Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is not the rant of a spurned single male but an honest question/observation. In its first few years fabswingers was a site for people who knew and understood the lifestyle or for people who were curious and dipping toes in, it was quiet niche,it was polite,non demanding and a community. It seems somewhat that it has become a demanding, aggressive easy option for people (of both sex) to have one off hook up sex with someone that they would struggle to even get eye contact from in a bar,almost a 'swipe left for instant sex' type site. This is of course only my opinion and I understand times change. But can it still really be called a swingers site? Michael. " If it was a swipe left for instant sex type of site there would be no ranting single males . A site like this that reflects the requirements of its user will evolve to suit those requirements. If those users call it a swinging site then that's what it is. We use it how we want to. Lots of people sat we're not proper swingers because we insist on socials first, don't use clubs and meet single men but we just get in with it. That's the beauty of the site, you can use it how you want to. If you change the name it'll remain the same | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is not the rant of a spurned single male but an honest question/observation. In its first few years fabswingers was a site for people who knew and understood the lifestyle or for people who were curious and dipping toes in, it was quiet niche,it was polite,non demanding and a community. It seems somewhat that it has become a demanding, aggressive easy option for people (of both sex) to have one off hook up sex with someone that they would struggle to even get eye contact from in a bar,almost a 'swipe left for instant sex' type site. This is of course only my opinion and I understand times change. But can it still really be called a swingers site? Michael. If it was a swipe left for instant sex type of site there would be no ranting single males . A site like this that reflects the requirements of its user will evolve to suit those requirements. If those users call it a swinging site then that's what it is. We use it how we want to. Lots of people sat we're not proper swingers because we insist on socials first, don't use clubs and meet single men but we just get in with it. That's the beauty of the site, you can use it how you want to. If you change the name it'll remain the same" Personally I think a social first is a big part of swinging. I won't meet anyone for sex without one for my safety. Pretty much given up meeting new people as they just seem to have the instashag mentality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |