Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? " I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat." I agree with this.. Being treated like a piece of meat means something else entirely to me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. I agree with this.. Being treated like a piece of meat means something else entirely to me" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." Read from the bottom up , this says :- women do men's bidding. Be scared of his rejection, beware his wrath and retaliation. Tread gently on his ego. It's long discussed in here that it is not rude to not reply to messages. I don't agree that men treat women like meat either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. " *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. " Good point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. I agree with this.. Being treated like a piece of meat means something else entirely to me" And me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain " I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. " When I first made my single profile, I tried replying to each mail saying no thanks, being polite. It took days and guys still messaged assuming I was interested because I replied. I then deleted without reading if I knew from looking at their profile they aren't what I was looking for. I then tried replying again, a polite no thanks, to which men wouldn't quit, or I received obnoxious messages in response. This is what is off putting and why women often delete without replying. It's individual choice, there is no set guidelines on how to reply to the plethora of mail women receive. If you reply to every message with no abuse, that's great! That however, is not the case for many women and that should also be acknowledged, rather than making women out to be the problem. N x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. " To be fair, but it's not so much guys wanting fuck and go. (essentially that's what we want from guys) it's them having no bloody idea how to approach people. You know, the cock pics and explicit suggestions in a first message. That approach will very rarely work with women or couples and you would think that men would realise that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I quite like basting breasts to be fair " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact that so many messages are deleted or not replied to is what makes people act in the way they do. Realistically if you are already aware that the bulk of the polite messages you send will not get a response (and with a profile as shit as mine it’s hardly surprising), it as a bloke, often feels like you’re treated like a piece of shit as much as a piece of meat. Now I don’t feel as though I am entitled to demand a response every time, but the likelihood is that if I don’t get replies at least some of the time I’ll start to feel like the process is throwaway. I’m intrigued to read this thread and see the responses of some of the women. Even on April fool’s day it’s nice to think that some have the empathy to realise how their actions affect the feelings and responses of others. The ability to hide your profile and search for and message the profiles that suit your requirements remains." Shit. I forgot it's April Fool's Fuckity Fuck ....... You shouldn't have told me. I'd have spent half the day wondering why there were so many wanky threads today. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact that so many messages are deleted or not replied to is what makes people act in the way they do. Realistically if you are already aware that the bulk of the polite messages you send will not get a response (and with a profile as shit as mine it’s hardly surprising), it as a bloke, often feels like you’re treated like a piece of shit as much as a piece of meat. Now I don’t feel as though I am entitled to demand a response every time, but the likelihood is that if I don’t get replies at least some of the time I’ll start to feel like the process is throwaway. I’m intrigued to read this thread and see the responses of some of the women. Even on April fool’s day it’s nice to think that some have the empathy to realise how their actions affect the feelings and responses of others. The ability to hide your profile and search for and message the profiles that suit your requirements remains." I'd forgotten it was April Fool's day. I should have posted this aft. It's a serious post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact that so many messages are deleted or not replied to is what makes people act in the way they do. Realistically if you are already aware that the bulk of the polite messages you send will not get a response (and with a profile as shit as mine it’s hardly surprising), it as a bloke, often feels like you’re treated like a piece of shit as much as a piece of meat. Now I don’t feel as though I am entitled to demand a response every time, but the likelihood is that if I don’t get replies at least some of the time I’ll start to feel like the process is throwaway. I’m intrigued to read this thread and see the responses of some of the women. Even on April fool’s day it’s nice to think that some have the empathy to realise how their actions affect the feelings and responses of others. The ability to hide your profile and search for and message the profiles that suit your requirements remains." The site is basically throwaway as its a site for people to have casual sex. People who get upset because no one considers their feelings would be best off leaving the site. We don't reply to people we aren't interested in as explicit rejection is generally more painful than implicit rejection. That being said, we appreciate that it can be a frustrating experience for single men, but unfortunately that's inevitable when you have a group of about 80% chasing the other 20%. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. When I first made my single profile, I tried replying to each mail saying no thanks, being polite. It took days and guys still messaged assuming I was interested because I replied. I then deleted without reading if I knew from looking at their profile they aren't what I was looking for. I then tried replying again, a polite no thanks, to which men wouldn't quit, or I received obnoxious messages in response. This is what is off putting and why women often delete without replying. It's individual choice, there is no set guidelines on how to reply to the plethora of mail women receive. If you reply to every message with no abuse, that's great! That however, is not the case for many women and that should also be acknowledged, rather than making women out to be the problem. N x" I'm not saying women are the problem. The abusers are the problem. But a cycle of disrespect and rudeness will never end well. That's all I'm saying. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. When I first made my single profile, I tried replying to each mail saying no thanks, being polite. It took days and guys still messaged assuming I was interested because I replied. I then deleted without reading if I knew from looking at their profile they aren't what I was looking for. I then tried replying again, a polite no thanks, to which men wouldn't quit, or I received obnoxious messages in response. This is what is off putting and why women often delete without replying. It's individual choice, there is no set guidelines on how to reply to the plethora of mail women receive. If you reply to every message with no abuse, that's great! That however, is not the case for many women and that should also be acknowledged, rather than making women out to be the problem. N x I'm not saying women are the problem. The abusers are the problem. But a cycle of disrespect and rudeness will never end well. That's all I'm saying. " I am not quite sure what you are saying here. That we should reply to everyone? If women and couples took your advice, that would mean men's inboxes would be full of "no thanks" messages. I can't think of anything more soul destroying. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. To be fair, but it's not so much guys wanting fuck and go. (essentially that's what we want from guys) it's them having no bloody idea how to approach people. You know, the cock pics and explicit suggestions in a first message. That approach will very rarely work with women or couples and you would think that men would realise that. " They see a site full of cock and pussy pics and people fucking. Where is the clue that they shouldn't send a cock pic? They read explicit verifications about people fucking every which way, so they write messages in the same vein. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Having experienced this site both as a single woman and now as a couple I have always replied politely to every message... even the occassional rude or abusive ones. I find people struggle to remain abusive if they are met with calm, firm but polite responses. But then even as a single woman I have never displayed dozens of provocative pictures enticing 100s of messages daily. Just as men are guilty of the sausage forest galleries, ladies are equally accountable for showing numerous tit and bum pics in various colours of underwear and without. If you cannot respond to the attention you bring to your profile what is the point?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. When I first made my single profile, I tried replying to each mail saying no thanks, being polite. It took days and guys still messaged assuming I was interested because I replied. I then deleted without reading if I knew from looking at their profile they aren't what I was looking for. I then tried replying again, a polite no thanks, to which men wouldn't quit, or I received obnoxious messages in response. This is what is off putting and why women often delete without replying. It's individual choice, there is no set guidelines on how to reply to the plethora of mail women receive. If you reply to every message with no abuse, that's great! That however, is not the case for many women and that should also be acknowledged, rather than making women out to be the problem. N x I'm not saying women are the problem. The abusers are the problem. But a cycle of disrespect and rudeness will never end well. That's all I'm saying. " You CLEARLY said that women and couples are part of the problem. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. " Interesting debate based on actualities is always good - debate based on wide of the mark perceptions is always going to result in lots of though and questions that go unanswered by the person who is unable to substantiate their comments Fact of the matter is there ARE many people here (and let's face it it IS mainly single men) who DO have off kilter expectations, regardless of whether they are looking for fuck and go or something a little deeper than that (frankly I don't see what someone is looking for, or the fact the site is full of sexual content has to do with people having unrealistic expectations) - we all know the type, one line profiles, gallery of disembodied cock pics and messages along the lines of "wanna fuck now?" - THOSE are the ones with off kilter expectations and a sense of entitlement who DO deserve disdain no matter which way you look at it. Either way I still fail to see how ignoring someone that doesn't interest you equates to treating them like a piece of meat | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. To be fair, but it's not so much guys wanting fuck and go. (essentially that's what we want from guys) it's them having no bloody idea how to approach people. You know, the cock pics and explicit suggestions in a first message. That approach will very rarely work with women or couples and you would think that men would realise that. They see a site full of cock and pussy pics and people fucking. Where is the clue that they shouldn't send a cock pic? They read explicit verifications about people fucking every which way, so they write messages in the same vein. " Its pretty clear that what turns on women and what turns on men is generally very different. Most women are not turned on by explicit stuff in the way men are. Hence anyone with a brain would realise that if you take the explicit approach in a first message your chances reduce dramatically. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain I like debate. I put forward ideas for discussion. I disagree about your comment re: the off kilter expectations. It's a site full of sexually explicit pics and 'sex reviews' and menus of what sex acts people offer. Sure some people want friendship but some just want fuck n go. Neither are wrong, just incompatible. I don't see the need to be rude to someone that wants different to me. To be fair, but it's not so much guys wanting fuck and go. (essentially that's what we want from guys) it's them having no bloody idea how to approach people. You know, the cock pics and explicit suggestions in a first message. That approach will very rarely work with women or couples and you would think that men would realise that. They see a site full of cock and pussy pics and people fucking. Where is the clue that they shouldn't send a cock pic? They read explicit verifications about people fucking every which way, so they write messages in the same vein. " The clue will often be in the profile how best to approach the couple or lady. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? I Delete unread mail and look at pictures and profiles before deciding if I would like to reply/start a conversation .. this is because o cannot reply to everybody and I would rather so this than even politely reply due to opening myself up to abuse .. And that is the difference .. I may do the things you have mentioned, but in no way do I regard this as treating people like a piece of meat. I do not send rude, abusive or demanding messages or messages of entitlement .. *** Out of Curiosity, as I'm sure you know the difficulties being a single woman on this site.. what would you suggest is the kind way to say no , to EVERY SINGLE MAN , so that all parties are happy and not left open to abuse .. Realistically.. *** I manage to do this and pretty much never get abuse. When I first made my single profile, I tried replying to each mail saying no thanks, being polite. It took days and guys still messaged assuming I was interested because I replied. I then deleted without reading if I knew from looking at their profile they aren't what I was looking for. I then tried replying again, a polite no thanks, to which men wouldn't quit, or I received obnoxious messages in response. This is what is off putting and why women often delete without replying. It's individual choice, there is no set guidelines on how to reply to the plethora of mail women receive. If you reply to every message with no abuse, that's great! That however, is not the case for many women and that should also be acknowledged, rather than making women out to be the problem. N x I'm not saying women are the problem. The abusers are the problem. But a cycle of disrespect and rudeness will never end well. That's all I'm saying. You CLEARLY said that women and couples are part of the problem. " *Part* of the problem. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We don’t treat men like pieces of meat, and I suspect every man from the swing scene whom we know personally would vouch that we don’t do that. We treat our swingingbfriends no different than our vanilla friends (with the exception that we fuck out swinging friends). With regards to messages, I remember years ago on Dating Direct I messaged a man. He asked for a face pic. I uploaded one to my profile and I never heard from him again. He didn’t fancy me basically. It never occurred to me that 15 years later there would be a swingers site with men up in arms for the same behaviour. I certainly didn’t regard it that I was being treated like a piece of meat when he looked at my photo and silently rejected me. Mrs" Indeed. As I say above. We are all advertising for no strings sex. This site is a classic meat market and its silly to pretend otherwise. If you don't like that and want something meaningful, you should try a vanilla dating site. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Having experienced this site both as a single woman and now as a couple I have always replied politely to every message... even the occassional rude or abusive ones. I find people struggle to remain abusive if they are met with calm, firm but polite responses. But then even as a single woman I have never displayed dozens of provocative pictures enticing 100s of messages daily. Just as men are guilty of the sausage forest galleries, ladies are equally accountable for showing numerous tit and bum pics in various colours of underwear and without. If you cannot respond to the attention you bring to your profile what is the point?" You make a good point...... You reap what you sow? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Interesting post to see both sides of the debate (avoided say argument as I don’t think the OP was intending for that) I guess single ladies and couples will get swamped by messages that are quite often unintelligent and rude. It just a shame that a polite and considered message gets lost among them. " I'm ok with arguments. It's still debate. A wishy washy statement doesn't get people fired up the same, so then the debate would be a bit flat. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bugger, just realized, it's April fools day" Its April fool's day everyday on here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Having experienced this site both as a single woman and now as a couple I have always replied politely to every message... even the occassional rude or abusive ones. I find people struggle to remain abusive if they are met with calm, firm but polite responses. But then even as a single woman I have never displayed dozens of provocative pictures enticing 100s of messages daily. Just as men are guilty of the sausage forest galleries, ladies are equally accountable for showing numerous tit and bum pics in various colours of underwear and without. If you cannot respond to the attention you bring to your profile what is the point? You make a good point...... You reap what you sow?" Absolutely. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who want to see my cock ? " Gallic rooster | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat." Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who want to see my cock ? " Me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense." I thought that but my brain couldn't make the right words | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who want to see my cock ? " Okay, flop it out xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. " Not everyone is seeking NSA | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. I thought that but my brain couldn't make the right words " I thought the saying treating someone like a piece of meat implies they are satisfying a hunger. Nothing more? Or am I wrong on that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." I don't treat men like meat coz i,m a vegetarian. I treat them like a piece of Quorn instead xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense." This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA" Most are and even if we're not, we are by and large trying to entice people on the basis of our sexual allure. In the vanilla world, that's pretty much the definition of a meat market. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just let's be honest with ourselves. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." I happily delete people who want to meet but do not send a face pic, write more than 'let's meet' or ask where I am before they even say 'hello', they make no effort for me to be attracted to them. There are so few decent people on here and that includes tgurls too. Swinging used to be part of a lifestyle not just getting a fuck every weekend, some of like to feel a connection. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. " Indeed. I never understand why people want an explicit message saying "I don't fancy you", rather than having it delivered implicitly. When people aren't interested in us, we much prefer to be ignored rather than get a direct rejection. The latter seems more hurtful. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. Indeed. I never understand why people want an explicit message saying "I don't fancy you", rather than having it delivered implicitly. When people aren't interested in us, we much prefer to be ignored rather than get a direct rejection. The latter seems more hurtful. " rather have a direct rejection than be ignored, least you know where you stand | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bugger, just realized, it's April fools day Its April fool's day everyday on here" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. Indeed. I never understand why people want an explicit message saying "I don't fancy you", rather than having it delivered implicitly. When people aren't interested in us, we much prefer to be ignored rather than get a direct rejection. The latter seems more hurtful. rather have a direct rejection than be ignored, least you know where you stand" I know where I stand when someone ignores me? I really don't understand why others don't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. Indeed. I never understand why people want an explicit message saying "I don't fancy you", rather than having it delivered implicitly. When people aren't interested in us, we much prefer to be ignored rather than get a direct rejection. The latter seems more hurtful. rather have a direct rejection than be ignored, least you know where you stand I know where I stand when someone ignores me? I really don't understand why others don't. " Indeed. And do single guys really want an inbox full of rejections? I can't imagine anything more depressing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Having experienced this site both as a single woman and now as a couple I have always replied politely to every message... even the occassional rude or abusive ones. I find people struggle to remain abusive if they are met with calm, firm but polite responses. But then even as a single woman I have never displayed dozens of provocative pictures enticing 100s of messages daily. Just as men are guilty of the sausage forest galleries, ladies are equally accountable for showing numerous tit and bum pics in various colours of underwear and without. If you cannot respond to the attention you bring to your profile what is the point? You make a good point...... You reap what you sow?" Some peole dont mind letting letting the field grow wild and having the birds move in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Regarding off-kilter expectations: The OP makes a good point; when you first join the site, you see profiles full of, in some cases, incredibly explicit photographs. People write and publish luridly detailed verifications. Now, maybe /you/ don’t do these things, or maybe /you/ only do one of them, but surely it’s easy to see, viewing the site as a whole, why people might find it difficult to gauge the tone on arrival. . Regarding whether deleting unread messages qualifies as ‘treating people like meat’, it’s perhaps a poor choice of wording. ‘Treating people like nothing’ or, even, ‘treating people like shit’ might be more applicable. (And yes, I understand that the initial message may have lacked respect.) . It needn’t even be messages looking for a meet. I’ve messaged people regarding forum posts, in some cases in direct response to requests for messages, which can then go unread. Yes, there is an argument that it’s a meat market, and nobody should be offended, but when you take time to compose a message, and are batted away with the back of the hand like an irritating fly, it’s surely easy to see why people might react in a less favourable way. . “Don’t take it personally,” is always an interesting retort. Considering these decisions are based on our looks and our profile (a reflection of our personality) taking it personally is the only available, valid reaction. The degree to which it upsets is not a choice either; some of you are luckily enough that it barely registers, I’m lucky enough (possibly because I haven’t been /entirely/ unsuccessful) that mine registers as disappointment. I don’t rattle off dozens of messages, it’s a conscious decision to message somebody rather than a production line, so that’s maybe why. But it’s a little unfair to give people a hard time over a reaction they can’t choose. . Anyway, that’s more than enough waffle from me, sorry. Carry on." Maybe they can't choose how they feel about rejection but they should be able to choose how they act upon those feelings. If they attack another because of some perceived slight they are fully responsible. Inappropriate responses shouldn't be rewarded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe they can't choose how they feel about rejection but they should be able to choose how they act upon those feelings. If they attack another because of some perceived slight they are fully responsible. Inappropriate responses shouldn't be rewarded. " They can, and nothing I said condones sending shitty messages. I was just trying to shed a little light for those who don’t seem to understand why some people react certain ways. . I also felt that it was worth pointing out that not all the unread, deleted messages are anything to do with failing to match what someone is looking for. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How can I treat men like a piece of meat just because I don't answer their message. I merely don't find them attractive from the information I have,that in my mind is not treating them like a piece of meat. Agreed, it’s completely inaccurate to conflate the management of an inbox with the concept of treating someone like a piece of meat. Makes no sense. This and this I don't message people who make it clear on their profiles they don't want to meet someone who looks like me. Makes no sense in my book. Would be like applying for a job that requires certain qualifications I don't have. Waste of time all around. I used to reply to every single message but decided not to after a while. Aside from the abusive replies to a, "thanks but you're not quite what I'm looking for and I wish you all the best on fab" or similar - from people who initiated contact with me, I take the junk mail view. I don't reply to every pizza or other takeaway leaflet I receive in my letterbox. Although the main reason I decided to just not reply is because I discovered in doing so, that profile can still message you if you have your filters on. Any profiles I message first who read and delete, I take it as them not being interested. I never expect a reply from a profile and think lines such as, "please reply yes or no" are kinda pointless. Reading and deleting is a reply in my book. To be clear, by "people", I mean any profile. Indeed. I never understand why people want an explicit message saying "I don't fancy you", rather than having it delivered implicitly. When people aren't interested in us, we much prefer to be ignored rather than get a direct rejection. The latter seems more hurtful. rather have a direct rejection than be ignored, least you know where you stand" you seriously don't know where you stand if someone doesn't enter into any kind of interaction with you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Regarding off-kilter expectations: The OP makes a good point; when you first join the site, you see profiles full of, in some cases, incredibly explicit photographs. People write and publish luridly detailed verifications. Now, maybe /you/ don’t do these things, or maybe /you/ only do one of them, but surely it’s easy to see, viewing the site as a whole, why people might find it difficult to gauge the tone on arrival. . Regarding whether deleting unread messages qualifies as ‘treating people like meat’, it’s perhaps a poor choice of wording. ‘Treating people like nothing’ or, even, ‘treating people like shit’ might be more applicable. (And yes, I understand that the initial message may have lacked respect.) . It needn’t even be messages looking for a meet. I’ve messaged people regarding forum posts, in some cases in direct response to requests for messages, which can then go unread. Yes, there is an argument that it’s a meat market, and nobody should be offended, but when you take time to compose a message, and are batted away with the back of the hand like an irritating fly, it’s surely easy to see why people might react in a less favourable way. . “Don’t take it personally,” is always an interesting retort. Considering these decisions are based on our looks and our profile (a reflection of our personality) taking it personally is the only available, valid reaction. The degree to which it upsets is not a choice either; some of you are luckily enough that it barely registers, I’m lucky enough (possibly because I haven’t been /entirely/ unsuccessful) that mine registers as disappointment. I don’t rattle off dozens of messages, it’s a conscious decision to message somebody rather than a production line, so that’s maybe why. But it’s a little unfair to give people a hard time over a reaction they can’t choose. . Anyway, that’s more than enough waffle from me, sorry. Carry on." You make some valid points and it's true that we can't help our reactions, but the reality is that for most people this site is about meeting others to get their rocks off and thus everyone IS disposable. . Unfortunately for single guys, because there are so many of them, they are more disposable than most. That's the reality and it isn't going to change. Hence people need to decide whether being on here with that ethos is good for them emotionally. If not, they should leave. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"...the reality is that for most people this site is about meeting others to get their rocks off and thus everyone IS disposable. . Unfortunately for single guys, because there are so many of them, they are more disposable than most. That's the reality and it isn't going to change." No, no, no, no, no. Just because you /treat/ people like they are disposable, doesn’t mean they are. It’s not a reality, it’s an attitude. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." Ok, but I would like to know what suggestions you may have on how to improve the situation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe they can't choose how they feel about rejection but they should be able to choose how they act upon those feelings. If they attack another because of some perceived slight they are fully responsible. Inappropriate responses shouldn't be rewarded. They can, and nothing I said condones sending shitty messages. I was just trying to shed a little light for those who don’t seem to understand why some people react certain ways. . I also felt that it was worth pointing out that not all the unread, deleted messages are anything to do with failing to match what someone is looking for." They can what ? You don't make that clear. I said - Inappropriate responses shouldn't be rewarded. That comment is not about you or anything you said. Inappropriate responses shouldn't be rewarded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same. Ok, but I would like to know what suggestions you may have on how to improve the situation. " It's simple. Be nice. Reply to messages, or use your filters so you aren't too swamped to answer them. Men aren't meat to me, they are delicious desserts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"All the people with all these excuses, you complain when men dont read profiles but barely ever read theirs whether they read yours or not, most of you beliitle men and fly into a 3 year olds tantrum when someone points out your faults even in forums that were made to do so, hundreds of you here and thousands in general completely disregard how men are treated and how much it takes out of you to be treated with disdain a disrespect by 80% of you people. Ive seen couples refuse to meet me because im not their type but when my fem fb is in town its different suddenly my profile gets the human decency of being read. I ALWAYS read profiles and only message if im interested and think they would be too based on their profile, im always polite and put effort into my messages infact i doubt ive ever used the same introduction twice since i joined years ago, i dont send cockpics unless asked so how is it i could send out 50 of those messages to women and couples but most dont even get read even though they are clearly online then out of those that get read most people check out your attached pics or profile but dont really read it and then finally out of those 50 well thought out personally tailored messages less than 10 people view your profile..oh but women and couples have it hard getting "too many messages" anyone whos been part of a swinging couple (I have) knows its not that hard to actually show some human decency and read your messages and not just scroll down the little profile pics next to the message looking for the fittest ones ooops did i ruin the big secret? Obviously if the profile pic is truly gross then DELETE..Unverified? DELETE shit cut and paste message DELETE but dont sit their with your lies and tell me it doesnt happen atleast the people who admit it have some dignity but either way whether you deny it or not if you as a woman or couple felt compelled enough to comment or felt targeted by that statement you have already proved the OP right, but its not guilt that made you comment it was your hubris that made you..a self defence mechanism to protect your ego from the realisation youre a hypocrite. " Cor blimey. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"They can what ? You don't make that clear." Sorry. They can choose how they act upon those feelings, as you said. I’m sure you can see why I thought your other comment was in response to my post, too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"They can what ? You don't make that clear. Sorry. They can choose how they act upon those feelings, as you said. I’m sure you can see why I thought your other comment was in response to my post, too." Thanks. If they can choose how they act upon their feelings then they are responsible for their actions as I said. No. I can't see why you thought that. I can only imagine and I don't like early assumptions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same. Ok, but I would like to know what suggestions you may have on how to improve the situation. It's simple. Be nice. Reply to messages, or use your filters so you aren't too swamped to answer them. Men aren't meat to me, they are delicious desserts. " more whipped cream with that miss | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA Most are and even if we're not, we are by and large trying to entice people on the basis of our sexual allure. In the vanilla world, that's pretty much the definition of a meat market. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just let's be honest with ourselves. " I disagree. You’re essentially boiling down any seeking of interaction as being a meat market, I disagree - if someone is selling their thoughts and opinions it’s not just meat. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt " No one turns down a 'real swinger' for a man with no pic and a ten word profile. They DO turn down one man for another one that they fancy more. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Breathe, L-B-213, breathe." yeah sure thanks for patronizeing me nice one, any way since im typing saying (Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack L-B-213 Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack) would have been funnier lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"...the reality is that for most people this site is about meeting others to get their rocks off and thus everyone IS disposable. . Unfortunately for single guys, because there are so many of them, they are more disposable than most. That's the reality and it isn't going to change. No, no, no, no, no. Just because you /treat/ people like they are disposable, doesn’t mean they are. It’s not a reality, it’s an attitude." But it's the reality on this site. . You can call it an attitude, but it's the common attitude on the site and given the nature of the site, it isn't going to change. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt " Not sure I understand. What is it that happens to you that makes you feel you are not treated as s human? Mrs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt No one turns down a 'real swinger' for a man with no pic and a ten word profile. They DO turn down one man for another one that they fancy more. " and yet they do, have and will continue to do so? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA Most are and even if we're not, we are by and large trying to entice people on the basis of our sexual allure. In the vanilla world, that's pretty much the definition of a meat market. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just let's be honest with ourselves. I disagree. You’re essentially boiling down any seeking of interaction as being a meat market, I disagree - if someone is selling their thoughts and opinions it’s not just meat. " But we're not (on the whole) trying to attract people with our thoughts and opinions on here, we're trying to attract them with our bodies. If we weren't, there would be no need for pics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA Most are and even if we're not, we are by and large trying to entice people on the basis of our sexual allure. In the vanilla world, that's pretty much the definition of a meat market. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just let's be honest with ourselves. I disagree. You’re essentially boiling down any seeking of interaction as being a meat market, I disagree - if someone is selling their thoughts and opinions it’s not just meat. But we're not (on the whole) trying to attract people with our thoughts and opinions on here, we're trying to attract them with our bodies. If we weren't, there would be no need for pics. " I’m only disagreeing with your all encompassing “even if we’re not” in response to my comment above. I understand your point, but it isn’t *always* the case - and having photos doesn’t mean it’s only reductionist to being a meat market exchange, so I disagree that it’s dishonest to suggest it is only a meat market in here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours " I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack first | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We all put up alluring pics of ourselves in the hope we can entice people we like to have no strings sex with us. In a sense we are all presenting ourselves as prime cuts in the butcher's window. Not everyone is seeking NSA Most are and even if we're not, we are by and large trying to entice people on the basis of our sexual allure. In the vanilla world, that's pretty much the definition of a meat market. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just let's be honest with ourselves. I disagree. You’re essentially boiling down any seeking of interaction as being a meat market, I disagree - if someone is selling their thoughts and opinions it’s not just meat. But we're not (on the whole) trying to attract people with our thoughts and opinions on here, we're trying to attract them with our bodies. If we weren't, there would be no need for pics. I’m only disagreeing with your all encompassing “even if we’re not” in response to my comment above. I understand your point, but it isn’t *always* the case - and having photos doesn’t mean it’s only reductionist to being a meat market exchange, so I disagree that it’s dishonest to suggest it is only a meat market in here. " Ah but on re-reading you did requalify with by and large. Good - as you were. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I can't see why you thought that. I can only imagine and I don't like early assumptions." You can’t see why I thought something written in a post which contained a response to me might have been directed at me? Okay... (Btw, you have s way of agreeing with people which reads like you’re disagreeing with them.) . "What you give is what you get..." Obvious humblebrag is obvious. It’s also demonstrably untrue, on a case by case basis, but don’t let that stop you feeling better about yourself. . "...and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..." As someone who can’t have his face displayed because of work, I’d like a clarification on why you felt the need to put it in quotation marks. . "...any way since im typing saying (Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack L-B-213 Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack) would have been funnier lol" No, it wouldn’t. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt No one turns down a 'real swinger' for a man with no pic and a ten word profile. They DO turn down one man for another one that they fancy more. and yet they do, have and will continue to do so?" People just turn people down that they simply arent attracted to surely, whether they're a real swinger/serial shagger or supermodel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But we're not (on the whole) trying to attract people with our thoughts and opinions on here, we're trying to attract them with our bodies. If we weren't, there would be no need for pics. " You’re not. Different people take many different approaches. If it was down to attracting people with our bodies, I would have no meets. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack first" David Cameron ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt No one turns down a 'real swinger' for a man with no pic and a ten word profile. They DO turn down one man for another one that they fancy more. and yet they do, have and will continue to do so? People just turn people down that they simply arent attracted to surely, whether they're a real swinger/serial shagger or supermodel." I'm on the supermodel bench. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. I can't see why you thought that. I can only imagine and I don't like early assumptions.You can’t see why I thought something written in a post which contained a response to me might have been directed at me? Okay... (Btw, you have s way of agreeing with people which reads like you’re disagreeing with them.) . What you give is what you get...Obvious humblebrag is obvious. It’s also demonstrably untrue, on a case by case basis, but don’t let that stop you feeling better about yourself. . ...and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"...As someone who can’t have his face displayed because of work, I’d like a clarification on why you felt the need to put it in quotation marks. . ...any way since im typing saying (Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack L-B-213 Interlocking fingers leaning back in chair knuckle crack) would have been funnier lolNo, it wouldn’t." I know. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But we're not (on the whole) trying to attract people with our thoughts and opinions on here, we're trying to attract them with our bodies. If we weren't, there would be no need for pics. You’re not. Different people take many different approaches. If it was down to attracting people with our bodies, I would have no meets." . Note the "on the whole" there may be a few exceptions, but most people on here are looking to find people they find physically attractive to have sex with and using their own physicality to attract others. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Regarding off-kilter expectations: The OP makes a good point; when you first join the site, you see profiles full of, in some cases, incredibly explicit photographs. People write and publish luridly detailed verifications. Now, maybe /you/ don’t do these things, or maybe /you/ only do one of them, but surely it’s easy to see, viewing the site as a whole, why people might find it difficult to gauge the tone on arrival. . Regarding whether deleting unread messages qualifies as ‘treating people like meat’, it’s perhaps a poor choice of wording. ‘Treating people like nothing’ or, even, ‘treating people like shit’ might be more applicable. (And yes, I understand that the initial message may have lacked respect.) . It needn’t even be messages looking for a meet. I’ve messaged people regarding forum posts, in some cases in direct response to requests for messages, which can then go unread. Yes, there is an argument that it’s a meat market, and nobody should be offended, but when you take time to compose a message, and are batted away with the back of the hand like an irritating fly, it’s surely easy to see why people might react in a less favourable way. . “Don’t take it personally,” is always an interesting retort. Considering these decisions are based on our looks and our profile (a reflection of our personality) taking it personally is the only available, valid reaction. The degree to which it upsets is not a choice either; some of you are luckily enough that it barely registers, I’m lucky enough (possibly because I haven’t been /entirely/ unsuccessful) that mine registers as disappointment. I don’t rattle off dozens of messages, it’s a conscious decision to message somebody rather than a production line, so that’s maybe why. But it’s a little unfair to give people a hard time over a reaction they can’t choose. . Anyway, that’s more than enough waffle from me, sorry. Carry on." So many times, people will say if men don't get a reply "just move on to the next one". Like people are just a piece of meat. Or a name on a screen. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a ridiculous (and perhaps deliberately?) inflammatory statement!! How on earth is choosing not to interact with someone based on their (often crap) profile, pics and message treating them like a piece of meat? And let's face it, even if it could be classified as that, the person treating them as such would have sent them a message based on their pics and profile and therefore by definition will have treated them as....oh the irony is strong As for "many" women and couples complaining about that, another completely wide of the mark statement - even if you're using the forums as a guide (which we all know is a small percentage of the overall site) those women and couples that actually "complain" as opposed to offer reasoned advice/observations is again small - so actually "not many" would have been a better phrase to use. Simple fact of the matter is there are many (and that's a genuine "many" not a made up one) single men who use the site, that have no idea how to make a success of it, who do have completely off kilter expectations and do think they only have to sign up to be entitled to sex - and frankly those that do and won't listen when given advice deserve to be treated with disdain " Superb post. It beggars belief how much crap is presented to women as a baited hook in the name of selling themselves by blokes. I guess some woman and indeed couples do likewise but it isn't anything like the men. As has been said many times before, it does at least act as a filter, even if it does get clogged up with crap pretty quickly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't reply to all booking.coms offers I get saying we are not free at that time." Hey, congratulations on picking an example that isn’t remotely analogous, but does clearly demonstrate your view of the people on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Regarding off-kilter expectations: The OP makes a good point; when you first join the site, you see profiles full of, in some cases, incredibly explicit photographs. People write and publish luridly detailed verifications. Now, maybe /you/ don’t do these things, or maybe /you/ only do one of them, but surely it’s easy to see, viewing the site as a whole, why people might find it difficult to gauge the tone on arrival. . Regarding whether deleting unread messages qualifies as ‘treating people like meat’, it’s perhaps a poor choice of wording. ‘Treating people like nothing’ or, even, ‘treating people like shit’ might be more applicable. (And yes, I understand that the initial message may have lacked respect.) . It needn’t even be messages looking for a meet. I’ve messaged people regarding forum posts, in some cases in direct response to requests for messages, which can then go unread. Yes, there is an argument that it’s a meat market, and nobody should be offended, but when you take time to compose a message, and are batted away with the back of the hand like an irritating fly, it’s surely easy to see why people might react in a less favourable way. . “Don’t take it personally,” is always an interesting retort. Considering these decisions are based on our looks and our profile (a reflection of our personality) taking it personally is the only available, valid reaction. The degree to which it upsets is not a choice either; some of you are luckily enough that it barely registers, I’m lucky enough (possibly because I haven’t been /entirely/ unsuccessful) that mine registers as disappointment. I don’t rattle off dozens of messages, it’s a conscious decision to message somebody rather than a production line, so that’s maybe why. But it’s a little unfair to give people a hard time over a reaction they can’t choose. . Anyway, that’s more than enough waffle from me, sorry. Carry on. So many times, people will say if men don't get a reply "just move on to the next one". Like people are just a piece of meat. Or a name on a screen. " That with due respect is what couples have to do if they don’t get a reply. And that’s people have to do if they don’t hear back after applying for a job - move on to the next possibility. Mrs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mean really people would rather turn down a real swinger fir a slightly fitter guy whos profile is less than ten words and doesnt have a facepic displayed because of his "work"..I told you i read profiles that means veris and sometimes even the profiles behind those veris. Ive seen it happen #donttellmeitdoesnt. If it seems like im angry..I am and no not because i got turned down its because im a swinger too..Just because im a single man on a swinging site doesnt mean im not human..Men arent even allowed to complain because most women and couples jump on it and gang up on you for daring to think men have it even slightly hard. Just like what happened in this thread. #donttellmeitdoesnt No one turns down a 'real swinger' for a man with no pic and a ten word profile. They DO turn down one man for another one that they fancy more. " I wouldn't know a real swinger if they kicked me in the bollocks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people really aren't cut out for online interactions. " Name names! My granny wouldn’t get the hang of it. Not sure my neighbour would, either. Who were you thinking of? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who want to see my cock ? " Not again thanks........... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Really interesting thread here Agree with those who say ignoring a message isn’t treating someone like a piece of meat, to me that’s when you use someone purely for your own pleasure and ignore theirs. It is, I agree, demoralising when messages aren’t replied to but that’s the nature of the beast and simple supply and demand, too many of us single guys chasing too few women and couples. So you just suck it up. Replying with an playground insult is just childish and will quickly get you a bad rap. Yes it’s a swinging site but if this were a job site would you fire off a response to every ad and expect a reply? Not really any different here. Read the profile, if someone says they are not looking for single guys, don’t message as clearly you’ve not read the most basic part of the profile. Sell yourself, be pleasant and interesting. But be prepared to be knocked back, many times. Hell I’ve been knocked back so many times it feels like I’m punch d*unk. Right, as someone said that’s enough waffle from me. Anyone for a mug of tea and a toasted hot cross bun??" Bit too soon after my dinner but i'll have a tea please. No milk. No sugar. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack first" that's a new one on me ! Let me google veg kink ,and I'll get back to you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack first" Do you also bring your veg to clubs ?,just curious | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Really interesting thread here Agree with those who say ignoring a message isn’t treating someone like a piece of meat, to me that’s when you use someone purely for your own pleasure and ignore theirs. It is, I agree, demoralising when messages aren’t replied to but that’s the nature of the beast and simple supply and demand, too many of us single guys chasing too few women and couples. So you just suck it up. Replying with an playground insult is just childish and will quickly get you a bad rap. Yes it’s a swinging site but if this were a job site would you fire off a response to every ad and expect a reply? Not really any different here. Read the profile, if someone says they are not looking for single guys, don’t message as clearly you’ve not read the most basic part of the profile. Sell yourself, be pleasant and interesting. But be prepared to be knocked back, many times. Hell I’ve been knocked back so many times it feels like I’m punch d*unk. Right, as someone said that’s enough waffle from me. Anyone for a mug of tea and a toasted hot cross bun?? Bit too soon after my dinner but i'll have a tea please. No milk. No sugar. " Consider it done | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack firstthat's a new one on me ! Let me google veg kink ,and I'll get back to you" Make sure you do get back. She’s not a piece of meat | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Yes it’s a swinging site but if this were a job site would you fire off a response to every ad and expect a reply? Not really any different here. " This exactly! Although we do try to reply to most, I often wonder why we put that amount of time into replying to messages, when I wouldn’t get the same level of respect when applying for a job. Let’s get things in perspective. Mrs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack firstthat's a new one on me ! Let me google veg kink ,and I'll get back to you Make sure you do get back. She’s not a piece of meat " Noooooo sounds more like a ButternutSquash. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Yes it’s a swinging site but if this were a job site would you fire off a response to every ad and expect a reply? Not really any different here. This exactly! Although we do try to reply to most, I often wonder why we put that amount of time into replying to messages, when I wouldn’t get the same level of respect when applying for a job. Let’s get things in perspective. Mrs" Some folk find keeping perspective difficult, particularly when their blood supply is being cut off from their head. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Even weirdos need lurrrrrve. " PMSL but the type of love they are after I'm not willing to do lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. " I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs" I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Through my work (and some friends) I have a lot of contact with people who are out of work and job-hunting. It’s worth noting that, far and away, the over-riding feeling is one of being utterly demoralised by the lack of any feedback from companies. Every single person says that they’d feel a bit better if they even got a ‘no thanks’. They would at least know that their efforts are achieving more than screaming into the void. But the total absence of any acknowledgement makes them feel less than human. It’s brilliant that some of you are unaffected. I’m honestly happy for you, I’m sure it makes life easier. But don’t try to dismiss a natural, human reaction the same way that you dismiss the humans having it." I don’t think everyone is unaffected but if you do let affect you then this site can truly chew you up and spit you out and not give you a second thought. But such is the nature of the internet. It’s made it easier to meet on some levels but it has, sadly, made it easier for people to simply ignore you, no matter how much effort you may have put in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve replied to ever message I’ve received on Fab, both of them. " He's telling the truth ....... he really is. Can't believe you've only had 2. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Through my work (and some friends) I have a lot of contact with people who are out of work and job-hunting. It’s worth noting that, far and away, the over-riding feeling is one of being utterly demoralised by the lack of any feedback from companies. Every single person says that they’d feel a bit better if they even got a ‘no thanks’. They would at least know that their efforts are achieving more than screaming into the void. But the total absence of any acknowledgement makes them feel less than human. It’s brilliant that some of you are unaffected. I’m honestly happy for you, I’m sure it makes life easier. But don’t try to dismiss a natural, human reaction the same way that you dismiss the humans having it." Having experienced this myself, I agree with you that feedback would be better when sending an application. But I understand that if employers were to put more resources into this area there would be less resources elsewhere. There needs to be a sense of reasonability, and women on sex sites cannot be held responsible for hundreds of men’s sense of self worth. I’ll do what I can to avoid dehumanising someone, but I’m not sure it’s reasonable to have years of a daily admin task when we only joined for a bit of fun. I do feel single men could be a bit more understanding about that. Understanding needs to go both ways. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself." I guess it’s not possible to know how someone wants to be treated. I would hate it if some said ‘you’re not for me’. So I will treat people as I want to be treated, which becomes a problem when they want different treatment from want would work for me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself. I guess it’s not possible to know how someone wants to be treated. I would hate it if some said ‘you’re not for me’. So I will treat people as I want to be treated, which becomes a problem when they want different treatment from want would work for me. " I've had some good funny conversations with people I've said your not for me 2.It also makes me feel better that I've not just blanked them like there not there or lower than me.If they do get upset or hostile about you not being attracted 2 them then there in the wrong so you leave them 2 sulk alone lol. As I said before were all different and we all treat people in different ways.My way personally is 2 treat people how I would like 2 be treated. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Through my work (and some friends) I have a lot of contact with people who are out of work and job-hunting. It’s worth noting that, far and away, the over-riding feeling is one of being utterly demoralised by the lack of any feedback from companies. Every single person says that they’d feel a bit better if they even got a ‘no thanks’. They would at least know that their efforts are achieving more than screaming into the void. But the total absence of any acknowledgement makes them feel less than human. It’s brilliant that some of you are unaffected. I’m honestly happy for you, I’m sure it makes life easier. But don’t try to dismiss a natural, human reaction the same way that you dismiss the humans having it." But this happens all the time on the forums. If anyone says they felt hurt at something that happened, they get told to suck it up. Unless they're a woman - then they're given hugs. People are told to forget the rejection and move on to the next one. I'm not sure how many 'humans' are on this site. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself. I guess it’s not possible to know how someone wants to be treated. I would hate it if some said ‘you’re not for me’. So I will treat people as I want to be treated, which becomes a problem when they want different treatment from want would work for me. I've had some good funny conversations with people I've said your not for me 2.It also makes me feel better that I've not just blanked them like there not there or lower than me.If they do get upset or hostile about you not being attracted 2 them then there in the wrong so you leave them 2 sulk alone lol. As I said before were all different and we all treat people in different ways.My way personally is 2 treat people how I would like 2 be treated." I do the same. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself. I guess it’s not possible to know how someone wants to be treated. I would hate it if some said ‘you’re not for me’. So I will treat people as I want to be treated, which becomes a problem when they want different treatment from want would work for me. I've had some good funny conversations with people I've said your not for me 2.It also makes me feel better that I've not just blanked them like there not there or lower than me.If they do get upset or hostile about you not being attracted 2 them then there in the wrong so you leave them 2 sulk alone lol. As I said before were all different and we all treat people in different ways.My way personally is 2 treat people how I would like 2 be treated. I do the same. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." This is not ‘treating people like pieces of meat’. I’m hidden so no one gets chance to treat me like a ‘piece of meat’!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people really aren't cut out for online interactions. Name names! My granny wouldn’t get the hang of it. Not sure my neighbour would, either. Who were you thinking of?" Those who think that online interactions are the same as face to face. They are very different. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I try 2 reply to all messages appart from the weird ones even if it's just a sorry your not for me. I have noticed that mind set on here of arrogance and igronance though. Would they do that face 2 face? Would they blank someone in the street if they said a friendly hello? I doubt it but for some its the norm here 2 think there above others from behind there sheild/screen. I guess if people treat you that way and you still come back for more then they feel entitled 2 do it again as your feeding there ego. I don’t think it’s comparable to someone saying hello in the street. Of course I would say hello if some said hello if they were passing me in the street. But after exchanging pleasantries one moves on. But if I respond to someone sayng hello on a sex site, I will then be encouraging an on line be conversation I never wanted and getting that persons hopes up. Mrs I've always treated people the way I would like 2 be treated but those are my views and were all different. So a friendly hello back and your not for me is straight to the point and keeps people grounded including myself. I guess it’s not possible to know how someone wants to be treated. I would hate it if some said ‘you’re not for me’. So I will treat people as I want to be treated, which becomes a problem when they want different treatment from want would work for me. I've had some good funny conversations with people I've said your not for me 2.It also makes me feel better that I've not just blanked them like there not there or lower than me.If they do get upset or hostile about you not being attracted 2 them then there in the wrong so you leave them 2 sulk alone lol. As I said before were all different and we all treat people in different ways.My way personally is 2 treat people how I would like 2 be treated. I do the same. " Me too. And on here I don't get butt hurt when I get ignored/ deleted/ blocked. It's part of online communication. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I delete any messages that don’t interest me. I almost always reply to regular forum posters. I don’t discriminate between men, couples or women, if I don’t like something about someone I just delete. Exactly this . I don’t care what anyone thinks about this approach. Have a nice day " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack firstthat's a new one on me ! Let me google veg kink ,and I'll get back to you Make sure you do get back. She’s not a piece of meat " If she allowed me to treat her that way ,what's the problem ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve cut meat out my diet " Don't believe you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd love to treat Autumn like a piece of meat ,for a couple of hours I always bring an eye wateringly large vegetable with me, I'd love to use you as a veg rack firstthat's a new one on me ! Let me google veg kink ,and I'll get back to you Make sure you do get back. She’s not a piece of meat Noooooo sounds more like a ButternutSquash." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve cut meat out my diet Don't believe you " Loving all the Quorn stuff | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve cut meat out my diet Don't believe you Loving all the Quorn stuff " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Through my work (and some friends) I have a lot of contact with people who are out of work and job-hunting. It’s worth noting that, far and away, the over-riding feeling is one of being utterly demoralised by the lack of any feedback from companies. Every single person says that they’d feel a bit better if they even got a ‘no thanks’. They would at least know that their efforts are achieving more than screaming into the void. But the total absence of any acknowledgement makes them feel less than human. It’s brilliant that some of you are unaffected. I’m honestly happy for you, I’m sure it makes life easier. But don’t try to dismiss a natural, human reaction the same way that you dismiss the humans having it." Before hiding our profile it said unless we have a meet posted then we are not meeting. We still got messages asking to meet. I then changed the profile to say nothing but we are not meeting. Yet the mail asking to meet carried on. Deleting these messages without replying is not rude in the slightest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"butt hurt" That’s a standard internet way of diminishing or dismissing other’s feelings. You posted the other day that people labelling you a certain way offended you. Would you like it if everyone dismissed that as being butt-hurt? . "Simple answer is "Yes it is, no-one has to interact with anyone they don't want to, for whatever reason they choose"" People can do whatever they want in all aspects of life. It doesn’t mean that it’s without consequence, or necessarily the right thing to do. There’s no hyperbole in how this affects people, btw. The results are evident. . "Deleting these messages without replying is not rude in the slightest. " In that very specific example... quite possibly. There are message filters, btw... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To be treated like a piece of meat is to objectify the person - for desire and nothing else. To delete an email / not reply / not want to see more cock pics ... is not objectifying them. To discard another’s email is no different than walking past a clothing shop window saying to oneself I like that... I dislike that.....someone has created the shop window, the clothes, the layout, style, lighting - some make it outstanding and some don’t. We have a choice to go into the shop or not. We are attracted or invited in by the said email. Discarding the email shows we are not attracted to its content either visual photo or content. In fact those that send generic emails are they not behaving in such a way as to treat others like a piece of meat - send out 30 generic emails - nothing personal - see what comes back to meet my desire ..... perhaps those are the ones that get discarded first." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To delete an email / not reply / not want to see more cock pics ... is not objectifying them." We’ve already covered this. The wording wasn’t ideal, but we get the idea. Regarding your shop analogy; it doesn’t really work. Our profiles are our ‘shop windows’ and, as you look at the profile, you have the choice to walk on by. Ignoring a message is more akin to blanking the customer who has walked into your shop. . "In fact those that send generic emails are they not behaving in such a way as to treat others like a piece of meat..." Quite possibly, yes. I’m not sure anyone is condoning sending out hundreds of messages spamming everyone. . I’m not sure if somebody sending out dozens of identikit messages would notice or take note of who replies. I think the issue here may be that genuine attempts at communication are often treated with the same disdain / contempt / whatever by the recipients. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"butt hurtThat’s a standard internet way of diminishing or dismissing other’s feelings. You posted the other day that people labelling you a certain way offended you. Would you like it if everyone dismissed that as being butt-hurt? " Others are welcome to view that as me being butt hurt. I have no issue if they think I'm overreacting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So many women and couples complain that they are treated like a piece of meat, but they treat men the same. They delete mail without replying. They just look at a man's profile/ pics and reject him with no interaction. Do you do this? Do you feel at all guilty for treating men like a piece of meat? Do you realise that you are part of the problem- by treating men this way they will treat you the same." I would agree but some get treat like a nobody too i would say | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" People can do whatever they want in all aspects of life. It doesn’t mean that it’s without consequence, or necessarily the right thing to do. There’s no hyperbole in how this affects people, btw. The results are evident. " Posting my original post back in for the avoidance of loss of context In the instance under discussion, there's absolutely no consequence to the person deleting the message, and arguably for most sending it too. Whether it's the "right thing" to do is subjective, as the thread has clearly shown - personally absolutely it's the right thing to do, just in the same way as deleting junk mail is the right thing to do. In fact, for the most part, the ONLY people that appear to think it's the wrong thing to do to ignore messages, are those whose messages are ignored (and even then not all of them) - funny that eh, who'd have thought it!! As for how it affects those that are ignored - sure it can be frustrating, but to be frustrated also suggests a sense of entitlement, and is that good? Ultimately though the overwhelming majority of users here just get on with it, accept the limitations and restrictions for what they are and make the best of the site they can - I know that's what I do | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether it's the "right thing" to do is subjective, as the thread has clearly shown" Indeed. You have correctly identified what we are discussing. . "In fact, for the most part, the ONLY people that appear to think it's the wrong thing to do to ignore messages, are those whose messages are ignored (and even then not all of them) - funny that eh, who'd have thought it!!" Well, you see, now I think you’re making claims you’re not really entitled to make. Particularly when there are two very different types of messages being discussed. . Out of interest, if I give myself a thumbs-up at the end of my message, does it turn it into some universal truth? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ultimately when you cut through the crap and the hyperbole and the way the OP and other posts have been dressed up this thread actually amounts to the simple question (that's asked on a daily basis) of "Is it ok to ignore a message from someone that doesn't interest you?" Simple answer is "Yes it is, no-one has to interact with anyone they don't want to, for whatever reason they choose" People can do whatever they want in all aspects of life. It doesn’t mean that it’s without consequence, or necessarily the right thing to do. There’s no hyperbole in how this affects people, btw. The results are evident. Posting my original post back in for the avoidance of loss of context In the instance under discussion, there's absolutely no consequence to the person deleting the message, and arguably for most sending it too. Whether it's the "right thing" to do is subjective, as the thread has clearly shown - personally absolutely it's the right thing to do, just in the same way as deleting junk mail is the right thing to do. In fact, for the most part, the ONLY people that appear to think it's the wrong thing to do to ignore messages, are those whose messages are ignored (and even then not all of them) - funny that eh, who'd have thought it!! As for how it affects those that are ignored - sure it can be frustrating, but to be frustrated also suggests a sense of entitlement, and is that good? Ultimately though the overwhelming majority of users here just get on with it, accept the limitations and restrictions for what they are and make the best of the site they can - I know that's what I do " I think it's wrong to ignore messages. I also think it's wrong to court attention and then ignore it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether it's the "right thing" to do is subjective, as the thread has clearly shownIndeed. You have correctly identified what we are discussing. . In fact, for the most part, the ONLY people that appear to think it's the wrong thing to do to ignore messages, are those whose messages are ignored (and even then not all of them) - funny that eh, who'd have thought it!!Well, you see, now I think you’re making claims you’re not really entitled to make. Particularly when there are two very different types of messages being discussed. . Out of interest, if I give myself a thumbs-up at the end of my message, does it turn it into some universal truth? " Serious question. Are you suggesting we are morally obliged to reply to every message we get? If so, would a standard. "sorry, not for us" suffice, or should we craft an individual message for each person (as, presumably, sending a generic message would be as dehumanising as ignoring). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" In fact, for the most part, the ONLY people that appear to think it's the wrong thing to do to ignore messages, are those whose messages are ignored (and even then not all of them) - funny that eh, who'd have thought it!! Well, you see, now I think you’re making claims you’re not really entitled to make. Particularly when there are two very different types of messages being discussed." The type of message doesn't bear any relevance at all - ultimately the decision to ignore a message or not comes down to individual choice of the recipient and whether they think a reply is required - it may be the most vile and abusive message going, or it may be a well written and articulate message but on this site, if it's with a view to ultimately meeting someone- if there's no attraction based on the sender's profile, pics and indeed message then it's perfectly ok not to reply. And that's a claim I'm perfectly entitled to make based on the site's own FAQs . "Out of interest, if I give myself a thumbs-up at the end of my message, does it turn it into some universal truth? " No it doesn't, any more than assuming you're giving yourself a thumbs up, as opposed to indicating you've expressed your opinion and are done does | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |