Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeesh what is this utter claptrap, surely no intelligent, emotionally mature male actually believes the crap they peddle?? "i find it nauseating...its being regarded by a lot of educationalists as potentially dangerous as other types of radicalisation.. its repulsive. Lot of targeting of young men through 'fitness and health' etc websites, along with their 'motivational' videos etc..very scary stuff... on here there are a few men who spout great chunks lifted from their imbecilic blogs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?  "It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!! "The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists. The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault. In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]""Can you dumb that down a bit. I am by no means thick but you lost me a bit there! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. " Hence the quotation marks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeesh what is this utter claptrap, surely no intelligent, emotionally mature male actually believes the crap they peddle?? ". It's the equivalent of women's lib groups... Utter bollocks  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeesh what is this utter claptrap, surely no intelligent, emotionally mature male actually believes the crap they peddle?? .
It's the equivalent of women's lib groups...
Utter bollocks "no, it's not the equivalent of them at all...and 'womens lib'??? are you trapped in 1976? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeesh what is this utter claptrap, surely no intelligent, emotionally mature male actually believes the crap they peddle?? .
It's the equivalent of women's lib groups...
Utter bollocks
no, it's not the equivalent of them at all...and 'womens lib'??? are you trapped in 1976?". Yep.... Greatest year ever | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]""Oh good god | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god "\ I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I want to be trapped in 1976. Best summer ever! Oh yeah" . Gimme five bro  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. ." Did anyone ever explain to you what quotation marks meant? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeesh what is this utter claptrap, surely no intelligent, emotionally mature male actually believes the crap they peddle?? .
It's the equivalent of women's lib groups...
Utter bollocks
no, it's not the equivalent of them at all...and 'womens lib'??? are you trapped in 1976?"Well in fairness what I got from that big post was it is exactly that. Men are the best blah blah blah. Is that not the case? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. " Thank you Ms | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website."And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it! 
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms "No worries. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website.
And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it!
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate. ". If a man didn't write it... It's probably not worth reading I say.. Huzzah | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website.
And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it!
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate. .
If a man didn't write it...
It's probably not worth reading I say..
Huzzah "True. OP, you should ask a man to post this thread so it gets the attention it deserves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries. "I notice he’s not acknowledged his error. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Claptrap alert.... Whoop whoop whoop "A load of old bollocks if you ask me... But then someone has to get paid for churning out bullshit these days don't they? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error. ". The cad!! Hang him high  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website.
And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it!
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate. .
If a man didn't write it...
It's probably not worth reading I say..
Huzzah "I mistook your profile pic for a ladies foot in a ballet slipper stepping on someone.
I do apologise! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error. "Left them off the second quote, my bad, but I added a credit so I'm still a GOOD girl!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error. "Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now. Signed - a honey badger | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website.
And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it!
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate. .
If a man didn't write it...
It's probably not worth reading I say..
Huzzah
I mistook your profile pic for a ladies foot in a ballet slipper stepping on someone.
I do apologise! "Hahaha, stop it Estella! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error.
Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now.
Signed - a honey badger "
Love you C.
Signed - a vinegar titted manhating spinster  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Claptrap alert.... Whoop whoop whoop
A load of old bollocks if you ask me... But then someone has to get paid for churning out bullshit these days don't they? "It explains a LOT of the threads we get on here lately!! I feel sorry for young men nowadays, I really do....and young women.  Something is going very wrong..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error.
Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now.
Signed - a honey badger
Love you C.
Signed - a vinegar titted manhating spinster "Hey don't worry, someone on here will still fuck you.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]"
Oh good god \
I suspect that's a direct lift from a critique website.
And a man probably wrote it and she's taking credit for it!
Anyway....I've read a lot about this (and yes, I've seen the documentary you referenced earlier) and this description still reads as fairly accurate. .
If a man didn't write it...
It's probably not worth reading I say..
Huzzah
I mistook your profile pic for a ladies foot in a ballet slipper stepping on someone.
I do apologise! ". I have very lady like feet don't you know! I'm in touch with my feminosphere | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nice lesson re the quote marks, will look more for those next time. " Please teach me. Was that sarcasm dripping there? Or the sound of my wetness for all knowing men? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error.
Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now.
Signed - a honey badger
Love you C.
Signed - a vinegar titted manhating spinster
Hey don't worry, someone on here will still fuck you. "It’s true
How about you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Claptrap alert.... Whoop whoop whoop
A load of old bollocks if you ask me... But then someone has to get paid for churning out bullshit these days don't they?
It explains a LOT of the threads we get on here lately!! I feel sorry for young men nowadays, I really do....and young women. Something is going very wrong....."I feel more sorry for them from the perspective of student debt, secure job prospects, access to mortgages and pension provision. Would not want to be starting out again. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error.
Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now.
Signed - a honey badger
Love you C.
Signed - a vinegar titted manhating spinster
Hey don't worry, someone on here will still fuck you.
It’s true
How about you? "Oh you're good! I like you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Claptrap alert.... Whoop whoop whoop
A load of old bollocks if you ask me... But then someone has to get paid for churning out bullshit these days don't they?
It explains a LOT of the threads we get on here lately!! I feel sorry for young men nowadays, I really do....and young women. Something is going very wrong....."You have hit the nail on the head actually and I was having a similar conversation with my mum earlier about how everything has gone OTT PC... what was once taken as a bit of fun is often now taken as offence... Kinda sad in my eyes (although as with everything there are exceptions) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Claptrap alert.... Whoop whoop whoop
A load of old bollocks if you ask me... But then someone has to get paid for churning out bullshit these days don't they?
It explains a LOT of the threads we get on here lately!! I feel sorry for young men nowadays, I really do....and young women. Something is going very wrong.....". Yeah it's like they've been spoon fed utter shit by their elders who should no better | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures." This will do for the answer I sought. Cheers bud! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures." Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Hence the quotation marks. Thank you Ms
No worries.
I notice he’s not acknowledged his error.
Men don't make errors. You may leave the thread now.
Signed - a honey badger
Love you C.
Signed - a vinegar titted manhating spinster
Hey don't worry, someone on here will still fuck you.
It’s true
How about you?
Oh you're good! I like you."Seppuku time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nice lesson re the quote marks, will look more for those next time. Please teach me. Was that sarcasm dripping there? Or the sound of my wetness for all knowing men? " Men are easy to know and very predictable. Empty balls and full belly sorts most of it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S."Which part of the red pill movement advocated violence? Have you seen the film by the way? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nice lesson re the quote marks, will look more for those next time. Please teach me. Was that sarcasm dripping there? Or the sound of my wetness for all knowing men? " . We got maself a gusher Cletus  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You didn’t type that, you lifted it from another critique site. That’s not your own work. Your definition is too narrow also. There are many women who advocate for men. Google the Honey Badgers and Cassie Jay. Cassie Jay dared to make a film highlightin men’s issue and she is a self proclaimed feminist. She was no platformed and vilified by other women." You were perhaps angry about that, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nice lesson re the quote marks, will look more for those next time. Please teach me. Was that sarcasm dripping there? Or the sound of my wetness for all knowing men? Men are easy to know and very predictable. Empty balls and full belly sorts most of it. " And never seem acknowledge they got something wrong simply and accountably. #notallmen | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S.
Which part of the red pill movement advocated violence? Have you seen the film by the way?"She said she’d seen the film in an earlier reply to you. Ye gods!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S."I think thanks to the internet (and the increasing influence it has on free thinking) that it's too early to tell how bad all this can turn out. Feminists demonising young men as creeps and losers spawns more of this bile about women being bitches and sluts and and on and on in a ticking timebomb of self cofirming echo chamber god knows what. A black mirror episode on chemical castration for all as the ultimate solution  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S.
Which part of the red pill movement advocated violence? Have you seen the film by the way?"I already mentioned above that I've seen the film. The movement doesn't have a single cohesive core, so it's difficult to say where it advocates violence. But it's pretty easy to see the anger and threats associated with the movement when you read individuals' twitter and Reddit contributions to 'the cause', which I've done. I'm making a prediction, which is never a truly smart thing to do. Time will tell. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures." I do agree. Both have legitimate concerns I am sure but I despise anything that promotes an adversarial 'war of the sexes' mindset - that way only lies destruction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it "Toxic Narcissist | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. I do agree. Both have legitimate concerns I am sure but I despise anything that promotes an adversarial 'war of the sexes' mindset - that way only lies destruction." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W T F you on about Fuck off" Now this is the shit right here! This I understood lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W T F you on about Fuck off Now this is the shit right here! This I understood lol" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S.
Which part of the red pill movement advocated violence? Have you seen the film by the way?
I already mentioned above that I've seen the film.
The movement doesn't have a single cohesive core, so it's difficult to say where it advocates violence. ."" "Roosh V", aka Daryush Valizadeh, is an American pick-up artist and sex tourist who runs websites that make up some of the darkest corners of the "Manosphere", including his personal blog RooshV and Return of Kings. One of his most interesting views is that r@pe should be legal on private property." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to." And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it
Toxic Narcissist "#ToxicNarcissist | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to." People fired up still get to interact with others every day, so their aggressive can spill over ay any point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it
Toxic Narcissist
#ToxicNarcissist ". #stillbollocks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it
Toxic Narcissist
#ToxicNarcissist "LOL this is over my head this post
Back in the corner for me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Live and let live...x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's absolute bollox and I reckon firmly sponsored by the christian right with a pro gun, anti , traditional family values tint. It's the equal and opposite to radical feminism...a second order effect if you like and they both feed off each other in a silly war to crush common sense, drive the sexes apart (via recruitment) and generally make the world worse. If you value equality you should hate the manosphere and most of feminism in equal measures. Hmm. I tend not to usually agree with you. But....I agree with this.
Although I will add what I said earlier - the whole red pill movement is more dangerous than feminism because of the higher likelihood of violence. I do believe we'll see physical repercussions in the future, particularly in the U.S.
Which part of the red pill movement advocated violence? Have you seen the film by the way?
I already mentioned above that I've seen the film.
The movement doesn't have a single cohesive core, so it's difficult to say where it advocates violence. .
"
"Roosh V", aka Daryush Valizadeh, is an American pick-up artist and sex tourist who runs websites that make up some of the darkest corners of the "Manosphere", including his personal blog RooshV and Return of Kings. One of his most interesting views is that r@pe should be legal on private property.""He's not the most savoury character but this was take from a satirical piece he wrote where he said these are not HIS views. It's often misquoted. "Note: The following article was published as a satirical thought experiment. It’s conclusion is not to be taken literally. Click here to learn my real views on r@pe." That's his header for the subject. He's not a r@pe apologist | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. " I made a point elsewhere and it applies here....the real moderate feminists should look to work on mens issues too as the most dangerous of all is the marginalised social outcast male with little to lose. Healthy, happy men are better for women. Instead in some cases we have feminists shutting down what should be healthy discussions of genuine issues some men have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W T F you on about Fuck off Now this is the shit right here! This I understood lol" . Landrover owner talk | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen plenty of violence at those alt left student rallies to shut down free speech...an embarrassment to any sense of intellectual honesty at those institutions. I think men are more prone to a lone wolf marginalised violent attacker and women are better at mobilising a group and persuading innocent bystanders with a more palatable hook message (after all...who doesn't want equality?...) Plenty of psychology around small concessions to recruit..either cult members or customers. Sales 102." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. I made a point elsewhere and it applies here....the real moderate feminists should look to work on mens issues too as the most dangerous of all is the marginalised social outcast male with little to lose. Healthy, happy men are better for women. Instead in some cases we have feminists shutting down what should be healthy discussions of genuine issues some men have." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the long and the short of it is, men should be able to have loads of sex with loads of women but if a woman has loads of sex with loads of men, that's bad... So where are the men suppose to get the women to have sex with??? I don't think they have fully thought it out...
Live and let live...x". #fabstraight | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. " Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it
Toxic Narcissist
#ToxicNarcissist
LOL this is over my head this post
Back in the corner for me "It's Ok, I can tell you now what you would think of it - total bollocks, and they're probably all on steroids too!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen plenty of violence at those alt left student rallies to shut down free speech...an embarrassment to any sense of intellectual honesty at those institutions. I think men are more prone to a lone wolf marginalised violent attacker and women are better at mobilising a group and persuading innocent bystanders with a more palatable hook message (after all...who doesn't want equality?...) Plenty of psychology around small concessions to recruit..either cult members or customers. Sales 102." You're conflating feminism with student protests (I reject your use of the label alt-left. The alt-right defined themselves by that label (just look at Breitbart) Just because other right-wing thinkers don't like it doesn't mean that they can use the alt-right's own descriptions against the left). Anyway, as I said, you're conflating two different movements. I'm making a prediction regarding the violent aspect, as I already said. We'll see what comes of it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never heard of it ... What is it?
It's the most absurd and pernicious reaction to feminism as far as I can gather! We've had a couple of young men on here spouting their ridiculous theories but i never bothered to look it up before!!
"The "Manosphere" is a loose network of websites oriented towards a particular vision of masculinity, sometimes called neomasculinity. It includes men's rights and many pick-up artist blogs, as well as some bodybuilding and men’s fashion blogs, although the latter aren’t the ones that draw controversy for having a hateful misogynistic rhetoric. The most benign end of the spectrum may include legitimate dating and sex advice, or concern for legal issues affecting men (such as child custody rights) - while the other "radical" end of the spectrum ventures into slut-shaming, women-hating, and (to a lesser extent) homophobic rhetoric resembling that of many Christian and Islamic fundamentalists.
The thing that ties these boys' clubs together is their collective obsession with feminism and the weird way in which they express both a strong desire and a profound distaste for women. Much of the animosity centers on self-proclaimed "Nice Guys"™ believing that all of their troubles with women are simply because said "evil, golddigging, slutty women" are too stupid to realize how great said men are (the possibility that maybe they're really just losers having never crossed their minds). They also share a similar vocabulary and troubling attitudes concerning sexual assault.
In an example of crank magnetism, many of these people also embrace racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular. There's also a fair amount of overlap between the manosphere and the neoreactionary and alt-right movements (as seen in the Gamergate kerfuffle). There has even been some indication that MRA is a pathway into the alt-right.[1]""Thank you. Now I know what it is I'm even more confused than usual lol. Then I read it again. Haven't you just described the majority of the why aren't women running and throwing themselves on my dick threads
Whatever happened to equality for everyone.
Too utopian perhaps?
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the long and the short of it is, men should be able to have loads of sex with loads of women but if a woman has loads of sex with loads of men, that's bad... So where are the men suppose to get the women to have sex with??? I don't think they have fully thought it out...
Live and let live...x"We see loads of it here - any woman on here is a low-value slut fit for shagging, and a high-value woman fit for being a gf/wife is obviously locked in a ivory tower somewhere!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the long and the short of it is, men should be able to have loads of sex with loads of women but if a woman has loads of sex with loads of men, that's bad... So where are the men suppose to get the women to have sex with??? I don't think they have fully thought it out...
Live and let live...x
We see loads of it here - any woman on here is a low-value slut fit for shagging, and a high-value woman fit for being a gf/wife is obviously locked in a ivory tower somewhere!!!"Agree with you there in terms of the unfairness of that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"# fucking there's the fucking problem. Hash fucking tag , it should have been called bullshit tag as that's what generally follows it
Toxic Narcissist
#ToxicNarcissist
LOL this is over my head this post
Back in the corner for me
It's Ok, I can tell you now what you would think of it - total bollocks, and they're probably all on steroids too!!
". Steroids?...what with my lady feet!! No need anyhow, we've got bollocks, big bollocks that ooze manliness | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known " No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen plenty of violence at those alt left student rallies to shut down free speech...an embarrassment to any sense of intellectual honesty at those institutions. I think men are more prone to a lone wolf marginalised violent attacker and women are better at mobilising a group and persuading innocent bystanders with a more palatable hook message (after all...who doesn't want equality?...) Plenty of psychology around small concessions to recruit..either cult members or customers. Sales 102. You're conflating feminism with student protests (I reject your use of the label alt-left. The alt-right defined themselves by that label (just look at Breitbart) Just because other right-wing thinkers don't like it doesn't mean that they can use the alt-right's own descriptions against the left). Anyway, as I said, you're conflating two different movements. I'm making a prediction regarding the violent aspect, as I already said. We'll see what comes of it." I'm not too hung up on the terminology all I know is i've seen some fairly rabid creatures at talks that respectful criticise feminism for many of the reasons discussed here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides." There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. " Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what this is really all about.... Women are just jealous of our bollocks "Oh no, I'd love to have the power of a pussy for one day as a hot 21-year-old woman. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what this is really all about.... Women are just jealous of our bollocks
Oh no, I'd love to have the power of a pussy for one day as a hot 21-year-old woman. ". What, salt and pepper style | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed?" I've no idea...I'm more of a principles than a details person and ignore the news. Perhaps a male suicide or 10...but let's not be taking sides. The elephant in the room is global poverty while these arseholes play up a gender war between the better offs of the world as if it were life and death. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed?" Thay have maimed, permanently disfigured and beaten up people they have cornered. It's violence top-trumps? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
.
We'll see these wenches blind if it's the last thing we do | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed? I've no idea...I'm more of a principles than a details person and ignore the news. Perhaps a male suicide or 10...but let's not be taking sides. The elephant in the room is global poverty while these arseholes play up a gender war between the better offs of the world as if it were life and death. " The answer is that they haven't killed anyone. The rest of what you write I wholeheartedly agree with. Identity politics is the poison of the economically repressed. Bannon himself admitted it. I wish it would go away. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed? Thay have maimed, permanently disfigured and beaten up people they have cornered. It's violence top-trumps?" Nonsense. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed? I've no idea...I'm more of a principles than a details person and ignore the news. Perhaps a male suicide or 10...but let's not be taking sides. The elephant in the room is global poverty while these arseholes play up a gender war between the better offs of the world as if it were life and death. The answer is that they haven't killed anyone. The rest of what you write I wholeheartedly agree with. Identity politics is the poison of the economically repressed. Bannon himself admitted it. I wish it would go away." Who exactly are the advocates of identity and gender politics exactly? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed it will. But I don't see any advocacy for violence in the at all. It that leads to people spouting off on keyboards then so be it but that is all it will most likely amount to. And so you're making a prediction as well.... If you don't see any advocacy for violence.....then you aren't looking very hard. In fact, some of the movements that have been associated with the red pill movement have led to known death threats... Anyway, that's not to say radical feminists haven't shown their own proclivity to violent remarks, however, it tends to be young single angry men who actually act on such violence, especially in the west. So the chance of it turning violent, even if just as a result of angry people behind their keyboards, is still higher than for radical feminism. Radical feminism certainly tips into the AntiFa brigade and their antics are well known No. It doesn't. You're conflating seperate movements. If we want to go in that direction.....it has been suggested that many people at the neo-Nazi protests in the US were supporters of the red pill movement (think about all those young white men with tiki torches in Virginia). One such man killed a woman by running her over with a car. Shall we conflate those movements or does it only apply to the left? No, better to be precise, I think. On both sides. There is overlap on both sides. I can certainly see how some sucker inhaling the red pill shit could turn up at a white christian rally looking for trouble. Right. Ok. Well then, I stand by my earlier assumption. One woman has been killed by a group associated with the red pill movement (of we are accepting your conflation). Who has antifa killed? I've no idea...I'm more of a principles than a details person and ignore the news. Perhaps a male suicide or 10...but let's not be taking sides. The elephant in the room is global poverty while these arseholes play up a gender war between the better offs of the world as if it were life and death. The answer is that they haven't killed anyone. The rest of what you write I wholeheartedly agree with. Identity politics is the poison of the economically repressed. Bannon himself admitted it. I wish it would go away. Who exactly are the advocates of identity and gender politics exactly?" What is your point, exactly? In the US, race and gender identity politics are peddled by the left. Religious and Race (pro-white, anti mexican/black) politics are also peddled by the right. (I avoid UK politics because it isn't a subject I'm great at). Identity politics are used widely by everyone because they get people's emotions involved. I really dislike their use, but they are great at keeping the current power structure in check... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W T F you on about Fuck off Now this is the shit right here! This I understood lol. Landrover owner talk "Somebody mention Land Rovers???? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway...I'm sleepy and I have a flight tomorrow. G'nite all! "Na night. Sleep tight, have a nice flight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway...I'm sleepy and I have a flight tomorrow. G'nite all! "Yes and I have girly things to do in the morning. .... Thanks for the contributions all | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway...I'm sleepy and I have a flight tomorrow. G'nite all! "This is how to get you sleepy, Courtney. For future reference. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W T F you on about Fuck off Now this is the shit right here! This I understood lol. Landrover owner talk "More vauxhall astra I think | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
