

When do we get the answer to this English and Mathematics Queation?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

My fab stock must surely rise after this display of intellect!

Ditto

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uicy72Woman
over a year ago

North Colchester

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:08:58]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Actually just read the question, 1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:11:02]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

So why was one wrong?

He's saying the one going to the river was not going towards it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Actually just read the question, 1"

Nope..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

So why was one wrong?

He's saying the one going to the river was not going towards it.

Spot on.x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:12:33]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Not necessarily...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

Your wrong..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:15:13]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Google has the answer

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

6 only

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *essandpatCouple
over a year ago

chester

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Nearly

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

Your wrong.."

How do you go to something without going towards it?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m mistaken reread and yeah 5. My fault didn’t read it right.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

[Removed by poster at 05/04/18 21:17:11]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event ."

A river is not an event.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event .

A river is not an event. "

It was an example..

Plus who knows what was going on at that river ...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eesideMan
over a year ago

margate sumwear by the sea

"The battle of English & mathematics...

QUEATION:

1 Rabbit saw 6 Elephants while going to the river. Every Elephant saw 2 Monkeys going towards the river. Every Monkey had 1 Parrot in their hands.

How many Animals were going towards the river?

Ok so....

1 rabbit going to river.

Rabbit sees 6 elephants

Every Elephant saw 2 Monkeys going towards the river.

Dus not say Every industrial Elephant sor 2 different monkeys

So 2 monkeys going towards the river.

Every Monkey had 1 Parrot in their hands

2+2 going towards the river.

How many Animals were going towards the river?

Not to the river. !!

Arnsar is 4 animals going towards the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So OP what do you feel the answer is?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *essandpatCouple
over a year ago

chester

It's 4 x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event .

A river is not an event.

It was an example..

Plus who knows what was going on at that river ...

Intending to attending the event is commitment towards.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event .

A river is not an event.

It was an example..

Plus who knows what was going on at that river ...

Intending to attending the event is commitment towards.

Wow.. just .. wow

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fuck off...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Doh !! Blonde moment, so after re reading this,its actually 4 animals heading towards the river,2 monkeys with a parrot each in their hands.

Mrs x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

Going to (current tense) versus Going to (future tense)

I’m at be severely underestimating a rabbit here, but I’d always felt that they had little capacity for planning

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"Doh !! Blonde moment, so after re reading this,its actually 4 animals heading towards the river,2 monkeys with a parrot each in their hands.

Mrs x"

Or six, if they're carrying a parrot in each hand. Or, seven if you accept that the rabbit is moving towards something that happens to be the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Fuck off..."

I totally second this fuck off

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Ahhh feck knows then lol I'm sticking to my original answer...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Doh !! Blonde moment, so after re reading this,its actually 4 animals heading towards the river,2 monkeys with a parrot each in their hands.

Mrs x

Or six, if they're carrying a parrot in each hand. Or, seven if you accept that the rabbit is moving towards something that happens to be the river.

Or none, because the river doesn't exist.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

"3"

Up, got it in one.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"If you're going to something you have to be going towards it.

That's my understanding of motion towards = going to.

It's a play of words...

Example... I might say im going to an event as in attending an event... not actually physically walking to a event .

A river is not an event.

It was an example..

Plus who knows what was going on at that river ...

Intending to attending the event is commitment towards.

And to go to it one has to walk towards it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Yes but all the white socks coukd be at the bottom so it would be 28 lol..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

I'm loving this thread...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"Doh !! Blonde moment, so after re reading this,its actually 4 animals heading towards the river,2 monkeys with a parrot each in their hands.

Mrs x

Or six, if they're carrying a parrot in each hand. Or, seven if you accept that the rabbit is moving towards something that happens to be the river.

Or none, because the river doesn't exist. "

Even if "river" is the name of the event?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What's a queation?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Fuck off...

I totally second this fuck off

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Doh !! Blonde moment, so after re reading this,its actually 4 animals heading towards the river,2 monkeys with a parrot each in their hands.

Mrs x"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Yes but all the white socks coukd be at the bottom so it would be 28 lol.. "

Doesn’t matter which colour, just a pair of the same colour.

Actually they are not colours, just shades. So need to put my brain in gear.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"What's a queation? "

I assumed it's a modern portmanteau word for question and equation. I could be wrong as I don't really speak modern* and yoof.

*See my understanding of "towards" above.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but opinions other than 5 are wrong

I lime it but wrong..

It’s an old trick question

There’s 1 rabbit

2 monkeys

2 parrots

The number of elephants is irrelevant

10,000 elephants could of seen 2 monkeys going to the river, it’s still only 2 monkeys.

Hmm so what's your answer..?

5 as stated above ! Dude if you do a brain tease at leadt get your answer right.

If it is not 5 then explain....

Were the elephants going to the river?

Nope, that’s the point of this question, the number of elephants is irrelevant. It’s asking how many animals we’re going to the river. The elephants weren’t. But they saw two monkeys going.

You're so close

Rabbit is going to the river, not towards it. 4

That's it.....

No it's not the answer is 5. Google it. Simple and clear. It's been explained to you a number of times. How can you get the wrong answer to your own question?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The aeroplane on the treadmill question is the best one, I've seen some wars on forums over that

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Yes but all the white socks coukd be at the bottom so it would be 28 lol..

Doesn’t matter which colour, just a pair of the same colour.

Actually they are not colours, just shades. So need to put my brain in gear."

To be fair I'm also chatting shit...your making sense and I'm not paying attention. Can I have a clue lol Xx is it 3 monkeys carrying and elephant?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Bit like the question: if you had 27 black socks: and 13 white socks in a bag.

How many socks would you need to pull our (eyes closed) to ensure you had a pair?

Wow got got that so wrong, you have me totally there.

I should have said, ‘off the same colour’

Hangs one head on shame....

Yes but all the white socks coukd be at the bottom so it would be 28 lol..

Doesn’t matter which colour, just a pair of the same colour.

Actually they are not colours, just shades. So need to put my brain in gear.

To be fair I'm also chatting shit...your making sense and I'm not paying attention. Can I have a clue lol Xx is it 3 monkeys carrying and elephant?

Lmfao

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol

"What's a queation?

I assumed it's a modern portmanteau word for question and equation. I could be wrong as I don't really speak modern* and yoof.

*See my understanding of "towards" above.

We bastardise the 'where's it to?' in this neck of the woods yet I still contextualised that it meant towards - I mean, you can't get to somewhere without heading in its actual direction. Unless the rabbit was hopping backwards, which would frankly be silly.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Six elephants are going to the river, everyone else is seen but no direction is implied.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

What sort of elephants are they? If they're Indian then I think that rabbit is a red herring.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

"What's a queation?

I assumed it's a modern portmanteau word for question and equation. I could be wrong as I don't really speak modern* and yoof.

*See my understanding of "towards" above.

Actually, it is the verb “to be” reference, Korbkzki, Borman.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"What's a queation?

I assumed it's a modern portmanteau word for question and equation. I could be wrong as I don't really speak modern* and yoof.

*See my understanding of "towards" above.

It's still towards, even hopping backwards, if that wabbit is going to the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who gives a shit?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"Who gives a shit?"

Everyone, I hope! Severe constipation is baaaad.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *airyfatmanMan
over a year ago

by 'ere

It says “queation” not question so nobody should even be answering......

And the answer is 4 but not for the reason of the rabbit going to and not towards.

Every monkey holds one parrot in their hands - one parrot held by every monkey. Therefore you have 1 rabbit going to the river (which is the same as towards the river as to head to the river you have to go towards it) and 2 monkeys holding 1 parrot which is 4

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

"Who gives a shit?"

You? Eluding to your preference

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eesideMan
over a year ago

margate sumwear by the sea

Rabbit is going to the river.

It don't say wear on the jurney the rabbit is.

The rabbit mite be 10 miles away still.

Elephants see monkeys going towards the river.

This may be miles from the river. With roads going summer els future down.

As far as the elephants are concerned the monkeys are going towards the river cos that's the way thay are hedding.

It's like me in margate saying i sor 2 monkeys going towards London even thow thay may as well be going to Canterbury. But London is in the same direction.

Hope this clears it up for everyone.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Who gives a shit?

Everyone, I hope! Severe constipation is baaaad. "

Lol.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"Rabbit is going to the river.

It don't say wear on the jurney the rabbit is.

The rabbit mite be 10 miles away still.

Elephants see monkeys going towards the river.

This may be miles from the river. With roads going summer els future down.

As far as the elephants are concerned the monkeys are going towards the river cos that's the way thay are hedding.

It's like me in margate saying i sor 2 monkeys going towards London even thow thay may as well be going to Canterbury. But London is in the same direction.

Hope this clears it up for everyone.

Lmao... thanks you...

But somehow people will still choose a site from goole.. believing it's Google itself who answered it ..haha

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *airyfatmanMan
over a year ago

by 'ere

"Rabbit is going to the river.

It don't say wear on the jurney the rabbit is.

The rabbit mite be 10 miles away still.

Elephants see monkeys going towards the river.

This may be miles from the river. With roads going summer els future down.

As far as the elephants are concerned the monkeys are going towards the river cos that's the way thay are hedding.

It's like me in margate saying i sor 2 monkeys going towards London even thow thay may as well be going to Canterbury. But London is in the same direction.

Hope this clears it up for everyone.

Lmao... thanks you...

But somehow people will still choose a site from goole.. believing it's Google itself who answered it ..haha "

But the rabbit is still going towards the river if he is going to be river. He’s hardly going to be heading away from it if he is going there

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"Rabbit is going to the river.

It don't say wear on the jurney the rabbit is.

The rabbit mite be 10 miles away still.

Elephants see monkeys going towards the river.

This may be miles from the river. With roads going summer els future down.

As far as the elephants are concerned the monkeys are going towards the river cos that's the way thay are hedding.

It's like me in margate saying i sor 2 monkeys going towards London even thow thay may as well be going to Canterbury. But London is in the same direction.

Hope this clears it up for everyone.

Lmao... thanks you...

But somehow people will still choose a site from goole.. believing it's Google itself who answered it ..haha

But the rabbit is still going towards the river if he is going to be river. He’s hardly going to be heading away from it if he is going there"

Exactly, even if the river isn't her/his final destination (as in London/Canterbury above) s/he is still going towards.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *essandpatCouple
over a year ago

chester

We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eesideMan
over a year ago

margate sumwear by the sea

"Rabbit is going to the river.

It don't say wear on the jurney the rabbit is.

The rabbit mite be 10 miles away still.

Elephants see monkeys going towards the river.

This may be miles from the river. With roads going summer els future down.

As far as the elephants are concerned the monkeys are going towards the river cos that's the way thay are hedding.

It's like me in margate saying i sor 2 monkeys going towards London even thow thay may as well be going to Canterbury. But London is in the same direction.

Hope this clears it up for everyone.

Lmao... thanks you...

But somehow people will still choose a site from goole.. believing it's Google itself who answered it ..haha

But the rabbit is still going towards the river if he is going to be river. He’s hardly going to be heading away from it if he is going there"

Yes.

But it wos allredey sed the rabbit wos going to the river.

And it don't say wen the elephants see the monkeys.

The rabbit cood have gon to the river and back agen before the elephants see the monkeys. Going towards the river

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x"

Amen..x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x"

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

In the words of Paul Hardcastle

N.n.n.n 19

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

Maybe not the ones that survive by licking the dew off the grass but I've watched enough David Attenborough to know that the river is the gathering point. It can be dangerous but they all want a bit of river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

I’m so over this riddle !! Just give the answer

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I assume the rabbit is an animal and not an Ann Summers purchase?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

I’m so over this riddle !! Just give the answer "

According to the OP

every elephant in the group ( no matter what size) saw 2 Monkeys " GOING towards the river".. ..

Each monkey had a parrot in their hands... =2

So the answer is 4

However according to google the answer is 5

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

What about the natural water springs, or simply... another river

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

What about the natural water springs, or simply... another river

That's why I used vicinity.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

I’m so over this riddle !! Just give the answer

According to the OP

every elephant in the group ( no matter what size) saw 2 Monkeys " GOING towards the river".. ..

Each monkey had a parrot in their hands... =2

So the answer is 4

However according to google the answer is 5

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river."

I love you so much....

It's not according to Google.. it's a reference / an answer posted from another site which Google found

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

What about the natural water springs, or simply... another river

That's why I used vicinity.

Hmmm yes/ no

But would another river be in the same vicinity?... elephants can go for miles you know

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

What about the natural water springs, or simply... another river

That's why I used vicinity.

Hmmm yes/ no

But would another river be in the same vicinity?... elephants can go for miles you know

How big is your vicinity? Vicinity - near a place. In this case, the river.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

"I assume the rabbit is an animal and not an Ann Summers purchase?"

Haha...maybe

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We all ready know the rabbit it going to the river but many animals are going towards it x

In fact, all the animals in the vicinity, not just those in the OP, would head towards the river at some point.

Maybe...maybe not

I’m so over this riddle !! Just give the answer

According to the OP

every elephant in the group ( no matter what size) saw 2 Monkeys " GOING towards the river".. ..

Each monkey had a parrot in their hands... =2

So the answer is 4

However according to google the answer is 5

1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river. – Hence, 1 animal (rabbit) is going towards the river.

However, the statement does not explicitly mention that “Every elephant saw 2 DIFFERENT monkeys…”, hence implicit rules apply and infer that the 2 monkeys are the same.

Hence, correct answer is that every elephant saw 2 monkeys, and by inference, the 2 monkeys are the same, hence there exists only 2 monkeys which are going towards the river !! ??

Finally, every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands. – Hence, 2 parrots are going towards the river.

So in total, 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots (5 animals) are going towards the river.

I love you so much....

It's not according to Google.. it's a reference / an answer posted from another site which Google found

OP please do not declare your love for me on a public site, I’m really not that nice!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it's time we put little fluffy to sleep and stop the arguing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think it's time we put little fluffy to sleep and stop the arguing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *airyfatmanMan
over a year ago

by 'ere

Well seeing as it says the battle of English vs maths then says “QUEATION” i don’t think there’s anything to answer

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tuntmuffin OP Man
over a year ago

BIRMINGHAM

Maybe...maybe not

I’m so over this riddle

I love you so much....

It's not according to Google.. it's a reference / an answer posted from another site which Google found

OP please do not declare your love for me on a public site, I’m really not that nice!

Precisely... treat them mean, keep them kean

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some doggers to wash the cum from their pants

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread