Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So how clean is the air at your place? We scored a 1! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42566393 Not surprised- you normally post from the bathroom Clem! " It's definitely polluted in there. For a good half hour after as well... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So how clean is the air at your place? We scored a 1! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42566393 Not surprised- you normally post from the bathroom Clem! It's definitely polluted in there. For a good half hour after as well..." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. " I was wondering where they got their information from. My daughter lives by a very busy A road into London, and by an industrial estate that has hundreds of lorries and cats going in and out day and night, and her address got a 2 also. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I was wondering where they got their information from. My daughter lives by a very busy A road into London, and by an industrial estate that has hundreds of lorries and cats going in and out day and night, and her address got a 2 also." Are they flatulent cats or something | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. " I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc." I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. " To clarify. The post code has higher than recommended NO2 levels. So should rate as a 6 but came up a 1 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"3 here, suprised it's not more.." You'd have thought so. Do they count pollution from aircraft too? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"3 here, suprised it's not more.. You'd have thought so. Do they count pollution from aircraft too?" Of course. Its just air quality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. " Maybe the government are lying.... surely not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. Maybe the government are lying.... surely not. " So your saying the government would say air pollution is bad in an area when it’s actually good. Seems a little bit backwards to me. No the area I mention has been independently tested. The NO2 values are higher than the government recommend ie the air is very very polluted. Yet using the bbc post code checker you get a 1. ie good quality air. Whose right ? Knowing the area the bbc are wrong | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. Maybe the government are lying.... surely not. So your saying the government would say air pollution is bad in an area when it’s actually good. Seems a little bit backwards to me. No the area I mention has been independently tested. The NO2 values are higher than the government recommend ie the air is very very polluted. Yet using the bbc post code checker you get a 1. ie good quality air. Whose right ? Knowing the area the bbc are wrong " The bbc didn't do the sampling... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't put too much reliance on the BBC info. I just put in a post code where the air quality was rated as very bad 6 months the ago. Nothing has changed to improve air quality as it's due to road traffic. Yet The BBC gives a 1. Totally opposite the official result. I thought it was the company "earthsense" that had compiled the data, rather than the bbc. I don't know who compiled the data but the BBC presented it. The area I checked By post code that was rated a 1 but in reality was well above Gorverment guidelines when tested last year. Maybe the government are lying.... surely not. So your saying the government would say air pollution is bad in an area when it’s actually good. Seems a little bit backwards to me. No the area I mention has been independently tested. The NO2 values are higher than the government recommend ie the air is very very polluted. Yet using the bbc post code checker you get a 1. ie good quality air. Whose right ? Knowing the area the bbc are wrong The bbc didn't do the sampling..." I’m NOT saying the BBC did do the sampling. However if you visit the bbc news web site science section the article has a post code search function which gives you the result. So I’m getting the result via the BBC. My comments stay the same. The answer given ( via the BBC) differs vastly from independent results. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So how clean is the air at your place? We scored a 1! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42566393" Hmm we scored a 1 too and living next too a dock I find that complete BS | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So how clean is the air at your place? We scored a 1! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42566393 Hmm we scored a 1 too and living next too a dock I find that complete BS" By the sea? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |