Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Announced at 10.00 on the Clarence House Twitter feed. The wedding will take place in spring 2018. He's about 5th in line to the throne of the UK (until the birth of another baby to William and Kate, expected next Spring)."  I like Harry | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged!" Aww bless, good luck to them  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Awwww I think it's lovely ."Me too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just seen their first interview on tv. Lovely couple, nice to have a happy piece of news! "Bit too much whitener on those bloody teeth though lol, this is London, not Hollywood!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just seen their first interview on tv. Lovely couple, nice to have a happy piece of news!
Bit too much whitener on those bloody teeth though lol, this is London, not Hollywood!! "Haha bless her | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A divorced woman on the throne of the House of Windsor would be a pretty big feather in the cap of that bunch of rootless intellectuals, alien Jews and international pederasts who call themselves the Labour Party" Not sure Harry will ever get to the throne | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Awwww I think it's lovely .
Me too"Me 3, she is sooo beautiful! Love her smile | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure... "Let's hope not and give them a chance. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A divorced woman on the throne of the House of Windsor would be a pretty big feather in the cap of that bunch of rootless intellectuals, alien Jews and international pederasts who call themselves the Labour Party" Charles, heir to the throne is divorced, as is Camilla | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A divorced woman on the throne of the House of Windsor would be a pretty big feather in the cap of that bunch of rootless intellectuals, alien Jews and international pederasts who call themselves the Labour Party Charles, heir to the throne is divorced, as is Camilla " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed!" Just seen him on news, he was chuffed! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed! Just seen him on news, he was chuffed! "Really? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure... "How do you know that then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A divorced woman on the throne of the House of Windsor would be a pretty big feather in the cap of that bunch of rootless intellectuals, alien Jews and international pederasts who call themselves the Labour Party Charles, heir to the throne is divorced, as is Camilla " It's a quote from 40 years on, Alan Bennett's John Buchan parody! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed!" It would be funny if princess Soots had a baby and its father also turned out to be James Hewitt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just seen their first interview on tv. Lovely couple, nice to have a happy piece of news!
Bit too much whitener on those bloody teeth though lol, this is London, not Hollywood!! "They'll soon go yellow with our weather! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed! It would be funny if princess Soots had a baby and its father also turned out to be James Hewitt. " Off to the tower for you for even thinking Harry is not from the loins of Charlie! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Its like edward and mrs simpson all over again ..... "How? Harry doesnt need to abdicate for a start | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"A divorced woman on the throne of the House of Windsor would be a pretty big feather in the cap of that bunch of rootless intellectuals, alien Jews and international pederasts who call themselves the Labour Party Charles, heir to the throne is divorced, as is Camilla It's a quote from 40 years on, Alan Bennett's John Buchan parody!" Never liked Bennett's stuff, always seems too whining. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Its like edward and mrs simpson all over again .....
How? Harry doesnt need to abdicate for a start "As in shes an American divorcee .... Of course he doesn't have to abdicate .... he isnt king | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
Ah well, good luck to them I say!
And nice of Downing Street to get straight in there within hours of the announcement to tell us we aren't getting the day off work  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed!" James Hewitt? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I for one wish them well. Like s many couples just starting out I am sure they will be saving for a deposit to try and get on the housing ladder as London gaffs are very expensive. Additionally with the uncertainty over the economy they like all young couples will hope their jobs are safe. Weddings are an expensive gig to arrange but I am sure they will have a lovely day with all the families having a good old knees up! Yes I wish them well! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed! James Hewitt?" You may say that I couldn't possibly comment! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am sure his dad will be chuffed! James Hewitt?" If memory serves, they actually was a DNA test and with Their permission it was "leaked" but They got cold feet and ridiculed the woman who did so. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite "Like who?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure... "Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yuu'd expect the age difference to be a major factor. But if they're both happy let them be, she could certainly do with some good news after the recent German election result." Bit too subtle for the average poster on here mate but that one gets a from me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged!" And the rest of us will have to tighten our belts further since there's now going to be yet another royal suckling on the taxpayer's teat, for the rest of their life! Not to mention the lavish wedding we will have to pay for as well  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged! And the rest of us will have to tighten our belts further since there's now going to be yet another royal suckling on the taxpayer's teat, for the rest of their life! Not to mention the lavish wedding we will have to pay for as well "How much are you paying towards it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another burden on the welfare state !!!" Explain? Do you know how the sovereign grant works, or are you jumping on the bandwagon? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
let’s hope we get the day off work for the wedding too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
American
Divorced
Mixed Race
Catholic
Bet the Daily Heil has a complete meltdown tomorrow | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another burden on the welfare state !!! Explain? Do you know how the sovereign grant works, or are you jumping on the bandwagon? " How does the sovereign grant work, oh learned one. And what on earth has it got to do with this  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I like how Harry's picked the one person to marry who would piss off the establishment the most Commoner
American
Divorced
Mixed Race
Catholic
Bet the Daily Heil has a complete meltdown tomorrow "Unless he just, you know, fell in love with a hot piece of ass | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Unless he just, you know, fell in love with a hot piece of ass" Purely coincidence I'm sure  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged! And the rest of us will have to tighten our belts further since there's now going to be yet another royal suckling on the taxpayer's teat, for the rest of their life! Not to mention the lavish wedding we will have to pay for as well "Hmmm...don't think that equates with recent reports on what the royal family brings to the public purse...Can u imagine all the American tourists who will come to London just for the wedding and the ££££££££ it will generate...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??"All us taxpayers. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged! And the rest of us will have to tighten our belts further since there's now going to be yet another royal suckling on the taxpayer's teat, for the rest of their life! Not to mention the lavish wedding we will have to pay for as well
Hmmm...don't think that equates with recent reports on what the royal family brings to the public purse...Can u imagine all the American tourists who will come to London just for the wedding and the ££££££££ it will generate......"I always take these pro royals reports with a pinch of the proverbial | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Unless he just, you know, fell in love with a hot piece of ass Purely coincidence I'm sure "They'll be swinging in 5 years once the routine sets in | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged!" Love conquers all! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers."sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Unless he just, you know, fell in love with a hot piece of ass Purely coincidence I'm sure
They'll be swinging in 5 years once the routine sets in". Obviously it will be a couples account but she'll never seem to be there and he will be pretending not to be ginger | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that... "No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle. "I'm quite sure 90% of the time they would want the simple life....probably why the QUEEN spends so much time in Balmoral...driving herself about...and generally doing normal things... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged! And the rest of us will have to tighten our belts further since there's now going to be yet another royal suckling on the taxpayer's teat, for the rest of their life! Not to mention the lavish wedding we will have to pay for as well
Hmmm...don't think that equates with recent reports on what the royal family brings to the public purse...Can u imagine all the American tourists who will come to London just for the wedding and the ££££££££ it will generate......"No tourist comes here because they think they will get to meet or see any of the royals. They come here to look at and take pictures of their ridiculous houses. In other words, whether the royal family is here or not, tourists will still come and take pictures of Buck House. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I like how Harry's picked the one person to marry who would piss off the establishment the most Commoner
American
Divorced
Mixed Race
Catholic
Bet the Daily Heil has a complete meltdown tomorrow
Unless he just, you know, fell in love with a hot piece of ass"There's no way Phil the Fixer has signed off on this. One phone call... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle. "The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They just checked the fab forum to see if you lot have congragulated them "Did you get a wink off them as well? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle.
The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties. "Ok, I defer to your obviously better knowledge of this, but if the sovereign grant is from the treasury, taxpayer, then is it still not us, the working public that are footing most of the bills? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just seen their first interview on tv. Lovely couple, nice to have a happy piece of news!
Bit too much whitener on those bloody teeth though lol, this is London, not Hollywood!!
They'll soon go yellow with our weather! "Haha! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle.
The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties.
Ok, I defer to your obviously better knowledge of this, but if the sovereign grant is from the treasury, taxpayer, then is it still not us, the working public that are footing most of the bills?"Only for their ‘official duties’ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle.
The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties.
Ok, I defer to your obviously better knowledge of this, but if the sovereign grant is from the treasury, taxpayer, then is it still not us, the working public that are footing most of the bills?
Only for their ‘official duties’ "Always glad to learn something new. . I just think it's archaic, and I know their life has it's difficulties but it's not the same kind of difficult as someone working 10 hours a day for minimum wage just to get by, or mothers juggling kids and jobs to make ends meet. In my opinion that money could be better spent improving the lifes of everyone and not just an elite few. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle.
The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties.
Ok, I defer to your obviously better knowledge of this, but if the sovereign grant is from the treasury, taxpayer, then is it still not us, the working public that are footing most of the bills?
Only for their ‘official duties’
Always glad to learn something new. . I just think it's archaic, and I know their life has it's difficulties but it's not the same kind of difficult as someone working 10 hours a day for minimum wage just to get by, or mothers juggling kids and jobs to make ends meet. In my opinion that money could be better spent improving the lifes of everyone and not just an elite few. "There's a certain type of person who thinks the solution to every problem is always just another few million pounds away. It's not. Nor wouldn't want to trade my life with his, even to tap that, which i admit i would like to. If i want to wear a nazi uniform then i bloody well will because it's hillarious and i wouldn't want to put up with a bunch of arm chair expert tossers telling me who they think my father is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just watched their engagement interview on iPlayer- it was toecurlingly nauseating! She is very polished, confident and PR-prepped, Harry doesn't really get a word in edgeways unless the interviewer asks him by name for a response
Ah well, good luck to them I say!
"I thought I was the only one thinking this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers."Not me, I don't live in the Duchy of Cornwall. And that's where the PoW and his family get their loot. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I live just down the road from where Harry went to school and the online headline of our local paper is “Former Wokingham Schoolboy Gets Engaged” "Luv it :D It's going to be a Windsor wedding too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I live just down the road from where Harry went to school and the online headline of our local paper is “Former Wokingham Schoolboy Gets Engaged” "Ah love that! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"My American friends, who mystifyingly got rid of a monarchy they now obsess over, were full of glee and indeed diversity is a wonderful thing, though Kate, as a commononer, was supposed to be a symbl of change but was assimilated into the Borg, while the gender pay gap actuallu widened following her assimilation. So, I explained to our colonial cousins 'cross the sea, while some subjects (for we are subjects of a monarch, not citizens of a state) see a black princess as a wonderful role model, others see it as rather like they would if Michelle Obama became a Scientologist. It's nice she has the same initials as Mickey Mouse, which is also a lucrative tourist attraction." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry who ?" No it's Doctor Who | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry who ? No it's Doctor Who" Who's there ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The whole thing is bordering on Disneyfication. The sycophants at the BBC are the directors of Frozen 2. It's just Tramadol for the masses." It's already very tedious | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"My American friends, who mystifyingly got rid of a monarchy they now obsess over, were full of glee and indeed diversity is a wonderful thing, though Kate, as a commononer, was supposed to be a symbl of change but was assimilated into the Borg, while the gender pay gap actuallu widened following her assimilation. So, I explained to our colonial cousins 'cross the sea, while some subjects (for we are subjects of a monarch, not citizens of a state) see a black princess as a wonderful role model, others see it as rather like they would if Michelle Obama became a Scientologist. It's nice she has the same initials as Mickey Mouse, which is also a lucrative tourist attraction. "I thought Harry had turned Gay an was announcing his engagement to the South African fast bowler Morne Morkel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry who ? No it's Doctor Who Who's there ?" Where | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I live just down the road from where Harry went to school and the online headline of our local paper is “Former Wokingham Schoolboy Gets Engaged”
Luv it :D
It's going to be a Windsor wedding too "Not Toxtheth in Liverpool then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They just checked the fab forum to see if you lot have congragulated them " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The romantic in me thinks "awww" The rest of me thinks it's a bit soon! I am a fan of ultra long engagements." Her biological clock is ticking. I like Prince Harry and he's obviously blissfully happy and over the moon. There is something about her I just don't like...a little too "polished" for want of a better word. Think she'll struggle then run back to la la land: I hope I'm wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I live just down the road from where Harry went to school and the online headline of our local paper is “Former Wokingham Schoolboy Gets Engaged” "Private Eye used to announce such things as Woman gets engaged Woman is pregnant Woman has baby | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The romantic in me thinks "awww" The rest of me thinks it's a bit soon! I am a fan of ultra long engagements. Her biological clock is ticking. I like Prince Harry and he's obviously blissfully happy and over the moon. There is something about her I just don't like...a little too "polished" for want of a better word. Think she'll struggle then run back to la la land: I hope I'm wrong. " Are you saying she's not ghetto enough for our prince? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"The romantic in me thinks "awww" The rest of me thinks it's a bit soon! I am a fan of ultra long engagements. Her biological clock is ticking. I like Prince Harry and he's obviously blissfully happy and over the moon. There is something about her I just don't like...a little too "polished" for want of a better word. Think she'll struggle then run back to la la land: I hope I'm wrong. Are you saying she's not ghetto enough for our prince? " No...too Hollywood. The wave and pose...wouldn't have looked out of place on the red carpet. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I live just down the road from where Harry went to school and the online headline of our local paper is “Former Wokingham Schoolboy Gets Engaged”
Luv it :D
It's going to be a Windsor wedding too Not Toxtheth in Liverpool then?"As opposed to a London venue | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The romantic in me thinks "awww" The rest of me thinks it's a bit soon! I am a fan of ultra long engagements. Her biological clock is ticking. I like Prince Harry and he's obviously blissfully happy and over the moon. There is something about her I just don't like...a little too "polished" for want of a better word. Think she'll struggle then run back to la la land: I hope I'm wrong. " Someone at work said she cheated on her ex husband so she will fit in with the royals quite well  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The romantic in me thinks "awww" The rest of me thinks it's a bit soon! I am a fan of ultra long engagements. Her biological clock is ticking. I like Prince Harry and he's obviously blissfully happy and over the moon. There is something about her I just don't like...a little too "polished" for want of a better word. Think she'll struggle then run back to la la land: I hope I'm wrong. Are you saying she's not ghetto enough for our prince? No...too Hollywood. The wave and pose...wouldn't have looked out of place on the red carpet. " That's probably the actress side of her coming out... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Someone at work said she cheated on her ex husband so she will fit in with the royals quite well "She'd fit right in here too then... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
Like who??
All us taxpayers.
sure a few taxpayers will....I didn't give u an invite to my wedding r u sore about that...
No, but I won't be helping to pay for yours. And I wouldn't say I'm particularly sore about it, just a little irked. And I'm not anti royal either, but do grudge helping to fund their lavish lifestyle.
The tax payer doesn’t pay for their ‘lavish lifestyle, neither will it pay for this or any other royal wedding . Granted , it pays for some of the policing. The Sovereign Grant is money that comes from the Treasury – taxpayers – and is given to the Queen for her and her family to carry out official duties.
Ok, I defer to your obviously better knowledge of this, but if the sovereign grant is from the treasury, taxpayer, then is it still not us, the working public that are footing most of the bills?
Only for their ‘official duties’
Always glad to learn something new. . I just think it's archaic, and I know their life has it's difficulties but it's not the same kind of difficult as someone working 10 hours a day for minimum wage just to get by, or mothers juggling kids and jobs to make ends meet. In my opinion that money could be better spent improving the lifes of everyone and not just an elite few.
There's a certain type of person who thinks the solution to every problem is always just another few million pounds away. It's not.
Nor wouldn't want to trade my life with his, even to tap that, which i admit i would like to. If i want to wear a nazi uniform then i bloody well will because it's hillarious and i wouldn't want to put up with a bunch of arm chair expert tossers telling me who they think my father is. "what kind of a tosser would find wearing a nazi uniform hilarious? Some people need to get out more - 'before' they tie any knots. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can"
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best."You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one? I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Harry and Meghan are officially engaged!" Who? Are they on fab? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?"The above sentiment I can get on board with and would concur and yet, when it was announced that Kate was expecting yet again, there was not so much negativity and it makes me wonder why? Even if one had an elected head of state (as many countries do) true democracy doesn’t always exist and in many cases is just a myth or smokescreen. But that’s another discussion. For now, I sincerely wish them well but with all the comments here and in the media in general, I think she’s got a huge mountain to climb and will probably be held to far higher standards and more scrutiny that Diana or Kate ever had to face. In contrast Camilla, the third wheel and also a divorcee who one day will likely be Queen, got off incredibly lightly. In some ways I feel a tad sorry for her as she has absolutely no idea what the British media is capable of and the depths to which they will not sink. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
The above sentiment I can get on board with and would concur and yet, when it was announced that Kate was expecting yet again, there was not so much negativity and it makes me wonder why?
Even if one had an elected head of state (as many countries do) true democracy doesn’t always exist and in many cases is just a myth or smokescreen. But that’s another discussion. For now, I sincerely wish them well but with all the comments here and in the media in general, I think she’s got a huge mountain to climb and will probably be held to far higher standards and more scrutiny that Diana or Kate ever had to face.
In contrast Camilla, the third wheel and also a divorcee who one day will likely be Queen, got off incredibly lightly.
In some ways I feel a tad sorry for her as she has absolutely no idea what the British media is capable of and the depths to which they will not sink.
"I just don't see the point of the monarchy as it is today. The whole concept seems to be a waste of time and money. I agree there is no such thing as a perfect democratic state but I would still like the chance to vote for the head of state. Change is a difficult concept but bowing and deferring to anyone just seems ludicrous. The coverage has been OTT don't you think? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?"What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic. "And yours is not? The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia. "No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion. "Like Thailand you mean | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
"or Jordan | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
"Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view. "So on average republican states have the same qualities! What an average set of facts! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view.
So on average republican states have the same qualities!
What an average set of facts!"7/10 of the least corrupt countries in the world have constitutional monarchies. Google that term because your list of countries shows that you clearly don't understand it. They have an average of 1.03% extra GDP growth per year, they are 5/10 of the easiest countries to do business in and you get more bank holidays. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view.
So on average republican states have the same qualities!
What an average set of facts!
7/10 of the least corrupt countries in the world have constitutional monarchies. Google that term because your list of countries shows that you clearly don't understand it. They have an average of 1.03% extra GDP growth per year, they are 5/10 of the easiest countries to do business in and you get more bank holidays. "8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskers and your point is? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view.
So on average republican states have the same qualities!
What an average set of facts!
7/10 of the least corrupt countries in the world have constitutional monarchies. Google that term because your list of countries shows that you clearly don't understand it. They have an average of 1.03% extra GDP growth per year, they are 5/10 of the easiest countries to do business in and you get more bank holidays.
8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskers and your point is?"So hypothesis is based on more bank holidays in countries with a monarchy. Well that's it then point proved? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view.
So on average republican states have the same qualities!
What an average set of facts!
7/10 of the least corrupt countries in the world have constitutional monarchies. Google that term because your list of countries shows that you clearly don't understand it. They have an average of 1.03% extra GDP growth per year, they are 5/10 of the easiest countries to do business in and you get more bank holidays.
8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskers and your point is?
So hypothesis is based on more bank holidays in countries with a monarchy. Well that's it then point proved?"I've presented my facts. You clearly have none so I'm bored now. By the way, of the 8 attempts you made, only 1 has a royal family that doesn't get involved in day to day politics and most were absolute monarchies. #fail. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can see another Charles and Diana coming here....shes not suited to royal duties or the pressure...
Why would you say that? She has already done a lot of humanitarian work long before she met Harry. And being an actress over there must bring a lot of its own pressures. If Kate can do it I am fairly sure she can
Makes me wonder why some are so negative. Kate pops them out and everyone is all smiles, Harry gets engaged to an American mixed race divorced actress and all the reasons pop out about why it won't work, she's far too polished etc but skirt around their true feelings and heaven forfend that it should have anything to do with her being......a really lovely person.
She's lived, she's had a career and a life, she will be good for him and visa versa.
As for 'us' paying for the wedding. The royals bring in far more money to this country than they are given. I haven't got the figures to hand but I'm sure it's easy enough to find.
We need cheering up as a country, this will do it, plus the revenues from this (especially from America) as Harry is extremely popular in the U.S. will be huge.
I don't know them but I truly wish the all the best.
You need to research the figures. The Royal Family, as an institution, belongs to a time gone by. A true democracy should be able to elect a head of state as if we don't what's the point of having one?
I really do wish the young couple well but as far as the hype goes it's just the establishment using its power to deflect what the true issues facing the country are?
What's so wonderful about elected people? It's not like the population is overwhelmingly or even particualy satisfied with the elected politicians we have. Why on earth people like you think we need more of them, i will never understand. The prince is a far better man than at least two thirds of the house of commons. He's literally served his country in afghanistan rather than a bunch of preppy cunts who run their mouth for a living. Your view is incredibly simplistic.
And yours is not?
The deal is if you don't like the preppy cunts you can vote them out! However you cannot vote out a prince who turned up at fancy dress part emblazoned in Nazi regalia.
No you can vote out one preppy cunt and replace them with another preppy cunt. My view is based on objective facts, that countries with constitutional monarchies are more successful, on average, than republics and other forms of government. They have higher living standards, less corruption and more political stability. Those are facts on which i base my opinion.
Like Thailand you mean
or Jordan
Maybe google the word 'average' while you're on there looking for something to back up your ideological point of view.
So on average republican states have the same qualities!
What an average set of facts!
7/10 of the least corrupt countries in the world have constitutional monarchies. Google that term because your list of countries shows that you clearly don't understand it. They have an average of 1.03% extra GDP growth per year, they are 5/10 of the easiest countries to do business in and you get more bank holidays.
8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskers and your point is?
So hypothesis is based on more bank holidays in countries with a monarchy. Well that's it then point proved?
I've presented my facts. You clearly have none so I'm bored now. By the way, of the 8 attempts you made, only 1 has a royal family that doesn't get involved in day to day politics and most were absolute monarchies. #fail. "Your facts are muddled at best and infantile at worst. They are set of irrelevant numbers picked from goodness knows where? So, you are seriously telling me that the heir to throne, whilst not avoiding uk taxes on his private income, does not get involved in politics? He writes to ministers on a regular basis trying to influence policy and trying to feather his nest. I am bored now ..............7 out of 10 countries.........what drivel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Fuckinell. I just came here for a wank. Now im getting cats whiskers and fractions thrown at me. Nice one lads. Way to help a brother out "I did giggle at that Crack on bro ........literally! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Fuckinell. I just came here for a wank. Now im getting cats whiskers and fractions thrown at me. Nice one lads. Way to help a brother out
I did giggle at that
Crack on bro ........literally!"Too late. Its gone now! Not even miss markle can rise this from the grave! Lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Fuckinell. I just came here for a wank. Now im getting cats whiskers and fractions thrown at me. Nice one lads. Way to help a brother out
I did giggle at that
Crack on bro ........literally!
Too late. Its gone now! Not even miss markle can rise this from the grave! Lol"Try Miss Marple? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Fuckinell. I just came here for a wank. Now im getting cats whiskers and fractions thrown at me. Nice one lads. Way to help a brother out
I did giggle at that
Crack on bro ........literally!
Too late. Its gone now! Not even miss markle can rise this from the grave! Lol
Try Miss Marple?"Id rather smash one over Agatha Christie's black and white mugshot lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"what kind of a tosser would find wearing a nazi uniform hilarious?" Oh I dunno, I thought 'Allo 'Allo was pretty hilarious  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry "He comes across as a proper dweeb | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"what kind of a tosser would find wearing a nazi uniform hilarious? Oh I dunno, I thought 'Allo 'Allo was pretty hilarious "Springtime for Hitler | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally irrelevant question...but how many pics a day do u get to upload if ur not a site supporter?" In a republican or monarchist state? as evidently 7 out of 10 swingers get 30% more if you reside in the latter! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb"A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm..... "He wasn't 'involved' in the Invictus games, but actually was one of the founders of the Invictus games. We ALL make mistakes when we're young but the difference is that Harry's made front page and no matter what good he does, that's the one thing that idiots can hang onto and bring up to justify having a pop. I'm sure that there are a lot of people who overcame their youthful indiscretions and stupidites and went on to succeed in life because it wasn't hauled up at every opportunity! Give the man a fecking break, what more has he got to do to prove that he's a good guy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm.....
He wasn't 'involved' in the Invictus games, but actually was one of the founders of the Invictus games.
We ALL make mistakes when we're young but the difference is that Harry's made front page and no matter what good he does, that's the one thing that idiots can hang onto and bring up to justify having a pop.
I'm sure that there are a lot of people who overcame their youthful indiscretions and stupidites and went on to succeed in life because it wasn't hauled up at every opportunity!
Give the man a fecking break, what more has he got to do to prove that he's a good guy?"What mistakes? If you think Nazi uniforms aren't funny then you haven't seen 'Springtime for Hitler' | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm.....
He wasn't 'involved' in the Invictus games, but actually was one of the founders of the Invictus games.
We ALL make mistakes when we're young but the difference is that Harry's made front page and no matter what good he does, that's the one thing that idiots can hang onto and bring up to justify having a pop.
I'm sure that there are a lot of people who overcame their youthful indiscretions and stupidites and went on to succeed in life because it wasn't hauled up at every opportunity!
Give the man a fecking break, what more has he got to do to prove that he's a good guy?
What mistakes? If you think Nazi uniforms aren't funny then you haven't seen 'Springtime for Hitler'"Sweetie, I wasn't referring to the uniforms but to the naked romps in LA and other little misdeameanours he may have made. He's a good man and he's clearly a smitten kitten. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm.....
He wasn't 'involved' in the Invictus games, but actually was one of the founders of the Invictus games.
We ALL make mistakes when we're young but the difference is that Harry's made front page and no matter what good he does, that's the one thing that idiots can hang onto and bring up to justify having a pop.
I'm sure that there are a lot of people who overcame their youthful indiscretions and stupidites and went on to succeed in life because it wasn't hauled up at every opportunity!
Give the man a fecking break, what more has he got to do to prove that he's a good guy?
What mistakes? If you think Nazi uniforms aren't funny then you haven't seen 'Springtime for Hitler'
Sweetie, I wasn't referring to the uniforms but to the naked romps in LA and other little misdeameanours he may have made.
He's a good man and he's clearly a smitten kitten."Never heard of those but good boy, i like him even more now. He could have posted it in the meet section though, we'd have been up for that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm.....
He wasn't 'involved' in the Invictus games, but actually was one of the founders of the Invictus games.
We ALL make mistakes when we're young but the difference is that Harry's made front page and no matter what good he does, that's the one thing that idiots can hang onto and bring up to justify having a pop.
I'm sure that there are a lot of people who overcame their youthful indiscretions and stupidites and went on to succeed in life because it wasn't hauled up at every opportunity!
Give the man a fecking break, what more has he got to do to prove that he's a good guy?"Thank you and totally agree with you! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well I think it's lovely for Harry to find someone he wants to marry
He comes across as a proper dweeb
A'dweeb' who served in Afghanistan, who worked in Lesotho with orphaned children and who was involved with the Invictus games, to name just a few of the good things he has done....hmm..... "yes a dweeb, - she'll have him for breakfast! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Royal Family are for children and Americans....another hog to the trough that are the nations wealthiest benefit scroungers... "wtf. dat avatar | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite "As its the Royal family who are paying for the wedding, I suspect youre wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shame, non of the folk who will pay for the wedding will get an invite
As its the Royal family who are paying for the wedding, I suspect youre wrong. "and where exactly do you think the leeches acquired their wealth? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His real name is Henry and hers is Rachel . who knew eh " off with your head ....although not in the Fab sense | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His real name is Henry and hers is Rachel . who knew eh off with your head ....although not in the Fab sense" Well if I was named after a Hoover I would use Harry too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His real name is Henry and hers is Rachel . who knew eh off with your head ....although not in the Fab sense Well if I was named after a Hoover I would use Harry too " Ginger hoovers go faster | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
