Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom" Being a member of fab has certainly lessened my sexual activity by some margin. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom" Interesting how this question is aimed at married/partnered men, but not women... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Interesting how this question is aimed at married/partnered men, but not women... " That’s cause it’s always guys being called cheaters on here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Being a member of fab has certainly lessened my sexual activity by some margin." Is that because the wife is getting it away from home? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Being a member of fab has certainly lessened my sexual activity by some margin. Is that because the wife is getting it away from home? " Wrong emoji. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Being a member of fab has certainly lessened my sexual activity by some margin. Is that because the wife is getting it away from home? " Nope. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Being a member of fab has certainly lessened my sexual activity by some margin. Is that because the wife is getting it away from home? Nope." Then how did being on fab directly contribute? Forum addiction, no time for sex? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely. We came here together and we will be staying (or leaving) here together. This is an enhancement to OUR relationship and the fact that we enjoy it all so much is the fact that we are doing it together " This all the way | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was asked this the other day, the answer is I couldn’t go back to vanilla, I need kink in a relationship " Okay but if you found one partner who could fulfil all your kinks, would you feel the need for other partners? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was asked this the other day, the answer is I couldn’t go back to vanilla, I need kink in a relationship Okay but if you found one partner who could fulfil all your kinks, would you feel the need for other partners?" Until I find that person I cannot state, however I like the sharing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was asked this the other day, the answer is I couldn’t go back to vanilla, I need kink in a relationship Okay but if you found one partner who could fulfil all your kinks, would you feel the need for other partners? Until I find that person I cannot state, however I like the sharing. " Ah, but of course you would need one of each...but would that be enough. If you like the sharing I suppose not.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is possible to have a kinky/dirty/adventurous sexual relationship with one person. Not being on a swingers site doesn't mean you're having boring sex. " I think so, that would be my ideal, although I wouldn't object if she occasionally included her best girlfriend.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom" Yes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely. We came here together and we will be staying (or leaving) here together. This is an enhancement to OUR relationship and the fact that we enjoy it all so much is the fact that we are doing it together " Exactly this x ^^^^ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is possible to have a kinky/dirty/adventurous sexual relationship with one person. Not being on a swingers site doesn't mean you're having boring sex. I think so, that would be my ideal, although I wouldn't object if she occasionally included her best girlfriend.. " I've had more than one man from here who wanted a monogamous relationship, but then go on to say they would be ok with me finding other women for us. They obviously don't understand what monogamy is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was asked this the other day, the answer is I couldn’t go back to vanilla, I need kink in a relationship Okay but if you found one partner who could fulfil all your kinks, would you feel the need for other partners? Until I find that person I cannot state, however I like the sharing. Ah, but of course you would need one of each...but would that be enough. If you like the sharing I suppose not.." Yes I theory however in practice it doesn’t blever happen like that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find it easy to be faithful when there is someone worth being faithful for " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is possible to have a kinky/dirty/adventurous sexual relationship with one person. Not being on a swingers site doesn't mean you're having boring sex. I think so, that would be my ideal, although I wouldn't object if she occasionally included her best girlfriend.. I've had more than one man from here who wanted a monogamous relationship, but then go on to say they would be ok with me finding other women for us. They obviously don't understand what monogamy is. " I didn't say I wanted monogamy, my preference would be one regular partner, or should I say two regular partners, where we are enough for each other. I don't want loads of different partners or one offs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reassuring to see people saying yes " I don't believe them!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We will always be faithful to each other. We came here together and will always play here together. Being faithful to us is about live,trust, and honesty. If one wants to stop then we both stop. No cheating behind each others backs." Yes but that doesn't constitute a vanilla relationship | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I could be faithful emotionally with Mr Right, in that he would be the one I loved and planned my future with, and I wouldn't want any emotional connection or ongoing relationship with another man. But I could never be monogamous, I need more than one cock in my life and believe that the variety and fun of swinging enhances a relationship IF you are solid as a couple. So IMHO being faithful is a different thing to being monogamous (am i spelling that right?!)." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We will always be faithful to each other. We came here together and will always play here together. Being faithful to us is about live,trust, and honesty. If one wants to stop then we both stop. No cheating behind each others backs." My partner has decided he doesn't want to swing any more but is happy for me to do so. That isn't cheating. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom" I can and have. I first used fab when it was new. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For the right guy I'd give it all up " The right guy you wouldn't have to... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is possible to have a kinky/dirty/adventurous sexual relationship with one person. Not being on a swingers site doesn't mean you're having boring sex. I think so, that would be my ideal, although I wouldn't object if she occasionally included her best girlfriend.. I've had more than one man from here who wanted a monogamous relationship, but then go on to say they would be ok with me finding other women for us. They obviously don't understand what monogamy is. " I the opposite. I've always liked the idea of my partner enjoying other men. The idea of 2nd woman isn't a big deal for me so I could stay monogamous to my gf age her sleep around | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh gosh the level of virtue signalling and bullshit on this thread is overwhelming. There's nothing special about being monogamous, some people are born with a predisposition to it and most aren't. The idea that a non-mongamous person could be faithful for the 'right person' is disney puke. That's basically like saying that a gay guy would be straight for the right woman. No they wouldn't - grow up. There are reasons in evolutionary psychology why women are more likely to want one partner whilst men are more likely to want more. Polygamy is by far the most common form of marriage through history. " No one has said they are special for being monogamous, just that they could be if the feelings were right. Why is that 'virtue signalling'. Is it a new trend to try and run down something we don't like or understand with some trendy new term? Much like calling the easily offended snowflakes? You seem quite threatened by the concept to be honest. If its not for you that's great, it doesn't have to be for everyone. Comparing monogamy to sexuality is like comparing apples and pears. They are not the same thing at all. Having said that just because someone identifies themselves as gay doesn't mean they can't have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. Sexuality can be fluid. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh gosh the level of virtue signalling and bullshit on this thread is overwhelming. There's nothing special about being monogamous, some people are born with a predisposition to it and most aren't. The idea that a non-mongamous person could be faithful for the 'right person' is disney puke. That's basically like saying that a gay guy would be straight for the right woman. No they wouldn't - grow up. There are reasons in evolutionary psychology why women are more likely to want one partner whilst men are more likely to want more. Polygamy is by far the most common form of marriage through history. No one has said they are special for being monogamous, just that they could be if the feelings were right. Why is that 'virtue signalling'. Is it a new trend to try and run down something we don't like or understand with some trendy new term? Much like calling the easily offended snowflakes? You seem quite threatened by the concept to be honest. If its not for you that's great, it doesn't have to be for everyone. Comparing monogamy to sexuality is like comparing apples and pears. They are not the same thing at all. Having said that just because someone identifies themselves as gay doesn't mean they can't have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. Sexuality can be fluid. " It's not apples and pears, it's nature. I'm not threatened at all, i just find it pathetic when people say they could change their nature for someone else. It's very simple, some of you on here are naturally monogamous people who are having casual sex because you are single. There's nothing really to "give up" in that sense, it's a minor change for you. Swingers are predominately non-monogamous people by nature, we don't want to change our nature and our choice of partners are part of that. It's virtue signalling because the stats on the number of people who can get married monogamously, stay married and be faithful are well publicised. It's a small proportion of the population ~25% yet most of those 25% happen to be on a fecking swingers forum, apparently | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think I could trust anyone after being on here. I don't want this to be a stupid gender war but I said in a different thread that nearly everyone on my local feed is cheating. I say men - because it's men I'm looking for. I see a lot of them in my town with their wives and kids. Even though they've got single male profiles. I'm not judging - it's not my marriage " This should make you feel better, there's actually no statistically significant difference in the proportion of men and women who cheat. It's possible men cheat more frequently, i don't have those figures, but on the whole it's just that women are better at not getting caught and smarter about the whole thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think I could trust anyone after being on here. I don't want this to be a stupid gender war but I said in a different thread that nearly everyone on my local feed is cheating. I say men - because it's men I'm looking for. I see a lot of them in my town with their wives and kids. Even though they've got single male profiles. I'm not judging - it's not my marriage This should make you feel better, there's actually no statistically significant difference in the proportion of men and women who cheat. It's possible men cheat more frequently, i don't have those figures, but on the whole it's just that women are better at not getting caught and smarter about the whole thing. " I don't need to feel better. I'm not the one who's in a relationship. I don't think I could be in another relationship - too much like hard work! I admire couples that swing - I wish I could do it. But I'm to nutty and jealous lol. I'm sure women do cheat as much as men. Relationships based on lies - I cant be arsed! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom Interesting how this question is aimed at married/partnered men, but not women... That’s cause it’s always guys being called cheaters on here " A cheating woman? That's like a black racist or a female sexist. It cannot exist. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh gosh the level of virtue signalling and bullshit on this thread is overwhelming. There's nothing special about being monogamous, some people are born with a predisposition to it and most aren't. The idea that a non-mongamous person could be faithful for the 'right person' is disney puke. That's basically like saying that a gay guy would be straight for the right woman. No they wouldn't - grow up. There are reasons in evolutionary psychology why women are more likely to want one partner whilst men are more likely to want more. Polygamy is by far the most common form of marriage through history. No one has said they are special for being monogamous, just that they could be if the feelings were right. Why is that 'virtue signalling'. Is it a new trend to try and run down something we don't like or understand with some trendy new term? Much like calling the easily offended snowflakes? You seem quite threatened by the concept to be honest. If its not for you that's great, it doesn't have to be for everyone. Comparing monogamy to sexuality is like comparing apples and pears. They are not the same thing at all. Having said that just because someone identifies themselves as gay doesn't mean they can't have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. Sexuality can be fluid. It's not apples and pears, it's nature. I'm not threatened at all, i just find it pathetic when people say they could change their nature for someone else. It's very simple, some of you on here are naturally monogamous people who are having casual sex because you are single. There's nothing really to "give up" in that sense, it's a minor change for you. Swingers are predominately non-monogamous people by nature, we don't want to change our nature and our choice of partners are part of that. It's virtue signalling because the stats on the number of people who can get married monogamously, stay married and be faithful are well publicised. It's a small proportion of the population ~25% yet most of those 25% happen to be on a fecking swingers forum, apparently " Also seeing the term "not enough for each other" being quoted here. That's something you would expect to be explaining in the vanilla world not here which highlights the points made above. Madame Boo | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh gosh the level of virtue signalling and bullshit on this thread is overwhelming. There's nothing special about being monogamous, some people are born with a predisposition to it and most aren't. The idea that a non-mongamous person could be faithful for the 'right person' is disney puke. That's basically like saying that a gay guy would be straight for the right woman. No they wouldn't - grow up. There are reasons in evolutionary psychology why women are more likely to want one partner whilst men are more likely to want more. Polygamy is by far the most common form of marriage through history. No one has said they are special for being monogamous, just that they could be if the feelings were right. Why is that 'virtue signalling'. Is it a new trend to try and run down something we don't like or understand with some trendy new term? Much like calling the easily offended snowflakes? You seem quite threatened by the concept to be honest. If its not for you that's great, it doesn't have to be for everyone. Comparing monogamy to sexuality is like comparing apples and pears. They are not the same thing at all. Having said that just because someone identifies themselves as gay doesn't mean they can't have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. Sexuality can be fluid. It's not apples and pears, it's nature. I'm not threatened at all, i just find it pathetic when people say they could change their nature for someone else. It's very simple, some of you on here are naturally monogamous people who are having casual sex because you are single. There's nothing really to "give up" in that sense, it's a minor change for you. Swingers are predominately non-monogamous people by nature, we don't want to change our nature and our choice of partners are part of that. It's virtue signalling because the stats on the number of people who can get married monogamously, stay married and be faithful are well publicised. It's a small proportion of the population ~25% yet most of those 25% happen to be on a fecking swingers forum, apparently Also seeing the term "not enough for each other" being quoted here. That's something you would expect to be explaining in the vanilla world not here which highlights the points made above. Madame Boo" Sometimes it's like people would be shocked if they looked at the url and realised this was fab swingers. I think they were trying to navigate to mumsnet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's so much more than either being monogamous or swinging. I'm open to having the right lifestyle for me, that also depends on who is around. I don't need fairy-tale make believe though - I'll stick with full scale reality" i get this totally x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes easy 100% can and wood if i did / cood get a partner. And i wood hope for them to do the same back. I don't understand how or y anyone cood / wood say no to this. Cos if your in a relationship then you shood be divoting all your attention on the pursoun your with not to sumone els your not with. But eatch to Thar own i gess." Y do i never get quoted on thes things just cos i seem to be the odd 1 out lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just believe a loving relationship is 2 people so if it started vanilla it would turn kink very soon hahaha. I wouldn't want to meet someone who thought being in a relationship ok'd you to have sex with other people....no no no you gotta go haha" Right.... So I shall tell my wife and two girlfriends, who I absolutely love to bits, that you don't approve.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. I for one know from experience that I can't hence the current spell of singledom" If you are the type of person that is going to cheat being on fab will not make any difference. You're going to cheat regardless! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One for the guys do you think you could ever be faithful in a Vanilla relationship after discovering fab. " Absolutely yes of course, why on earth not.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"being unfaithful is a choice as is entering a relationship if you can't choose one without the other your better off choosing neither I've been the on the painful side of an unfaithful relationship and trust me it's not a good place to be" Did you see the name on the door as you walked in? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"being unfaithful is a choice as is entering a relationship if you can't choose one without the other your better off choosing neither I've been the on the painful side of an unfaithful relationship and trust me it's not a good place to be Did you see the name on the door as you walked in? " There is a huge difference between being unfaithful and swinging, swinging is mutual and done with consent, being unfaithful is deceit | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"being unfaithful is a choice as is entering a relationship if you can't choose one without the other your better off choosing neither I've been the on the painful side of an unfaithful relationship and trust me it's not a good place to be Did you see the name on the door as you walked in? There is a huge difference between being unfaithful and swinging, swinging is mutual and done with consent, being unfaithful is deceit " That's how we like to see ourselves, yes. The distinction would be lost on the average joe though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I could be faithful emotionally with Mr Right, in that he would be the one I loved and planned my future with, and I wouldn't want any emotional connection or ongoing relationship with another man. But I could never be monogamous, I need more than one cock in my life and believe that the variety and fun of swinging enhances a relationship IF you are solid as a couple. So IMHO being faithful is a different thing to being monogamous (am i spelling that right?!)." Totally agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |