Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"First ever post, and starting with a rant... Why are basic elements of courtesy so lacking on here? Do people have great courage hiding behind their keyboard or, has society since abandoned basic courtesy? Here's how I roll. Create a search. Place those that are of interest to me on my hotlist. Send a polite message (no crudeness) as basic introduction, and include a face picture. In my PS I ask for reply, even if it's no thanks. Then I wait... I can see when the message is read. If it is read, and deleted, straight away (no reply) then I add them to my block list. That way, I don't see them in a search and I don't bother them again. Yesterday, this happened and I went to block the person only to find I had already been blocked by them! I get we all have a type, but really, would a "no thanks" have been too much? Dave" Let me see if I've understood this right OP - your gripe appears to be that the person you were about to block was doing exactly the same thing as you (i.e. blocking so you/they wouldn't be bothered again) but that they beat you to it? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst there are decent gents like us on here, I can only assume the larger percentage of single guys are abbusive sex starved nobs... but we get tarnished with this brush!" This | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"First ever post, and starting with a rant... Why are basic elements of courtesy so lacking on here? Do people have great courage hiding behind their keyboard or, has society since abandoned basic courtesy? Here's how I roll. Create a search. Place those that are of interest to me on my hotlist. Send a polite message (no crudeness) as basic introduction, and include a face picture. In my PS I ask for reply, even if it's no thanks. Then I wait... I can see when the message is read. If it is read, and deleted, straight away (no reply) then I add them to my block list. That way, I don't see them in a search and I don't bother them again. Yesterday, this happened and I went to block the person only to find I had already been blocked by them! I get we all have a type, but really, would a "no thanks" have been too much? Dave" So hang on your complaining they do the exact same thing you do? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"First ever post, and starting with a rant... Why are basic elements of courtesy so lacking on here? Do people have great courage hiding behind their keyboard or, has society since abandoned basic courtesy? Here's how I roll. Create a search. Place those that are of interest to me on my hotlist. Send a polite message (no crudeness) as basic introduction, and include a face picture. In my PS I ask for reply, even if it's no thanks. Then I wait... I can see when the message is read. If it is read, and deleted, straight away (no reply) then I add them to my block list. That way, I don't see them in a search and I don't bother them again. Yesterday, this happened and I went to block the person only to find I had already been blocked by them! I get we all have a type, but really, would a "no thanks" have been too much? Dave Let me see if I've understood this right OP - your gripe appears to be that the person you were about to block was doing exactly the same thing as you (i.e. blocking so you/they wouldn't be bothered again) but that they beat you to it? " I'm glad I wasn't the only one to think this | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst there are decent gents like us on here, I can only assume the larger percentage of single guys are abbusive sex starved nobs... but we get tarnished with this brush!" You assume wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" So you block them if they say no thanks, but are upset because someone blocked you without saying no thanks? Surely they've saved you the hassle of having to block them then because they did it for you? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" Here's an example of a recent attempt at a polite 'no thanks' Him: blah blah blah polite message Me: thank you but we're not meeting anyone new for the foreseeable future, good luck. Him: why not? Me: you don't need to know why not, it's just what we've decided Him: what's wrong with me Me: we're sure there's nothing wrong, it's simply we're not meeting new people Him: fucking time wasting idiots then like all the rest. Now, if we'd deleted and blocked from the outset. We'd have saved ourselves receiving the abusive ending. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" Ah but do the rude ones have 100+ men hassling them simultaneously in the street? Different scenario altogether! I hear what you're saying but it's the way it is, rightly or wrongly! The sooner you accept it, the more pleasant your user experience will be | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" Try and think of it as the junk mail you get posted through your letter box or in your email inbox - you know, those offers of a share in a Nigerian princes millions, or double glazing etc - the messages you've not asked for from people you don't know or don't match your criteria of something you're looking for. Do you reply to each and everyone of those with a no thanks? Is it discourteous of you not to? Same principle applies here | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" Stand in the middle of a busy shopping centre with a large card round your neck saying "Free £10 notes (subject to terms and conditions)" You can only give money to those you fancy. Then see how many people approach you who are polite and courteous but you don't fancy, then refuse to give them a tenner. Do it for 24 hours. How arsed off are you going to be after 10 minutes of explaining why you won't give them the money. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Here's an example of a recent attempt at a polite 'no thanks' Him: blah blah blah polite message Me: thank you but we're not meeting anyone new for the foreseeable future, good luck. Him: why not? Me: you don't need to know why not, it's just what we've decided Him: what's wrong with me Me: we're sure there's nothing wrong, it's simply we're not meeting new people Him: fucking time wasting idiots then like all the rest. Now, if we'd deleted and blocked from the outset. We'd have saved ourselves receiving the abusive ending. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Stand in the middle of a busy shopping centre with a large card round your neck saying "Free £10 notes (subject to terms and conditions)" You can only give money to those you fancy. Then see how many people approach you who are polite and courteous but you don't fancy, then refuse to give them a tenner. Do it for 24 hours. How arsed off are you going to be after 10 minutes of explaining why you won't give them the money. " mods, pin this! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Try and think of it as the junk mail you get posted through your letter box or in your email inbox - you know, those offers of a share in a Nigerian princes millions, or double glazing etc - the messages you've not asked for from people you don't know or don't match your criteria of something you're looking for. Do you reply to each and everyone of those with a no thanks? Is it discourteous of you not to? Same principle applies here " mods! Pin this as well! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Here's an example of a recent attempt at a polite 'no thanks' Him: blah blah blah polite message Me: thank you but we're not meeting anyone new for the foreseeable future, good luck. Him: why not? Me: you don't need to know why not, it's just what we've decided Him: what's wrong with me Me: we're sure there's nothing wrong, it's simply we're not meeting new people Him: fucking time wasting idiots then like all the rest. Now, if we'd deleted and blocked from the outset. We'd have saved ourselves receiving the abusive ending. " I wouldn't have sent the second message and got into the conversation. You said all that was needed in your first message. Or just block new people from messaging in your filters. That said, no form of abuse is acceptable. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Okay, so in future I won't ask for a reply even if it's a thanks but no thanks message. Shame the site doesn't have template responses." I think that would be a good idea.... Unless people start complaining about how they always get a 'not interested' and find people are just rude by pressing a button. When you think about it OP, not replying does the same thing. It's a sign a person isn't interested. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public?" OP just to give you a clue, so far today I have over 500 unread messages in my inbox. I'm not a rude person, but I also have a life and a job. I don't have time to read and respond to 500 messages a day. Sending someone a message doesn't entitle you to a reply. It's not rudeness, it's just not wanting to spend 24 hours a day on fab. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Here's an example of a recent attempt at a polite 'no thanks' Him: blah blah blah polite message Me: thank you but we're not meeting anyone new for the foreseeable future, good luck. Him: why not? Me: you don't need to know why not, it's just what we've decided Him: what's wrong with me Me: we're sure there's nothing wrong, it's simply we're not meeting new people Him: fucking time wasting idiots then like all the rest. Now, if we'd deleted and blocked from the outset. We'd have saved ourselves receiving the abusive ending. I wouldn't have sent the second message and got into the conversation. You said all that was needed in your first message. Or just block new people from messaging in your filters. That said, no form of abuse is acceptable." It was a demonstration of the point rather than an actual occurrence. Outlining to the OP why some might just delete from the off. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"First ever post, and starting with a rant... Why are basic elements of courtesy so lacking on here? Do people have great courage hiding behind their keyboard or, has society since abandoned basic courtesy? Here's how I roll. Create a search. Place those that are of interest to me on my hotlist. Send a polite message (no crudeness) as basic introduction, and include a face picture. In my PS I ask for reply, even if it's no thanks. Then I wait... I can see when the message is read. If it is read, and deleted, straight away (no reply) then I add them to my block list. That way, I don't see them in a search and I don't bother them again. Yesterday, this happened and I went to block the person only to find I had already been blocked by them! I get we all have a type, but really, would a "no thanks" have been too much? Dave Let me see if I've understood this right OP - your gripe appears to be that the person you were about to block was doing exactly the same thing as you (i.e. blocking so you/they wouldn't be bothered again) but that they beat you to it? " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"When I posted a new pic recently, I had an in-box with hundreds and hundreds of messages. I simply don't have the time to reply "no thanks" to everyone, so I delete. I then, as people have stated, get more messages saying "did you get my message"?... "if you meet me you won't regret it", "was it my pic" blahhhh blahhhh blahhhh. I'm not a rude or arrogant person but it's the only way to say, not interested by deleting and not replying. I was stood up a few weeks ago, waited 2hrs, no message, nothing. You just have to accept that it's Fab life and move on! Fact " Unfortunately a vicious circle Dana, even the ones you let through and get to the point of meeting tarnish the genuine ones when they don't show | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Here's an example of a recent attempt at a polite 'no thanks' Him: blah blah blah polite message Me: thank you but we're not meeting anyone new for the foreseeable future, good luck. Him: why not? Me: you don't need to know why not, it's just what we've decided Him: what's wrong with me Me: we're sure there's nothing wrong, it's simply we're not meeting new people Him: fucking time wasting idiots then like all the rest. Now, if we'd deleted and blocked from the outset. We'd have saved ourselves receiving the abusive ending. I wouldn't have sent the second message and got into the conversation. You said all that was needed in your first message. Or just block new people from messaging in your filters. That said, no form of abuse is acceptable. It was a demonstration of the point rather than an actual occurrence. Outlining to the OP why some might just delete from the off. " Apologies, your post said here's a recent attempt at a no thanks. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Apologies, your post said here's a recent attempt at a no thanks." No apologies needed. I could have been clearer on the example being hypothetical. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No, it was the lack of a polite "no thanks" after a very polite message. I block those who reply in such a way to save each of us from wasting time in the future. I get we won't all be for everybody. The consensus here so far would appear to be discourtesy is the accepted norm. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if it wasn't? Are the rude ones as rude in public? Stand in the middle of a busy shopping centre with a large card round your neck saying "Free £10 notes (subject to terms and conditions)" You can only give money to those you fancy. Then see how many people approach you who are polite and courteous but you don't fancy, then refuse to give them a tenner. Do it for 24 hours. How arsed off are you going to be after 10 minutes of explaining why you won't give them the money. " Thats bloody brilliant! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Some great advice and experience shared here everybody so thank you! I agree that as some people have pointed out there may be flaws in my approach. I won't ever ask for a reply again (was something I only tried recently), I'll unblock my block list, and stop worrying about things I can't control (which, to be fair, is my usual lifestyle). To those who took the time to mail me directly, and show examples of full mailboxes, thank you! Context and all that. Thank you! " No. Continue to block as you did before and dont ask for a reply. You dont need to change your approach in any other way. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"First ever post, and starting with a rant... Why are basic elements of courtesy so lacking on here? Do people have great courage hiding behind their keyboard or, has society since abandoned basic courtesy? Here's how I roll. Create a search. Place those that are of interest to me on my hotlist. Send a polite message (no crudeness) as basic introduction, and include a face picture. In my PS I ask for reply, even if it's no thanks. Then I wait... I can see when the message is read. If it is read, and deleted, straight away (no reply) then I add them to my block list. That way, I don't see them in a search and I don't bother them again. Yesterday, this happened and I went to block the person only to find I had already been blocked by them! I get we all have a type, but really, would a "no thanks" have been too much? Dave" I have found there's a lot of gents that don't like a no response and often come back with a why, or a go on or another message suggesting a meet time. But it generally leads to abuse of accusations of time wasting. After a short while it's easy to learn that it's best not to reply at all. I try to work out which ones to reply to that may not abuse me. It can be a mine field. So in answer to your question,a few idiots have again ruined it for the lovely gents and I apologise on behalf of all the lady's that don't reply, but plz don't think it's all to do with ego . | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |