FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Sex in Domino's conviction

Jump to newest
 

By *unandbuck OP   Couple
over a year ago

Sheffield

BBC News, couple found guilty and due to be sentenced:

A couple had sex against the counter of a pizza delivery shop as staff worked in its kitchen, a court has heard.

Daniella Hirst, 29, and Craig Smith, 31, were captured on CCTV in the Domino's shop in Scarborough in February.

Scarborough Magistrates' Court was played 18 minutes of video that had been captured by the pizza shop's CCTV.

It showed the couple going into the Domino's shop, on Castle Road, and ordering food. It then showed Ms Hirst performing oral sex on Mr Smith.

The couple were also seen having sex leaning against the shop counter.

Ms Beardshall said: "This offence was in a public place. It was a lengthy incident.

"Members of the public were present as were staff."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

18 minutes!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

What the fuck is wrong with people?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester

It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I giggled at 'lengthy incident'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inful xWoman
over a year ago

In a sleepy little village

Wonder what pizza they were waiting for

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely someone in the shop would've stopped them embarassed or not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court ."

I've heard tales of people fucking in public. I don't believe it happens. Disgusting behaviour.

Sex should occur in the darkness of a marital bedroom. In silence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court ."

I wonder if the employee has been prosecuted for sharing the video?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuck OP   Couple
over a year ago

Sheffield

If you search the ladies name in google images there's some acrobatic moves from the cctv.. Maybe that's why it took so long.

I don't think they've helped themselves in terms of punishment, as it looks like they've done tabloid features exploiting the event..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for "

This will make all the difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for "

Mighty meaty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuck OP   Couple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for "

She just said she wanted 12" and the rest is history

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

18 minutes????

Did they get the pizza free

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzz And WoodyCouple
over a year ago

Maidstone

High time I got my Whopper out in Burger King

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hes already on remand for other stuff she clearly likes a bad lad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for

She just said she wanted 12" and the rest is history "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"What the fuck is wrong with people?! "

Totally agree ... the employee who leaked the footage and the cps for taking it to court definitely have something wrong with them !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aul1973HullMan
over a year ago

East Hull


"I giggled at 'lengthy incident'

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What the fuck is wrong with people?!

Totally agree ... the employee who leaked the footage and the cps for taking it to court definitely have something wrong with them !

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surprised nobody has mentioned the stuffed crust...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuck OP   Couple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"Hes already on remand for other stuff she clearly likes a bad lad"

She might be going down too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hocko87Man
over a year ago

dublin


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I've heard tales of people fucking in public. I don't believe it happens. Disgusting behaviour.

Sex should occur in the darkness of a marital bedroom. In silence. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aul1973HullMan
over a year ago

East Hull


"Surprised nobody has mentioned the stuffed crust... "

I did in one of the other dominoes threads today.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aul1973HullMan
over a year ago

East Hull


"Hes already on remand for other stuff she clearly likes a bad lad

She might be going down too "

Not for the first time going by the cctv.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Was tossed salad their side order?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itmanAndHerrCouple
over a year ago

st helens


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for "

Apparently she asked for a stuffed crust.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oss2810Man
over a year ago

Chesterfield

Can't fault him she's well tidy x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Surprised nobody has mentioned the stuffed crust...

I did in one of the other dominoes threads today."

Good man

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuck OP   Couple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"Surprised nobody has mentioned the stuffed crust...

I did in one of the other dominoes threads today.

Good man "

All this free publicity, they must be lapping it up..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian BlueMan
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..

I can't believe it took 18 minutes..

I do hope dominos gave them a refund for taking so long to cook the pizza..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court ."

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Shea,29, not a stupid teenager, and he's already doing time.

Classy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous "

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *octor DeleriumMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"

I've heard tales of people fucking in public. I don't believe it happens. Disgusting behaviour.

Sex should occur in the darkness of a marital bedroom. In silence. "

Indeed; whilst wearing a night shirt and cap.

The gentleman is, of course, allowed to sing 'Shall We Gather at the River'.

Dr Nasty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *octor DeleriumMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for "

Never order anything with anchovies.

Dr Nasty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy ! "

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"Classy, thought people like that fucked animals in fields."

Oh ffs .... words fail me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets."

Yes , and that's why it concerns us ....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets."

But surely fucking in an open shop is different to woods/ car parks etc away from town?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets.

But surely fucking in an open shop is different to woods/ car parks etc away from town? "

Of course, certainly in my eyes anyway. But the defence for people who go dogging or who have sex discreetly outdoors always seem to use is that they aren't outraging public decency because no 9ne sees them to be outraged. This case questions that. The judge is clear in their commentirety thst the fact that they could have been caight is enough nit just meet the threshold for the charge but also for a custodiAl sentence. The precedent is really scary, this case has potentially changed the offence to "actions which have the potential to outrage public decency".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court ."
.

I've looked I couldn't find it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unniebee1970Woman
over a year ago

The Hive


"Wonder what pizza they were waiting for

Never order anything with anchovies.

Dr Nasty"

Stuffed Crust...Ewww.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Classy, thought people like that fucked animals in fields."
.

Have you been donkey riding in Columbia

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets.

But surely fucking in an open shop is different to woods/ car parks etc away from town?

Of course, certainly in my eyes anyway. But the defence for people who go dogging or who have sex discreetly outdoors always seem to use is that they aren't outraging public decency because no 9ne sees them to be outraged. This case questions that. The judge is clear in their commentirety thst the fact that they could have been caight is enough nit just meet the threshold for the charge but also for a custodiAl sentence. The precedent is really scary, this case has potentially changed the offence to "actions which have the potential to outrage public decency". "

Ok I see. I thought that if anyone caught dogging by the police was charged anyway as the police officer saw them. Didn't have to be just a member of the public reporting them. If that makes sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aul1973HullMan
over a year ago

East Hull


"It was late night and both were worse for wear after drinking too much .

No one asked them to stop or said they were offended .

Storm in a teacup and something that happens all over the place when the pubs shut .

It's only because an employee released the footage on you tube that it came to court .

I said on one of the other threads how can you charge soneone with outraging public decency if no members of the public were outraged. The implications of this are quite scary. A custodial is ridiculous

Spot on .... the world has gone crazy !

Don't get me wrong if staff had noticed amd complained or there had been other customers o

I think the charge but not the potential custodial sentence would have been warranted. But this is ridiculous. Anyone that enjoys outdoor sex or doggong should be concerned about the basis of this conviction and the precedent it sets.

But surely fucking in an open shop is different to woods/ car parks etc away from town?

Of course, certainly in my eyes anyway. But the defence for people who go dogging or who have sex discreetly outdoors always seem to use is that they aren't outraging public decency because no 9ne sees them to be outraged. This case questions that. The judge is clear in their commentirety thst the fact that they could have been caight is enough nit just meet the threshold for the charge but also for a custodiAl sentence. The precedent is really scary, this case has potentially changed the offence to "actions which have the potential to outrage public decency".

Ok I see. I thought that if anyone caught dogging by the police was charged anyway as the police officer saw them. Didn't have to be just a member of the public reporting them. If that makes sense."

I think in the eyes of the law this situation is no different to somebody being caught by cctv pissing in the street. It's clearly very different though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ieman300Man
over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East

Load of tripe. If no one at the time saw who cares. Cctv guy should have just knocked one out whilst watching the footage and let that be the end of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top