Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips?" If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there." | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. " Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " I save that stuff for private messages | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If they’ve been on a year with no verifications then it’s a no from me No pictures also makes me suspect " I was the same until I received a random hello from such a profile. Suspicions turned to some of the best sex I've ever had | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " Oh I’ve seen a few ladies who talk like that! I like to be fucked hard up the arse on occasion too (looks down and checks for rapidly growing willy!) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips?" yes you can see say for example in a couples profile all the pics are of the guy and no pics of man and woman together oh and its always the guy chatting she's always doing ironing ,sleeping,working or with her master | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Oh I’ve seen a few ladies who talk like that! I like to be fucked hard up the arse on occasion too (looks down and checks for rapidly growing willy!) " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If they’ve been on a year with no verifications then it’s a no from me No pictures also makes me suspect " This 1 is not garenteed as i wos on over a year befor i got my 1st very. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Oh I’ve seen a few ladies who talk like that! I like to be fucked hard up the arse on occasion too (looks down and checks for rapidly growing willy!) " you could turn a cucumber on though so not a good example | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " Dammit. I thought I was well in with Ethel from cleethorpes who said those exact words to me | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If they’ve been on a year with no verifications then it’s a no from me No pictures also makes me suspect This 1 is not garenteed as i wos on over a year befor i got my 1st very." Highly unlikely that a guys profile is fake veri's or not! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing." How would it? I’m a single fem so don’t have others to take pics of me very often - ergo the vast majority of my pics are selfies (albeit taken with camera on timer!) Isn’t the opposite likely to be true? Ie if all pics look terribly professional and posed then there’s a high chance they were nicked from the internet? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"For us we’ve found (as we are looking for females only): lack of face pic within the first couple of messages, we have a rule if they can’t provide a live face pic (if they haven’t got one on their verified profile) within the first couple of messages then we move on. Vulgar language, while a handful of females might use that kind of ‘talk’ I don’t think most women would use that kind of language (if they were real we wouldn’t want to meet them anyway). Veris if they have been on a long while without one that is a bit ‘alarmy’ for us, we also prefer a site supporter too as they seem a little more serious about it. Geeky x" With you on the site supporter thing! Only site supporters can message me! Keeps the volume down too! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"For us we’ve found (as we are looking for females only): lack of face pic within the first couple of messages, we have a rule if they can’t provide a live face pic (if they haven’t got one on their verified profile) within the first couple of messages then we move on. Vulgar language, while a handful of females might use that kind of ‘talk’ I don’t think most women would use that kind of language (if they were real we wouldn’t want to meet them anyway). Veris if they have been on a long while without one that is a bit ‘alarmy’ for us, we also prefer a site supporter too as they seem a little more serious about it. Geeky x With you on the site supporter thing! Only site supporters can message me! Keeps the volume down too! " Yes that’s one of our filters now, it’s definitely helped!! Geeky x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... " Damn, I'm a fake, all this time I thought I was real - oh hum. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Dammit. I thought I was well in with Ethel from cleethorpes who said those exact words to me " Or Mrs Trellis from North Wales | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " Oh please tell me this isn't true?! Called decorum! Some people have no shame! Haha | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... " Preach | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. How would it? I’m a single fem so don’t have others to take pics of me very often - ergo the vast majority of my pics are selfies (albeit taken with camera on timer!) Isn’t the opposite likely to be true? Ie if all pics look terribly professional and posed then there’s a high chance they were nicked from the internet? " More referring to 'couples' accounts tbh but same with singles to a degree if they are meeting others. Everyone's a photographer these days! Your 'opposite' proposition isn't anything to do with multiple selfies. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. How would it? I’m a single fem so don’t have others to take pics of me very often - ergo the vast majority of my pics are selfies (albeit taken with camera on timer!) Isn’t the opposite likely to be true? Ie if all pics look terribly professional and posed then there’s a high chance they were nicked from the internet? More referring to 'couples' accounts tbh but same with singles to a degree if they are meeting others. Everyone's a photographer these days! Your 'opposite' proposition isn't anything to do with multiple selfies." Okidoke. Let’s agree to disagree! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Dammit. I thought I was well in with Ethel from cleethorpes who said those exact words to me Or Mrs Trellis from North Wales " Cheeky bugger! I would never suggest a cucumber. I'm more of a butternut squash kinda gal... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. How would it? I’m a single fem so don’t have others to take pics of me very often - ergo the vast majority of my pics are selfies (albeit taken with camera on timer!) Isn’t the opposite likely to be true? Ie if all pics look terribly professional and posed then there’s a high chance they were nicked from the internet? More referring to 'couples' accounts tbh but same with singles to a degree if they are meeting others. Everyone's a photographer these days! Your 'opposite' proposition isn't anything to do with multiple selfies. Okidoke. Let’s agree to disagree! " Always a good default result on a forum | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... Preach" *couples where the guy ONLY meets alone We play as a couple & occasionally separately from our couples profile as we aren’t always free at the same time for meets. We have veri’s as a couple & both separately - so the fact that G meets alone from it most definitely doesn’t not make it a fake profile! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... " Not always the case, a couple I know, the lady loves her other half going out and coming back to tell her what he's been up to. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Dammit. I thought I was well in with Ethel from cleethorpes who said those exact words to me Or Mrs Trellis from North Wales Cheeky bugger! I would never suggest a cucumber. I'm more of a butternut squash kinda gal..." Girthy | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Use Google Reverse Image Search to check any suspicious photos. It's very good and will show you where else on the internet any particular photo is posted." Just used it on your bath picture, it's showing on the Ideal Standard website! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " Oh jesus! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Use Google Reverse Image Search to check any suspicious photos. It's very good and will show you where else on the internet any particular photo is posted. Just used it on your bath picture, it's showing on the Ideal Standard website!" Will have to chase them up over unpaid royalties | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples profiles where the guy meets alone..... " Ohh I don’t know we are a couple and both meet separately. For example MrP is off to a club tonight and I’m dropping him off MrsK x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " Oh Dear! I was thinking of putting this sort of message on our profile to spice things up a little. Not so sure now!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing." I don't get how having selfies sets alarm bells ringing. I have to take all my pictures myself. I ain't asking guys I meet to start taking pictures of me. I have to take about 20 to get one decent one to use. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. How would it? I’m a single fem so don’t have others to take pics of me very often - ergo the vast majority of my pics are selfies (albeit taken with camera on timer!) Isn’t the opposite likely to be true? Ie if all pics look terribly professional and posed then there’s a high chance they were nicked from the internet? " If you ever need a photographer let me know... (I think we've met socially btw. so not quite the random offer...) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Women offering immediate meets and giving you address details. .. Miss" Yes. Not so much on here but on dating sites i see women who give their town as somewhere I know is basically a hamlet of 3 houses. They're immediately ringing alarms. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. I don't get how having selfies sets alarm bells ringing. I have to take all my pictures myself. I ain't asking guys I meet to start taking pictures of me. I have to take about 20 to get one decent one to use. " I'd be lost without a mirror!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. I don't get how having selfies sets alarm bells ringing. I have to take all my pictures myself. I ain't asking guys I meet to start taking pictures of me. I have to take about 20 to get one decent one to use. " You missed out the word 'all' which is quite important by context. Maybe if someone else was taking them you could get it down to one decent one in ten? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy " That’s rude and has no logic! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy " So someone asks 'Why?' when subjected to an out-of-the-blue accusation and you assume they're fake? If someone said that to me I'd probably give them a piece of my mind, and I can assure you I'm perfectly real! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy That’s rude and has no logic!" Getting to the point has got to be logical! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy That’s rude and has no logic!" It is logical, it works for me . | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy That’s rude and has no logic! Getting to the point has got to be logical!" I get messages frequently saying you’re fake even when I have my profile active and veris showing. I assume it’s just desperate men seeking attention and trying to get a message regardless of the content. So if someone’s questions your reasoning then they are fake?! How is that logical? Just nasty men abusing women for no reason, happens all day he time on here and it shouldn’t be condoned!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy So someone asks 'Why?' when subjected to an out-of-the-blue accusation and you assume they're fake? If someone said that to me I'd probably give them a piece of my mind, and I can assure you I'm perfectly real!" It works for me, and let’s be honest, your profile doesn’t look fake | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy That’s rude and has no logic! Getting to the point has got to be logical! I get messages frequently saying you’re fake even when I have my profile active and veris showing. I assume it’s just desperate men seeking attention and trying to get a message regardless of the content. So if someone’s questions your reasoning then they are fake?! How is that logical? Just nasty men abusing women for no reason, happens all day he time on here and it shouldn’t be condoned!!" Just block them then, why would you question someone who thought you were fake?? That has no logic | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently your fake if you don't answer all your messages and get wet by fancy a fuck babe messages! " You mean to tell me those don't work? Dammit!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"When it's a silouette " They’re dodgy those silhouettes, especially cave dwelling ones | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently your fake if you don't answer all your messages and get wet by fancy a fuck babe messages! You mean to tell me those don't work? Dammit!! " Must try harder babes! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"When it's a silouette They’re dodgy those silhouettes, especially cave dwelling ones " Well that's my cover blown | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently your fake if you don't answer all your messages and get wet by fancy a fuck babe messages! You mean to tell me those don't work? Dammit!! Must try harder babes! " Others: Fancy a fuck? Me, an intellectual: Would you care to partake in some amorous activities involving a period of cunnillingus, followed by penile vaginal penetration culminating in mutual satisfaction? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Any profile that look suspect I tend to message them saying they are fake, if they reply with ‘why’ or on over reaction then they are definately dodgy That’s rude and has no logic! Getting to the point has got to be logical! I get messages frequently saying you’re fake even when I have my profile active and veris showing. I assume it’s just desperate men seeking attention and trying to get a message regardless of the content. So if someone’s questions your reasoning then they are fake?! How is that logical? Just nasty men abusing women for no reason, happens all day he time on here and it shouldn’t be condoned!!" Think you might be over-reacting a tad. We think it is quite funny when someone accuses us of being fake. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"When it's a silouette They’re dodgy those silhouettes, especially cave dwelling ones Well that's my cover blown " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing." Don't get this one?! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. Don't get this one?!" Me neither | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. Don't get this one?! Me neither " Me neither, mine all are maybe they think they’re stolen off Facebook or something!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. I don't get how having selfies sets alarm bells ringing. I have to take all my pictures myself. I ain't asking guys I meet to start taking pictures of me. I have to take about 20 to get one decent one to use. You missed out the word 'all' which is quite important by context. Maybe if someone else was taking them you could get it down to one decent one in ten?" How do you tell a selfie from one taken by someone else?! Mine are a mix of both but it's only me in the picture! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Onjly if you ask nicely Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing. Don't get this one?!" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Messages just off the "girl" saying that she is just organising a meet for her partner/boyfriend/husband. And there is no pictures of him on her profile. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that?" Not if both of them were in the pic | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If the pictures are all selfies that should set alarm bells ringing." Why would that set alarm bells?! All of my pics are self taken | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"[Removed by poster at 19/01/18 18:40:09]" Soz forgot to reply and quote hence the delete | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic" And if they weren't? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't?" I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies " 'Weren't'! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'!" Were | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were" Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes!" Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Can’t we all just get along? " I'm not feeling the love in this thread! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone " The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense." No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Can’t we all just get along? I'm not feeling the love in this thread! " The reason for this thread was really just to get advice as to which people to invest time with and those to avoid. The purpose was not to start a witch hunt. Life is too short to spend time on those people that don’t enrich it. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious." What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If they’ve been on a year with no verifications then it’s a no from me No pictures also makes me suspect " Unfortunately some of us not right age or status is wrong for most to meet I'm real looking to meet but I've been here over year with no verify | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. " The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there. Just checked your profile and it's fine. You aren't a rudey dudey! It's the ones who write I want someone to fuck me hard up the arse and stick a cucumber in my sopping cunt that tend not to be written by a lady Oh I’ve seen a few ladies who talk like that! I like to be fucked hard up the arse on occasion too (looks down and checks for rapidly growing willy!) " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well." Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. " There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Problem with these threads is, they also act as a guide for the fakes to make their profiles less obvious...." Very true... But most guys dont think like girls would ... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Problem with these threads is, they also act as a guide for the fakes to make their profiles less obvious.... Very true... But most guys dont think like girls would ... " And most of the fakes avoid the forums as far as I can tell C | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips?yes you can see say for example in a couples profile all the pics are of the guy and no pics of man and woman together oh and its always the guy chatting she's always doing ironing ,sleeping,working or with her master " Tracey doesn't often chat on fab it's usually Chris but pics are mainly of Tracey not chris | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"They use stolen pics. Unfortunately for them my lovely Fab friends tell me about them. It’s happened twice now. " No one is ever gonna want to steal my pics | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips?" The woman has a cock and a beard | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Couples with really old veris-I tend to think they maybe split up and it's just the guy using the profile." Love this. The last verification Will be from 4 yrs ago, and the accompanying message says it's juat the male meeting at the moment, as his wife/partner is unable to meet due to (insert excuse here). | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"It's like carbon dating. You can work out when their wife fucked off " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Depends how you define fake; just counted the number of fields filled in on my profile and it's over 20 (includes interests). So, if I was to change my sex to female and be non gender spefic about other things (but honest), then my profife would be over 95% true. Or is a fake profile one that has one false entry? In which case, those that don't put their real age (I know there's a lot that do this) have fake profiles." Percentages don’t really cover this though, do they. Males pretending to be females or couples is far more serious than, ahem, adjusting one’s date of birth a little... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"When it's a silouette They’re dodgy those silhouettes, especially cave dwelling ones Well that's my cover blown " Or maybe it's a guy in a white shirt.... us fakes are very inventive | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Depends how you define fake; just counted the number of fields filled in on my profile and it's over 20 (includes interests). So, if I was to change my sex to female and be non gender spefic about other things (but honest), then my profife would be over 95% true. Or is a fake profile one that has one false entry? In which case, those that don't put their real age (I know there's a lot that do this) have fake profiles." There's a fair amount of untruths on my profile using your example. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Depends how you define fake; just counted the number of fields filled in on my profile and it's over 20 (includes interests). So, if I was to change my sex to female and be non gender spefic about other things (but honest), then my profife would be over 95% true. Or is a fake profile one that has one false entry? In which case, those that don't put their real age (I know there's a lot that do this) have fake profiles. Percentages don’t really cover this though, do they. Males pretending to be females or couples is far more serious than, ahem, adjusting one’s date of birth a little..." I don't know; if I went to a meet and it turned out to be a bloke, we could laugh about it and have a drink together. But, if a meet turned out to be a 90 year old granny, we'd spend the evening chewing toffees (not an youthanism) and talking about the war. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there." A real give away. A female that goes straight for the jugular. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance?" May I answer by quoting your own words? "Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" That is exactly where you told me not to stick my nose in. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance? May I answer by quoting your own words? "Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" That is exactly where you told me not to stick my nose in. " Given your previous confusion over what purpose quotation marks have I can see where you you have got muddled here. Just because the word nose is in each of the very different sentences it doesn't make them mean the same thing. As an aside if you did think what I said, not what you think i said, was insulting did you report it? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Every one of these threads help create a fakers 'not-to-do' list" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance? May I answer by quoting your own words? "Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" That is exactly where you told me not to stick my nose in. Given your previous confusion over what purpose quotation marks have I can see where you you have got muddled here. Just because the word nose is in each of the very different sentences it doesn't make them mean the same thing. As an aside if you did think what I said, not what you think i said, was insulting did you report it?" Why don't you all just get a room and fuck? It's supposed to be an adult site! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance? May I answer by quoting your own words? "Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" That is exactly where you told me not to stick my nose in. Given your previous confusion over what purpose quotation marks have I can see where you you have got muddled here. Just because the word nose is in each of the very different sentences it doesn't make them mean the same thing. As an aside if you did think what I said, not what you think i said, was insulting did you report it?" Yes. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I spend some time viewing profiles but how do you know if the profiles are fake? Any tips? If it's a female using vulgar language ....this is unlikely to be female, although there are the occasional rudey rudey out there." i get this - not many ladies come on full on straight away - most of the profiles tend to go unlos quite quickly | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If you looked at a couples profile and all the pictures were selfies. wouldn't you question that? Not if both of them were in the pic And if they weren't? I have 20 years worth of pics with my ex, ever since smart phones I’d say 100% of them were selfies 'Weren't'! Were Ffs, it's like having teeth pulled sometimes! Well make your point then and stop being arrogant! My point is since smartphones all my pics with my ex were selfies taken on said smartphone. Your comment of “weren’t “ shed no light on what you were trying to say other than contradict my statement that all my pics WERE selfies since the purchase of my first smartphone The speech marks around weren't indicated it was a quote ie something previously said. Read back and it should make sense. No that's not how it reads at all. The quotes don't imply that. It reads like you are saying the previous 'were' is untrue. If that's not what you meant here's a novel idea: explain clearly instead of getting defensive and obnoxious. What would be the point of the speech marks if I was just disagreeing with a post. Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer? The point of the quote marks would be to suggest you were disagreeing with the specific choice of word. With no other context offered this is a reasonable and valid interpretation of your post. You could have followed up by explaining but no, you got insulting. The point of quote marks is to quote, there is a massive clue in the words. You must have a different interpretation of the word 'insulting', to most as well. Yes, you were quoting. It is the implications of the quote that are the issue. Telling someone not to poke their nose in is generally consider rude and insulting behaviour in civilised discourse. Leaving this now as I have paid writing work to do. There were no implications it was a quote ffs, nothing more nothing less. The 'implications' are in your head as is your latter accusation. Where did I tell you not to stick your nose in? Do you write fairy-tales by chance? May I answer by quoting your own words? "Here's a novel idea for you, only stick your nose in if you've got something sensible to add. Or do you want me to be clearer?" That is exactly where you told me not to stick my nose in. Given your previous confusion over what purpose quotation marks have I can see where you you have got muddled here. Just because the word nose is in each of the very different sentences it doesn't make them mean the same thing. As an aside if you did think what I said, not what you think i said, was insulting did you report it? Yes." Umm...not sure why you are arguing any more, or on what basis you would report each other...might be better just to walk away now...love and kisses to you both x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Given your previous confusion over what purpose quotation marks have I can see where you you have got muddled here. Just because the word nose is in each of the very different sentences it doesn't make them mean the same thing. As an aside if you did think what I said, not what you think i said, was insulting did you report it?" I think everyone can see what you were saying. Let's keep the rude comments away from the forum please as everyone is welcome to comment | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |