Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Gwanny are you sure the toddler is not a midget ?  "He was wearing a red mac and looking back ............  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1" What is your evidence / summing up M, lud. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1. Suspect 2 had never taken over looking after the toddler." But both actually responsible as both knew neither was with the baby. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Hits Juge hammer on bit of wood 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nobody, the toddler wasn't on the step, it was outside the gate "Doh. Yes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nobody, the toddler wasn't on the step, it was outside the gate "ooooooo good point | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1. Suspect 2 had never taken over looking after the toddler." Very good summing up m'lud. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 & 2 both guilty BUT As Suspect 1 went in the house 1st. Suspect 2 shood see Suspect 1 going in to the house and ther for Suspect 2 shood wotch the toddler. Case closed
Hits Juge hammer on bit of wood
"Suspect 2 was never with the baby as mentioned by our learned friend above. It can't be assumed that suspect 2 had sight of the baby on the step | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nobody, the toddler wasn't on the step, it was outside the gate "Dohhhhhhhh ......... Who did it ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Suspect 2. Suspect 2 had a momentary lapse of concentration and assuming this isn't a prima facie case, there is no mens rea. I suggest subject 2 was trying to avoid all responsibility whilst quaffing tea and was quite clearly negligent and trying to avoid responsibility....witg the required intent to do so." How can suspect 2 be responsible if they were not minding said toddler at the time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the pushchair was on a moving conveyor belt travelling at the same but opposite speed..." Opposite to what ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 What is your evidence / summing up M, lud." Suspect 1 was looking after toddler - getting into pushchair etc. The only reason suspect 2 even came to the door was because of the knock, which the toddler was only able to do because suspect 1 was already quite lax in the first place. Suspect 1 should not have made the assumption that suspect 2 was now primary caregiver in that moment without at least having a discussion along the lines of "need to pop out of the house. Can you stay here for a minute!" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 What is your evidence / summing up M, lud. Suspect 1 was looking after toddler - getting into pushchair etc. The only reason suspect 2 even came to the door was because of the knock, which the toddler was only able to do because suspect 1 was already quite lax in the first place. Suspect 1 should not have made the assumption that suspect 2 was now primary caregiver in that moment without at least having a discussion along the lines of "need to pop out of the house. Can you stay here for a minute!"" You rest your case very well your honour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the pushchair was on a moving conveyor belt travelling at the same but opposite speed... Opposite to what ?" An aeroplane. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is suspect 1s side of the story...shirley suspect 2 is required to give evidence" This is not anyone's side. This is simply an unemotional relaying of events. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is suspect 1s side of the story...shirley suspect 2 is required to give evidence" In the interests of fairness I asked suspect 2 to give their version of events and they said ......... Suspect 1 is putting up a buggy outside for a toddler they are about to take out. Toddler knocks on door. Suspect 2 who is inside working, walks to door. Meanwhile suspect 1 puts toddler into buggy outside the gate. Suspect 2 says...... oh I thought you were knocking. Suspect 1 walks into house just for a moment to get a near item and is followed by suspect 2. Suspect 1 turns and says ...... OMG you left the toddler on the step. Suspect 2 says, no YOU left the baby on the step. Okay Judge. Who left the baby on the step? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'll say suspect one  "You deserve that halo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The toddler has to take responsibility for their own actions. " He did! He sat and stretched his neck looking for someone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'll say suspect one
You deserve that halo "Why thank you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 What is your evidence / summing up M, lud. Suspect 1 was looking after toddler - getting into pushchair etc. The only reason suspect 2 even came to the door was because of the knock, which the toddler was only able to do because suspect 1 was already quite lax in the first place. Suspect 1 should not have made the assumption that suspect 2 was now primary caregiver in that moment without at least having a discussion along the lines of "need to pop out of the house. Can you stay here for a minute!" You rest your case very well your honour. " I forgot to bang my gavel!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When the toddler knocked on the door, which side was it on?" The outside.......... ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 What is your evidence / summing up M, lud. Suspect 1 was looking after toddler - getting into pushchair etc. The only reason suspect 2 even came to the door was because of the knock, which the toddler was only able to do because suspect 1 was already quite lax in the first place. Suspect 1 should not have made the assumption that suspect 2 was now primary caregiver in that moment without at least having a discussion along the lines of "need to pop out of the house. Can you stay here for a minute!" You rest your case very well your honour. I forgot to bang my gavel!!" She said you bang her now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 & 2 both guilty BUT As Suspect 1 went in the house 1st. Suspect 2 shood see Suspect 1 going in to the house and ther for Suspect 2 shood wotch the toddler. Case closed
Hits Juge hammer on bit of wood
Suspect 2 was never with the baby as mentioned by our learned friend above. It can't be assumed that suspect 2 had sight of the baby on the step"That may be.... However As Suspect 2 sed ...... oh I thought you were knocking. note the word (sed) This Inderkats that Suspect 2 can see Suspect 1 with the toddler to say that. As Suspect 1 is putting the toddler in the buggy at the time. And wen Suspect 2 follows Suspect 1 in to the house it surgests Suspect 1 & 2 eather no eatch other Verry well or even live in the same house. So as Suspect 2 can see Suspect 1 going in the house and leeving the toddler. as a responsible adult Suspect 2 shood wotch the toddler. Even if Suspect 1 has not arsked Suspect 2 even thow Suspect 1 also as a responsible adult (shood) have asked Suspect 2 to wotch over the toddler 1st befor leeving. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 23/09/17 15:42:12]" What is suspect 1 is the toddlers parent and suspect 2 is not and the parent was visiting suspect 2. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Immigrants" What ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When the toddler knocked on the door, which side was it on? The outside.......... ?" Then Suspect 1 left the child as they were both outside, Suspect 2 was inside the house with the door closed, it is a logical suggestion that they could of been unaware of the presence of Suspect 1 and the toddler outside until opening the door after the toddler had knocked on it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When the toddler knocked on the door, which side was it on? The outside.......... ? Then Suspect 1 left the child as they were both outside, Suspect 2 was inside the house with the door closed, it is a logical suggestion that they could of been unaware of the presence of Suspect 1 and the toddler outside until opening the door after the toddler had knocked on it." Great reasoning Spock! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Immigrants What ?" Think he means they always get the blame. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When the toddler knocked on the door, which side was it on? The outside.......... ? Then Suspect 1 left the child as they were both outside, Suspect 2 was inside the house with the door closed, it is a logical suggestion that they could of been unaware of the presence of Suspect 1 and the toddler outside until opening the door after the toddler had knocked on it. Great reasoning Spock!" Has The High Council come to a verdict? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Immigrants What ? Think he means they always get the blame." Obviously brexit is the answer  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty." So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario." Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep." Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight. "Splutter, rage, old lady rant. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1. Suspect 2 had never taken over looking after the toddler." This. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight. "And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight.
And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective."No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
No mention off step until they go into the house. You said outside gate 
So must be 1 lol
Was you inside doing your knitting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight.
And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective.
No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same."That's a relief
It just concerns me seeing kids so young playing out with no sign of any parents. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective. No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same. That's a relief
It just concerns me seeing kids so young playing out with no sign of any parents."The truth is that bad things don't happen very often and if you let a 3 year old and a 6 year old out alone the probability that they'll return home safe and sound is high. I for one am not prepared to take even the slightest risk with something as precious as small children though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective. No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same. That's a relief
It just concerns me seeing kids so young playing out with no sign of any parents.
The truth is that bad things don't happen very often and if you let a 3 year old and a 6 year old out alone the probability that they'll return home safe and sound is high. I for one am not prepared to take even the slightest risk with something as precious as small children though.
"They are precious  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective. No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same. That's a relief
It just concerns me seeing kids so young playing out with no sign of any parents.
The truth is that bad things don't happen very often and if you let a 3 year old and a 6 year old out alone the probability that they'll return home safe and sound is high. I for one am not prepared to take even the slightest risk with something as precious as small children though.
They are precious "They're precious no matter what age they are .
Our son is asthmatic and was having a very serious attack when he was about 4. The doctor said to me "they're too precious to take chances. Take him straight to hospital" that hit home. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective. No you're not being over protective keeping an eye on a 3 year old or a 6 year old. We would be the same. That's a relief
It just concerns me seeing kids so young playing out with no sign of any parents.
The truth is that bad things don't happen very often and if you let a 3 year old and a 6 year old out alone the probability that they'll return home safe and sound is high. I for one am not prepared to take even the slightest risk with something as precious as small children though.
They are precious
They're precious no matter what age they are .
Our son is asthmatic and was having a very serious attack when he was about 4. The doctor said to me "they're too precious to take chances. Take him straight to hospital" that hit home. "It would me too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We suspect that suspect 1 suspected suspect 2 was suspected to look after the toddler. Suspect 2 didn't suspect a toddler to be at the door. When suspect 2 answered the door then he suspected suspect 1 to look after the toddler." Denied, your case is based entirely on supposition with no evidence to support it. I suspect you know this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Suspect 1 left baby on step while putting toddler in buggy. I demand a judicial caning for suspect 1." What about if suspect 1 was at that moment somewhat harried and stressed out, trying to do lots of things at once with no help from suspect 2, leading to the baby being left on the step/in the buggy? Should we also be administering a judicial caning to suspect 2 for not helping out more? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight.
And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective."You sound like a good Dad!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario. Person 1. If you're looking after someone who can't look after themselves don't stop doing that until you know for sure someone else has taken over the job. Don't get me started on the parents/carers who set their kids free on the beach then erect a windbreak and go to sleep. Okay I won't but what about the parents that take their kids to leisure centres with soft play and drink coffee out of sight.
And the parents sat watching tv while their very small children are out playing half way up the road out of sight. I know this cos when my 3&6yr old are playing out I'm sat out watching them, they know which lampposts they're allowed to play between and to stay off the road. Sometimes I think I'm being overprotective.
You sound like a good Dad!! "Thank you, that means a lot  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did someone say judge? Oo I like a bit of judgement. I say guilty. So who ? 1, 2, both and this imaginary 3rd ? P.S. Toddler / Baby ...... same ting in this scenario." I just seen baby/toddler same thing ffs. So what is the fkin answer? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Omg granny you are confused today
No mention off step until they go into the house. You said outside gate
So must be 1 lol
Was you inside doing your knitting "Too right I was. I stopped doing shreddies to get you some decent socks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
